Pharmacodynamic activity of BMS-986156, a glucocorticoid-induced TNF receptor-related protein agonist, alone or in combination with nivolumab in patients with advanced solid tumors.

BACKGROUND: The success of immune checkpoint inhibitors has revolutionized cancer treatment options and triggered development of new complementary immunotherapeutic strategies, including T-cell co-stimulatory molecules, such as glucocorticoid-induced tumor necrosis factor receptor-related protein (GITR). BMS-986156 is a fully agonistic human immunoglobulin G subclass 1 monoclonal antibody targeting GITR. We recently presented the clinical data for BMS-986156 with or without nivolumab, which demonstrated no compelling evidence of clinical activity in patients with advanced solid tumors. Here, we further report the pharmacodynamic (PD) biomarker data from this open-label, first-in-human, phase I/IIa study of BMS-986156 ± nivolumab in patients with advanced solid tumors (NCT02598960). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed PD changes of circulating immune cell subsets and cytokines in peripheral blood or serum samples collected from a dataset of 292 patients with solid tumors before and during treatment with BMS-986156 ± nivolumab. PD changes in the tumor immune microenvironment were measured by immunohistochemistry and a targeted gene expression panel. RESULTS: BMS-986156 + nivolumab induced a significant increase in peripheral T-cell and natural killer (NK) cell proliferation and activation, accompanied by production of proinflammatory cytokines. However, no significant changes in expression of CD8A, programmed death-ligand 1, tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily members, or key genes linked with functional parameters of T and NK cells were observed in tumor tissue upon treatment with BMS-986156. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the robust evidence of peripheral PD activity of BMS-986156, with or without nivolumab, limited evidence of T- or NK cell activation in the tumor microenvironment was observed. The data therefore explain, at least in part, the lack of clinical activity of BMS-986156 with or without nivolumab in unselected populations of cancer patients.

Leukemia burden delays lymphocyte and platelet recovery after allo-SCT for AML.

Lymphocyte and platelet recovery may influence outcomes of allo-SCT for treatment of AML. It is not clear, however, if this impact is independent of patient and transplant characteristics. To investigate this question, we evaluated the influence of pre- or post transplant factors on day +30 absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) and the speed of platelet engraftment. We studied 106 AML patients treated with fludarabine and melphalan reduced-intensity conditioning and allo-SCT. Twenty nine percent of patients were in CR at the initiation of the conditioning, 39% had active disease with circulating blasts and 32% had active disease without circulating blasts. The graft source was peripheral blood from a matched sibling donor in 55% and BM from a matched unrelated donor in 45%. Our data showed that the presence of circulating blasts before transplantation is significantly correlated with low post-SCT day +30 ALC and slow platelet engraftment. This finding suggests that the impact of early ALC and platelet recovery on transplant outcome may not be independent of disease status at transplantation.

Phase I/II study of gemtuzumab ozogamicin added to fludarabine, melphalan and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for high-risk CD33 positive myeloid leukemias and myelodysplastic syndrome.

We investigated the hypothesis that gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO), an anti-CD33 immunotoxin would improve the efficacy of fludarabine/melphalan as a preparative regimen for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in a phase I/II trial. Toxicity was defined as grades III-IV organ damage, engraftment failure or death within 30 days. 'Response' was engraftment and remission (CR) on day +30. We sought to determine the GO dose (2, 4 or 6 mg m(-2)) giving the best trade-off between toxicity and response. All patients were not candidates for myeloablative regimens. Treatment plan: GO (day -12), fludarabine 30 mg m(-2) (days -5 to -2), melphalan 140 mg m(-2) (day -2) and HSCT (day 0). GVHD prophylaxis was tacrolimus and mini-methotrexate. Diagnoses were AML (n=47), MDS (n=4) or CML (n=1). Median age was 53 years (range, 13-72). All but three patients were not in CR. Donors were related (n=33) or unrelated (n=19). Toxicity and response rates at 4 mg m(-2) were 50% (n=4) and 50% (n=4). GO dose was de-escalated to 2 mg m(-2): 18% had toxicity (n=8) and 82% responded (n=36). 100-day TRM was 15%; one patient had reversible hepatic VOD. Median follow-up was 37 months. Median event-free and overall survival was 6 and 11 months. GO 2 mg m(-2) can be safely added to fludarabine/melphalan, and this regimen merits further evaluation.

Microbial contamination of hematopoietic progenitor cell products: clinical outcome.

We reviewed the results of routine microbiological assays of 3078 infused hematopoietic progenitor cell (HPC) products for autologous and allogeneic transplantation between January 2001 and December 2005. Thirty-seven (1.2%) contaminated products were found. All patients receiving contaminated infusions received empirical antibiotic prophylaxis according to the assay result. None of these patients developed a positive blood culture with the same agent, developed infections that could be attributable to the contaminated product or experienced any clinical sequelae. Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus was found in 32 (86.5%) products. Admission lengths and time to engraftment were within the expected time frame for autologous and allogeneic transplants. Microbial contamination of HPC products occurs at a low frequency; prophylactic use of antibiotics based on the microbiological assay appears to be effective in preventing clinical complications.

Efficacy of prophylactic transfusions using single donor apheresis platelets versus pooled platelet concentrates in AML/MDS patients receiving allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Superiority of single-donor apheresis platelets (SDAP) over pooled platelet concentrates (PPC) transfusions is largely assumed, but unproven. We hypothesized that prophylactic SDAP and PPC transfusions are clinically equivalent after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplants (HSCT). We studied all transfusions administered to 33 patients with AML/MDS during the first 100 days after busulfan-based, myeloablative HSCT. All donor-recipient pairs were ABO identical. Transfusion threshold was a platelet count < or =15 x 10(9)/l. The corrected increment (CCI) was used for all comparisons. Median time to platelet engraftment was 13 days (n=30). PPC transfusions (n=105) were ABO compatible, while 10% of 41 SDAP were not (P=0.006). Median post-transfusion platelet count was 51K/microl (5-118K) after SDAP and 36K/microl (3-115K) after PPC (P=0.0004). Median CCI was 14.178 (SDAP) versus 7.793 (PPC) (P=0.0001). Median time to another transfusion was 3 days (SDAP) and 2 days (PPC; P=0.3). In the week following any given transfusion, the median number of new transfusions was similar (n=2), as well as the need of further transfusion (16 versus 24%, P=0.2). A total of 17% of SDAP and 30% of PPC transfusions were labeled 'ineffective' (P=0.1). There were two non-lethal hemorrhage episodes (6%). SDAP transfusions produced better platelet counts, but SDAP and PPC were equally effective in preventing hemorrhage.