Impact of American Society of Anesthesiologists' Classification on Postoperative Satisfaction and Clinical Outcomes Following Lumbar Decompression: Cohort-Matched Analysis.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to compare patient-reported outcomes (PROMs), minimum clinically important difference (MCID) achievement, and postoperative satisfaction following minimally invasive lumbar decompression in patients stratified by American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Some guidelines recommend against performing elective procedures for patients with an ASA score of 3 or greater; however, long-term postoperative outcomes are not well described. METHODS: Primary, single-level, minimally invasive lumbar decompression procedures were identified. PROMs were administered at preoperative, 6-week, 12-week, 6-month, 1-year, 2-year timepoints and included Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Physical Function, visual analog scale (VAS) back/leg, Oswestry disability index (ODI), and 12-item short form physical component score. Satisfaction scores were collected postoperatively for VAS back/leg, ODI, and individual ODI subcategories. Patients were grouped (ASA<3, ASA≥3), and propensity scores were matched to control for significant differences. Demographic and perioperative characteristics were compared using χ 2 and the Student's t test. Mean PROMs and postoperative satisfaction were compared at each time point by a 2-sample t test. Postoperative PROM improvement from the preoperative baseline within each cohort was calculated with a paired t test. MCID achievement was determined by comparing ΔPROMs to established thresholds and comparing between groups using simple logistic regression. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-nine propensity-matched patients were included: 99 ASA<3 and 30 ASA≥3. No significant demographic differences were observed between groups. ASA≥3 patients experienced significantly increased length of stay and postoperative narcotic consumption on surgery day ( P <0.048, all). Mean PROMs and MCID achievement did not differ. The ASA<3 cohort significantly improved from the preoperative baseline for all PROMs at all postoperative time points. ASA<3 patients demonstrated higher levels of postoperative satisfaction at 6 weeks for VAS leg, VAS back, ODI, sleeping, lifting, walking, standing, sex, travel, and at 6 months for VAS back ( P <0.045, all). CONCLUSION: ASA≥3 patients may achieve similar long-term clinical outcomes to ASA<3 patients, though they may show poorer short-term satisfaction for disability, leg pain, and back pain, which could be related to differing preoperative expectations.

Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Versus Cervical Disc Replacement for a Workers' Compensation Population in an Ambulatory Surgical Center.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective Cohort. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) and minimal clinically important difference (MCID) achievement outcomes between anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and cervical disk replacement (CDR) in the Workers' Compensation (WC) population. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: No studies to our knowledge have compared PROMs and MCID attainment between ACDF and CDR among patients with WC insurance undergoing surgery in an outpatient ambulatory surgical center (ASC). METHODS: WC insurance patients undergoing primary, single/double-level ACDF/CDR in an ASC were identified. Patients were divided into ACDF versus CDR. PROMs were collected at preoperative/6-week/12-week/6-month/1-year timepoints, including PROMIS-PF, SF-12 PCS/MCS, VAS neck/arm, and NDI. RESULTS: Seventy-nine patients were included, 51 ACDF/28 CDR. While operative time (56.4 vs. 54.4 min), estimated blood loss (29.2 vs. 25.9 mL), POD0 pain (4.9 vs. 3.8), and POD0 narcotic consumption (21.2 vs. 14.5 oral morphine equivalents) were higher in ACDF patients, none reached statistical significance ( P >0.050, all). One-year arthrodesis rate was 100.0% among ACDF recipients with available imaging (n=36). ACDF cohort improved from preoperative for PROMIS-PF from 12 weeks to 1 year, SF-12 PCS at 6 months, all timepoints for VAS neck/arm, and 12 weeks/6 months for NDI ( P ≤0.044, all). CDR cohort improved from preoperative for PROMIS-PF at 6 months, VAS neck/arm from 12 weeks to 1 year, and NDI at 12 weeks/6 months ( P ≤0.049, all). CDR cohort reported significantly lower VAS neck at 12 weeks/1 year and VAS arm at 12 weeks ( P ≤0.039, all). MCID achievement rates did not differ. CONCLUSION: While operative duration/estimated blood loss/acute postoperative pain/narcotic consumption were, on average, higher among ACDF recipients, these were not statistically significant, possibly due to the limited sample size. ACDF and CDR ASC patients generally demonstrated comparable arm pain/disability/physical function/mental health, though neck pain was significantly lower at multiple timepoints among CDR patients. Clinically meaningful PROM improvements were comparable. Larger, multicentered studies are required to confirm our results.

