Phase 1 Study to Assess the Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor in Subjects Without Cystic Fibrosis With Moderate Hepatic Impairment.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor is highly effective in treating people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF) who have ≥ 1 responsive mutation. Liver disease occurs in approximately 10%-20% of pwCF. The objective of this study was to assess the safety and pharmacokinetics of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor in people with moderate hepatic impairment, which is necessary to inform on its use and guide dosing recommendations. METHODS: The safety and pharmacokinetics of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor were evaluated in subjects without CF with moderate hepatic impairment versus matched healthy controls. Twenty-two subjects (11 with moderate hepatic impairment and 11 healthy subjects) received half the standard adult daily dose of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (elexacaftor 100 mg/tezacaftor 50 mg/ivacaftor 150 mg) orally for 10 days. RESULTS: Elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor was safe and well tolerated in subjects with moderate hepatic impairment and healthy controls. On day 10, the mean values of the area under the curve during the dosing interval (AUCτ) for total (bound and unbound) elexacaftor and its major active metabolite M23-elexacaftor were increased 1.25-fold (95% CI 1.01, 1.54) and 1.73-fold (95% CI 1.27, 2.35), respectively, in subjects with moderate hepatic impairment compared with matched healthy subjects. The mean values of AUCτ for ivacaftor and tezacaftor were increased 1.50-fold (95% CI 1.09, 2.06) and 1.20-fold (95% CI 1.00, 1.43), respectively, while the mean value of AUCτ for the active metabolite M1-tezacaftor was 1.29-fold lower [ratio of moderate hepatic impairment to healthy subjects (95% CI): 0.778 (0.655, 0.924)] in subjects with moderate hepatic impairment. CONCLUSIONS: A dose reduction of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor is warranted in people with moderate hepatic impairment. (Trial registry number 2018-002570-40; registered 2 July 2018.).

Elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor is a combination product (made up of the three drugs elexacaftor, tezacaftor, and ivacaftor) that can effectively treat cystic fibrosis (CF). About 10%­20% of people with CF have liver disease, and the liver plays an important role in breaking down these drugs. Thus, it is important to understand how liver disease or reduced liver function affects the amounts of these drugs in the body over time. This can help determine how much of the drug (i.e., what dose) people should take.We gave people with reduced liver function and healthy people (with normal liver function) elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor for 10 days. We looked at the safety of the combination and measured the amounts of elexacaftor, tezacaftor, and ivacaftor in the body over time.We found that when people with moderately reduced liver function take elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor, they have higher amounts of the drugs elexacaftor, tezacaftor, and ivacaftor in their bodies compared with healthy people with normal liver function. These findings mean that people with moderately reduced liver function should take a lower dose of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor.

Ivacaftor in Infants Aged 4 to <12 Months with Cystic Fibrosis and a Gating Mutation. Results of a Two-Part Phase 3 Clinical Trial.

Rationale: We previously reported that ivacaftor was safe and well tolerated in cohorts aged 12 to <24 months with cystic fibrosis and gating mutations in the ARRIVAL study; here, we report results for cohorts aged 4 to <12 months.Objectives: To evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of ivacaftor in infants aged 4 to <12 months with one or more gating mutations.Methods: ARRIVAL is a single-arm phase 3 study. Infants received 25 mg or 50 mg ivacaftor every 12 hours on the basis of age and weight for 4 days in part A and 24 weeks in part B.Measurements and Main Results: Primary endpoints were safety (parts A and B) and pharmacokinetics (part A). Secondary/tertiary endpoints (part B) included pharmacokinetics and changes in sweat chloride levels, growth, and markers of pancreatic function. Twenty-five infants received ivacaftor, 12 in part A and 17 in part B (four infants participated in both parts). Pharmacokinetics was consistent with that in older groups. Most adverse events were mild or moderate. In part B, cough was the most common adverse event (n = 10 [58.8%]). Five infants (part A, n = 1 [8.3%]; part B, n = 4 [23.5%]) had serious adverse events, all of which were considered to be not or unlikely related to ivacaftor. No deaths or treatment discontinuations occurred. One infant (5.9%) experienced an alanine transaminase elevation >3 to ≤5× the upper limit of normal at Week 24. No other adverse trends in laboratory tests, vital signs, or ECG parameters were reported. Sweat chloride concentrations and measures of pancreatic obstruction improved.Conclusions: This study of ivacaftor in the first year of life supports treating the underlying cause of cystic fibrosis in children aged ≥4 months with one or more gating mutations.Clinical trial registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02725567).

