Effect of Thalamic versus Pallidal Deep Brain Stimulation on Head Tremor in Dystonic and Essential Tremor Patients-A Retrospective Video-Blinded Study.

BACKGROUND: Head tremor is common in dystonia syndromes and difficult to treat. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a therapeutic option in medically-refractory cases. In most DBS-centers, the globus pallidus internus (GPi) is targeted in patients with predominant dystonia and the ventrointermediate nucleus of the thalamus (Vim) in predominant tremor. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of GPi- versus Vim-DBS in dystonic or essential head tremor. METHODS: All patients with dystonia or essential tremor (ET) (n = 381) who underwent DBS surgery at our institution between 1999 and 2020 were screened for head tremor in our database according to predefined selection criteria. Of the 33 patients meeting inclusion criteria tremor and dystonia severity were assessed at baseline, short- (mean 10 months) and long-term follow-up (41 months) by two blinded video-raters. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients with dystonic head tremor received either GPi- (n = 12) or Vim-stimulation (n = 10), according to the prevailing clinical phenotype. These two groups were compared with 11 patients with ET, treated with Vim-stimulation. The reduction in head tremor from baseline to short- and long-term follow-up was 60-70% and did not differ significantly between the three groups. CONCLUSIONS: GPi-DBS effectively and sustainably reduced head tremor in idiopathic dystonia. The effect was comparable to the effect of Vim-DBS on head tremor in dystonia patients with predominant limb tremor and to the effect of Vim-DBS on head tremor in ET.

The role of the motor thalamus in deep brain stimulation for essential tremor.

The advent of next-generation technology has significantly advanced the implementation and delivery of Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) for Essential Tremor (ET), yet controversies persist regarding optimal targets and networks responsible for tremor genesis and suppression. This review consolidates key insights from anatomy, neurology, electrophysiology, and radiology to summarize the current state-of-the-art in DBS for ET. We explore the role of the thalamus in motor function and describe how differences in parcellations and nomenclature have shaped our understanding of the neuroanatomical substrates associated with optimal outcomes. Subsequently, we discuss how seminal studies have propagated the ventral intermediate nucleus (Vim)-centric view of DBS effects and shaped the ongoing debate over thalamic DBS versus stimulation in the posterior subthalamic area (PSA) in ET. We then describe probabilistic- and network-mapping studies instrumental in identifying the local and network substrates subserving tremor control, which suggest that the PSA is the optimal DBS target for tremor suppression in ET. Taken together, DBS offers promising outcomes for ET, with the PSA emerging as a better target for suppression of tremor symptoms. While advanced imaging techniques have substantially improved the identification of anatomical targets within this region, uncertainties persist regarding the distinct anatomical substrates involved in optimal tremor control. Inconsistent subdivisions and nomenclature of motor areas and other subdivisions in the thalamus further obfuscate the interpretation of stimulation results. While loss of benefit and habituation to DBS remain challenging in some patients, refined DBS techniques and closed-loop paradigms may eventually overcome these limitations.

The comorbidity and co-medication profile of patients with progressive supranuclear palsy.

BACKGROUND: Progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) is usually diagnosed in elderly. Currently, little is known about comorbidities and the co-medication in these patients. OBJECTIVES: To explore the pattern of comorbidities and co-medication in PSP patients according to the known different phenotypes and in comparison with patients without neurodegenerative disease. METHODS: Cross-sectional data of PSP and patients without neurodegenerative diseases (non-ND) were collected from three German multicenter observational studies (DescribePSP, ProPSP and DANCER). The prevalence of comorbidities according to WHO ICD-10 classification and the prevalence of drugs administered according to WHO ATC system were analyzed. Potential drug-drug interactions were evaluated using AiDKlinik®. RESULTS: In total, 335 PSP and 275 non-ND patients were included in this analysis. The prevalence of diseases of the circulatory and the nervous system was higher in PSP at first level of ICD-10. Dorsopathies, diabetes mellitus, other nutritional deficiencies and polyneuropathies were more frequent in PSP at second level of ICD-10. In particular, the summed prevalence of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases was higher in PSP patients. More drugs were administered in the PSP group leading to a greater percentage of patients with polypharmacy. Accordingly, the prevalence of potential drug-drug interactions was higher in PSP patients, especially severe and moderate interactions. CONCLUSIONS: PSP patients possess a characteristic profile of comorbidities, particularly diabetes and cardiovascular diseases. The eminent burden of comorbidities and resulting polypharmacy should be carefully considered when treating PSP patients.

The Challenge of Choosing the Right Stimulation Target for Dystonic Tremor-A Series of Instructive Cases.