Impact of Postoperative Length of Stay on Patient-Reported and Clinical Outcomes After Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

BACKGROUND: Existing literature has not yet evaluated the impact of postoperative length of stay (LOS) on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and minimum clinically important difference (MCID) in patients undergoing anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF). The authors investigates the influence of postoperative LOS following ALIF on PROMs and MCID achievement rates. METHODS: A single-surgeon database was retrospectively reviewed for patients undergoing single-level ALIF. The following 2 cohorts were studied: patients with LOS <45 hours and patients with LOS ≥45 hours. The following PROMs were recorded at preoperative and 6-week, 12-week, 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year postoperative timepoints: visual analog scale (VAS) back and leg, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), 12-item short form (SF-12) physical composite score (PCS), and patient-reported outcome measurement information system physical function. MCID achievement was compared by LOS grouping using χ 2 analysis. The rates of complications by LOS grouping and the relative risk among demographic and perioperative characteristics for a longer hospital stay of ≥45 hours were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 52 subjects were included in each cohort. LOS ≥45 hours demonstrated worse ODI at 6 weeks and SF-12 PCS preoperative and at 12 weeks (P ≤ 0.026, all). LOS <45 hours demonstrated greater MCID rates for all PROMs except VAS back (P ≤ 0.004, all). Postoperative urinary retention (POUR), fever, and total complications (P ≤ 0.003, all) were associated with increased LOS. Diabetes (P = 0.037), preoperative VAS neck ≥7 (P = 0.012), and American Society of Anesthesiologists classification ≥2 (P = 0.003) served as preoperative risk factors for postoperative stay ≥45 hours. CONCLUSION: Following single-level ALIF, patients with shorter LOS demonstrated significantly greater overall MCID achievement for most PROMs. POUR, fever, and total complications were associated with longer LOS and greater blood loss. Diabetes and higher preoperative leg pain were identified as risk factors for longer LOS. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Patients undergoing ALIF with shorter LOS had greater MCID achievement for disability, physical function, and leg pain outcomes. Patients with greater preoperative leg pain and diabetes may be at risk for longer LOS.

Validation of Neck Disability Index Severity among Patients Receiving One or Two-Level Anterior Cervical Surgery.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. PURPOSE: To evaluate the validity of established severity thresholds for Neck Disability Index (NDI) among patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) or cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA). OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Few studies have examined the validity of established NDI threshold values among patients undergoing ACDF or CDA. METHODS: A surgical database was reviewed to identify patients undergoing cervical spine procedures. Demographics, operative characteristics, comorbidities, NDI, Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and 12-item Short Form (SF-12) physical and mental composite scores (PCS and MCS) were recorded. NDI severity was categorized using previously established threshold values. Improvement from preoperative scores at each postoperative timepoint and convergent validity of NDI was evaluated. Discriminant validity of NDI was evaluated against VAS neck and arm and SF-12 PCS and MCS. RESULTS: All 290 patients included in the study demonstrated significant improvements from baseline values for all patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) at all postoperative timepoints (p<0.001) except SF-12 MCS at 2 years (p =0.393). NDI showed a moderate- to-strong correlation (r≥0.419) at most timepoints for VAS neck, VAS arm, SF-12 PCS, and SF-12 MCS (p<0.001, all). NDI severity categories demonstrated significant differences in mean VAS neck, VAS arm, SF-12 PCS, and SF-12 MCS at all timepoints (p<0.001, all). Differences between NDI severity groups were not uniform for all PROMs. VAS neck values demonstrated significant intergroup differences at most timepoints, whereas SF-12 MCS showed significantly different values between most severity groups. CONCLUSIONS: Neck disability is strongly correlated with neck and arm pain, physical function, and mental health and demonstrates worse outcomes with increasing severity. Previously established severity categories may be more applicable to pain than physical function or mental health and may be more uniformly applied preoperatively for cervical spine patients.

The Influence of Presenting Physical Function on Postoperative Patient Satisfaction and Clinical Outcomes Following Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression.

