Clinical and radiological outcomes of gradual reduction and circumferential fusion of high-grade spondylolisthesis in adolescents: a prospective cohort study of 29 young patients.

AIM: The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a novel technique of formal reduction and circumferential fusion for pediatric high-grade spondylolisthesis (HGS). PURPOSE: The safety and efficacy of formal reduction for high-grade spondylolisthesis (HGS) has never been thoroughly examined. This study reports the outcomes of 29 children with HGS who underwent a procedure of gradual reduction and circumferential fusion. METHODS: 29 children (13 males, 16 females) were recruited between 2006 and 2010. Radiographic measurements (including % of slip, lumbosacral angle-LSA, pelvic incidence-PI, pelvic tilt-PT, sacral slope-SS, and proximal femoral angle-PFA) and quality of life assessment (SRS-22 questionnaire) were prospectively obtained at baseline and at the last post-operative follow-up (> 2 years post-op). Radiological measurements were used to classify patients according to the Spine Deformity Study Group (SDSG) classification. RESULTS: Mean baseline slip % was 69.9 ± 16.5%. There were 13 patients with a balanced pelvic (SDSG Type 4) and 16 with an unbalanced pelvis (SDSG Type 5 and 6). On average, a reduction of 45.5 ± 15.3% (range 20-86%) was achieved safely with no major complication. In particular, of the 29 patients, only 3 had a L5 radiculopathy postoperatively that was self-resolved at follow-up. From a radiological standpoint, we observed a mean improvement of LSA from 80.3 ± 17.9° to 91.7 ± 13.6°. We also observed a statistically significant improvement in global HRQOL, and in the function and body image domains. CONCLUSION: This prospective study suggests that formal reduction of HGS followed by circumferential fusion is safe when using a standardized surgical technique based on gradual reduction. Performing this intervention could also help improve QOL in some patients.

Analysis of three-dimensional spine growth for vertebral body tethering patients at 2 and 5 years post operatively.

PURPOSE: Scoliosis can be treated with vertebral body tethering (VBT) as a motion-sparing procedure. However, the knowledge of how growth is affected by a tether spanning multiple levels is unclear in the literature. Three-dimensional true spine length (3D-TSL) is a validated assessment technique that accounts for the shape of the spine in both the coronal and sagittal planes. This study aimed to assess if 3D-TSL increases over a five-year period after VBT implantation in thoracic curves for idiopathic scoliosis. METHODS: Prospectively collected radiographic data from an international pediatric spine registry was analyzed. Complete radiographic data over three visits (post-operative, 2 years, and 5 years) was available for 53 patients who underwent VBT. RESULTS: The mean age at instrumentation of this cohort was 12.2 (9-15) years. The average number of vertebrae instrumented was 7.3 (SD 0.7). Maximum Cobb angles were 50° pre-op, which improved to 26° post-op (p < 0.001) and was maintained at 5 years (30°; p = 0.543). Instrumented Cobb angle was 22° at 5 years (p < 0.001 vs 5-year maximum Cobb angle). An accentuation was seen in global kyphosis from 29° pre-operative to 41° at 5 years (p < 0.05). The global spine length (T1-S1 3D-TSL) started at 40.6 cm; measured 42.8 cm at 2 years; and 44.0 cm at the final visit (all p < 0.05). At 5 years, patients reached an average T1-S1 length that is comparable to a normal population at maturity. Immediate mean post-operative instrumented 3D-TSL (top of UIV-top of LIV) was 13.8 cm two-year length was 14.3 cm; and five-year length was 14.6 cm (all p < 0.05). The mean growth of 0.09 cm per instrumented level at 2 years was approximately 50% of normal thoracic growth. Patients who grew more than 0.5 cm at 2 years had a significantly lower BMI (17.0 vs 19.0, p < 0.05) and smaller pre-operative scoliosis (48° vs 53°, p < 0.05). Other subgroup analyses were not significant for age, skeletal maturity, Cobb angles or number of spanned vertebras as contributing factors. CONCLUSIONS: This series demonstrates that 3D-TSL increased significantly over the thoracic instrumented levels after VBT surgery for idiopathic scoliosis. This represented approximately 50% of expected normal thoracic growth over 2 years.

Differential vertebral body growth is maintained after vertebral body tethering surgery for idiopathic scoliosis: 4-year follow-up on 888 peri-apical vertebrae and 592 intervertebral discs.

PURPOSE: To radiographically evaluate if vertebral body tethering (VBT) can maintain differential peri-apical vertebral growth at medium-term follow-up of 4 years. METHODS: A prospective, international, multicenter database was queried to identify idiopathic scoliosis patients treated with thoracic VBT. Concave vs. convex vertebral body height, vertebral wedging, and disc wedging of the 3 peri-apical vertebrae were measured by two independent observers at 5 timepoints (pre-operative to 4-year follow-up). RESULTS: 65 skeletally immature patients (60 female, mean 12.8 years old, 21 with open triradiate cartilages) met inclusion criteria. Mean pre-operative maximum scoliosis of 50 ± 8° decreased significantly post-operatively to 27 ± 9° (p < 0.001), which remained stable at 4-year follow-up 30 ± 17° (p = 0.38 vs. post-operative). Mean instrumented scoliosis was 21 ± 14° at 4-year follow-up, which was significantly different than 4-year maximum scoliosis (p < 0.001). Mean pre-operative kyphosis of 30 ± 12° did not significantly change post-operatively (p = 1.0) and remained stable at 4-year follow-up (35 ± 18°; p = 0.05). Mean individual convex vertebral height increased from 17.7 ± 1.9 mm to 19.8 ± 1.5 mm (p < 0.001), while mean individual concave height increased from 14.8 ± 1.9 mm to 17.6 ± 1.6 mm (p < 0.001). Summing the peri-apical heights, the difference in height from pre-operative to 4-year follow-up was greater on the concave (8.3 ± 4.7 mm) than on the convex side (6.2 ± 4.7 mm) (p < 0.001). Mean individual vertebral wedging decreased from 6 ± 2° at pre-operative to 4 ± 2° at 4-year follow-up (p < 0.001). Mean total vertebral and disc wedging started at 29 ± 7° pre-operatively, decreased to 16 ± 6° at post-operative (p < 0.001), then further decreased to 14 ± 8° at 4-year follow-up (p < 0.001). Patients with open triradiate cartilages at the time of surgery had a larger height change over the 4 years compared to those with closed triradiate cartilages (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Patients with idiopathic scoliosis treated with VBT demonstrated differential vertebral growth which was maintained at minimum 4-year follow-up. This effect was more pronounced in patients whose triradiate cartilages were open at the time of surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Coronal decompensation following thoracic vertebral body tethering in idiopathic scoliosis.

PURPOSE: Post-operative coronal decompensation (CD) continues to be a challenge in the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). CD following selective spinal fusion has been studied. However, there is currently little information regarding CD following Vertebral Body Tethering (VBT). Thus, the goal of this study is to better understand the incidence and risk factors for CD after VBT. METHODS: Retrospective review of a prospective multicenter database was used for analysis. Inclusion criteria were patients undergoing thoracic VBT, a minimum 2-year follow-up, LIV was L1 or above, skeletally immature (Risser ≤ 1), and available preoperative and final follow-up AP and lateral upright radiographs. Radiographic parameters including major and minor Cobb angles, curve type, LIV tilt/translation, L4 tilt, and coronal balance were measured. CD was defined as the distance between C7PL and CSVL > 2 cm. Multiple logistic regression model was used to identify significant predictors of CD. RESULTS: Out of 136 patients undergoing VBT, 94 patients (86 female and 6 male) met the inclusion criteria. The mean age at surgery was 12.1 (9-16) and mean follow-up period was 3.4 years (2-5 years). Major and minor curves, AVR, coronal balance, LIV translation, LIV tilt, L4 tilt were significantly improved after surgery. CD occurred in 11% at final follow-up. Lenke 1A-R (24%) and 1C (26%) had greater incidence of CD compared to 1A-L (4%), 2 (0%), and 3 (0%). LIV selection was not associated with CD. Multivariate logistic regression analysis yielded 1A-R and 1C curves as a predictor of CD with the odds ratio being 17.0. CONCLUSION: CD occurred in 11% of our thoracic VBT patients. Lenke 1A-R and 1C curve types were predictors for CD in patients treated with VBT. There were no other preoperative predictors associated with CD.

Changes in trunk appearance following surgical correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

PURPOSE: To assess the postoperative appearance of the trunk in surgically treated scoliosis patients after a 2 year follow-up using reliable indices and compare the results with 6-month follow-up. METHODS: Forty-six Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) patients (female; preop mean age 14.4 ± 2.4 years) who underwent a posterior spinal fusion from 2009 to 2018 were included in this study. All had Lenke 1A thoracic curves, with surface topography taken preoperatively, 6 months and 2 years postoperatively. To assess spinal deformity, we measured the proximal thoracic, main thoracic and thoracolumbar/lumbar Cobb angles in the frontal plane from spinal X-rays and inclinometer angles in the thoracic and lumbar regions. To assess trunk deformity, Back Surface Rotation (BSR) and Trunk Lateral Shift (TLS) were computed along the trunk. We analysed the effect of age, height, weight, Cobb angle, length of follow-up, and surgical technique. We also compared correction rates (CRs) of the spinal and trunk measurements after 6 months and 2 years. RESULTS: Good spinal correction was achieved, with Cobb angles decreasing in the whole cohort. CRs for TLS and BSR were positive (denoting improvement) for 76% and 48% of patients, respectively, after 2 years. Compared with 6 months, the mean TLS CR increased while there was no improvement for BSR on average. We found no significant association after 2 years between truncal index CRs and clinical variables (age, height, weight, preoperative Cobb angles) or surgical technique. However, there were significant correlations between the CRs of TLS and the main thoracic Cobb angle (r = 0.35), and between the CRs of BSR and thoracic inclinometer angle. CONCLUSION: Although more than 55% of the TLS was corrected after 2 years of follow-up, the BSR remained stable over time and the persistence of rib hump on the back surface could be observed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Vertebral body tethering for Lenke 1A curves: the lumbar modifier predicts less optimal outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: The addition of the L4 "AR" and "AL" lumbar modifier for Lenke 1A idiopathic scoliosis (IS) has been shown to direct treatment in posterior spinal fusion; however, its utility in vertebral body tethering (VBT) has yet to be evaluated. METHODS: A review of a prospective, multicenter database for VBT in IS was performed for patients with Lenke 1A deformities and a minimum of 2 years follow-up. Patients were categorized by their lumbar modifier (AR vs AL). Less optimal VBT outcome (LOVO) was defined as a final coronal curve > 35°, lumbar adding-on, or revision surgery for deformity progression or adding-on. RESULTS: Ninety-nine patients met inclusion criteria (81% female, mean 12.6 years), with 55.6% being AL curves. Overall, there were 23 instances of tether breakage (23.3%) and 20 instances of LOVO (20.2%). There was a higher rate of LOVO in AR curves (31.8% vs 10.9%, P = 0.01). Patients with LOVO had greater preoperative deformity, greater apical translation, larger coronal deformity on first erect radiographs, and less coronal deformity correction. Failure to correct the deformity < 30° on first erect was associated with LOVO, as was LIV selection short of the last touch vertebra (TV). Independent risk factors for LOVO included AR curves (OR 3.4; P = 0.04) and first erect curve magnitudes > 30 degrees (OR 6.0; P = 0.002). DISCUSSION: There is a 20.2% rate of less optimal VBT following VBT for Lenke 1A curves. AR curves are independently predictive of less optimal outcomes following VBT and require close attention to LIV selection. Surgeons should consider achieving an initial coronal correction < 30 degrees and extending the LIV to at least the TV to minimize the risk of LOVO.

Automatic assessment of scoliosis surgery outcome on trunk shape using left-right trunk asymmetry.

PURPOSE: To present a novel set of Left-Right Trunk Asymmetry (LRTA) indices and use them to assess the postoperative appearance of the trunk in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) patients. METHODS: We hypothesize that LRTA measurements provide complementary information to existing trunk asymmetry indices when documenting the outcome of scoliosis surgery. Forty-nine AIS patients with thoracic curves who underwent posterior spinal fusion were included. All had surface topography scans taken preoperatively and at least 6 months postoperatively. We documented spinal curvature using Radiographic Cobb angles, scoliometer readings and coronal balance. To evaluate Global Trunk Asymmetry (GTA), we used the standard measures of Back Surface Rotation (BSR) and Trunk Lateral Shift (TLS). To measure LRTA, we identified asymmetry areas as regions of significant deviation between the left and right sides of the 3D back surface. New parameters called Deformation Rate (DR) and Maximum Asymmetry (MA) were measured in different regions based on the asymmetry areas. We compared the GTA and LRTA changes with those in spinal curvature before and after surgery. RESULTS: The GTA indices, mainly TLS, showed improvement for more than 75% of patients. There was significant improvement of LRTA in the shoulder blades and waist regions (95% and 80% of patients respectively). CONCLUSION: We report positive outcomes for LRTA in the majority of patients, specifically in the shoulder blades and waist, even when no reduction of BSR is observed. The proposed indices can evaluate local trunk asymmetries and the degree to which they are improved or worsened after scoliosis surgery.

The Effect of Implant Density on Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Fusion: Results of the Minimize Implants Maximize Outcomes Randomized Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Severe adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) can be treated with instrumented fusion, but the number of anchors needed for optimal correction is controversial. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, randomized study that included patients undergoing spinal fusion for single thoracic curves between 45° and 65°, the most common form of operatively treated AIS. Of the 211 patients randomized, 108 were assigned to a high-density screw pattern and 103, to a low-density screw pattern. Surgeons were instructed to use ≥1.8 implants per spinal level fused for patients in the high-implant-density group or ≤1.4 implants per spinal level fused for patients in the low-implant-density group. The primary outcome measure was the percent correction of the coronal curve at the 2-year follow-up. The power analysis for this trial required 174 patients to show equivalence, defined as a 95% confidence interval (CI) within a ±10% correction margin with a probability of 90%. RESULTS: In the intention-to-treat analysis, the mean percent correction of the coronal curve was equivalent between the high-density and low-density groups at the 2-year follow-up (67.6% versus 65.7%; difference, -1.9% [95% CI: -6.1%, 2.2%]). In the per-protocol cohorts, the mean percent correction of the coronal curve was also equivalent between the 2 groups at the 2-year follow-up (65.0% versus 66.1%; difference, 1.1% [95% CI: -3.0%, 5.2%]). A total of 6 patients in the low-density group and 5 patients in the high-density group required reoperation (p = 1.0). CONCLUSIONS: In the setting of spinal fusion for primary thoracic AIS curves between 45° and 65°, the percent coronal curve correction obtained with use of a low-implant-density construct and that obtained with use of a high-implant-density construct were equivalent. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level I . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

A Surgical Treatment Algorithm for Restoring Pelvic Balance and Health-related Quality of Life in High-grade Lumbosacral Spondylolisthesis: Prospective Multicenter Cohort of 61 Young Patients.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective multicenter cohort-study. OBJECTIVE: We propose an evidence-based surgical algorithm for achieving normal pelvic balance while optimizing health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in high-grade spondylolisthesis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The principles of surgical treatment for young patients with high-grade L5-S1 spondylolisthesis remain unclear. There is a growing body of evidence supporting the central role of pelvic balance in the postural control and biomechanics of subjects with high-grade spondylolisthesis. METHODS: This retrospective study assessed a multicenter cohort of 61 patients with high-grade L5-S1 spondylolisthesis. Classification and regression tree analysis was used to identify objective criteria associated with pelvic balance and HRQoL after surgery. RESULTS: The most important predictor of a postoperative balanced pelvis was a postoperative L5 incidence ≤63.5 degrees. With postoperative L5 incidence ≤63.5 degrees,a residual slip percentage 9% and performing an L5-S1 posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF)/transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) increased the likelihood of achieving a balanced pelvis postoperatively. When L5 incidence was 63.5 degrees,a balanced pelvis was most likely achieved with fusion limited to L5 proximally, residual slip percentage ≤40%, and residual lumbosacral angle 98 degrees. Predictors of postoperative HRQoL were the preoperative HRQoL score, L5 incidence and slip percentage. CONCLUSIONS: A surgical algorithm is proposed to achieve normal pelvic balance, while optimizing HRQoL. The first step during surgery is to assess L5 incidence and if L5 incidence is <65 degrees, the next step depends on the pelvic balance. With a preoperative balanced pelvis, it is important not to reduce completely the slip percentage by leaving a slip percentage ≥10%. When the preoperative pelvis is unbalanced, a TLIF/PLIF at L5-S1 is recommended to facilitate correcting the angular deformity at L5-S1. If L5 incidence is ≥65 degrees,a TLIF/PLIF at L5-S1 should be performed to correct the angular deformity at L5-S1, and fusion should ideally end at L5 proximally, in addition to performing gradual reduction of the slip percentage. If fusion up to L4 is required, a lumbosacral angle ≥100 degrees is key.

Differential Regulation of POC5 by ERα in Human Normal and Scoliotic Cells.

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is a complex three-dimensional spinal deformity. The incidence of AIS in females is 8.4 times higher than in males. Several hypotheses on the role of estrogen have been postulated for the progression of AIS. Recently, Centriolar protein gene POC5 (POC5) was identified as a causative gene of AIS. POC5 is a centriolar protein that is important for cell cycle progression and centriole elongation. However, the hormonal regulation of POC5 remains to be determined. Here, we identify POC5 as an estrogen-responsive gene under the regulation of estrogen receptor ERα in normal osteoblasts (NOBs) and other ERα-positive cells. Using promoter activity, gene, and protein expression assays, we found that the POC5 gene was upregulated by the treatment of osteoblasts with estradiol (E2) through direct genomic signaling. We observed different effects of E2 in NOBs and mutant POC5A429V AIS osteoblasts. Using promoter assays, we identified an estrogen response element (ERE) in the proximal promoter of POC5, which conferred estrogen responsiveness through ERα. The recruitment of ERα to the ERE of the POC5 promoter was also potentiated by estrogen. Collectively, these findings suggest that estrogen is an etiological factor in scoliosis through the deregulation of POC5.

Concave and convex growth do not differ over tethered vertebral segments, even with open tri-radiate cartilage.

