RESUMO
BACKGROUND: There have been conflicting results on the association of asthma with the severity of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Poor metabolic health has been previously associated with both severe COVID-19 and inflammation in asthma. OBJECTIVES: To examine the association between asthma and COVID-19 outcomes and whether these associations are modified by metabolic syndrome. METHODS: We performed an international, observational cohort study of adult patients hospitalized for COVID-19 from February 2020 through October 2021. The primary outcome was hospital mortality. RESULTS: The study included 27,660 patients from 164 hospitals, 12,114 (44%) female, with a median (interquartile range) age of 63 years (51-75). After adjusting for age, sex, smoking, race, ethnicity, geographic region, and Elixhauser comorbidity index, we found that patients with asthma were not at greater risk of hospital death when compared with patients with no chronic pulmonary disease (controls) (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.97; 95% CI, 0.90-1.04; P = .40). Patients with asthma, when compared with controls, required higher respiratory support identified by the need for supplemental oxygen (aOR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.01-1.14; P = .02), high-flow nasal cannula or noninvasive mechanical ventilation (aOR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.00-1.13; P = .04), and invasive mechanical ventilation (aOR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.03-1.16; P = .003). Metabolic syndrome increased the risk of death in patients with asthma, but the magnitude of observed association was similar to controls in stratified analysis (interaction P value .24). CONCLUSIONS: In this international cohort of hospitalized COVID-19 patients, asthma was not associated with mortality but was associated with increased need for respiratory support. Although metabolic dysfunction was associated with increased risks in COVID-19, these risks were similar for patients with or without asthma.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) in smoky venues puts patrons and employees at risk for immediate respiratory symptoms. Although much literature focuses on outcomes associated with chronic ETS exposure, the current study assesses changes in lung function after acute exposure. METHODS: Ninety-six nonsmoking, healthy adults were exposed to ETS at a bar. Lung function [eg, forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1âsecond (FEV1)] was assessed at baseline, immediately after 3âhours of ETS exposure, and 2âhours after exiting the bar. PM2.5 recordings were also measured. RESULTS: Repeated-measures analysis of variance found significant decreases in FEV1, FVC and FEF25-75%, and peak expiratory flow after ETS exposure compared with baseline that remained significantly decreased after a 2-hour recovery period. CONCLUSIONS: Acute exposure to ETS in a natural environment significantly attenuates lung function. A subgroup experienced heightened reductions in lung function.