STUDY DESIGN: The study of retrospective cohort. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to compare patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), satisfaction, and minimum clinically important difference (MCID) achievement following minimally invasive lumbar decompression (MIS-LD) in patients stratified by the preoperative patient-reported outcomes measurement information system physical function (PROMIS-PF) score. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Although prior studies have assessed the predictive utility of preoperative PROMIS-PF scores on patient outcomes in spinal fusion, its utility has not been studied for patients undergoing MIS-LD. METHODS: Primary, single/multilevel MIS-LD procedures were identified. PROMs were administered at preoperative/6-week/12-week/6-month/1-year/2-year time points and included PROMIS-PF/visual analog scale (VAS) back and leg/Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Satisfaction scores were collected postoperatively. The patients were grouped by preoperative PROMIS-PF score (≤35, >35), with higher scores indicating improved physical function. Demographic/perioperative characteristics were compared using χ 2 /Student t test. Mean PROMs/postoperative satisfaction was compared utilizing 2-sample t test. Postoperative PROM improvement from preoperative was calculated with paired t tests. MCID achievement rates were compared using simple logistic regression. RESULTS: Two hundred and sixteen patients were included, 58 PROMIS-PF≤35 and 158 PROMIS-PF>35. Ethnicity/insurance differed ( P ≤0.004, all). Hospital length of stay was greater for PROMIS-PF>35 ( P =0.042). All preoperative mean PROMs significantly differed except for VAS Back. Several postoperative mean PROMs differed: PROMIS-PF at 6 weeks/12 weeks/6 months/1 year, SF-12 PCS at 6 weeks/12 weeks/1 year, VAS Back at 6 weeks/12 weeks, VAS leg at 6 weeks/12 weeks, and ODI at 6 weeks/12 weeks ( P <0.050, all). All PROMs significantly improved from preoperative at all postoperative time points ( P <0.003, all). The MCID achievement rates differed only for VAS back for 6 weeks, favoring PROMIS-PF>35 cohort ( P =0.001). Postoperative satisfaction was greater in PROMIS-PF>35 cohort for VAS leg at 6 weeks/12 weeks/6 months/2 years, VAS back at 6-weeks/12-weeks, and ODI at all time points ( P <0.037, all). Postoperative satisfaction was greater in PROMIS-PF>35 cohort for individual ODI categories: sleep at 6-weeks/12-weeks/1-year/2-years, lifting, walking, standing, and travel at all time points, and sexual at 6-weeks/12-weeks/1-year/2-years ( P <0.030, all). CONCLUSION: Poorer preoperative PROMIS-PF scores were associated with worse postoperative clinical outcomes and satisfaction. By stratifying patients with preoperative PROMIS-PF scores, surgeons may better predict postoperative clinical improvement and seek to manage patient expectations.

Multimodal analgesic protocol for cervical disc replacement in the ambulatory setting: Clinical case series.

Background: Effective pain management is paramount for outpatient surgical success. This study aims to report a case series of patients undergoing cervical disc replacement (CDR) in an ambulatory surgery center (ASC) with the use of an enhanced multimodal analgesic (MMA) protocol. Methods: Primary, single-/2-level CDR procedures at an ASC with an enhanced MMA protocol were included. ASC patients were discharged day of surgery. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were administered at preoperative/6-week/12-week/6-month/1-year/2-year timepoints and included Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) neck, VAS arm, Neck Disability Index (NDI), Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Physical Function (PROMIS-PF), and 12-Item Short-Form Physical and Mental Composite Score (SF-12 PCS/SF-12 MCS). A t-test assessed postoperative PROM improvement from baseline. MCID achievement was determined by comparing ΔPROM scores to previously established thresholds. Results: 106 patients were included, 76 single-level and 30 2-level. Most single-levels occurred at C5-C6, most 2-levels at C5-C7. One 2-level patient developed a hematoma 5 days postoperatively and underwent revision for evacuation. Five patients reported postoperative dysphagia; all were quickly resolved. One patient had an episode of seizure secondary to serotonin syndrome from concealed drug use. Patient was reintubated, transferred, and treated for serotonin syndrome. Two patients experienced postoperative nausea/vomiting. Cohort significantly improved from baseline for all PROMS at all timepoints except SF-12 MCS at 1-year/2-years and SF-12 PCS at 2 years (p < 0.047, all). Overall MCID achievement rates were: VAS arm (48.7%), VAS neck (69.1%), NDI (98.9%), SF-12 MCS (50.0%), SF-12 PCS (54.6%), and PROMIS-PF (73.4%). Conclusion: Outpatient CDR, incorporating an enhanced MMA protocol, can be safely and effectively performed with proper patient selection and surgical technique. Patients saw timely discharge, well-controlled postoperative pain, and favorable long-term outcomes.

