Impact of Surgical Timing (Primary, Delayed, or Second Look) on Surgical Morbidity and Outcomes in Malignant Germ Cell Tumor of the Ovary in Children.

BACKGROUND: Malignant ovarian germ cell tumors (MOGCT) are rare in children. Surgery with or without chemotherapy is the primary treatment approach. This study aimed to analyze the impact of primary and delayed surgery on surgical morbidity and outcomes. Second-look surgery after inadequate surgical staging and the various components of surgical staging were also evaluated. METHODS: Children below 15 years with MOGCT treated between 2006 and 2022 were analyzed. A comparison of patients undergoing primary, delayed, and second-look surgery was performed. RESULTS: 118 patients with a median age of 12 (0.11-15) years were eligible. Forty patients underwent primary, 51 delayed, and 27 second-look surgeries. Overall complications, including tumor rupture, blood loss, and adjacent organ removal, were significantly higher in the primary compared to the delayed surgery group (p = 0.0001). Second-look surgery conceded more blood loss (p = 0.0001), extended duration (p = 0.03), and complications (p = 0.004) than delayed surgery. The compliance with surgical guidelines was 100% for most components, with a positive yield rate of 10-80%. At a median follow-up of 5.2 years, the 5-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) for the entire cohort are 86% and 89%, respectively. The OS and EFS did not differ by the timing of surgery, although the second-look surgery demonstrated relatively inferior outcomes consequential to initial suboptimal surgery. CONCLUSIONS: MOGCT shows favorable outcomes. Delayed surgery after chemotherapy in appropriately selected patients minimizes the morbidity of surgery with similar outcomes compared to primary surgery. An optimal initial surgery is essential since second-look surgery produces significant morbidity. Prognosis Study, Level II evidence.

Outcome and prognostic variables in childhood rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) with emphasis on impact of FOXO1 fusions in non-metastatic RMS: experience from a tertiary cancer centre in India.

While factors influencing outcomes of rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) in developed countries have evolved from clinical characteristics to molecular profiles, similar data from developing countries are scarce. This is a single-centre analysis of outcomes in treated cases of RMS, with emphasis on prevalence, risk-migration and prognostic impact of Forkhead Box O1 (FOXO1) in non-metastatic RMS. All children with histopathologically proven RMS, treated between January 2013 and December 2018 were included. Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study-4 risk stratification was used, with treatment based on a multimodality-regimen with chemotherapy (Vincristine/Ifosfamide/Etoposide and Vincristine/Actinomycin-D/Cyclophosphamide) and appropriate local therapy. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues were tested using Reverse Transcriptase-Polymerase Chain Reaction for FOXO1-fusions (PAX3(P3F); PAX7(P7F)). A total of 221 children (Cohort-1) were included, of which 182 patients had non-metastatic disease (Cohort-2). Thirty-six (16%), 146 (66%), 39 (18%) patients were low-risk (LR), intermediate-risk (IR) and high-risk, respectively. FOXO1-fusion status was available in 140 patients with localised RMS (Cohort 3). P3F and P7F were detected in 25/49 (51%) and 14/85 (16.5%) of alveolar and embryonal variants, respectively. The 5-year-event-free survival (EFS)/overall survival (OS) of Cohorts 1, 2 and 3 was 48.5%/55.5%, 54.6%/62.6% and 55.1%/63.7%, respectively. Amongst the localised RMS, presence of nodal metastases and primary tumour size > 10 cms were adverse prognostic factorvs (p < 0.05). On incorporating fusion-status in risk-stratification, 6/29 (21%) patients migrated from LR (A/B) to IR. All patients who re-categorised as LR (FOXO1 negative) had a 5-year EFS/OS of 80.81%/90.91%. FOXO1-negative tumours had a better 5-year relapse-free survival (58.92% versus 44.63%; p = 0.296) with a near-significant correlation in favourable-site tumours (75.10% versus 45.83%; p = 0.063). While FOXO1-fusions have superior prognostic utility compared to histology alone in localised, favourable-site RMS, traditional prognostic factors (tumour size and nodal metastases) impacted outcome the most in this subset. Strengthening of early referral systems in community and timely local intervention can help in improving outcome in resource-constrained countries.

Treatment outcomes and prognostic factors in children with hepatoblastoma using a risk-stratified approach.

BACKGROUND: Not all the significant progress made in the management of children with hepatoblastoma (HB) has translated into improved outcomes in limited-resource settings. There are limited data on outcomes in children with HB from India. METHODS: All patients diagnosed with HB between July 2013 and December 2020 were risk-stratified and treated as per International Liver Tumor Strategy Group (SIOPEL). Patients with standard-risk HB received cisplatin monotherapy and those with high-risk HB received alternating cycles of cisplatin and the combination of carboplatin plus doxorubicin. Data regarding demographic details, chemotherapy, surgery, liver transplantation, outcomes, prognostic factors, and toxicity were collected. RESULTS: Of 157 patients with HB, 117 (74%) were high risk, 31 (20%) were standard risk, and nine (6%) unknown. Patients with standard-risk disease had excellent outcomes, with 3-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) of 96% and 100%, respectively. Among high-risk HB, six underwent orthotopic liver transplantation of which four were alive at last follow-up. The 3-year EFS and OS of patients with high-risk disease was 56% and 66%, respectively. Outcomes of patients with PRETEXT IV (3-year EFS: 42%, 3-year OS: 50%) and metastatic disease (3-year EFS: 30%, 3-year OS: 50%) were dismal. Patients with serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) reduction greater than 90% following two courses of chemotherapy had favorable outcomes; 3-year EFS: 80% versus 58% (p = .013) and 3-year OS: 95% vs. 68% (p < .01). Only two (6%) of 31 patients with relapse/refractory HB were alive at a median follow-up of 36 months, and both had received salvage chemotherapy and surgery. CONCLUSIONS: While children with standard-risk HB had excellent outcomes, those with high-risk disease continue to do poorly. Serial monitoring of serum AFP values is a cost-effective and reliable predictor of outcomes. Orthotopic liver transplantation remains a viable option for inoperable disease in resource-limited settings as well.

