The Relationship Between Lesion Size and Load to Failure After Stabilization of Simulated Metastatic Lesions of the Proximal Femur.

Background: As overall cancer survival continues to improve, the incidence of metastatic lesions to the bone continues to increase. The subsequent skeletal related events that can occur with osseous metastasis can be debilitating. Complete and impending pathologic femur fractures are common with patients often requiring operative fixation. However, the efficacy of an intramedullary nail construct, on providing stability, continue to be debated. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to utilize a synthetic femur model to determine 1) how proximal femur defect size and cortical breach impact femur load to failure (strength) and stiffness, and 2) and how the utilization of an IMN, in a prophylactic fashion, subsequently alters the overall strength and stiffness of the proximal femur. Methods: A total of 21 synthetic femur models were divided into four groups: 1) intact (no defect), 2) 2 cm defect, 3) 2.5 cm defect, and 4) 4 cm defect. An IMN was inserted in half of the femur specimens that had a defect present. This procedure was performed using standard antegrade technique. Specimens were mechanically tested in offset torsion. Force-displacement curves were utilized to determine each constructs load to failure and overall torsional stiffness. The ultimate load to failure and construct stiffness of the synthetic femurs with defects were compared to the intact synthetic femur, while the femurs with the placement of the IMN were directly compared to the synthetic femurs with matching defect size. Results: The size of the defect invertedly correlated with the load the failure and overall stiffness. There was no difference in load to failure or overall stiffness when comparing intact models with no defect and the 2 cm defect group (p=0.98, p=0.43). The 2.5 cm, and 4.5 cm defect groups demonstrated significant difference in both load to failure and overall stiffness when compared to intact models with results demonstrating 1313 N (95% CI: 874-1752 N; p<0.001) and 104 N/mm (95% CI: 98-110 N/mm; p=0.03) in the 2.5 cm defect models, and 512 N (95% CI: 390-634 N, p<0.001) and 21 N/mm (95% CI: 9-33 N/mm, p<0.001) in the models with a 4 cm defect. Compared to the groups with defects, the placement an IMN increased overall stiffness in the 2.5 cm defect group (125 N/mm; 95% CI:114-136 N/mm; p=0.003), but not load to failure (p=0.91). In the 4 cm defect group, there was a significant increase in load to failure (1067 N; 95% CI: 835-1300 N; p=0.002) and overall stiffness (57 N/mm; 95% CI:46-69 N/mm; p=0.001). Conclusion: Prophylactic IMN fixation significantly improved failure load and overall stiffness in the group with the largest cortical defects, but still demonstrated a failure loads less than 50% of the intact model. This investigation suggests that a cortical breach causes a loss of strength that is not completely restored by intramedullary fixation. Level of Evidence: II.

Survival after reoperation for recurrent glioblastoma.

Determining which patients will benefit from reoperation for recurrent glioblastoma remains difficult and the impact of the volume of FLAIR signal hyperintensity is not well known. The primary purpose of this study is to analyze the impact of preoperative volume of FLAIR hyperintensity on prognosis. 37 patients who underwent a reoperation for recurrent glioblastoma after initial gross total resection followed by standard chemoradiation were retrospectively reviewed. Volumetric analysis of preoperative MR images from the initial and second surgery was performed and correlated with clinical data. Survival probabilities were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression to assess the effect of risk factors on time to reoperation (TTR), progression-free survival (PFS) after reoperation, and overall survival (OS). The volumes of FLAIR signal hyperintensity prior to the initial surgery and reoperation were not associated with prognosis. TTR and OS were significantly affected by the preoperative enhancement volume at the initial surgery, with increasing volumes yielding poorer prognosis. Patients with tumor in critical/eloquent areas were found to have a worse prognosis. Median TTR was 11 months, median PFS after reoperation was 3 months, and OS in patients undergoing a reoperation was 21 months. The results suggest FLAIR signal change seen in patients with glioblastoma does not influence time to reoperation, progression-free survival, or overall survival. These findings suggest the amount of FLAIR signal change should not greatly influence a surgeon's decision to perform a second surgical resection compare to other factors, and when appropriate, aggressive surgical intervention should be considered.

An effective modification to simplify the right atrial lesion set of the Cox-cryomaze.

Reluctance to perform biatrial Cox-cryomaze is primarily to avoid the vexation of creating a right-atrial-lesion (RAL) set of Cox-Maze-III. An alternative pattern of RAL set includes (i) a horizontal atriotomy, continued medially as a linear cryolesion across the posterior tricuspid annulus, (ii) a cavocaval lesion, and (iii) a lateral cryolesion from the midportion of the atriotomy to the tip of the right atrial appendage (RAA). This latter lesion is a substitute for a cryolesion that, in past, was directed medially by a stab wound in the tip of the RAA to the anterior tricuspid annulus. Use of the simplified RAL set, therefore, allows for more deftly achieving a complete biatrial Cox-cryomaze.