Impact of Gender on Postsurgical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.

BACKGROUND: Prior studies associate male gender with higher complication rates following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), but none has investigated gender influence on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and minimal clinically important difference (MCID) following single-level ACDF. METHODS: Patients undergoing primary, single-level ACDF were divided into female and male groups. Visual analog scale (VAS) neck/arm, Neck Disability Index (NDI), 12-item short form (SF-12) physical composite score (PCS), PROM information system physical function (PROMIS-PF), and veterans RAND 12-item (VR-12) health survey PCS were collected preoperatively and postoperatively. Simple linear regression analysis evaluated the predictive capability of gender on PROMs. Multiple regression analysis was performed to determine the effects of gender on mean PROMs while accounting for insurance type. Established MCID values determined achievement rates across PROMs. χ 2 analysis compared MCID achievement by gender. RESULTS: A total of 179 women and 134 men were included. Cohorts differed in insurance type, length of stay, and discharge day (P ≤ 0.017, all). Women improved in PROMs at all timepoints (P ≤ 0.049, all) except SF-12 PCS 6 weeks and PROMIS-PF 6 weeks. Men improved in PROMs at all timepoints (P ≤ 0.042) except VAS arm 2 years, SF-12 PCS 6 weeks and 2 years, PROMIS-PF 6 weeks, and VR-12 PCS 6 weeks. Women demonstrated higher SF-12 PCS (P = 0.043) and VR-12 PCS (P = 0.035) 2 years. Multiple regression determined that VAS neck and arm from 6 weeks to 6 months, NDI from preoperative to 6 months, SF-12 PCS and VR-12 PCS from preoperative to 12 weeks, and PROMIS-PF preoperative, 6 weeks, and 6 months were significantly affected by gender and insurance status (P ≤ 0.031, all). MCID achievement rate did not differ for any PROM between genders. CONCLUSION: Women reported significantly higher long-term physical function health (SF-12 PCS and VR-12 PCS) compared with men, while disability and pain did not differ. Nevertheless, no significant differences in MCID achievement were observed for any PROM studied. Gender does not appear to play a significant role in clinically meaningful recovery following single-level ACDF. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Gender has little value in prognostication for determining clinically meaningful recovery after single-level ACDF.

History and Evolution of the Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

The minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) is a popular surgical technique for lumbar arthrodesis, widely considered to hold great efficacy while conferring an impressive safety profile through the minimization of soft tissue damage. This elegant approach to lumbar stabilization is the byproduct of several innovations throughout the past century. In 1934, Mixter and Barr's paper in the New England Journal of Medicine elucidated the role of disc herniation in spinal instability and radiculopathy, prompting surgeons to explore new approaches and instruments to access the disc space. In 1944, Briggs and Milligan published their novel technique, the posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), involving continuous removal of vertebral bone chips and replacement of the disc with a round bone peg. The following decades witnessed several PLIF modifications, including the addition of long pedicle screws. In 1982, Harms and Rolinger sought to redefine the posterior corridor by approaching the disc space through the intervertebral foramen, establishing the transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). In the 1990s, lumbar spine surgery experienced a paradigm shift, with surgeons placing increased emphasis on tissuesparing minimally invasive techniques. Spurred by this revolution, Foley and Lefkowitz published the novel MIS-TLIF technique in 2002. The MIS-TLIF has demonstrated comparable surgical outcomes to the TLIF, with an improved safety profile. Here, we present a view into the history of the posterior-approach treatment of the discogenic radiculopathy, culminating in the MIS-TLIF. Additionally, we evaluate the hallmark characteristics, technical variability, and reported outcomes of the modern MIS-TLIF and take a brief look at technologies that may define the future MIS-TLIF.