Outcomes and prognostic variables of extracranial germ cell tumors in children and adolescents treated over a decade: A developing world perspective.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this single-center study was to analyze the outcomes of extracranial germ cell tumors (GCTs) in children treated on a multimodality regimen. METHODS: Retrospective study of children (<18 years) with a histopathologically confirmed diagnosis of extracranial GCT over a period of 10 years (January 2009 to December 2018) treated on a uniform institution-based protocol consisting of both cisplatin- and carboplatin-based regimens. All completely excised teratomas and stage I gonadal tumors received no further therapy (low risk [LR]); stage IV ovarian, stage III-IV extragonadal GCTs received six cycles of chemotherapy (high risk [HR]), and the remaining received four cycles of chemotherapy (intermediate risk [IR]). RESULTS: A total of 297 children were treated with a female:male ratio of 1.72:1 and median age of 4 years. Forty-three children had pure teratomas. Gonadal GCTs (N = 180) were more common than extragonadal GCTs (N = 117) with ovary as primary site in 128 children (43%) and sacrococcygeal site being the commonest extragonadal location (N = 41; 14%). LR, IR, and HR disease were noted in 60 (20.2%), 125 (42%), and 112 (37.8%) patients, respectively. Three-fourths of ovarian tumors and half of testicular tumors operated prior to presentation needed upstaging. Forty-one patients relapsed and 43 children expired (disease-related: 33; toxic deaths: 9; unknown: 1). The 5-year event-free survival (EFS)/overall survival (OS) of malignant GCT (n = 254) was 72.50%/82.70%, respectively, with gonadal site (p = .001), LR and IR (p = .001) and nonmetastatic disease (p = .001) being favorable prognostic variables. CONCLUSIONS: The LR and IR GCTs in our cohort had an excellent outcome. A significant proportion of IR gonadal GCTs can be spared of systemic chemotherapy by adhering to strict surgical guidelines. In HR GCTs however, intensifying therapies to improve outcomes must be balanced against the risk of cumulative toxicity, more so in a resource-limited setting.

Assessment of outcomes of elective cancer surgeries in children during coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: Retrospective cohort study from a tertiary cancer center in India.

ABSTRACT: To describe the outcomes of elective cancer surgeries and adverse consequences on the patients and medical staff due to the surgical interventions in children during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.The study included children younger than 15 years who underwent elective cancer surgeries from March 4, 2020 and December 3, 2020.A total of 121 patients (62% male; median age, 3 years) underwent surgery. The surgical procedures included nephrectomies (n = 18), neuroblastoma (n = 26) and soft tissue tumor resections (n = 24) and complex surgical procedures like extended liver resections (n = 2), intra-atrial thrombectomy under cardiopulmonary bypass (n = 2), pancreatoduodenectomy (n = 1), and free microvascular flaps (n = 7). Clavien-Dindo Grade III complications were 5% (n = 6), and there were no postoperative deaths. Preoperative COVID-19 testing was performed in 82% of children, and only 2% showed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 positivity. Postoperatively, 26 children were tested because of specific symptoms and, 6 tested positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. Except for a median delay of 23 days in treatment, none of the patients with COVID-19 required critical hospital management. None of the surgical residents or faculty acquired COVID-19, while 4 each medical and support staff were tested positive in the study period.COVID-19 was not a deterrent for continued cancer care, and surgeries could be safely performed adopting universal preventive measures without any added morbidity from COVID-19. Caregivers and centers dealing with childhood cancers can be encouraged to sustain or seek early healthcare.

Standardizing lymph nodal sampling for Wilms tumor: A feasibility study with outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Despite being mandated by cooperative groups, omission of nodal sampling is the most frequent protocol deviation in surgery for Wilms tumor. The stations as well as the number of nodes that should be sampled are not clearly defined resulting in a marked variation in practices among surgeons. We propose a systematic method for nodal sampling intending to reduce interoperator variation. In this study, we have assessed the feasibility and yield of systematic lymph node sampling and also evaluated the factors influencing nodal metastasis. METHODS: Prospective evaluation of 113 Wilms tumor patients operated at a single tertiary cancer center between 2015 and 2019. All these patients underwent a systematic 5-station nodal sampling. RESULTS: Median lymph node yield was 8 and 13.2% (15/113) patients harbored a histologically positive nodal disease. Of the patients with positive nodal disease, interaortocaval nodes had metastasis in 46.7% (n = 7). They represented isolated sites of nodal disease (skip metastases) in 28.6% (n = 4) of patients. Right-sided tumors had more frequent involvement of interaortocaval nodes and skip disease. Tumors with high-risk histology had 12.5 times more odds of harboring nodal disease as compared to low and intermediate-risk histology Wilms tumor. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed method of systematic station wise sampling provides a template to guide surgeons in performing lymph node harvesting. Interaortocaval nodes sampling should be performed routinely as the incidence of disease at this station is sufficiently high and metastasis may skip hilar nodes. STUDY OF DIAGNOSTIC TEST: Level III evidence.