Background: Thalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS) is established for medically refractory tremor syndromes and globus pallidus stimulation (GPi-DBS) for medically refractory dystonia syndromes. For combined tremor and dystonia syndromes, the best target is unclear. Objectives: We present four patients with two different profiles whose clinical course demonstrates that our current analysis of clinical symptomatology is not a sufficient predictor of surgical success. Methods: Outcome parameters were assessed with observer-blinded video ratings and included the Fahn-Tolosa-Marin-Tremor Rating Scale (FTM-TRS) and the Unified Dystonia Rating Scale (UDRS). Results: Two patients with "predominant lateralized action tremor" of the hands and mild cervical dystonia showed no relevant tremor improvement after GPi-DBS, but UDRS improved (mean, 45%). Rescue ventral intermediate nucleus of the thalamus (Vim)-DBS electrodes were implanted and both patients benefited significantly with a mean tremor reduction of 51%.Two other patients with "axial-predominant action tremor of the trunk and head" associated with cervical dystonia underwent bilateral Vim-DBS implantation with little effect on tremor (24% reduction in mean FTM-TRS total score) and no effect on dystonic symptoms. GPi rescue DBS was implanted and showed a significant effect on tremor (63% reduction in mean FTM-TRS) and dystonia (49% reduction in UDRS). Conclusions: The diagnosis of dystonic tremor alone is not a sufficient predictor to establish the differential indication of GPi- or Vim-DBS. Further criteria (eg, proximal-distal distribution of tremor/dystonia) are needed to avoid rescue surgery in the future. On the other hand, the course of our patients encourages rescue surgery in such severely disabled patients if the first target fails.

Intravenous thrombolysis and mechanical recanalization for acute ischemic stroke in deep brain stimulation patients: a case series.

BACKGROUND: Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and endovascular mechanical thrombectomy therapy (MT) are well established in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke. It is currently unclear whether these treatments can be applied in patients with previous deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery and how long the interval to the DBS operation should be. METHODS: Four patients with ischemic stroke and IVT or MT were included in this retrospective case series. Data on demographics, genesis, severity and course of the stroke and the DBS indication were extracted and evaluated. Furthermore, a literature review was conducted. Outcomes and hemorrhagic complications after IVT, MT or intra-arterial thrombolysis in patients with prior deep brain stimulation surgery and intracranial surgery were analyzed. RESULTS: Four patients with acute ischaemic stroke and previous DBS surgery were treated with IVT (2 patients), MT (1) or a combined therapy of IVT and MT (1). The time interval to the previous DBS surgery was between 6 and 135 months. In these four patients, no bleeding complications occurred. The literature review revealed four publications with a total of 18 patients, who were treated with IVT, MT or intra-arterial thrombolysis. Of these 18 patients, only 1 had undergone deep brain stimulation surgery, the other 17 patients had received brain surgery for other reasons. Bleeding complications occurred in four of the 18 reported patients, but not in the DBS case. All four patients with bleeding complications were reported to have died as a result. In three of the four patients with fatal outcome, surgery was less than 90 days before the onset of stroke. CONCLUSION: IVT and MT were tolerated by four patients with ischemic stroke more than 6 months after DBS surgery without bleeding complications.

Long-term efficacy with deep brain stimulation of the globus pallidus internus in cervical dystonia: a retrospective monocentric study.

BACKGROUND: Cervical dystonia (CD) is characterized by involuntary contractions of the cervical muscles. Data on long-term effectiveness of deep brain stimulation (DBS) are rare. The aim of this study was to evaluate the longitudinal ten years treatment efficacy of DBS in the globus pallidus internus (GPI). METHODS: A retrospective single-center data analysis was performed on patients with idiopathic CD, who were treated with GPI DBS for at least 10 years. TWSTR severity score and individual sub-items were compared between pre and post DBS surgery (n = 15) over time. RESULTS: There was a significant and persistent positive effect regarding the severity of TWSTRS between the conditions immediately before and 1, 5, and 10 years after establishment of GPI DBS (mean difference: 6.6-7 ± 1.6). Patients with increasing CD complexity showed a poorer response to established treatment forms, such as injection of botulinum toxin and were thus DBS candidates. Especially a predominant torticollis was significantly improved by DBS. CONCLUSION: GPI DBS is an effective procedure especially in severely affected patients with a positive 10-year outcome. It should be considered in more complex CD-forms or predominant torticollis.

The Contribution of Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation to the Improvement in Motor Functions and Quality of Life.

