Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
World Neurosurg ; 184: 127-136, 2024 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38159609

RESUMO

Neurosurgical technologies have become increasingly more adaptive, featuring real-time and patient-specific guidance in preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative settings. This review offers insight into how these integrative innovations compare with conventional approaches in spine surgery, focusing on machine learning (ML), artificial intelligence, augmented reality and virtual reality, and spinal navigation systems. Data on technology applications, diagnostic and procedural accuracy, intraoperative times, radiation exposures, postoperative outcomes, and costs were extracted and compared with conventional methods to assess their advantages and limitations. Preoperatively, augmented reality and virtual reality have applications in surgical training and planning that are more immersive, case specific, and risk-free and have been shown to enhance accuracy and reduce complications. ML algorithms have demonstrated high accuracy in predicting surgical candidacy (up to 92.1%) and tailoring personalized treatments based on patient-specific variables. Intraoperatively, advantages include more accurate pedicle screw insertion (96%-99% with ML), enhanced visualization, reduced radiation exposure (49 µSv with O-arm navigation vs. 556 µSv with fluoroscopy), increased efficiency, and potential for fewer intraoperative complications compared with conventional approaches. Postoperatively, certain ML and artificial intelligence models have outperformed conventional methods in predicting all postoperative complications of >6000 patients as well as predicting variables contributing to in-hospital and 90-day mortality. However, applying these technologies comes with limitations, such as longer operative times (up to 35.6% longer) with navigation, dependency on datasets, costs, accessibility, steep learning curve, and inherent software malfunctions. As these technologies advance, continuing to assess their efficacy and limitations will be crucial to their successful integration within spine surgery.


Assuntos
Parafusos Pediculares , Cirurgia Assistida por Computador , Humanos , Cirurgia Assistida por Computador/métodos , Imageamento Tridimensional/métodos , Inteligência Artificial , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos , Coluna Vertebral/cirurgia
2.
Cancers (Basel) ; 15(19)2023 Sep 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37835374

RESUMO

Patients with meningiomas may have reduced health-related quality of life (HRQoL) due to postoperative neurological deficits, cognitive dysfunction, and psychosocial burden. Although advances in surgery and radiotherapy have improved progression-free survival rates, there is limited evidence regarding treatment outcomes on HRQoL. This review examines HRQoL outcomes based on tumor location and treatment modality. A systematic search in PubMed yielded 28 studies with 3167 patients. The mean age was 54.27 years and most patients were female (70.8%). Approximately 78% of meningiomas were located in the skull base (10.8% anterior, 23.3% middle, and 39.7% posterior fossae). Treatment modalities included craniotomy (73.6%), radiotherapy (11.4%), and endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) (4.0%). The Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) was the most commonly utilized HRQoL instrument (27%). Preoperative KPS scores > 80 were associated with increased occurrence of postoperative neurological deficits. A significant difference was found between pre- and post-operative KPS scores for anterior/middle skull base meningiomas (SBMs) in comparison to posterior (SBMs) when treated with craniotomy. Post-craniotomy SF-36 scores were lower for posterior SBMs in comparison to those in the anterior and middle fossae. Risk factors for poor neurological outcomes include a high preoperative KPS score and patients with posterior SBMs may experience a greater burden in HRQoL.

3.
Med Sci (Basel) ; 11(3)2023 09 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37755165

RESUMO

The rapid emergence of publicly accessible artificial intelligence platforms such as large language models (LLMs) has led to an equally rapid increase in articles exploring their potential benefits and risks. We performed a bibliometric analysis of ChatGPT literature in medicine and science to better understand publication trends and knowledge gaps. Following title, abstract, and keyword searches of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases for ChatGPT articles published in the medical field, articles were screened for inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data were extracted from included articles, with citation counts obtained from PubMed and journal metrics obtained from Clarivate Journal Citation Reports. After screening, 267 articles were included in the study, most of which were editorials or correspondence with an average of 7.5 +/- 18.4 citations per publication. Published articles on ChatGPT were authored largely in the United States, India, and China. The topics discussed included use and accuracy of ChatGPT in research, medical education, and patient counseling. Among non-surgical specialties, radiology published the most ChatGPT-related articles, while plastic surgery published the most articles among surgical specialties. The average citation number among the top 20 most-cited articles was 60.1 +/- 35.3. Among journals with the most ChatGPT-related publications, there were on average 10 +/- 3.7 publications. Our results suggest that managing the inevitable ethical and safety issues that arise with the implementation of LLMs will require further research exploring the capabilities and accuracy of ChatGPT, to generate policies guiding the adoption of artificial intelligence in medicine and science.


Assuntos
Pesquisa Biomédica , Radiologia , Humanos , Inteligência Artificial , Bibliometria , Benchmarking
4.
Cureus ; 14(11): e31083, 2022 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36479403

RESUMO

Tumors of the craniocervical junction (CCJ) are complicated pathologies with high patient mortality or low quality of life. In the pediatric population, these tumors are less prevalent, with various symptomatic presentations that include motor and neurological manifestations. Three of the most common neoplasms at the CCJ in children are meningiomas, schwannomas, and chordomas. In this review, we will characterize the tissue biomarkers, clinical presentation, treatment methods, and surgical outcomes for these pediatric tumors at the CCJ. A comprehensive literature review was used using the PubMed Database. Keywords used were "craniocervical junction", "pediatric", "meningiomas", schwannomas", and "meningiomas". Articles that were not related to the CCJ, included only adult cases, and non-English studies were filtered. Our search yielded a total of 11 studies, with a total of 239 pediatric patients with tumors at the CCJ. These studies were broken down as five for meningiomas, one for schwannomas, and eight for chordomas. In conclusion, resection of pediatric neoplasms at the CCJ is challenging due to anatomical limitations and the size of the patient. Within the CCJ, chordomas were the most prevalent tumor type, with schwannomas being the least prevalent. Literature findings indicate that genetic mutations of the NF2 gene associated with neurofibromatosis type II, as well as incomplete tumor resection, are predictors of poor outcomes. Further developments of monoclonal antibody chemotherapy and endoscopic approaches could expand treatment options for aggressive pediatric neoplasms at the skull base.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA