RESUMO
The emergence of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has revolutionized the field of oncology, providing promising results in various malignancies. However, ICIs can sometimes lead to severe injection reactions, requiring alternative treatment options. In this case report, we introduce a case of a severe infusion reaction induced by atezolizumab. After atezolizumab infusion, the patient experienced symptoms that were suggestive of anaphylactic shock, including chest tightness, low blood pressure, and loss of consciousness, all of which were restored by immediate administration of steroid, antihistamine, and epinephrine. When selecting a new ICI, we were concerned about cross-reactivity with atezolizumab. As such, we conducted a skin test to establish the underlying mechanism of the previous reaction to atezolizumab infusion, the results of which were highly suggestive of Ig-E-mediated hypersensitivity. The skin test for pembrolizumab, another ICI, was negative. Therefore, we replaced atezolizumab with pembrolizumab, and the infusion proceeded safely. To date, the patient has undergone 13 cycles of pembrolizumab, and the disease has remained stable. This case demonstrates that patients who exhibit severe injection reactions to ICIs can continue treatment safely, without cross-reactions, with alternative ICIs. This case will help provide patients who have experienced drug-related hypersensitivity reactions with a choice to use alternative ICIs, thus expanding their options for chemotherapy.
RESUMO
Objective: We investigated how treating large brain metastasis (LBM) using two-day fraction gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) affects tumor control and patient survival. A prescription dose of 10.3 Gy was applied for two consecutive days, with a biologically effective dose (BED) equivalent to a tumor single-fraction dose of 16.05 Gy and a brain single-fraction dose of 15.12 Gy. Methods: Between November 2017 and December 2021, 42 patients (mean age: 68.3 years, range: 50-84 years, male: 29 [69.1%], female: 13 [30.9%]) with 44 tumors underwent two-day fraction GKRS to treat large volume brain metastasis. The main cancer types were non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC, N=16), small cell lung cancer (SCLC, N=7), colorectal cancer (N=7), breast cancer (N=3), gastric cancer (N=2), and other cancers (N=7). Twenty-one (50.0%) patients had a single LBM, nineteen (46.3%) had a single LBM and other metastasi(e)s, and two had two (4.7%) large brain metastases. At the time of the two-day fraction GKRS, the tumors had a mean volume of 23.1 cc (range: 12.5-67.4). on each day, radiation was administered at a dose of 10.3 Gy, mainly using a 50% isodose-line. Results: We obtained clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) follow-up data for 34 patients (81%) with 35 tumors, who had undergone two-day fraction GKRS. These patients did not experience acute or late radiation-induced complications during follow-up. The median and mean progression-free survival (PFS) periods were 188 and 194 days, respectively. The local control rates at 6, 9, and 12 months were 77%, 40%, and 34%, respectively. The prognostic factors related to PFS were prior radiotherapy (P = 0.019) and lung cancer origin (P = 0.041). Other factors such as tumor volumes, each isodose volumes, and peri-GKRS systemic treatment were not significantly related to PFS. The overall survival period of the 44 patients following repeat SRS ranged from 15-878 days (median: 263±38 days, mean: 174±43) after the two-day fraction GKRS. Eight patients (18.2%) were still alive. Conclusion: Considering the unsatisfactory tumor control, a higher prescription dose should be needed in this procedure as a salvage management. Moreover, in the treatment for LBM with fractionated SRS, using different isodoses and prescription doses at the treatment planning for LBMs should be important. However, this report might be a basic reference with the same fraction number and prescription dose in the treatment for LBMs with frame-based SRS.