Unplanned early hospital readmissions in a vascular surgery population

Background: Patients who undergo vascular surgery are burdened by high early readmission rates. We examined the frequency and cause of early readmissions after elective and emergent admission to the vascular surgery service at our institution to identify modifiable targets for quality improvement. Methods: Over a 5-year period, all patients admitted and readmitted to the vascular surgery service were identified. Medical records were then individually reviewed to identify baseline characteristics from the index admission and the most responsible diagnosis for readmission within 28 days of discharge. Results: Of a total of 3324 patients, 421 (12.7%) were readmitted to our institution within 28 days of discharge. Forty-seven were found to have more than 1 readmission following their index admission. The readmission rate ranged from 11.8% to 14.1% over the 5-year study period, resulting in an average readmission rate of 12.7%. There were similar rates for men (12.9%) and women (12.3%). Of the readmitted cases, 236 (63.1%) were unplanned readmissions. The most common diagnoses for unplanned readmissions were worsening of peripheral arterial disease status including complications related to peripheral bypass graft (30.9%), surgical site infections (15.3%) and nonsurgical infections (14.8%). Conclusion: To reduce readmission rates effectively, institutions must identify highrisk patients. In our study cohort, the most frequent pathology resulting in readmission was peripheral arterial disease. The most frequent preventable reason for readmission was surgical site infection. Interventions focused on early assessment of clinical status and wounds in addition to avoidance of infectious complications could help reduce readmission rates. Preventive resources can be efficiently targeted by focusing on subgroups at risk for readmission.

Contexte: Les patients soumis à une chirurgie vasculaire présentent malheureusement un taux élevé de réadmission précoce. Nous avons analysé la fréquence et les causes de réadmission précoce après une admission urgente ou non urgente au service de chirurgie vasculaire afin d'identifier les facteurs modifiables en vue d'améliorer la qualité des soins. Méthodes: Sur une période de 5 ans, tous les patients admis, puis réadmis au service de chirurgie vasculaire ont été identifiés. On a ensuite passé en revue individuellement les dossiers médicaux pour relever les caractéristiques de base à l'admission initiale et le diagnostic ayant le plus probablement justifié la réadmission dans les 28 jours suivant le congé. Résultats: Sur un total de 3324 patients, 421 (12,7 %) ont été réadmis à notre établissement dans les 28 jours suivant leur congé. Quarante-sept ont été réadmis plus d'une fois après leur hospitalisation initiale. Le taux de réadmission a varié de 11,8 % à 14,1 % pendant la période de 5 ans de l'étude, le taux moyen de réadmission étant de 12,7 %. Les taux étaient similaires chez les hommes (12,9 %) et les femmes (12,3 %). Parmi les cas réadmis, 236 (63,1 %) étaient imprévus. Les diagnostics ayant le plus souvent justifié une réadmission imprévue étaient aggravation de la maladie artérielle périphérique (y compris complications au niveau de pontages artériels périphériques) (30,9 %), infection du site opératoire (15,3 %) et infections non chirurgicales (14,8 %). Conclusion: Pour réduire efficacement les taux de réadmission, les établissements doivent identifier les patients à haut risque. Dans notre cohorte, la pathologie ayant le plus souvent mené à une réadmission était la maladie artérielle périphérique. La raison évitable la plus fréquente était l'infection du site opératoire. Les interventions axées sur une évaluation rapide de l'état clinique et de l'état des plaies, ainsi que la prévention des complications infectieuses pourraient contribuer à réduire les taux de réadmission. Des mesures préventives pourraient cibler judicieusement les groupes à risque de réadmission.

Menstrual and reproductive factors and lung cancer risk: A pooled analysis from the international lung cancer consortium.