Minimally Invasive Transforaminal versus Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Patients Undergoing Revision Fusion: Clinical Outcome Comparison.

OBJECTIVE: We aim to compare perioperative/postoperative clinical outcomes between minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) and anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) in patients presenting for revision surgery. METHODS: A retrospective database was reviewed for procedures between November 2005 and December 2021. Revision MIS-TLIF/ALIFs were included, whereas primary fusions or diagnosis of infection/malignancy/trauma were excluded. Patients were grouped into MIS-TLIF/ALIF cohorts. Preoperatively/postoperatively collected patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) included visual analog scale back/leg score, Oswestry Disability Index, Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System-Physical Function (PROMIS-PF), and Short-Form 12-Item Survey Mental/Physical Composite Scores. RESULTS: A total of 164 patients were eligible, with 84 patients in the MIS-TLIF cohort. The presence of degenerative spondylolisthesis and central stenosis, narcotic consumption on postoperative day 0/1, and postoperative urinary retention rates was greater in the MIS-TLIF cohort (P ≤ 0.036, all). Preoperative PROMs between cohorts did not significantly differ. Significantly favorable postoperative PROM scores were shown in the MIS-TLIF cohort with PROMIS-PF at 12 weeks/6 months (P ≤ 0.033, all). Most patients in both cohorts achieved overall minimum clinically important difference for visual analog scale back/leg score, Oswestry Disability Index, Short-Form 12-Item Survey Physical Composite Score, and PROMIS-PF. No differences were noted between cohorts within rates of MCID achievement. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing revision fusion via MIS-TLIF or ALIF reported similar 1-year postoperative mean outcomes and rates of meaningful clinical achievement for physical function, mental health, disability, and back/leg pain. However, patients undergoing revision MIS-TLIF reported improved physical function at 12 weeks and 6 months. Perioperatively, patients undergoing revision MIS-TLIF were noted to consume significantly greater quantities of narcotics.

The Effect of the Severity of Preoperative Leg Pain on Patient-Reported Outcomes, Minimum Clinically Important Difference Achievement, and Patient Satisfaction After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

OBJECTIVE: To compare patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), satisfaction, and minimum clinically important difference (MCID) achievement after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) in patients stratified by preoperative leg pain. METHODS: Patients undergoing MIS-TLIF were collected through retrospective review of a prospectively maintained single-surgeon database. PROMs administered preoperatively/postoperatively included Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function (PROMIS-PF), visual analog scale (VAS) back/leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and 12-Item Short Form (SF-12) Physical/Mental Component Score (PCS/MCS). Patients were grouped based on preoperative VAS leg scores: VAS leg ≤7 or VAS leg >7. Inferential statistics were used to compare PROMs, MCID achievement rates, and postoperative satisfaction between groups. RESULTS: A total of 562 patients were eligible (168 VAS leg score ≤7; 394 VAS leg score >7). Significant differences between cohorts in postoperative mean PROMs were noted for PROMIS-PF at 6 weeks/2 years, SF-12 PCS at 6 weeks/2 years, SF-12 MCS at 6 weeks/12 weeks/6 months/1 year, VAS back score at 6 weeks/12 weeks/6 months, VAS leg score at 6 weeks/12 weeks/6 months/2 years and ODI at all postoperative time points (P < 0.045, all). In the VAS leg score >7 cohort, a greater proportion achieving MCID for VAS leg score at all postoperative time points and ODI at 12 weeks (P < 0.010, all). Postoperative satisfaction was greater in VAS back score ≤7 cohort for VAS leg score at 6 weeks/12 weeks/6 months/2 years, VAS back score at 12 weeks/2 years, and ODI at 6 weeks/12 weeks/6 months/2 years (P < 0.046, all). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with severe preoperative leg pain showed worse postoperative PROM scores and patient satisfaction for disability and back/leg pain. MCID achievement rates across cohorts were similar. Patients with severe leg pain may have expectations for surgical benefits incongruent with their postoperative outcomes, and physicians may seek to manage the preoperative expectations of their patients to reflect likely outcomes after MIS-TLIF.

