Evaluation of survival outcome and prognostic factors for oral cavity cancer treated with volumetric arc therapy.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the survival outcomes and identify prognostic factors for patients with oral cavity cancer (OCC) who underwent adjuvant treatment with volumetric arc therapy (VMAT) using simultaneous integrated boost (SIB). METHODS: Data was collected for post-operated patients of carcinoma of oral cavity who received adjuvant VMAT with SIB between June 2018 and December 2022. The data was entered and analyzed using SPSS software version 20.0. Survival rates were estimated using Kaplan Meier method. To determine survival difference between the groups, log rank test was used. Multivariate analyses were performed with Cox proportional hazard model and p value < 0.05 was considered as significant. RESULTS: A total of 178 patients were included in the study. The median follow-up period was 26 months (range 3-56 months). The 3-year OS, DFS, and LRC rates were 78% (95% CI 77-79%), 76% (95% CI 74-77%), and 81% (95% CI 80-82%), respectively. Univariate analysis identified age ≥ 50 years, lymph node involvement, extracapsular extension (ECE), and N2-N3 disease as significant adverse prognostic factors for OS, DFS, and LRC. Multivariate analysis confirmed age ≥ 50 years and nodal involvement as independent predictors of worse OS, DFS, and LRC. Additionally, ECE independently affected OS and DFS. CONCLUSION: Adjuvant treatment with VMAT using SIBin patients with OCC is effective. Age and nodal involvement had significant impact on LRC, DFSand OS while ECE on DFSand OS.

Development and validation of an indigenous, radiobiological model-based tumor control probability and normal tissue complication probability estimation software for routine plan evaluation in clinics.

Purpose: Development and validation of a simple and convenient computational program in MATLAB environment for estimating the tumor control probability (TCP) and the normal tissue complication probability (NTCP), as a decision support system for routine plan evaluation. Materials and Methods: We developed an in-house software using MATLAB 2016b (Mathworks) for estimating TCP and NTCP named as RBMODELV1. The program contains Niemierko free equivalent uniform dose (EUD) program code provided in authors research article. For rest of radiobiological (RB) models in the software separate coding is performed. The program accepts cumulative dose-volume histogram file in (.txt) format containing two columns dose and volume. A set of two RB parameters were prepared, default and user-dependent in excel sheet named as RBDATA. We cross-validated results of RBMODELV1 software with BioSuite software for Poisson's TCP model and Lyman-Kutcher-Burman (LKB) model. A set of total 20 patient's data of head and neck site took under study and respective TCP and NTCP calculated by all the RB models and compared. Results: This is the first study in which we tried to establish correlation between the mean doses (EUD) received by parallel structure (parotid gland and oral cavity) and predicted percentage of NTCP values. It is found that mean dose in the range of 35-40 Gy for parotid gland can result in more than 50% NTCP predicted by all four RB models. Similarly oral cavity receiving mean dose in the range of 53-58 Gy can results in more than 35% NTCP predicted by all the four models. There is <3% variation observed between TCP calculated by BioSuite and RBMODELV1 software and <4% variation observed between predicted NTCP for parotid gland and oral cavity OAR from LKB model by both the software. Conclusion: We created simple software RBMODELV1 which can be used as a research tool as well as decision support system.

Radiotherapy plan evaluation indices: A dosimetrical suitability check.

PURPOSE: To classify the available plan evaluation indices and compare the dosimetric suitability of these indices. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Available published plan evaluation indices were categorized. Conformity index (CI) into two groups, one group contains those CI formulas which do not consider critical structure and other group contains those CI formulas which consider planning target volume (PTV) coverage, normal tissue and critical structure sparing simultaneously. Various homogeneity index (HI) formulas extracted from literature. Structure data sets of 25 patients were taken under consideration comprising of various sites. For each patient, two plans were created using Volumetric Arc Therapy technique. First type of plan (Plan-A) were generated considering all tissue objectives for targets and Organ at Risks (OARs) whereas second type of plan (Plan-B) were generated considering only targets tissue objectives and excluding OARs tissue objectives during plan optimization and dose calculation. Planning evaluation parameters were compared between Plan-A and Plan-B. RESULTS: CI calculated by various formulas in two different scenarios presented <2% variation. Any commonly used CI formula failed to differentiate the two different planning situations. On comparison between HI of two different scenario, it is observed that there are four formulas of HI which showed negligible variation but two formulae: S-index and HI (D) showed marginal variation. It is also observed that when OARs are removed from optimization dose homogeneity improved which is specifically pointed by sigma index formula. CONCLUSION: CI, which has assimilated the presence of OAR in their formulation, shows more reliability in plan evaluation. Sigma index was found to be more efficient formula while evaluating homogeneity of a treatment plan.

