Echocardiographic image collection and evaluation in infants with CHD: lessons learned from the imaging core lab for the Residual Lesion Score study.

Many factors affect patient outcome after congenital heart surgery, including the complexity of the heart disease, pre-operative status, patient specific factors (prematurity, nutritional status and/or presence of comorbid conditions or genetic syndromes), and post-operative residual lesions. The Residual Lesion Score is a novel tool for assessing whether specific residual cardiac lesions after surgery have a measurable impact on outcome. The goal is to understand which residual lesions can be tolerated and which should be addressed prior to leaving the operating room. The Residual Lesion Score study is a large multicentre prospective study designed to evaluate the association of Residual Lesion Score to outcomes in infants undergoing surgery for CHD. This Pediatric Heart Network and National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute-funded study prospectively enrolled 1,149 infants undergoing 5 different congenital cardiac surgical repairs at 17 surgical centres. Given the contribution of echocardiographic measurements in assigning the Residual Lesion Score, the Residual Lesion Score study made use of a centralised core lab in addition to site review of all data. The data collection plan was designed with the added goal of collecting image quality information in a way that would permit us to improve our understanding of the reproducibility, variability, and feasibility of the echocardiographic measurements being made. There were significant challenges along the way, including the coordination, de-identification, storage, and interpretation of very large quantities of imaging data. This necessitated the development of new infrastructure and technology, as well as use of novel statistical methods. The study was successfully completed, but the size and complexity of the population being studied and the data being extracted required more technologic and human resources than expected which impacted the length and cost of conducting the study. This paper outlines the process of designing and executing this complex protocol, some of the barriers to implementation and lessons to be considered in the design of future studies.

Imaging and guiding intervention for tricuspid valve disorders using 3-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography in pediatric and congenital heart disease.

In the pediatric and congenital heart disease (CHD) population, tricuspid valve (TV) disorders are complex due to the variable TV morphology, its sophisticated interaction with the right ventricle as well as associated congenital and acquired lesions. While surgery is the standard of care for TV dysfunction in this patient population, transcatheter treatment for bioprosthetic TV dysfunction has been performed successfully. Detailed and accurate anatomic assessment of the abnormal TV is essential in the preoperative/preprocedural planning. Three-dimensional transthoracic and 3D transesophageal echocardiography (3DTEE) provides added value to 2-dimensional imaging in the characterization of the TV to guide therapy and 3DTEE serves as an excellent tool for intraoperative assessment and procedural guidance of transcatheter treatment. Notwithstanding advances in imaging and therapy, the timing and indication for intervention for TV disorders in this population are not well defined. In this manuscript, we aim to review the available literature, provide our institutional experience with 3DTEE, and briefly discuss the perceived challenges and future directions in the assessment, surgical planning, and procedural guidance of (1) congenital TV malformations, (2) acquired TV dysfunction from transvenous pacing leads, or following cardiac surgeries, and (3) bioprosthetic TV dysfunction.

The Apical View Sign for Easier Identification of Left Juxtaposition of the Right Atrial Appendage.

Left juxtaposition of the right atrial appendage (RAA) is a rare congenital cardiac malformation, where both atrial appendages are located leftward of the great arteries. Despite well-described echocardiographic markers, this diagnosis remains challenging to establish, especially for the novice imager. We describe the apical view sign in three patients with juxtaposed RAA. We noted that the normal left atrial appendage was visualized from the apical four-chamber or equivalent coronal view at the level of the atrioventricular valves.

Implementation of a Quality Improvement Bundle Improves Echocardiographic Imaging after Congenital Heart Surgery in Children.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative echocardiography after congenital heart disease surgery is of prognostic importance, but variable image quality is problematic. We implemented a quality improvement bundle comprising of focused imaging protocols, procedural sedation, and sonographer education to improve the rate of optimal imaging (OI). METHODS: Predischarge echocardiograms were evaluated in 116 children (median age, 0.51 years; range, 0.01-5.6 years) from two centers after tetralogy of Fallot repair, arterial switch operation, and bidirectional Glenn and Fontan procedures. OI rates were compared between the centers before and after the implementation of a quality improvement bundle at center 1, with center 2 serving as the comparator. Echocardiographic images were independently scored by a single reader from each center, blinded to center and time period. For each echocardiographic variable, quality score was assigned as 0 (not imaged or suboptimally imaged) or 1 (optimally imaged); structures were classified as intra- or extracardiac. The rate of OI was calculated for each variable as the percentage of patients assigned a score of 1. RESULTS: Intracardiac structures had higher OI than extracardiac structures (81% vs 57%; adjusted odds ratio [OR], 3.47; P < .01). Center 1 improved overall OI from 48% to 73% (OR, 4.44; P < .01), intracardiac OI from 69% to 85% (OR, 3.53; P = .01), and extracardiac OI from 35% to 67% (OR, 5.16; P < .01). There was no temporal difference for center 2. CONCLUSIONS: After congenital heart disease surgery in children, intracardiac structures are imaged more optimally than extracardiac structures. Focused imaging protocols, patient sedation, and sonographer education can improve OI rates.

Impact of Variability in Echocardiographic Interpretation on Assessment of Adequacy of Repair Following Congenital Heart Surgery: A Pilot Study.

Technical Performance Score (TPS) is based largely on the presence and magnitude of residual lesions on postoperative echocardiograms; this score correlates with outcomes following repair of congenital heart defects. We evaluated reader variability for echocardiographic components of TPS for complete repair of tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) and arterial switch operation (ASO) in two centers and measured its effect on TPS. Postoperative echocardiograms were evaluated in 67 children (39 TOF and 28 ASO). Two readers (one per center) interpreted each echocardiogram. Reader variability in image quality assessments and measurements was compared using weighted kappa (κ), percent agreement, and intra-class correlation. TPS class (1 optimal-no residua, 2 adequate-minor residua, 3 inadequate-major residua) was assigned for each echocardiographic review by an independent investigator. The effect of reader interpretation variability on TPS classification was measured. There was strong agreement for TPS between the two readers (κ = 0.88). The readers were concordant for TPS classes for 57 children (85%) and discordant for classes 2 (minor residua) versus 3 (major residua) in six (9%). Coronary arteries and branch pulmonary arteries were frequently suboptimally visualized. Although inter-reader agreement for TPS was strong, inter-reader variation in echocardiographic interpretations had a small, but important effect on TPS for TOF and ASO, particularly for the distinction between minor and major residua. Further studies of generalizability and reproducibility of TPS and refinement of scoring modules may be needed before it can be used as a tool to assess pediatric cardiac surgical performance and outcomes.