A phase 3, double-blind, parallel-group study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tezacaftor in combination with ivacaftor in participants 6 through 11 years of age with cystic fibrosis homozygous for F508del or heterozygous for the F508del-CFTR mutation and a residual function mutation.

BACKGROUND: The CFTR modulator tezacaftor/ivacaftor was efficacious and generally safe and well tolerated in Phase 3 studies in participants ≥12 years of age with cystic fibrosis (CF) homozygous for the F508del-CFTR mutation or heterozygous with a residual function-CFTR mutation (F/F or F/RF respectively). We evaluated tezacaftor/ivacaftor's efficacy and safety over 8 weeks in participants 6 through 11 years of age with these mutations. METHODS: Participants were randomized 4:1 to tezacaftor/ivacaftor or a blinding group (placebo for F/F, ivacaftor for F/RF). The primary endpoint was within-group change from baseline in the lung clearance index 2·5 (LCI2·5) through Week 8. Secondary endpoints were change from baseline in sweat chloride (SwCl), cystic fibrosis questionnaire-revised (CFQ-R) respiratory domain score, and safety. RESULTS: Sixty-seven participants received at least one study drug dose. Of those, 54 received tezacaftor/ivacaftor (F/F, 42; F/RF, 12), 10 placebo, and 3 ivacaftor; 66 completed the study. The within-group change in LCI2·5 was significantly reduced (improved) by -0·51 (95% CI: -0·74, -0·29). SwCl concentration decreased (improved) by -12·3 mmol/L and CFQ-R respiratory domain score increased (improved, nonsignificantly) by 2·3 points. There were no serious adverse events (AEs) or AEs leading to tezacaftor/ivacaftor discontinuation or interruption. The most common AEs (≥10%) in participants receiving tezacaftor/ivacaftor were cough, headache, and productive cough. CONCLUSIONS: Tezacaftor/ivacaftor improved lung function (assessed using LCI) and CFTR function (measured by SwCl concentration) in participants 6 through 11 years of age with F/F or F/RF genotypes. Tezacaftor/ivacaftor was safe and well tolerated; no new safety concerns were identified.

Correction to: Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling of CFTR Modulation in People with Cystic Fibrosis Transitioning from Mono or Dual Regimens to Triple-Combination Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor.

The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake.

Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling of CFTR Modulation in People with Cystic Fibrosis Transitioning from Mono or Dual Regimens to Triple-Combination Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor.

INTRODUCTION: The triple-combination (TC) cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulator regimen elexacaftor, tezacaftor, and ivacaftor was shown to be safe and efficacious in phase 3 trials of people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF) ≥ 12 years of age with ≥ 1 F508del-CFTR allele. Here, a simulation study predicted ivacaftor, tezacaftor, and elexacaftor exposures and impacts on CFTR modulation following transition from ivacaftor [a cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) substrate], lumacaftor (a CYP3A inducer)/ivacaftor, or tezacaftor/ivacaftor to TC. METHODS: Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling was used to evaluate plasma exposures during transition from mono- or dual-combination CFTR modulator regimens to TC. PBPK models were parameterized using data from human hepatocytes to account for CYP3A induction by lumacaftor and validated to match clinical data from healthy volunteers and pwCF. Using dosing regimens for pwCF ≥ 12 years of age, simulations were performed for ivacaftor, lumacaftor/ivacaftor, and tezacaftor/ivacaftor dosing for 14 days followed by immediate transition to elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor dosing for 14 days. Drug exposures during transitions were compared with respective half-maximal effective concentrations (EC50) estimated from efficacy endpoint data from clinical studies. RESULTS: In simulations of immediate transition from ivacaftor or tezacaftor/ivacaftor to TC, the preceding treatment had no impact on ivacaftor, tezacaftor, or elexacaftor exposures. In simulations of immediate transition from lumacaftor/ivacaftor to TC, ivacaftor exposure decreased to 64% of maximum effective concentration (EC), due to reduction in ivacaftor dose and residual CYP3A4 induction, then returned to 90-95% of maximum EC. Lumacaftor-mediated CYP3A induction resolved within approximately 2 weeks. In all simulations, ivacaftor, tezacaftor, and elexacaftor exposures approached steady state within 2 weeks following transition and, at all times, ivacaftor and ≥ 1 CFTR corrector remained above EC50. CONCLUSION: PBPK modeling indicates that immediate transition to the elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor regimen from an ivacaftor, lumacaftor/ivacaftor, or tezacaftor/ivacaftor regimen results in sustained CFTR modulation in pwCF ≥ 12 years of age.

