Shortcomings and disparities in contraception counseling and use by hypertensive individuals at risk for unintended pregnancy: a comparative analysis of the National Survey of Family Growth.

BACKGROUND: Hypertension is a leading cause of adverse pregnancy outcomes. These outcomes disproportionately affect Black individuals. Reproductive life planning that includes patient-centered contraception counseling could mitigate the impact of unintended pregnancy. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of the study is to compare contraception counseling and use between hypertensive and nonhypertensive individuals at risk for unintended pregnancy. Our secondary objectives are the following: (1) to evaluate the effect of race on the probability of counseling and the use of contraception, and (2) to evaluate the methods used by individuals with hypertension. METHODS: Data from the 2015-2017 and 2017-2019 National Survey of Family Growth Female Respondent Files were used to analyze whether individuals who reported being informed of having high blood pressure within the previous 12 months received counseling about contraception or received a contraceptive method. Covariates considered in the analysis included age, race, parity, educational attainment, body mass index, smoking, diabetes, and experience with social determinants of health. The social determinants of health covariate was based on reported experiences within 5 social determinants of health domains: food security, housing stability, financial security, transportation access, and childcare needs. Linear probability models were used to estimate the adjusted probability of receiving counseling and the use of a contraceptive. Using difference-in-difference analyses, we compared the change in counseling and use between hypertensive and nonhypertensive respondents by race, relative to White respondents. RESULTS: Of the 8625 participants analyzed, 771 (9%) were hypertensive. Contraception counseling was received by 26.2% (95% confidence interval, 20.4-31.9) of hypertensive individuals and 20.7% (95% confidence interval, 19.3-22.2) of nonhypertensive individuals. Contraception use was reported by 39.8% (95% confidence interval, 33.2-46.5) of hypertensive and 35.3% (95% confidence interval, 33.3-37.2) of nonhypertensive individuals. The linear probability model adjusting for age, parity, education attainment, body mass index, smoking, diabetes, and social determinants of health indicated that hypertensive individuals were 8 percentage points (95% confidence interval, 3-18 percentage points) more likely to receive counseling and 9 percentage points (95% confidence interval, 3-16 percentage points) more likely to use contraception. Hypertensive Black individuals did not receive more counseling or use more contraceptives compared with nonhypertensive Black individuals. The difference in counseling when hypertension was present was 13 percentage points lower than the difference observed for White respondents when hypertension was present (P=.01). The most frequently used contraceptive method among hypertensive individuals was combined oral contraceptive pills (54.0%; 95% confidence interval, 44.3%-63.5%). CONCLUSION: Despite the higher likelihood of receiving contraception counseling and using contraception among hypertensive individuals at risk for unintended pregnancy, two-thirds of this population did not receive contraception counseling, and <40% used any contraceptive method. Furthermore, unlike White individuals, Black individuals with hypertension did not receive more contraception care than nonhypertensive Black individuals. Of all those who used contraception, half relied on a method classified as Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Medical Eligibility Criteria Category 3. These findings highlight a substantial unmet need for safe and accessible contraception options for hypertensive individuals at risk for unintended pregnancy, emphasizing the importance of targeted interventions to improve contraceptive care and counseling in this population.

Factors in the Hospital Experience Associated with Postpartum Breastfeeding Success.

Introduction: Hospitals are in a unique position to promote, protect, and support breastfeeding. However, the association between in-hospital events and breastfeeding success within population-based samples has not been well studied. Materials and Methods: A stratified (by education and birth weight) systematic sample of 5,770 mothers taking part in the Utah Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System, 2012-2015, were included. Mothers, 2-4 months postpartum, completed the 82-item questionnaire, including if they had ever breastfed their new baby, and if so, current breastfeeding status. Relationships between in-hospital experiences and breastfeeding termination and duration were evaluated via Poisson and Cox proportional hazard regression models, respectively, adjusting for other in-hospital experiences, maternal age, race/ethnicity, maternal education, marital status, smoking, physical activity, delivery method, pregnancy complications, and length of hospital stay. Results: Of all, 94.4% of mothers self-reported breastfeeding initiation, of whom 18.8% had breastfed <2 months, having breastfed on average 3.2 weeks (standard error: 0.07). In fully adjusted models, mothers who reported receiving a pacifier, receiving formula, or had staff help them learn how to breastfeed had a higher prevalence of terminating breastfeeding before 2 months (adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR] = 1.13, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.97-1.32; aPR = 1.20, 95% CI: 1.07-1.36; and aPR = 1.25, 95% CI: 1.08-1.34). Conversely, mothers who reported starting and feeding only breast milk in the hospital and receiving a phone number to call for help with breastfeeding had a lower prevalence of breastfeeding termination before 2 months (aPR = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.61-0.86; aPR = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.51-0.64; and aPR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.80-1.03). Adjusted Cox models showed similar direction of associations. Conclusions: Encouraging mothers to exclusively breastfeed in the hospital, and reducing gift packs containing pacifiers and formula, may be key areas United States hospitals can focus on to increase breastfeeding success. Prospective assessment in other geographical regions is needed to corroborate these findings.