Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as a revisional option after gastric band failure.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) is an effective bariatric procedure with low morbidity and mortality. Unfortunately, it is fraught with high failure rates in long-term follow-up. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is an emerging procedure, quickly gaining momentum in the arsenal of bariatric practice as a first step toward gastric bypass/biliopancreatic diversion or as a stand-alone operation. Recently, it has been described as a revisional option for previous bariatric surgery failures. We report our early experience with LSG as a revisional procedure for failed LAGB. METHODS: From January 2007 to April 2010, 46 patients, who had undergone LAGB, underwent LSG. Patient demographics, reason for band removal, interval between removal and LSG, operative times, estimated blood loss, complications, length of hospital stay, and percent of excess weight loss were collected. RESULTS: Of the 46 patients, 20 (43%) had their bands removed before LSG (median time interval, 2 years; range, 2 months to 9 years); the rest had concomitant band removal and LSG. Twelve patients were men (26%). Mean age and BMI were 40 (range, 20-60) years and 43.1 kg/m(2) (range, 33-57), respectively. In two cases, surgery was converted to an open procedure due to extensive adhesions related to previous surgeries. Median operative time, estimated blood loss, and length of hospital stay were 118 (range, 70-250) minutes, 41 (range, 5-600) ml, and 3 (range, 1-100) days, respectively. Major morbidity was encountered in three patients (6%; leak in 2 and bleeding in 1). There were no mortalities. Mean follow-up time for our cohort is 17 (range, 1-39) months. Percent of excess weight loss at 2, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months was 24, 37, 53, 51, and 48%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that LSG is safe, feasible, and effective as a revisional procedure for failed LAGB and can be considered as an appealing option in these cases. Larger series and longer follow-up are needed to confirm this.

Association between very young age and adverse characteristics of breast cancer at presentation amongst Israeli women.

BACKGROUND: Up to 4% of breast cancer cases occur in women younger than 35 years. Studies have suggested an association between breast cancer at a young age, poorer outcome, and adverse clinical and pathologic characteristics. It is unclear whether age is an independent prognostic factor. OBJECTIVES: To characterize the prognostic significance of young age at diagnosis through comparison of disease characteristics of "less-young" (born between 1958-1962 and aged 37-44 years) and "very-young" (born after 1967 and aged ≤35 years) premenopausal patients. METHODS: Consecutive patients with breast cancer born after 1967 treated at Sheba Medical Centre between January, 1999 and October, 2002 were identified and their files reviewed. This cohort was identified as "very-young" and was compared with a group of "less-young" patients. The clinico-pathologic characteristics and survival data were compared. RESULTS: Sixty-one very young and 94 less-young patients were identified. The mean age at diagnosis was 29.9 (range, 23-34 years) and 40.5 years (range, 37-44 years) for the very young and less young patients, respectively (P < 0.0001). Significantly more very young patients had metastatic disease at presentation (20% vs. 3%, respectively, P = 0.0007). The very young patients were more likely to have high grade, endocrine nonresponsive tumors than the less young patients. After controlling for stage and tumor grade, very-young age was not shown to be an independent risk factor for reduced survival. CONCLUSIONS: Very young age among Israeli women with breast cancer is associated with higher stage at diagnosis, adverse pathologic characteristics and adverse outcome but is not an independent prognostic factor for survival.

Timing of sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To address optimal timing of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant treatment. METHODS: The study population included 117 patients with locally advanced cancer with clinically negative nodes treated with primary chemotherapy. Group 1 underwent SLNB and completion axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in conjunction with lumpectomy/mastectomy, after neoadjuvant treatment (n = 31). Group 2 underwent SLNB followed by neoadjuvant therapy and subsequently surgery and completion of ALNDs (n = 58). Group 3 was treated using the same sequence as group 2, however, completion ALND was performed only for patients with positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) (n = 28). RESULTS: SLN identification was lowest in group 1 compared to groups 2 and 3 (87% and 98.8% respectively; P = <0.05). The highest false negative rate was in group 1 (15.8% compared with 0% in group 2). CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant treatment lowers the SLN identification rate, possibly due to fibrosis within the axilla, and increases the false negative rate due to downstaging. SLN biopsy prior to chemotherapy could give a more accurate evaluation of axillary status, unaffected by any previous therapeutic intervention.

MDM2 SNP309 accelerates breast and ovarian carcinogenesis in BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers of Jewish-Ashkenazi descent.

A functional single nucleotide polymorphism in the promoter of the MDM2 gene, SNP309 (T>G), was recently found to accelerate tumorigenesis in early onset cancer cases. The SNP309 G-allele, introduces an SP1 site in the MDM2 promoter, resulting in enhanced MDM2 expression and activity. Thus, the G-allele of MDM2 SNP309 may represent a cancer predisposing allele. In this report, we assessed the role of SNP309 as a modifier of mutant BRCA1/BRCA2 alleles in inherited breast and ovarian cancer cases among Ashkenazi-Jewish (AJ) women. We genotyped several subsets of AJ women: 138 healthy women, 140 affected BRCA1/2 mutation carriers, 120 asymptomatic BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and 187 sporadic breast cancer patients. The frequency of GG genotype of SNP309 was similar among the different groups. Interestingly, we found almost three times higher frequency of the GG genotype among BRCA1/2 carriers diagnosed with breast and/or ovarian cancer at or under the age of 51 years compared with carriers diagnosed with cancer above the age of 51 years (allele frequency, P = 0.019). The GG genotype was significantly associated with breast and ovarian cancer risk among BRCA1/2 carriers diagnosed before 51 years of age (OR, 3.93; 95% CI, 1.41-10.90, P = 0.009). No significant difference in frequency of the GG genotype was observed between early and late onset non-carrier cancer patients and no association with risk, OR, 1.30; 95% CI 0.69-2.47, P = 0.419). These data suggest that MDM2 SNP309 acts as a modifier of mutant BRCA1/2 mutant alleles in AJ and may accelerate breast and ovarian carcinogenesis in genetically predisposed individuals.

Association between diabetes mellitus and adverse characteristics of breast cancer at presentation.

Type 2 diabetes mellitus is associated with increased incidence and inferior outcome of various malignancies. The aim of this study was to explore the impact of type 2 diabetes on breast cancer characteristics at presentation. The study population included 79 diabetic and 158 age-matched non-diabetic patients. Parity, country of birth, co-morbidity other than diabetes, and mode of diagnosis were similar in both groups. Mean body mass index (BMI) was higher among diabetic patients. Tumour stage and size were higher among diabetic patients and the differences remained significant after adjustment for BMI. Moreover, after adjustment for BMI, breast cancer among diabetic patients was more often hormone receptor negative. Our results show that diabetes mellitus is associated with negative prognostic factors at breast cancer presentation.