Many clinical features of lung cancer are different in women and men. Sex steroid hormones exert effects in nonreproductive organs, such as the lungs. The association between menstrual and childbearing factors and the risk of lung cancer among women is still debated. We performed a pooled analysis of eight studies contributing to the International Lung Cancer Consortium (4,386 cases and 4,177 controls). Pooled associations between menstrual or reproductive factors and lung cancer were estimated using multivariable unconditional logistic regression. Subgroup analyses were done for menopause status, smoking habits and histology. We found no strong support for an association of age at menarche and at menopause with lung cancer, but peri/postmenopausal women were at higher risk compared to premenopausal (OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.11-1.93). Premenopausal women showed increased risks associated with parity (OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.03-2.93) and number of children (OR 2.88, 95% CI 1.21-6.93 for more than 3 children; p for trend 0.01) and decreased with breastfeeding (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.30-0.98). In contrast, peri/postmenopausal subjects had ORs around unity for the same exposures. No major effect modification was exerted by smoking status or cancer histology. Menstrual and reproductive factors may play a role in the genesis of lung cancer, yet the mechanisms are unclear, and smoking remains the most important modifiable risk factor. More investigations in large well-designed studies are needed to confirm these findings and to clarify the underlying mechanisms of gender differences in lung cancer risk.

Occupation and head and neck cancer in women-Results of the ICARE study.

BACKGROUND: Few occupational studies have addressed head and neck cancer, and these studies have been predominantly conducted in men. Accordingly, our objective was to investigate the association between head and neck cancer and occupation in women. METHODS: ICARE, a French population-based case-control study, included 296 squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck in women and 775 controls. Lifelong occupational history was collected. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), adjusted for smoking, alcohol drinking and education level, were estimated for occupations and industries. RESULTS: An elevated OR was observed for working proprietors working for 10 years or more (OR = 3.83, 95% CI: 1.12-13.0) with a significant trend with duration of employment (P = 0.047). Elevated but non-significant ORs were observed for street vendors (OR = 3.76, 95% CI: 0.99-14.3, P for trend = 0.13), bakers (OR = 4.19, 95% CI: 0.63-27.9, P for trend = 0.06), and welders and flame cutters (OR = 2.18, 95% CI: 0.33-14.4, P for trend = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This exploratory study suggests a role of occupational exposures in the development of HN cancer in women. Further investigations of exposures to specific agents are needed.

Vascular quality of care pilot study: how admission to a vascular surgery service affects evidence-based pharmacologic risk factor modification in patients with lower extremity peripheral arterial disease.

BACKGROUND: Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) guidelines recommend aggressive risk factor modification to improve cardiovascular outcomes. Recommended pharmacologic therapies include antiplatelets, angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, and HMG-CoA-reductase inhibitors (statins). PURPOSE: We studied the degree to which patient admission to a vascular surgery service increased the use of these therapies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The authors conducted a retrospective chart review of 150 patients with PAD admitted to the vascular surgery service at a large Canadian tertiary care hospital. The use of recommended pharmacologic therapies at the time of admission and discharge were compared. A multidisciplinary clinical team established criteria by which patients were deemed ineligible to receive any of the recommended therapies. Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) were considered an alternative to ACE inhibitors. RESULTS: Prior to hospital admission, 64% of patients were on antiplatelet therapy, 67% were on an ACE inhibitor or ARB, and 71% were on a statin. At the time of discharge, 91% of patients were on an antiplatelet (or not, with an acceptable reason), 77% were on an ACE inhibitor or an ARB (or not, with an acceptable reason), and 85% were on a statin (or not, with an acceptable reason). While new prescriptions were largely responsible for improved guideline adherence with antiplatelets and statins, most of the apparent improvement in ACE inhibitor and ARB use was the result of identifying an acceptable reason for not having them prescribed. CONCLUSION: This hypothesis generating pilot study supports the findings of others that there is suboptimal prescription of pharmacologic risk reduction therapies in the PAD population. Admission to a vascular service increases these rates. Nevertheless, some patients are still not receiving evidence-based treatment at discharge even after consideration of acceptable reasons. Strategies are needed to improve PAD guideline adherence in both the community at large and the vascular surgery service.

