Fixed-dose combination therapy in pulmonary arterial hypertension: Pros & cons.

Quality of life of patients suffering from chronic diseases is inevitably conditioned by the number of pills taken during the day. To improve patients' tolerability, compliance and quality of life and reduce healthcare costs, pharmaceutical companies are focusing on the commercialization of fixed-dose combination (FDC) therapies. The last ESC/ERS guidelines for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) recommend initial dual combination therapy for newly diagnosed patients at low or intermediate mortality risk. In this regard, polypills including an endothelin receptor antagonist (ERA) and a phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor (PDE5-i) could represent an useful therapeutic strategy, although with some limitations. To date, evidence about the use of FDCs in PAH is limited but future studies evaluating their safety and efficacy are welcome.

Systemic sclerosis patients with and without pulmonary arterial hypertension: a nailfold capillaroscopy study.

OBJECTIVE: Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a complication of SSc due to increased vascular resistance, and abnormal vascularity is a well-known feature of the disease as shown by nailfold videocapillaroscopy (NVC). This study investigated for specific NVC changes in SSc patients with and without PAH to assess any useful difference. METHODS: Twenty-four SSc patients, 12 with PAH and 12 without, entered the study. Evidence of PAH was defined as increased systolic pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) (≥35 mmHg), indirectly assessed by echocardiography and confirmed by right heart catheterization (mPAP > 25 mmHg). NVC was performed, and a semi-quantitative rating scale, a rating system for avascular areas and a specific NVC pattern evaluation, namely early, active and late, were used. RESULTS: An NVC score >1 was more frequently found in patients with PAH than those without, 11 cases (92%) vs 5 cases (42%) (P = 0.03); an avascular areas grade >1 was present in 10 (83%) and 2 (17%) cases, respectively (P = 0.003); and a more severe NC pattern (active/late) was described in 11 (92%) and 5 (42%) patients, respectively (P = 0.03). When we compared the mPAP with NVC parameters, we found significant correlations between mPAP values and the NVC score (P < 0.005) and with the avascular areas score (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our results underline the relevance of early microvascular assessment in patients at risk of developing a severe complication such as PAH that can amplify the systemic microvascular impairment in SSc. More severe NVC abnormalities should lead to strict cardiopulmonary surveillance and a complete NVC study is indicated.