Level-specific Perioperative and Clinical Outcome Comparison: Cervical Disk Replacement Versus Anterior Cervical Diskectomy and Fusion at C5-C6 in Patients With Myeloradiculopathy.

INTRODUCTION: This study compares perioperative and postoperative clinical outcomes in patients undergoing anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion (ACDF) or cervical disk replacement (CDR) at C5-C6 in patients with myeloradiculopathy. METHODS: Primary, elective, single-level CDR or ACDF procedures at C5-C6 for patients with myeloradiculopathy were included. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) included visual analog scale (VAS) neck, VAS arm, Neck Disability Index (NDI), Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function (PROMIS-PF), and Short-Form 12-Item Physical Composite Score (SF-12 PCS) collected at preoperative/6-week/12-week/6-month/1-year time points. Surgical cohorts were assessed for differences in demographics/perioperative characteristics using the chi square test and unpaired Student t-test for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. Achievement of minimum clinically important difference (MCID) was determined by comparing ΔPROMs with established thresholds. Outcome measures were compared at postoperative time points with the Student t-test, and improvement from preoperative baseline was assessed with a paired sample t-test. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-seven patients were included, 43 CDR and 94 ACDF. CDR patients demonstrated significantly reduced surgical times (46.3 versus 55.1 minutes), estimated blood loss (24.4 versus 43.6 mL), revision surgery rates (0.0% versus 5.3%), postoperative length of stay (8.9 versus 23.0 hours), and postoperative narcotic consumption (P < 0.017, all). Complication rates and mean PROMs did not differ between cohorts. The CDR cohort markedly improved from baseline for all PROMs postoperatively except SF-12 PCS/PROMIS-PF at 6 weeks. The ACDF cohort markedly improved at each time point except VAS arm at 1 year, NDI at 6 weeks/1 year, and SF-12 PCS/PROMIS-PF at 6 weeks. A majority of both cohorts achieved overall MCID for VAS neck/NDI/PROMIS-PF. MCID achievement rates did not differ except NDI at 12 weeks/1 year and SF-12 PCS at 6 months, both favoring CDR. DISCUSSION: Both procedural cohorts demonstrated similar long-term clinical outcomes for arm/neck pain and physical function; however, patients undergoing CDR at C5-C6 demonstrated an improved ability to maintain 1-year postoperative progress for neck disability with improved 1-year NDI MCID achievement. The CDR cohort, in addition, demonstrated an improved perioperative profile and reduced rate of revision surgery.

Comparing Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Fusion for Isthmic Spondylolisthesis with Predominant Back Pain versus Predominant Leg Pain Symptoms.

OBJECTIVE: To compare patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and minimum clinically important difference (MCID) achievement following anterior or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for isthmic spondylolisthesis in patients presenting with predominant back pain versus predominant leg pain symptoms. METHODS: A single-surgeon database was reviewed for anterior or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion procedures for isthmic spondylolisthesis. Patient demographics, perioperative characteristics, postoperative complications, and PROMs were collected. Demographic/perioperative characteristics were compared among groups using χ2 and Student t tests for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. Mean PROM scores were compared using an unpaired Student t test. Postoperative improvement from preoperative baseline within each cohort was assessed with paired-samples t test. MCID achievement rates were compared with χ2 analysis. RESULTS: In total, 143 patients were included with 65 patients in the predominant back pain and 78 patients in the predominant leg pain cohort. Preoperative visual analog scale (VAS) leg was noted to be significantly greater in predominant leg pain cohort (P < 0.001). Cohorts demonstrated significant mean postoperative differences for the following PROMs at the following postoperative time points: significant differences were noted between cohorts for rate of achievement of MCID for the following PROMs at the following time points: VAS back at 2 years and VAS leg at 6 weeks/12 weeks/6 months/overall (P < 0.036, all). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with patients presenting for surgery with predominant leg pain symptoms, patients undergoing lumbar fusion at L4-L5 and L5-S1 for isthmic spondylolisthesis with predominant back pain symptoms may demonstrate improved long-term clinical outcomes for reported back pain, leg pain, and disability and reduced postoperative length of stay and narcotic consumption.

Dysphagia May Attenuate Improvements in Postoperative Outcomes Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.