BACKGROUND: Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) effectively treats motor symptoms and quality of life (QoL) of advanced and fluctuating early Parkinson's disease. Little is known about the relation between electrode position and changes in symptom control and ultimately QoL. OBJECTIVES: The relation between the stimulated part of the STN and clinical outcomes, including the motor score of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) and the quality-of-life questionnaire, was assessed in a subcohort of the EARLYSTIM study. METHODS: Sixty-nine patients from the EARLYSTIM cohort who underwent DBS, with a comprehensive clinical characterization before and 24 months after surgery, were included. Intercorrelations of clinical outcome changes, correlation between the affected functional parts of the STN, and changes in clinical outcomes were investigated. We further calculated sweet spots for different clinical parameters. RESULTS: Improvements in the UPDRS III and Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) correlated positively with the extent of the overlap with the sensorimotor STN. The sweet spots for the UPDRS III (x = 11.6, y = -13.1, z = -6.3) and the PDQ-39 differed (x = 14.8, y = -12.4, z = -4.3) ~3.8 mm. CONCLUSIONS: The main influence of DBS on QoL is likely mediated through the sensory-motor basal ganglia loop. The PDQ sweet spot is located in a posteroventral spatial location in the STN territory. For aspects of QoL, however, there was also evidence of improvement through stimulation of the other STN subnuclei. More research is necessary to customize the DBS target to individual symptoms of each patient. © 2022 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Mapping of subthalamic nucleus using microelectrode recordings during deep brain stimulation.

Alongside stereotactic magnetic resonance imaging, microelectrode recording (MER) is frequently used during the deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery for optimal target localization. The aim of this study is to optimize subthalamic nucleus (STN) mapping using MER analytical patterns. 16 patients underwent bilateral STN-DBS. MER was performed simultaneously for 5 microelectrodes in a setting of Ben's-gun pattern in awake patients. Using spikes and background activity several different parameters and their spectral estimates in various frequency bands including low frequency (2-7 Hz), Alpha (8-12 Hz), Beta (sub-divided as Low_Beta (13-20 Hz) and High_Beta (21-30 Hz)) and Gamma (31 to 49 Hz) were computed. The optimal STN lead placement with the most optimal clinical effect/side-effect ratio accorded to the maximum spike rate in 85% of the implantation. Mean amplitude of background activity in the low beta frequency range was corresponding to right depth in 85% and right location in 94% of the implantation respectively. MER can be used for STN mapping and intraoperative decisions for the implantation of DBS electrode leads with a high accuracy. Spiking and background activity in the beta range are the most promising independent parameters for the delimitation of the proper anatomical site.

Screening for Platelet Dysfunction and Use of Prophylactic Tranexamic Acid in Patients Undergoing Deep Brain Stimulation: A Retrospective Analysis of Incidence and Outcome of Intracranial Hemorrhage.

INTRODUCTION: The rate of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) after deep brain stimulation (DBS) is between 1.5 and 6.1%, with prolonged deficits occurring in 0.4-2.5% of the patients. This retrospective study investigates whether the prophylactic administration of tranexamic acid (TA) to patients with abnormal platelet function detected preoperatively by platelet function analyzer (PFA) lowered the risk for an ICH event. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of the medical records of 485 consecutively admitted patients who underwent bilateral DBS surgery in a single-center university hospital setting between 2009 and 2018. The cohort was split into two groups. In one group, preoperative PFA screening was performed (n = 156, patients recruited from 2014 to 2018), and TA was administered if platelet function was abnormal. No preoperative PFA was performed in the second group (n = 359, patients recruited from 2009 to 2013). Both cohorts were analyzed for the occurrence of ICH, defined by (i) detection of ICH in routine postoperative magnetic resonance/computed tomography imaging or (ii) in non-routine imaging for the onset of new neurological symptoms. RESULTS: Fourteen of the 156 screened patients (9%) showed reproducible PFA-100 closure abnormalities (3 with von Willebrand disease, 11 with no identifiable cause of platelet dysfunction). Two of the 156 patients (1.3%) in this cohort revealed an ICH on imaging, 1 of whom (0.6%) exhibited a prolonged neurological deficit as a result of ICH. In the cohort without platelet testing, 11 of the 329 patients (3.3%) demonstrated ICH on imaging, of whom 5 (1.5%) suffered from a prolonged neurological deficit. CONCLUSION: In this retrospective study, the screening and the administration of TA appeared to lower the risk of an ICH by 1.8%. One patient with von Willebrand disease suffered an ICH despite TA treatment. A prospective study is needed to clarify the impact of platelet testing and TA administration on the of incidence ICH.

Spin turns in advanced Parkinson's disease: A new clinical gait sign?