Occupation and head and neck cancer risk in men: results from the ICARE study, a French population-based case-control study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the associations between occupations and head and neck (HN) cancer risk in men. METHODS: ICARE is a French population-based case-control study on HN cancer. Analyses included 1833 cases and 2747 controls. Complete occupational history was collected. Odds ratios (ORs) were estimated for occupations and industries ever held and according to duration of employment. RESULTS: Elevated ORs, increasing with duration of employment, were observed for several occupations, including cleaners (OR = 1.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.0 to 2.8), launderers (OR = 6.8; CI, 1.3 to 34.4), firefighters (OR = 3.9; CI, 1.4 to 11.2), several agricultural occupations, welders (OR = 1.9; CI, 1.3 to 2.8), structural metal preparers and erectors (OR = 2.1; CI, 1.2 to 3.7), rubber workers (OR = 2.0; CI, 1.0 to 3.9), several construction occupations, and material-handling equipment operators (OR = 1.8; CI, 1.1 to 2.9). Analyses by industry corroborated these findings. CONCLUSIONS: These results confirmed the role of occupational exposures in HN cancer.

Risk of lung cancer associated with occupational exposure to mineral wools: updating knowledge from a french population-based case-control study, the ICARE study.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the risk of lung cancer associated with exposure to mineral wools (MWs), while taking into account smoking, asbestos, and crystalline silica exposures. METHODS: The analyses were restricted to men (1350 cases and 1912 controls). Lifelong occupational history was collected. MWs and asbestos exposures were assessed, using task-exposure matrices and silica exposure, a job-exposure matrix. RESULTS: We observed consistent not-significant increased risks of lung cancer of the same order of magnitude among workers exposed to high levels of MWs (odds ratio, 1.4; 95% confidence interval: 0.9 to 2.2; for highest quartile of the Cumulative Exposure Index). CONCLUSIONS: These results do not allow to draw firm conclusion about a carcinogenic effect of MWs on the lung, but they cannot exclude it. Given the high number of potentially exposed workers, it will be necessary to replicate them in a future further removed from the asbestos ban.

Body mass index, body mass change, and risk of oral cavity cancer: results of a large population-based case-control study, the ICARE study.

OBJECTIVE: The association between body mass index (BMI) and the risk of oral cavity cancer, suggested by the few available studies, is controversial because of weight loss preceding cancer diagnosis and possible confounding by tobacco and alcohol consumption. The aim of this study was to evaluate in France, a high-incidence country, the association between the risk of oral cavity cancer and body mass index at interview, 2 years before the interview and at age 30, as well as BMI change. METHODS: We used data from a population-based case-control study, the Investigation of occupational and environmental CAuses of REspiratory cancers study, with personal interviews and standardized questionnaires including 689 cases of oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma and 3,481 controls. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were estimated by unconditional logistic regression and were adjusted for gender, age, area of residence, education, tobacco smoking, and alcohol drinking. RESULTS: ORs were increased in underweight subjects at interview (OR 6.25, 95% CI 3.74-10.45). No association with underweight 2 years before the interview and at age 30 was found. Overweight and obesity at interview, 2 years before the interview and at age 30 were associated with decreased ORs (ranging from 0.13 to 0.60). BMI gain greater than 5% between age 30 and 2 years before the interview was inversely associated with oral cavity cancer (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.33-0.54). These associations were stronger in men, and in smokers and drinkers. CONCLUSION: These results add further support to the existence of a reduced risk of oral cavity cancer among overweight and obese people or among people who increased their BMI in adulthood. The underlying mechanisms remain to be clarified.

Tobacco smoking, alcohol drinking and risk of oral cavity cancer by subsite: results of a French population-based case-control study, the ICARE study.

The objective was to examine the role of tobacco smoking and alcohol drinking in the incidence of oral cavity cancer by subsite in France, a high-incidence area. We analysed detailed data on lifelong tobacco smoking and alcohol drinking from 772 oral cavity cancer cases and 3555 controls included in a population-based case-control study, the ICARE study. Tobacco smoking increased the risk of oral cavity cancer even for the smaller quantities and durations, whereas alcohol drinking increased this risk only in heavy drinkers who were also ever smokers. The combined effect of smoking and drinking was greater than multiplicative. The floor of the mouth was the subsite that was the most affected by the harmful effects of tobacco and alcohol, whereas the gums were less susceptible. The risk associated with tobacco and alcohol consumption did not differ between intraoral cavity and subsites usually included in the oropharynx (soft palate and base of the tongue). Population-attributable risks for oral cavity cancer were 78.6% for tobacco smoking, 7.3% for alcohol drinking and 80.7% for tobacco and/or alcohol consumption. These results indicate that regular oral check-ups should be targeted at smokers and heavy drinkers, and that prevention efforts should be focused on smoking cessation.