Correlation of sweat chloride and percent predicted FEV1 in cystic fibrosis patients treated with ivacaftor.

Ivacaftor, a CFTR potentiator that enhances chloride transport by acting directly on CFTR to increase its channel gating activity, has been evaluated in patients with different CFTR mutations. Several previous analyses have reported no statistical correlation between change from baseline in ppFEV1 and reduction in sweat chloride levels for individuals treated with ivacaftor. The objective of the post hoc analysis described here was to expand upon previous analyses and evaluate the correlation between sweat chloride levels and absolute ppFEV1 changes across multiple cohorts of patients with different CF-causing mutations who were treated with ivacaftor. The goal of the analysis was to help define the potential value of sweat chloride as a pharmacodynamic biomarker for use in CFTR modulator trials. For any given study, reductions in sweat chloride levels and improvements in absolute ppFEV1 were not correlated for individual patients. However, when the data from all studies were combined, a statistically significant correlation between sweat chloride levels and ppFEV1 changes was observed (p<0.0001). Thus, sweat chloride level changes in response to potentiation of the CFTR protein by ivacaftor appear to be a predictive pharmacodynamic biomarker of lung function changes on a population basis but are unsuitable for the prediction of treatment benefits for individuals.

Liver-to-plasma vaniprevir (MK-7009) concentration ratios in HCV-infected patients.

BACKGROUND: Some drugs that are actively taken up into the liver exhibit greater than dose proportional increases in plasma exposure, although human liver-to-plasma concentration ratios have rarely been evaluated. Understanding these relationships has implications for drug concentrations at the target site for certain classes of compounds, such as direct-acting antivirals, targeted towards HCV. METHODS: Treatment-experienced, chronic HCV non-cirrhotic patients (n=3) received vaniprevir (600 mg or 300 mg twice daily) on days 1-3 and (600 mg or 300 mg single dose) on day 4. Core needle biopsy was performed at 6 or 12 h post-dose on day 4. Blood samples were collected pre-dose on days 1 and 4, and for 24 h post-dose on day 4. The primary study objective was the hepatic concentration of vaniprevir at 6 and 12 h post-dose. RESULTS: Vaniprevir plasma pharmacokinetic parameters increased in a greater than dose-proportional manner between the 300 mg and 600 mg doses, with approximately fivefold increases in AUC0-12 and Cmax associated with a twofold increase in dose (AUC0-12, 10.6 µM/h to 59.5 µM/h; Cmax, 2.60 µM to 13.5 µM). In the 300 mg and 600 mg dose groups, mean liver concentrations of vaniprevir were 84.6 µM and 169 µM at 6 h post-dose, and 29.4 µM and 53.7 µM at 12 h post-dose. Liver concentrations were higher than plasma with liver-to-plasma concentration ratios of approximately 20-280. CONCLUSIONS: These data confirm higher vaniprevir concentrations in human liver compared with plasma and demonstrate that measurement of human liver drug concentration using needle biopsy is feasible.