PURPOSE: To assess the following hypotheses related to vertebral body tethering (VBT): 1. VBT is associated with asymmetric (concave > convex) increases in height over the instrumented vertebra. 2. The instrumented Cobb angle improves following VBT surgery with growth. METHODS: This is a retrospective case series of pediatric patients from a multicenter scoliosis registry treated with VBT between 2013 to 2021. INCLUSION CRITERIA: patients with standing radiographs at < 4 months and ≥ 2 years after surgery. Distances between the superior endplate of the UIV and the inferior endplate of the LIV were measured at the concave corner, mid-point, and convex corner of the endplates. The UIV-LIV angle was recorded. Subgroup analyses included comparing different Risser scores and tri-radiate cartilage (TRC) closed versus open using student t-tests. RESULTS: 83 patients met inclusion criteria (92% female; age at time of surgery 12.5 ± 1.4 years) with mean follow-up time of 3.8 ± 1.4 years. Risser scores at surgery were: 0 (n = 33), 1 (n = 12), 2 (n = 10), 3 (n = 11), 4 (n = 12), and 5 (n = 5). Of the 33 Risser 0 patients, 17 had an open TRC, 16 had a closed TRC. The UIV-LIV distance at concave, middle, and convex points significantly increased from immediate post-op to final-follow-up for Risser 0 patients, but not for Risser 1-5 patients. Increases in UIV-LIV distance were not significantly different between concave, middle, and convex points for all groups. There was no significant improvement or worsening in UIV-LIV angle for any group. CONCLUSION: At a mean of 3.8 years following VBT, 33 Risser 0 patients demonstrated significant growth in the instrumented segment, though there was no difference between concave or convex growth, even for patients with open TRC.

Thoracolumbar curve behavior after selective thoracic anterior vertebral body tethering in Lenke 1A vs Lenke 1C curve patterns.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of a prospective database. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to evaluate changes in the thoracic and thoracolumbar/lumbar curves and truncal balance in patients treated with selective thoracic anterior vertebral body tethering (AVBT) with Lenke 1A vs 1C curves at a minimum of 2 years follow-up. Lenke 1C curves treated with selective thoracic AVBT demonstrate equivalent thoracic curve correction and reduced thoracolumbar/lumbar curve correction compared to Lenke 1A curves. Additionally, at the most recent follow-up, both curve types demonstrate comparable coronal alignment at C7 and the lumbar curve apex, though 1C curves have better alignment at the lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV). Rates of revision surgery are equivalent between the two groups. METHODS: A matched cohort of 43 Risser 0-1, Sanders Maturity Scale (SMS) 2-5 AIS pts with Lenke 1A (1A group)and 19 pts with Lenke 1C curves (1C group) treated with selective thoracic AVBT and a minimum of 2-year follow-up were included. Digital radiographic software was used to assess Cobb angle and coronal alignment on preoperative, postoperative and subsequent follow-up radiographs. Coronal alignment was assessed by measuring the distance from the center sacral vertical line (CSVL) to the midpoint of the LIV, apical vertebra for thoracic and lumbar curves and C7. RESULTS: There was no difference in the thoracic curve measured preoperatively, at first erect, pre-rupture or at the most recent follow-up, nor was there a significant difference in C7 alignment (p = 0.057) or apical thoracic alignment (p = 0.272) between the 1A and 1C groups. Thoracolumbar/lumbar curves were smaller in the 1A group at all-time points. However, there was no significant difference between the percent correction between the two groups thoracic (p = 0.453) and thoracolumbar/lumbar (p = 0.105). The Lenke 1C curves had improved coronal translational alignment of the LIV at the most recent follow-up p = 0.0355. At the most recent follow-up the number of patients considered to have successful curve correction (Cobb angle correction of both the thoracic and thoracolumbar//lumbar curves to ≤ 35 degrees), was equivalent between Lenke 1A and Lenke 1C curves (p = 0.80). There was also no difference in the rate of revision surgery between the two groups (p = 0.546). CONCLUSION: This is the first study to compare the impact of lumbar curve modifier type on outcomes in thoracic AVBT. We found that Lenke 1C curves treated with selective thoracic AVBT demonstrate less absolute correction of the thoracolumbar/lumbar curve at all time points but have equivalent percent correction of the thoracic and thoracolumbar/lumbar curves. The two groups have equivalent alignment at C7 and the thoracic curve apex, and Lenke 1C curves have better alignment at the LIV at the most recent follow-up. Furthermore, they have an equivalent rate of revision surgery compared to Lenke 1A curves. Selective thoracic AVBT is a viable option for selective Lenke 1C curves, but despite equivalent correction of the thoracic curve, there is less correction of the thoracolumbar/lumbar curve at all-time points.

Vertebral body tethering for non-idiopathic scoliosis: initial results from a multicenter retrospective study.

PURPOSE: Vertebral body tethering (VBT) has been described for patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Results of the technique for non-idiopathic scoliosis have not yet been reported. METHODS: An international multicenter registry was retrospectively queried for non-idiopathic scoliosis patients who underwent VBT with minimum 2-year follow-up. Success at 2 years was defined as Cobb angle < 35 degrees and no fusion surgery. RESULTS: Of the 251 patients treated with VBT, 20 had non-idiopathic scoliosis and minimum 2-year follow-up. Mean age at surgery was 12.4 years (range 10 to 17 years). Mean major Cobb angle at enrollment was 56 degrees. Of those, 18 patients had a major thoracic curve and two had a major lumbar curve. Of the 20 patients, nine met criteria for success (45%). Eight of the 20 patients had poor outcomes (four fusions, four with curve > 50 degrees). Success was associated with smaller preoperative Cobb angle (50 vs. 62 degrees, p = 0.01) and smaller Cobb angle on initial postop imaging (28 degrees vs. 46 degrees, p = 0.0007). All patients with Cobb angle < 35 degrees on 1st postop imaging had a successful result, with the exception of one patient who overcorrected and required fusion. Syndromic vs. neuromuscular patients had a higher likelihood of success (5 of 7, 71%, 2 of 10, 20%, p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Selected non-idiopathic scoliosis can be successfully treated with VBT, but failure rates are high and were associated with large curves, inadequate intraoperative correction and neuromuscular diagnosis. Achieving a Cobb angle less than 35 degrees on 1st standing radiograph was associated with a successful outcome which was achieved in 45% of patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV (retrospective review study).

Reliability of radiographic assessment of growth modulation from anterior vertebral body tethering surgery in pediatric scoliosis.

PURPOSE: To assess the reliability of vertebral height and angular measurements for anterior vertebral body tethering (AVBT). METHODS: Eight observers measured PA radiographs of 15 idiopathic scoliosis patients treated with AVBT, pre-operative and 4-year follow-up. Vertebral wedging, disc wedging, convex vertebral body heights, and concave vertebral body heights of the 3 apical vertebrae were measured. For each observer, there were a total of 90 measurements for vertebral body height and 75 measurements for all wedging types At least 14 days elapsed between first and second round measurements. RESULTS: From the pre-operative to the 4-year follow-up time-point, the total wedging angle over the 3 peri-apical levels fell from 30 ± 7° to 16 ± 6° (p < 0.001) and the difference between the convex and concave vertebral heights decreased from 9 ± 4 to 6 ± 3 mm (p < 0.001). Interobserver agreement for pre-operative vertebral body heights was good [ICC = 0.80; 95% CI (0.74-0.85)]. At 4-year follow-up there was a moderate agreement [ICC = 0.67 (0.59-0.74)]. There was a poor interobserver agreement for pre-operative wedging angle measurements [ICC = 0.41 (0.32-0.52)] and 4-year follow-up [ICC = 0.45 (0.36-0.56)]. The Limits of Agreement with the Mean (LOAM) for pre-op heights was ± 2.4 mm, similar to the follow-up ± 2.6 mm. When raters are averaged in random groups of two the agreement limits decrease to ± 1.8 mm pre-op and ± 1.6 mm at follow-up. Similarly for wedging angles, LOAM values among the 8 observers of ± 4.6° pre-op and ± 4.2° dropped to ± 2.7° for both pre-op and follow-up when random groups of two raters were averaged together. Intraobserver agreement ranged from good to excellent per individual (ICC = 0.84-0.94) for pre-operative vertebral body heights, but this decreased at 4-year follow-up (ICC = 0.52-0.88). Intraobserver agreement was low overall for wedging (pre-operative ICC = 0.41-0.71; 4-year follow-up ICC = 0.41-0.76). CONCLUSION: Based on 8 individual observers, interobserver agreement ranged from good (pre-operative vertebral body heights) to moderate (4-year follow-up vertebral body heights) to poor (all wedging angles). To improve the reliability of the measurement of wedging angles, we recommend averaging the measurements of at least two observers.

Is quality of life after surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis affected by the presence of a concomitant low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis non-surgically treated? A retrospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: The HRQoL after surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is not affected by the presence of concomitant isthmic spondylolisthesis non-surgically treated. Improvement in QoL after surgery was similar for AIS patients with and without concomitant spondylolisthesis. The purpose is to compare preoperative and postoperative Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) scores in operated AIS patients with and without concomitant isthmic spondylolisthesis. METHODS: A retrospective study of a prospective cohort of 464 individuals undergoing AIS surgery between 2008 and 2018 was performed. All patients undergoing surgery for AIS with a minimum 2-year follow-up were included. We excluded patients with prior or concomitant surgery for spondylolisthesis. HRQoL scores were measured using the SRS-22 questionnaire. Comparisons were performed between AIS patients with versus without concomitant spondylolisthesis treated non-surgically. RESULTS: AIS surgery was performed for 36 patients (15.2 ± 2.5 y.o) with concomitant isthmic spondylolisthesis, and 428 patients (15.5 ± 2.4 y.o) without concomitant spondylolisthesis. The two groups were similar in terms of age, sex, preoperative and postoperative Cobb angles. Preoperative and postoperative HRQoL scores were similar between the two groups. HRQoL improved significantly for all domains in both groups, except for pain in patients with spondylolisthesis. There was no need for surgical treatment of the spondylolisthesis and no slip progression during the follow-up duration after AIS surgery. CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing surgical treatment of AIS with non-surgical management of a concomitant isthmic grade I spondylolisthesis can expect improvement in HRQoL scores, similar to that observed in patients without concomitant spondylolisthesis.

A Dangerous Curve: Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Brace Treatment in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

STUDY DESIGN: Observational Cohort study. OBJECTIVES: We aim to document the abandon and irregular compliance rate towards brace treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on AIS progression. METHODS: We reviewed a database of AIS patients recruited between March and September 2020. We included AIS patients under brace treatment according to SRS criteria. The patients were divided in 2 cohorts: those with self-reported Good-Compliance (GC) to treatment and those who had a Bad-Compliance (BC). Data analysis included biometric and radiographic data at first visit and last follow-up and percentage of progression. Unpaired student-t tests and Chi2 were used for comparison. RESULTS: 152 patients met inclusion criteria. 89 patients (age:12.1y.o.±1.4) reported good adherence to treatment, while 63 patients (age:12.7y.o.±1.8) were not compliant. Within the BC group, 18 patients reported irregular brace wear, while 45 had completely abandoned treatment (abandon rate of 29%). The GC cohort started treatment with a mean main thoracic (MT) curve of 26° and finished with 27°. The mean difference between measurements was +.65°±7.5; mean progression rate was -4.6%. However, the BC cohort started with a mean MT curve of 27° and finished with 32°, with a mean increase of +5°±8 and a mean progression rate of -13%. The differences between the 2 cohorts were statistically significant (P = .0002). Six patients from the BC group progressed and were offered surgery. CONCLUSION: The abandon rate of brace treatment in AIS significantly increased during the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic. Patients who voluntarily discontinued treatment had significant increases in curve progression and surgical indication rates. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Spontaneous Lumbar Curve Correction Following Vertebral Body Tethering of Main Thoracic Curves.

BACKGROUND: Growth modulation through anterior vertebral body tethering (AVBT) has emerged as a fusionless option for the treatment of progressive scoliosis. When tethering the main thoracic curve, the compensatory thoracolumbar/lumbar curve must correct indirectly as a result. The present study evaluated the response of these lumbar curves following AVBT of the main thoracic curves. METHODS: Patients who underwent thoracic AVBT and who had a minimum follow-up of 2 years were included. Magnitudes of the thoracic and lumbar curves were recorded preoperatively and at the first-erect and 2-year postoperative visits. Lumbar curves were further stratified according to their lumbar modifier (A, B, or C). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and repeated-measures ANOVA were performed to compare correction rates, and the Pearson coefficient was utilized to determine the correlation between the tethered thoracic curve and uninstrumented lumbar curve magnitudes. RESULTS: A total of 218 patients were included. Thoracic curve correction was 40% at the first-erect visit and 43% at 2 years (p = 0.012). Lumbar correction was 30%, 26%, and 18% at the first-erect visit (p < 0.001 for all compared with preoperatively) and minimally changed at 31%, 26%, and 24% at 2 years for lumbar modifiers A, B, and C, respectively. A total of 118 patients (54%) showed thoracic curve improvement between the first-erect and 2-year visits. In a subgroup analysis, these patients had a correction in lumbar curve magnitude from preoperatively to the first-erect visit of 30%, 22%, and 16% for lumbar modifiers A, B, C, respectively, that increased to 42%, 34%, and 31% at 2 years, with strong correlation to thoracic correction at 2-year follow-up (r = 0.557, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Although there was immediate lumbar correction following AVBT of a main thoracic curve, further improvement following initial correction was only observed among patients with growth modulation of the thoracic curve. Considering all patients, the uninstrumented lumbar curve corrected 30% at 2 years and the instrumented thoracic curve corrected 40%. As indications for AVBT are refined, these data will provide insight into the response of the uninstrumented lumbar curve. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Pedicle Screw Plowing in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: How Common Is It and Is It a Problem?

STUDY DESIGN: Multicenter retrospective review. OBJECTIVE: To calculate overall incidence of pedicle screw "plowing" in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients who underwent posterior spinal fusion (PSF). To identify risk factors for pedicle screw plowing and associated postoperative outcomes, including loss of correction and revision rate. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Curve correction of AIS generates perpendicular stresses that can cause pedicle screws to lose alignment and "plow" through pedicles craniocaudally. METHODS: We reviewed records of 1057 patients who underwent PSF for AIS from 2002 to 2015. Preoperative and first postoperative erect radiographs were evaluated by two observers to determine (1) presence of plowing and (2) subsequent loss of correction (LOC). Plowing was defined as more than 25° sagittal angulation compared with pedicle axis or entry of the most dorsal part of the screw outside the pedicle projection. LOC was defined as postoperative change in focal angulation of an instrumented spinal level, when in consensus of both reviewers. Bivariate analyses were performed (alpha = 0.05). RESULTS: Nineteen thousand five hundred sixty nine screws were assessed across our cohort of 1057 patients. Both observers agreed that 48 patients (4.5%) demonstrated plowing of more than or equal to one pedicle screw. For 72 screws (0.4%), both observers noted plowing, most commonly through the cranial cortex of the pedicle (65/72 screws) and at the lowest instrument vertebra (LIV) (17/72 screws). Factors associated with plowing included larger curves (P = 0.02); lower mean pedicle screw density (P = 0.0003); skeletal immaturity as measured by open triradiate cartilage (P = 0.04); and younger chronological age at time of surgery (P = 0.04). LOC occurred in 13 patients, most commonly at LIV (P < 0.0001). Revision rate for loss of screw fixation was higher in the plowing group (P = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Pedicle screw plowing occurred in 4.5% of AIS patients, especially in those skeletally immature and with decreased implant density. Plowing commonly occurred in the cranial direction and was associated with LOC, particularly at the LIV.Level of Evidence: 3.

Ten-year follow-up of Lenke 5 curves treated with spinal fusion.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with surgically treated Lenke 5 curves require at least partial fusion of the lumbar spine. The implications of lumbar fusion remain unknown as long-term follow-up is sparse. METHODS: A retrospective review of a prospectively collected registry of patients with Lenke 5 curves treated with spinal fusion was performed. Clinical and radiographic outcomes as well as SRS-22 scores were collected at 2- and 10-year follow-up. RESULTS: 54 of 247 available patients met all inclusion criteria [26 treated with posterior spinal fusion (PSF) and 28 with anterior spinal fusion (ASF)]. Preoperative lumbar curve magnitude was 45.1 ± 8.4° and corrected to 14.0 ± 7.2° (p < 0.001). A 3.3 ± 7.3° increase in curve size was noted at final follow-up (p < 0.008) with 20.3% of patients having a loss of correction (LOC)of 10° or more. Thoracic curve correction and kyphosis were stable at 10-year follow-up. End vertebrae angulation improved from 11.2 ± 23.2° to 0.96 ± 6.4° (p = 0.004) and translation improved from 2.5 ± 2.9 to 0.92 ± 1.5 cm (p = 0.008) with no LOC. Disc wedging below the lower instrumented vertebrae increased from 0.3 ± 4.9° to 2.8 ± 4.4° (p < 0.001) with no change at 10 years. SRS-22 self-image and satisfaction improved from post-operative to final follow-up. No patient required a second operation. CONCLUSIONS: Both ASF and PSF showed durable results at 10-year follow-up with no obvious difference between approaches. 20% of patients had a LOC > 10°; this did not correlate with pain or need for revision surgery. Disc wedging was stable. Selection of LIV did not correlate with pain scores. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Body mass index affects outcomes after vertebral body tethering surgery.

PURPOSE: To compare the outcomes of anterior Vertebral Body Tethering (AVBT) surgery between overweight and non-overweight patients. METHODS: AIS/JIS patients with AVBT with 2-year follow-up from a multi-center pediatric spine database were evaluated pre-operatively, 1st post-operative erect, and 2 years post-operatively. ANOVA was used to compare 3 categories of BMI with significance as per Tukey-Kramer HSD post hoc test. Risk of scoliosis progression was analysed with Mid-P exact test. RESULTS: 121 patients (51 underweight, 58 normal, 12 overweight; mean age 12.5 ± 1.6 yr; BMI 18.8 ± 4.6 kg/m2) were identified. Comparing underweight, normal, and overweight groups: mean pre-operative age (13 yr, 13 yr, 12 yr), scoliosis (52°, 50°, 52°), pre-operative kyphosis (29°, 28°, 33°), peri-operative scoliosis correction (44%, 42%, 46%), and complications by 2-year follow-up (23%, 24%, 17%) were similar between groups. There was one broken tether in each of the underweight and normal weight groups. Change in percent scoliosis correction from 1st erect to 2-year post-operative (i.e., growth modulation phase) was not significantly different between groups; however, the risk ratio for scoliosis progression during this period was 4.74 (1.02-22.02; p = 0.04) for overweight patients. CONCLUSION: Our findings demonstrate that, as compared to normal weight and underweight patients, overweight patients did not have a statistically significant difference in intra-operative scoliosis correction or in risk of experiencing complication; however, overweight patients had a risk ratio of 4.74 for progression of scoliosis during the growth modulation phase of treatment from first erect radiographs to minimum 2-year follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.