BACKGROUND: Past studies outline potential risk factors for dysphagia following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Few studies explored the impact of dysphagia, as measured by the swallowing quality of life (SWAL-QOL), on postoperative patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) improvement. This study aimed to determine the relationship between dysphagia and improvement in pain, disability, physical function, and mental health following ACDF. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients undergoing primary 1- or 2-level ACDF was performed. Individuals without a completed preoperative SWAL-QOL were excluded. Outcomes were collected for visual analog scale (VAS) neck and arm pain, Neck Disability Index (NDI), Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Physical Function (PROMIS-PF), 12-Item Short Form Physical Component Score (SF-12 PCS), 9-Item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), and SWAL-QOL. Postoperative improvement from preoperative values was evaluated using a paired t test. The impact of SWAL-QOL on each PROM was assessed using linear regression. RESULTS: A total of 91 patients were included. Mean preoperative SWAL-QoL was 90.4, which worsened at 6 weeks and resolved by 6 months (P ≤ 0.007, both). VAS neck and arm scores significantly improved postoperatively (P < 0.001), as did the NDI score (P < 0.001). Physical function significantly improved at 12 weeks and 6 months (P ≤ 0.021, both). Depressive symptoms improved at 6 weeks and 12 weeks (P ≤ 0.007, both). Preoperatively, SWAL-QOL demonstrated significant relationships with all PROMs (P ≤ 0.005, all). At 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 6 months (P ≤ 0.048, all), SWAL-QoL again demonstrated a similar significant association with all PROMs. Multiple regression did not demonstrate common demographic or operative variables that were significant predictors of PROMs. CONCLUSION: Following ACDF, patients experienced a worsening of dysphagia but resolved by 12 weeks. All PROMs demonstrated significant improvements by the 6-month timepoint, except for PHQ-9. SWAL-QoL demonstrated a significant effect on all postoperative outcomes, which may suggest that this questionnaire could effectively evaluate dysphagia and predict positive or negative outcomes following ACDF. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The severity of dysphagia has a significant association with pain, disability, mental health, and physical function patient-reported outcome measures in patients undergoing ACDF.

Predicting Acute Changes in Depressive Symptoms Following Lumbar Decompression.

BACKGROUND: While depressive symptoms improve for most patients following minimally invasive lumbar decompression (MIS LD), for some, symptoms may worsen. This study aimed to investigate predictors of change in depressive symptoms in the short-term postoperative period following MIS LD. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed a prospective surgical database for patients undergoing primary MIS LD procedures from 2016 to 2020. Preoperative pain (visual analog scale back and leg) scores were recorded, and the 9-Item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) was administered at the preoperative and postoperative (6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year) timepoints. Patients were grouped into 1 of 3 categories of depression severity based on preoperative PHQ-9 scores: minimal (0-4), mild (5-9), and moderate to severe (10-27). Postoperative change in depressive symptoms was calculated by determining differences from baseline scores to scores at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 6 months. Analysis of demographics, perioperative characteristics, and spinal pathologies was conducted using χ 2 test. Significant factors contributing to postoperative changes in depression were analyzed using multiple linear regression analysis. Significance was set at P = 0.05. RESULTS: The 216 patients included had a mean age of 48 years, and a majority were men (70.4%). Most patients had a preoperative diagnosis of spinal stenosis (90.3%) or herniated nucleus pulposus (69.9%). Univariate analysis identified age, ethnicity, insurance, and diabetes as significant variables among depression severity groups. Patients demonstrated significant improvements in depressive symptoms at all postoperative timepoints (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified several significant predictors of postoperative change in PHQ-9, which included moderate to severe preoperative depression for all postoperative timepoints (all P ≤ 0.038), mild preoperative depression for 6 weeks and 12 weeks (both P ≤ 0.029), and private insurance (P = 0.002) and smoking status (P = 0.047) at 12 weeks. CONCLUSION: Depression improved at all postoperative timepoints following LD. Insurance type, smoking status, and preoperative depression severity were all identified as significant predictors of postoperative changes in depressive symptoms. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study explores predictors of changes in depressive symptoms following LD.

Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Results in Clinically Significant Improvements in Patients With Preoperative Sleep Difficulties.

