T1 colon cancer in the era of screening: risk factors and treatment.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for lymph node positivity in T1 colon cancer and to carry out a surgical quality assurance audit. METHODS: The sample consisted of consecutive patients treated for early-stage colon lesions in 15 colorectal referral centres between 2011 and 2014. The study investigated 38 factors grouped into four categories: demographic information, preoperative data, indications for surgery and post-operative data. A univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to analyze the significance of each factor both in terms of lymph node (LN) harvesting and LN metastases. RESULTS: Out of 507 patients enrolled, 394 patients were considered for analysis. Thirty-five (8.91%) patients had positive LN. Statistically significant differences related to total LN harvesting were found in relation to central vessel ligation and segmental resections. Cumulative distribution demonstrated that the rate of positive LN increased starting at 12 LN harvested and reached a plateau at 25 LN. CONCLUSIONS: Some factors associated with an increase in detection of positive LN were identified. However, further studies are needed to identify more sensitive markers and avoid surgical overtreatment. There is a need to raise the minimum LN count and to use the LN count as an indicator of surgical quality.

Hemorrhoid laser procedure for second- and third-degree hemorrhoids: results from a multicenter prospective study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of our study was to assess the outcome of hemorrhoidal dearterialization, achieved by a dedicated laser energy device. METHODS: From November 2012 to December 2014, 51 patients with second- or third-degree hemorrhoids were studied. The primary end point was a reduction in the bleeding rate; secondary end points were: postoperative complications, reduction in pain and prolapse, resolution of symptoms, and degree of patient's perception of improvement. The procedure was carried out as 1-day surgery. A diode laser device was employed to seal the terminal branches of the hemorrhoidal arteries, detected by a Doppler-equipped proctoscope. Follow-up was scheduled at 1 and 4 weeks, 3, 12, and 24 months. The rate and degree of symptoms was assessed with a four-point verbal rating scale. The rate of subjective symptomatic improvement was also evaluated with the Patient Global Improvement (PGI) Scale. RESULTS: Mean bleeding and pain scores at baseline were 2 and 0.57. All the patients were discharged on the day of surgery. Postoperative complications were bleeding (n = 4) and external hemorrhoidal thrombosis (n = 4). Mean bleeding and pain scores at 3, 12, and 24 months were significatively reduced. After 24 months, complete resolution of bleeding was observed in 28/29 patients (96.7 %), resolution of pain in all patients, and resolution of the mucosal prolapse in 15/18 patients (76.9 %). At 12-month follow-up, 86.3 % of patients reported improvement with the PGI Scale. CONCLUSIONS: The hemorrhoid laser procedure was effective in improving bleeding and pain symptoms in patients with grade II and III hemorrhoids.

Tailored therapy for different presentations of chronic pain after stapled hemorrhoidopexy.

BACKGROUND: As stapled hemorrhoidopexy (SH) becomes more widely used, we see more patients with chronic postoperative anal pain after this surgery. Its presentation is variable and difficult to treat. The aim of our study was to investigate the impact of chronic anal pain after SH and whether tailored therapy was likely to achieve a favorable outcome. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 31 consecutive patients with chronic anal pain who had undergone SH in other hospitals and were referred to our institutions. Depending on the type of pain, unrelated (at rest) or related to defecation, two groups of patients were identified. Moreover, the mean distance of the staple line from the anal verge was calculated in both groups. Treatments included: topical nifedipine, local anesthetic and steroid infiltration, removal of retained staples, anal dilation, and scar excision with mucosal suturing. A visual analog scale (VAS) was used to compare pain at baseline, postoperatively, and in the follow-up. This mean difference of the VAS score between stages was always used as the main outcome measure, depending on the type of presentation, type of pain, and type of treatment. Treatment response was defined as a 50 % decrease of VAS from baseline. RESULTS: There were 22 males and 9 females. The overall median age was 43 years (range 21-62 years). On digital examination and proctoscopy, 15 (48 %) patients had inflammatory changes, 19 (61 %) patients had staple retention, 8 (26 %) patients had anorectal stenosis, and 30 (97 %) patients had scar tissue. All patients had one or more of the following treatments listed from the least to most invasive: topical nifedipine in 12 (39 %) patients, anal dilation in 6 (19 %) patients, anesthetic and steroid infiltration in 18 (58 %) patients, removal of staples in 10 (32 %) patients, and scar excision in 18 (58 %) patients. The mean VAS score at baseline was 6.100, ± 1.953 SD, which dropped significantly after treatment to 1.733, ± 1.658 SD (p < 0.001) and remained low at follow-up (1.741 ± SD 1.251; p < 0.743). In patients with pain at rest (n = 20, 65 %), the symptoms improved in 19 (95 %) patients, while the VAS score decreased from 5.552 ± 2.115 SD to 1.457 ± 1.440 SD (95 % CI 3.217-4.964; p < 0.001). In patients with post-evacuation pain (n = 11, 35 %), the symptoms improved in 11 (100 %) patients, while the VAS score decreased from 6.429 ± 1.835 SD to 1.891 ± 1.792 SD (95 % CI 3.784-5.269; p < 0.001). Rating of response based on presentation was 90.0 % (0.9/10) after treatment of staple retention, which led to a significant decrease in the mean VAS score from 6.304 ± 1.845 SD to 1.782 ± 1.731 SD (95 % CI 3.859-5.185; p < 0.001). Anal stenosis was successfully treated in 100.0 % (n = 8/8) of cases with the mean VAS score dropping from 6.500 ± 1.309 SD to 2.125 ± 1.808 SD (95 % CI 2.831-5.919; p < 0.001). Anal inflammation improved in 60.0 % (n = 9/15) of patients and the mean VAS score dropped from 6.006 ± 2.138 SD to 1.542 ± 1.457 SD (95 % CI 3.217-4.964; p < 0.001). The response after scar tissue treatment was 94 % (n = 17/18) of patients with a mean VAS decreasing from 6.117 ± 2.006 SD to 1.712 ± 1.697 SD (95 % CI 3.812-4.974; p < 0.001). Success for topical nifedipine was between 13 and 25 % of patients depending on the clinical presentation. Anal dilation was successful in 75 % of patients, while Anesthetic and steroid infiltration in 23-54 % of patients depending on the clinical presentation. Staple removal was successful in 77 % of patients, and scar excision with mucosal suturing in 94 % of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our retrospective study suggests that most patients with chronic anal pain after SH may be cured with treatment by applying a stepwise approach from the least to the most invasive treatment.