Body mass index and lung cancer risk: results from the ICARE study, a large, population-based case-control study.

BACKGROUND: The association between body mass index (BMI) and lung cancer is still disputed because of possible residual confounding by smoking and preclinical weight loss in case-control studies. We examined this association using data from the multicenter ICARE study in France, a large, population-based case-control study. METHODS: A total of 2,625 incident lung cancer cases and 3,381 controls were included. Weight was collected at interview, 2 years before the interview, and at age 30. Lifetime smoking exposure was calculated using the comprehensive smoking index (CSI). Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95 % confidence intervals were estimated by unconditional logistic regression and controlled for age, area, education, CSI, occupational exposure, previous chronic bronchitis, and parental history of lung cancer. We also examined the role of weight change. Analyses were stratified by smoking status and sex. RESULTS: When compared with that of men with normal BMI 2 years before the interview, lung cancer aORs (95 % CI) among men with BMIs of <18.5, 25-29.9, 30-32.4, and ≥32.5 kg/m(2) were 2.7 (95 % CI 1.2-6.2), 0.9 (95 % CI 0.7-1.1), 0.8 (95 % CI 0.6-1.1), and 0.8 (95 % CI 0.6-1.0), respectively (p(trend) = 0.02). Results were more pronounced among current smokers and were similar in men and women. Weight gain over time was associated with a significant decreased risk of lung cancer. CONCLUSIONS: We found an inverse dose-dependent association between lung cancer risk and BMI 2 years prior to interview in current smokers. IMPACT STATEMENT: BMI might be an individual factor impacting the risk of lung cancer related to smoking's carcinogen-induced DNA damage.

Risk of lung cancer and occupational history: results of a French population-based case-control study, the ICARE study.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the risk of lung cancer associated with occupations and industries. METHODS: A French population-based case-control study included 2923 cases and 3555 controls. Lifelong occupational history was collected. Two lists of occupations known (A) or suspected (B) to be associated with lung cancer were used. Occupations and industries not included in these lists were also explored. RESULTS: Among men, the smoking-adjusted odds ratio was 1.97 for list A (attributable fraction: 12.3%), 1.4 for list B (due especially to carpenters/joiners and transport workers). Among unlisted occupations, excess risks were found for welders, plumbers, and several construction crafts. Odds ratios among women were elevated for list A, list B (due especially to launderers/dry cleaners), cleaners and hairdressers. CONCLUSIONS: These results confirm the role of known occupations and give insight into new occupational risk factors among men and women.

Cigarette smoking and lung cancer in women: results of the French ICARE case-control study.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of female lung cancer in developed countries has been increasing since 1950. In order to have recent and reliable data on the association between cigarette smoking and the risk of lung cancer in women, we analysed cases from a French population-based case-control study. METHODS: The ICARE study is a multicenter case-control study on respiratory cancers (lung and UADT cancers), set up in 10 départements that include a general cancer registry. We included 648 women lung cancer cases up to 76 years of age, with a histologically confirmed primary lung cancer. The 775 controls were randomly selected from the general population and frequency-matched with cases by age and département. RESULTS: Overall, smoking cigarettes at some time was associated with a 8-fold increase in lung cancer risk (OR=8.2, 95% CI 6.0-11.4). A dose-response relationship was observed as a function of duration, intensity and pack-years. Using restricted splines cubic models, we have shown that intensity dose-response departed significantly from linearity while the risk increased linearly with duration and decreased linearly with time since cessation. The following characteristics were associated with a higher relative risk: smoke inhalation, smoking non-filter cigarettes, smoking dark tobacco cigarettes and starting at a young age. In addition, duration, intensity and time since cessation was significantly related with histological type. This was not the case for characteristics such as the use of a filter or not, the inhalation pattern, or the type of tobacco smoked. The proportion of lung cancer cases attributable to cigarette smoking was 55% (95% CI: [47-63%]). CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm that cigarette smoking is by far the most important cause of the current epidemic of lung cancer among French women and that the most important smoking-related variables for varying the risk of lung cancer are the duration, the intensity and the time since cessation.