Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am ; 34(4): 757-763, 2024 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39277303

RESUMO

In the last decade there has been significant development of novel devices and techniques in the field of endoscopic bariatric and metabolic therapies (EBMTs). Bariatric endoscopy fulfills an unmet need within the current paradigm of obesity management. The expansion of this field is an important step in offering complete care to patients with obesity and metabolic disease. Nevertheless, information, mentorship and guidance through starting a practice in EBMTs are limited. We discuss important considerations when beginning a practice in obesity care with a focus on endobariatrics in a variety of practice settings.


Assuntos
Cirurgia Bariátrica , Humanos , Cirurgia Bariátrica/métodos , Cirurgia Bariátrica/instrumentação , Endoscopia Gastrointestinal/métodos , Endoscopia Gastrointestinal/instrumentação , Obesidade/cirurgia
2.
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A ; 31(7): 765-771, 2021 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33155863

RESUMO

Introduction: Bariatric surgery is the most effective treatment for obesity while improving comorbid conditions and decreasing mortality rates. The purpose of this analysis was to identify the predictive factors associated with the short-term outcomes of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) at a single Veterans Affairs Medical Center (VAMC). Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of LSG performed at a VAMC from 2013 to 2019. Veterans were followed for 12 months postoperatively. The primary outcomes of interest were excess weight loss (EWL) and total weight loss (TWL) at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months along with resolution of comorbidities. Independent predictors included: demographics, pre- and postoperative findings, geographic distance from VAMC, and per-capita salary of the veteran's residence. Results: A total of 128 patients, including 50 males, completed 12 months' follow-up after LSG. There were no mortalities, transfusions, or conversions to open surgery. The mean length of stay was 2.3 days. At 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, EWL was 27.2%, 33.7%, 35.9%, and 36.6%, respectively; TWL was 12.3%, 15.3%, 16.3%, and 16.7%, respectively. Postoperative hemoglobin A1c and oral hyperglycemic medication usage significantly decreased. High-density lipoprotein levels significantly increased. At 6 months' follow-up, preoperative body mass index (BMI; odds ratio [OR] = 0.7 [95% confidence interval, CI 0.6-0.9]) and age (OR = 0.9 [95% CI 0.8-1.0]) were significant predictors of 50% EWL and EWL broadly (P = .002). Conclusion: Similar to the private sector, LSG is a safe and effective tool for morbid obesity with clinical and serological improvements. For Veterans, increasing BMI and age may portend less weight loss but does not affect resolution of some comorbidities.


Assuntos
Cirurgia Bariátrica/métodos , Gastrectomia/métodos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Adulto , Índice de Massa Corporal , Comorbidade , Feminino , Hospitais de Veteranos , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Razão de Chances , Período Pós-Operatório , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Redução de Peso
3.
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am ; 27(2): 245-256, 2017 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28292403

RESUMO

Cost-effective therapies to address the growing epidemic of obesity are a leading priority in modern medicine. Intragastric balloons (IGBs) are one such option, with increased effectiveness compared with pharmacotherapy and lifestyle and a lower rate of adverse events than bariatric surgery. IGBs are endoscopically placed or swallowed space-occupying devices in the stomach. Three IGB systems were approved in 2015 to 2016 by the Food and Drug Administration for use in the United States, with more devices nearing approval. This paper reviews the adverse events and efficacy of IGBs, and practice setup, management of common complications, and dietary advice for patients.


Assuntos
Cirurgia Bariátrica/métodos , Balão Gástrico/efeitos adversos , Gastroscopia/efeitos adversos , Obesidade/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/terapia , Cirurgia Bariátrica/efeitos adversos , Gastroscopia/métodos , Humanos , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Estômago/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos
4.
Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol ; 14(4): 507-534, 2016 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27709332

RESUMO

OPINION STATEMENT: As new and effective novel therapies in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) become available, patients are living longer with advancing age and are at increased risk for malignancy. The management of IBD and malignancy involves multiple combinations of chemotherapy agents and IBD drugs, with the potential for interactions between these therapies. Interactions may either potentiate the effectiveness of drug class or exacerbate their common side effects. In this review article, we present a guide on studied interactions between IBD therapies and chemotherapy agents, specifically those of colorectal cancer, breast cancer, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, and melanoma. The pharmacology and pharmocokinetics of each IBD drug will be discussed. Then, the IBD drug and chemotherapy interactions are summarized in table format. This guide will provide a quick reference to guide clinicians with this challenging management of two disease processes.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA