Prevalence and Outcomes of Primary Left Ventricular Dysfunction in Marfan Syndrome.

Even in the absence of significant valvular disease, patients with Marfan syndrome (MFS) have evidence of impaired left ventricular (LV) performance, suggestive of a primary cardiomyopathy. However, the true prevalence and long-term outcomes of this disease process remain largely unknown. We performed a retrospective analysis of all adult patients with confirmed MFS followed at Stanford Health Care. Those with significant valvular regurgitation, coronary artery disease, or previous cardiac surgery were excluded. LV systolic dysfunction was defined as a LV ejection fraction (LVEF) <55% on transthoracic echocardiography. A total of 753 patients with confirmed MFS were followed up over a median duration of 8 years (interquartile range 4 to 13). Of those, 241 patients (53% women, 71% White) met inclusion criteria and comprised the study cohort. LV systolic dysfunction was present in 30 patients (12%), with a median age of onset of 25 years (interquartile range 19 to 37), median EF of 52% (interquartile range 48 to 54), and evidence of clinical heart failure (New York Heart Association functional class ≥II) in 10% of patients. LV systolic dysfunction was more common in patients with larger aortic root diameters (≥4.0 cm: Odds ratio = 4.5, 95% confidence interval = 1.2 to 17.1) but was not associated with other cardiovascular manifestations of MFS or traditional atherosclerotic risk factors. In conclusion, apart from significant valvular pathology, LV systolic dysfunction was prevalent in MFS from a young age, suggestive of a primary cardiomyopathy. LV dysfunction was typically mild and subclinical and occurred more commonly in patients with more pronounced aortopathies.

Understanding variants of uncertain significance in the era of multigene panels: Through the eyes of the patient.

Variants of uncertain significance (VUSs) are often disclosed to patients despite ambiguous association with disease risk and lack of clinical actionability. It is important to understand how patients understand a VUS result, but few studies have assessed this. Our qualitative study explored patient recall, reaction to, and interpretation of a VUS in the context of multigene panels. We conducted 11 semi-structured phone interviews with adults who had a VUS identified on multigene panel testing in a hereditary oncology clinic, with questions focusing on the VUS result, personal and family history, and motivations for and expectations of genetic testing. Transcripts were coded iteratively, using both deductive and inductive codes. Overall, participants usually recalled that they had a VUS, despite variation in the vocabulary used. Participants responded both emotionally and intellectually to receiving information about having a VUS, which was often a result of their expectations and motivations prior to testing. Overall, participants understood the lack of clinical significance of a VUS, yet often interpreted the etiologic significance of a VUS within the context of the personal and family history. Our study provides insight into a process by which patients translate uncertain genetic testing results into a construct that fits within their current belief framework and which may be facilitated by a genetic counselor.

Connective tissue spectrum abnormalities associated with spontaneous cerebrospinal fluid leaks: a prospective study.

We aimed to assess the frequency of connective tissue abnormalities among patients with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks in a prospective study using a large cohort of patients. We enrolled a consecutive group of 50 patients, referred for consultation because of CSF leak. All patients have been carefully examined for the presence of connective tissue abnormalities, and based on findings, patients underwent genetic testing. Ancillary diagnostic studies included echocardiography, eye exam, and histopathological examinations of skin and dura biopsies in selected patients. We identified nine patients with heritable connective tissue disorders, including Marfan syndrome, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome and other unclassified forms. In seven patients, spontaneous CSF leak was the first noted manifestation of the genetic disorder. We conclude that spontaneous CSF leaks are associated with a spectrum of connective tissue abnormalities and may be the first noted clinical presentation of the genetic disorder. We propose that there is a clinical basis for considering spontaneous CSF leak as a clinical manifestation of heritable connective tissue disorders, and we suggest that patients with CSF leaks should be screened for connective tissue and vascular abnormalities.