Influence of posterior tibial slope on postoperative outcomes after postero-stabilized and condylar-stabilized total knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: To compare clinical outcomes and surgical times of two different types of total knee arthroplasty(TKA), postero-stabilized(PS) and condylar-stabilized(CS), in relation to posterior tibial slope(PTS) values and the deviation of these values from the surgical technique. METHODS: 168 patients undergoing TKA surgery between 2016 and 2020 met our inclusion criteria. For each case, gender, age at surgery, operating time, type of implant and preoperative PTS(preop-PTS) and postoperative PTS(postop-PTS) measurements were collected; difference(∆PTS) between preop-PTS and postop-PTS was also calculated. Short Form 12 Mental and Physical scores(SF-12 M and P) and functional Knee Society Score(fKSS) were collected preoperatively and at a minimum of 12 months postoperatively. Four subgroups were thus created in relation to PS or CS system and postop-PTS value(≤ 5°and > 5°). RESULTS: Of the 168 patients, 96 had a PS system and 72 CS system. Performing a CS-TKA took less time than a PS-TKA(p < 0.05). SF-12P showed better results(p < 0.05) in CS-TKA group than PS-TKA, probably because of the younger age of CS-TKA patients(p < 0.05). In the PS > 5° all examined postoperative scores were better(p < 0.05) than PS ≤ 5°, while only fKSS was better(p < 0.05) in CS > 5° than CS ≤ 5°. No significant difference(p > 0.05) in terms of postoperative outcomes between the PS > 5° and CS > 5° was noted, whereas only SF-12P was better in the CS ≤ 5° compared with PS ≤ 5°. Highest values of SF-12 M and fKSS were obtained in the PS ≤ 5°, in which postop-PTS was closer to technique. CONCLUSION: When performing a PS-TKA, the best result was obtained with a postop-PTS > 5°, but comparable outcomes between the two systems were evident with postop-PTS > 5°. It is crucial to come as close as possible to the indications reported in surgical technique regardless ∆PTS.

Low complication rates in Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis (MIPO) for proximal humeral fractures at 5 years of follow-up.

INTRODUCTION: Purpose of this study was to analyse the medium term follow-up of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) for proximal humeral fractures in terms of postoperative shoulder function, radiological outcome and complications. METHODS: 76 consecutive patients with unstable proximal humeral fractures were treated using locking plate with a minimally invasive antero-lateral approach in two surgical centers. Constant score and radiographic evaluation of 74 patients were available at mean follow up of 5 years (minimum 4 years). RESULTS: Mean Constant score was 74 (range to 28-100). Results were comparable in the two centers. Younger patients registered significantly higher scores (p < 0.05). 20 patients (27%) developed complications. Subacromial impingement occurred in 16,2% of cases for varus malreduction (6,7%) and for too proximal plate positioning (9,5%). Primary screws perforation (2,7%), secondary perforation due to cut-out (1,4%), avascular necrosis (AVN) of humeral head (1,4%), partial resorption of greater tuberosity (2,7%), secondary displacement of the greater tuberosity (2,7%) and stiffness (2,7%) were observed. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Even at a medium term follow-up, MIPO for proximal humeral fractures ensured good and reproducible results for most common pattern of fractures. Major complications were lower respect to open procedures, because of soft tissue, deltoid muscle and circumflex vessels sparing.

Perspectives on metaphyseal conservative stems.

Total hip replacement is showing, during the last decades, a progressive evolution toward principles of reduced bone and soft tissue aggression. These principles have become the basis of a new philosophy, tissue sparing surgery. Regarding hip implants, new conservative components have been proposed and developed as an alternative to conventional stems. Technical and biomechanical characteristics of metaphyseal bone-stock-preserving stems are analyzed on the basis of the available literature and our personal experience. Mayo, Nanos and Metha stems represent, under certain aspects, a design evolution starting from shared concepts: reduced femoral violation, non-anatomic geometry, proximal calcar loading and lateral alignment. However, consistent differences are level of neck preservation, cross-sectional geometry and surface finishing. The Mayo component is the most time-tested component and, in our hands, it showed an excellent survivorship at the mid-term follow-up, with an extremely reduced incidence of aseptic loosening (partially reduced by the association with last generation acetabular couplings). For 160 implants followed for a mean of 4.7 years, survivorship was 97.5% with 4 failed implants: one fracture with unstable stem, 1 septic loosening and 2 aseptic mobilizations. DEXA analysis, performed on 15 cases, showed a good calcar loading and stimulation, but there was significant lateral load transfer to R3-R4 zones, giving to the distal part of the stem a function not simply limited to alignment. Metaphyseal conservative stems demonstrated a wide applicability with an essential surgical technique. Moreover, they offer the options of a "conservative revision" with a conventional primary component in case of failure and a "conservative revision" for failed resurfacing implants.

Hip resurfacing: why does it fail? Early results and critical analysis of our first 60 cases.

Resurfacing replacement represents the most conservative solution available for total arthroplasty of the hip. However, despite the excellent results reported by highly experienced surgeons, a small but not insignificant body of literature has been published on the more controversial aspects of this approach, mainly those related to the biological and mechanical vulnerability of the retained epiphysis. We report here our evaluation of most of the variables inherent to this procedure (surgical exposure, implant design, technical steps). Based on our results, we conclude that the short-term outcome is strongly related to the surgical approach and the relationship between implant design and cementing technique. Even if posterior approaches are currently widely accepted for resurfacing replacement, the ability to preserve the medial circumflex artery has been questioned, and an alternative exposure has been proposed with good results (antero-lateral, lateral and digastric trochanteric osteotomy). Moreover, a minimally invasive posterior approach could increase the risks of vascular damage. Alternatively, inner implant geometry could affect the distribution of cement over the epiphysis when other variables (direct or indirect cementing technique, viscosity) are not properly selected.