Comparison between magnetic resonance imaging and rigid rectoscopy in the preoperative identification of intra- and extraperitoneal rectal cancer.

AIM: Accurate preoperative discrimination between extra- and intraperitoneal rectal cancer has important treatment implications. Our main objective was to compare the diagnostic performance of MRI with rigid rectoscopy (RRS) in assessing the location of rectal cancers above or below the peritoneal reflection (PR), using the findings obtained during abdominal surgery for treatment of the cancer as the reference standard. We also compared the accuracy of MRI and RRS in assessing the level of the lower border of the tumour from the anal verge. METHOD: Patients with rectal carcinoma awaiting surgery underwent MRI and RRS. The MRI images were reviewed by two abdominal radiologists who determined the location of the inferior border of the tumour in relation to the PR. Receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis was performed to determine the diagnostic performance of RRS at different cut-off values. RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity were 98.15% and 100%, respectively, for MRI, and 100% and 76.92%, respectively, for RRS at a cut-off value of < 10 cm. The mean level of the lower border of the tumour from the anal verge was 68 ± 44.3 mm on RRS and 73.5 ± 42.4 mm on MRI (P = 0.25), with a trend towards overestimation with MRI. CONCLUSION: RRS is still the main means of assessing the level of a rectal tumour from the anal verge, but MRI has value in determining the level of the tumour in relation to the PR, which cannot be seen on endoscopy.

Colonic gas transit in patients with bloating: the effect of an electromechanical stimulator of the abdominal wall.

BACKGROUND: The aim of our study was to evaluate gas retention, abdominal symptoms and changes in girth circumference in females with bloating using an active or sham abdominal wall mechanical stimulation. METHODS: In 14 female patients, complaining of bloating (11 with irritable bowel syndrome and 3 with functional bloating according to the Rome III criteria) a gas mixture was continuously infused into the colon for 1 h (accommodation period). Abdominal perception and girth were measured. At the beginning of the 30-min period of free rectal gas evacuation (clearance period), an electromechanical device was positioned on the abdominal wall of all patients. The patients were randomly assigned to an active or a sham stimulation protocol group. Gas retention, perception and abdominal distension were measured at the end of the clearance period. RESULTS: All patients tolerated the volume (1,440 ml) of gas infused into the colon. Abdominal perception and girth measurements was similar in both groups during the accommodation period. At the end of the clearance, the perception score and the girth changes in the active and sham stimulation groups were similar (2.8 ± 2.0 vs. 1.4 ± 1.2, p = 0.2 and 4.9 ± 4.5 vs. 2.8 ± 2.3 mm, p = 0.3 active vs. sham, respectively). Furthermore, the mechanical stimulation of the abdominal wall did not significantly reduce gas retention (495 ± 101 ml vs. 566 ± 55, active vs. sham, p = 0.1). CONCLUSIONS: An external mechanical massage of the abdominal wall did not improve intestinal gas transit, abdominal perception and abdominal distension in our female patients complaining of functional bloating.

[Occult aneurysms of the abdominal aorta. Our echographic experience]. / Aneurismi occulti dell'aorta addominale. Nostra esperienza ecografica.

The authors report their experience in evaluating abdominal aorta aneurysms (AAA) by ultrasound examination. The incidence of this kind of disease is growing up in the last years and an earlier diagnosis increases the surviving possibilities of the patient affected, above all if symptomless, leading to a correct treatment: a semestral or annual follow-up of the aneurysms with a diameter smaller than 5 cm and surgery of the aneurysms with a diameter wider than 5 cm, because of high risk of rupture. The authors stress the importance of extending abdominal ultrasound examination to the aorta in all patients over 50 year old especially if affected by vascular diseases, hypertension and diabetes. In their experience the authors found 106 AAA; 61% of them with less than 4 cm diameter.