Monoclonal Antibodies for Chronic Pain Treatment: Present and Future.

Chronic pain remains a major problem worldwide, despite the availability of various non-pharmacological and pharmacological treatment options. Therefore, new analgesics with novel mechanisms of action are needed. Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are directed against specific, targeted molecules involved in pain signaling and processing pathways that look to be very effective and promising as a novel therapy in pain management. Thus, there are mAbs against tumor necrosis factor (TNF), nerve growth factor (NGF), calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), or interleukin-6 (IL-6), among others, which are already recommended in the treatment of chronic pain conditions such as osteoarthritis, chronic lower back pain, migraine, or rheumatoid arthritis that are under preclinical research. This narrative review summarizes the preclinical and clinical evidence supporting the use of these agents in the treatment of chronic pain.

May a sigma-1 antagonist improve neuropathic signs induced by cisplatin and vincristine in rats?

BACKGROUND: The antineoplastic drugs cisplatin and vincristine induce peripheral neuropathies. The sigma-1 receptor (σ1R) is expressed in areas of pain control, and its blockade with the novel selective antagonist MR-309 has shown efficacy in nociceptive and neuropathic pain models. Our goal was to test whether this compound reduces neuropathic signs provoked by these antitumoural drugs. METHODS: Rats were treated with cisplatin or vincristine to induce neuropathies. The effects of acute or repeated administration of MR-309 were tested on mechanical and thermal sensitivity, electrophysiological activity of Aδ-primary afferents in the rat skin-saphenous nerve preparation, and gastrointestinal or cardiovascular functions. RESULTS: Rats treated with antitumourals developed tactile allodynia, while those treated with vincristine also developed mechanical hyperalgesia. These in vivo modifications correlated with electrophysiological hyperactivity (increased spontaneous activity and hyperresponsiveness to innocuous and noxious mechanical stimulation). Animals treated with cisplatin showed gastrointestinal impairment and those receiving vincristine showed cardiovascular toxicity. A single dose of MR-309 strongly reduced both nociceptive behaviour and electrophysiological changes. Moreover, its concomitant administration with the antitumourals blocked the development of neuropathic symptoms, thus restoring mechanical sensitivity, improving the impairment of feeding behaviour and gastrointestinal transit in the cisplatin-treated group along with ameliorating the altered vascular reactivity recorded in rats treated with vincristine. CONCLUSION: σ1R antagonist, MR-309, reduces sensorial and electrophysiological neuropathic signs in rats treated with cisplatin or vincristine and, in addition, reduces gastrointestinal and cardiovascular side effects. SIGNIFICANCE: σ1R antagonism could be an interesting and new option to palliate antitumoural neuropathies.