OBJECTIVE: Two strategies are known for turning while walking: step turns (the direction change is performed with 3 steps or more) and spin turns (turning on one/both feet simultaneously). It is unknown which strategy patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) choose and if l-dopa and STN-DBS are influencing this strategy. METHODS: Video-recordings of 171 PD patients that completed 180° turns were analyzed by two blinded raters before surgery, both off and on l-dopa, and one year after STN-DBS-implantation. The strategies were classified: 1) spin 2) step and 3) mixed (spin plus step) strategy. The characteristics of the patients with different strategies were compared. RESULTS: Interrater reliability for classification of turning strategy showed high agreement (κ = 0.894). The distribution of the preferred strategy differed significantly between treatment conditions (untreated, treated with l-dopa, l-dopa plus stimulation; X2(4) = 67.2, p < 0.0001). The spin turn was found in 10.5% of patients OFF-drug, 23.5% ON-drug and in 38.8% ON-drug/ON-stim condition. In the three treatment conditions patients with spin turns had significantly lower UPDRS III scores compared to people with step turns (p = 0.017, p = 0.001, p = 0.006, respectively); step turn patients had poorer postural instability and gait disorders (PIGD) scores (p = 0.04, p = 0.002, p = 0.04, respectively). CONCLUSION: The turn strategy can be reliably identified in clinical settings and is a simple motor sign. The spin turn is associated with better motor performance. Since improvements in motor score in patients with fluctuations are also related to behavioral changes, we cannot exclude that the turn strategy also represents a feature of psycho-motor interaction.

Long-term efficacy of deep brain stimulation for essential tremor: An observer-blinded study.

OBJECTIVE: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the ventral intermediate thalamic nucleus (Vim) is established for medically refractory severe essential tremor (ET), but long-term efficacy is controversial. METHODS: Twenty patients with ET with DBS had standardized video-documented examinations at baseline, in the stimulation-on condition at short term (13.1 ± 1.9 months since surgery, mean ± SEM), and in the stimulator switched on and off (stim-ON/OFF) at long term; all assessments were done between 32 and 120 months (71.9 ± 6.9 months) after implantation. The primary outcome was the Tremor Rating Scale (TRS) blindly assessed by 2 trained movement disorder neurologists. Secondary outcomes were TRS subscores A, B, and C; Archimedes spiral score; and activities of daily living score. At long-term follow-up, tremor was additionally recorded with accelerometry. The rebound effect after switching the stimulator off was assessed for 1 hour in a subgroup. RESULTS: Tremor severity worsened considerably over time in both in the nonstimulated and stimulated conditions. Vim-DBS improved the TRS in the short term and long term significantly. The spiral score and functional measures showed similar improvements. All changes were highly significant. However, the stimulation effect was negatively correlated with time since surgery (ρ = -0.78, p < 0.001). This was also true for the secondary outcomes. Only one-third of the patients had a rebound effect terminated 60 minutes after the stimulator was switched off. Long-term worsening of the TRS was more profound during stim-ON than in the stim-OFF condition, indicating habituation to stimulation. CONCLUSION: Vim-DBS loses efficacy over the long term. Efforts are needed to improve the long-term efficacy of Vim-DBS. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class IV evidence that for patients with medically refractory severe ET, the efficacy of Vim-DBS severely decreases over 10 years.

Patient Evaluation and Selection for Movement Disorders Surgery: The Changing Spectrum of Indications.

This report summarizes the state-of-the-art and controversies around patient selection for deep brain stimulation (DBS) for various conditions. Parkinson's disease (PD): several class I studies have shown superiority of DBS over best medical treatment for advanced PD with fluctuations and further inclusion criteria. One class I study suggests that PD patients with early motor complications might gain more quality of life if operated within 3 years after the onset of fluctuations. The subthalamic nucleus (STN) is still the standard target. STN DBS has an impact on impulse control disorders though the exact mechanism is unclear. Tremor: essential tremor (ET) patients found to be eligible for DBS surgery should first be treated with primidone, propranolol, and with a combined therapy preoperatively. Second-line drugs (i.e., topiramate and gabapentin) may be useful. No class I studies exist for DBS treatment of ET. The optimal target of DBS in ET might be the posterior subthalamic area. Dystonia: there is class I evidence for primary generalized and segmental dystonia and for some botulinum-resistant focal dystonias. The impact of age, symptom duration, and DYT-mutation status in primary dystonia on the outcome of DBS surgery clearly demands more studies. DBS has a role in SCGE-mutation positive myoclonus dystonia and tardive dystonia. Finally, neurostimulation in secondary dystonia might be considered in selected patients based on an individual patient's approach.