A comparison between revised Manchester Point A and ICRU-89-recommended Point A definition absorbed-dose reporting using CT images in intracavitary brachytherapy for patients with cervical carcinoma.

PURPOSE: This study is a comparison between revised Manchester Point A and International Commission on Radiation Units and measurements (ICRU) 89 report-recommended Point A absorbed-dose reporting in intracavitary brachytherapy for patients with cervical carcinoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The retrospective dosimetric study is based on the data of 32 patients with cervical carcinoma treated with high-dose-rate brachytherapy. Patients received 21 Gy in three fractions (7.0 Gy X three fractions) to Point A (Aflange, revised Manchester definition). All the patients were replanned with a new Point A (Aicru89) defined on CT images as per the American Brachytherapy Society/ICRU-89. The data collected were compared with the data obtained from Point A (Aflange). RESULTS: When using the Aflange plan normalization method, the mean dose of 0.1 cc, 1 cc, and 2 cc bladder volumes was 820.79 ± 207.47 cGy, 654.66 ± 152.69 cGy, and 588.91 ± 136.35 cGy, respectively. Likewise, when using the ICRU-89 Point Aicru89 normalization method, the mean dose of 0.1 cc, 1 cc, and 2 cc bladder volumes was 869.30 ± 224.67 cGy, 693.24 ± 166.20 cGy, and 616.61 ± 150.32 cGy, respectively. For the rectum, Point Aflange normalization plans, the mean dose of 0.1 cc, 1 cc, and 2 cc volumes was 589.37 ± 163.26 cGy, 487.51 ± 126.03 cGy, and 442.70 ± 111.43 cGy, respectively. Likewise, using the Aicru89 plan, the mean 0.1 cc, 1 cc, and 2 cc rectum volume was 625.07 ± 171.31 cGy, 517.50 ± 131.05 cGy, 464.94 ± 121.81 cGy, respectively. The statistical mean difference of Total Reference Air Kerma rate, V100 (cc), bladder, rectum and sigmoid, was found significant. CONCLUSIONS: It has been found that the position of revised Manchester (Aflange) and ICRU-89 Point A does not match on CT images/radiograph, which resulted in variation in doses to the tumor, V100 (cc), organ at risk, and Total Reference Air Kerma.

Plan evaluation indices: A journey of evolution.

AIM: A systemic review and analysis of evolution journey of indices, such as conformity index (CI), homogeneity index (HI) and gradient index (GI), described in the literature. BACKGROUND: Modern radiotherapy techniques like VMAT, SRS and SBRT produce highly conformal plans and provide better critical structure and normal tissue sparing. These treatment techniques can generate a number of competitive plans for the same patients with different dose distributions. Therefore, indices like CI, HI and GI serve as complementary tools in addition to visual slice by slice isodose verification while plan evaluation. Reliability and accuracy of these indices have been tested in the past and found shortcomings and benefits when compared to one another. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Potentially relevant studies published after 1993 were identified through a pubmed and web of science search using words "conformity index", "Homogeneity index", "Gradient index"," Stereotactic radiosurgery"," stereotactic Body radiotherapy" "complexity metrics" and "plan evaluation index". Combinations of words "plan evaluation index conformity index" were also searched as were bibliographies of downloaded papers. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Mathematical definitions of plan evaluation indices modified with time. CI definitions presented by various authors tested at their own and could not be generalized. Those mathematical definitions of CI which take into account OAR sparing grant more confidence in plan evaluation. Gradient index emerged as a significant plan evaluation index in addition to CI whereas homogeneity index losing its credibility. Biological index base plan evaluation is becoming popular and may replace or alter the role of dosimetrical indices.