BACKGROUND: Individual items within the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) have not been assessed as predictors of postoperative outcomes. Our objective is to study the relationship between responses to individual PHQ-9 items and achievement of a minimum clinically important difference (MCID) following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). METHODS: A prospective surgical database was reviewed for primary, single-level ACDF procedures performed for degenerative spinal pathology. Patient demographics, preoperative spinal pathology, and perioperative characteristics were recorded. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) including PHQ-9, visual analog scale (VAS) neck and arm, Neck Disability Index, 12-item Short Form physical component score (SF-12 PCS), and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function were administered at preoperative and 6-week, 12-week, 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year postoperative timepoints. MCID achievement was determined by comparing postoperative PROM improvement from baseline to previously established values. Logistic regression assessed responses to each individual question of the preoperative PHQ-9 as predictors of MCID achievement in each other PROMs. RESULTS: Sixty-six ACDF patients were included with a mean age of 47.2 years. Herniated nucleus pulposus was the most common preoperative spinal diagnosis (95.6%). The mean operative duration was 50.3 minutes, the mean estimated blood loss was 27.5 mL, and most patients were discharged on postoperative day 0 (81.8%). A majority of patients achieved MCID for all measures except SF-12 PCS. PHQ-9 question 3 significantly predicted MCID achievement for VAS neck (P = 0.045), VAS arm (P = 0.049), and SF-12 PCS (P = 0.037). No other PHQ-9 items or overall PHQ-9 scores significantly predicted MCID achievement. CONCLUSION: Question 3 of the PHQ-9 regarding "trouble falling asleep, staying asleep, or sleeping too much" significantly predicted clinically meaningful improvement in neck pain, arm pain, and physical function following ACDF, although overall PHQ-9 scores did not. Providers should inform patients experiencing significant sleep-related difficulties that they may be especially likely to benefit from ACDF surgery. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Evaluation of sleep from the PHQ-9 predicts clinically relevant improvement in neck pain, arm pain, and physical function in patients undergoing ACDF.

History of Prior Lumbar Surgery Does Not Impact Mental Health Outcomes Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.

STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of undergoing a prior lumbar procedure on mental health outcomes following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Revision and reoperations are perceived as risk factors for worse mental health outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective review of a surgical database was performed for cervical and lumbar procedures. The mental health measures used were: Short Form 12-Item Mental Composite Score (SF-12 MCS) and Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9). Secondary outcomes of interest were Visual Analogue Scale for neck and arm pain, Neck Disability Index, and Short Form 12-Item Physical Composite Score (SF-12 PCS). All outcomes were collected preoperatively and at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively. Minimum clinically important difference (MCID) was calculated using established values. Patients were grouped based on the surgical history of an elective lumbar spine procedure and propensity-matched. Differences in postoperative outcome scores and MCID achievement were evaluated using linear and logistic regression respectively. RESULTS: A total of 74 patients were included in this study. Mental health outcomes did not demonstrate significant differences between groups for SF-12 MCS and PHQ-9 for all time points except at 6 weeks for PHQ-9 ( P =0.038). MCID achievement was not significantly impacted by surgical history for all outcome measures at all postoperative time points (all P >0.050). The majority of patients achieved an MCID by the 1-year time point for all outcomes for patients without a prior lumbar surgery except for Visual Analogue Scale arm and SF-12 PCS, while those with a surgical history achieved an MCID for all outcomes except SF-12 PCS and PHQ-9. CONCLUSIONS: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion patients with a past history of lumbar surgery demonstrated significant improvements in depression, neck and arm pain, disability, and physical function as those without a past lumbar surgical history. Prior surgery also did not impact MCID achievement for all outcomes.

Impact of Body Mass Index on Postsurgical Outcomes for Workers' Compensation Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

BACKGROUND: Increased morbidity associated with obesity imposes a greater financial burden on companies that provide insurance to their employees. Few studies have investigated the relationship between body mass index (BMI) and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF) in the workers' compensation (WC) population. METHODS: WC patients who underwent a primary, single-level MIS TLIF were included/grouped according to BMI: nonobese (<30 kg/m2); obese I (≥30, <35 kg/m2); severe + morbid (≥35). PROMs were collected pre- and postoperatively: visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), 12-Item Short Form (SF-12) physical composite score (PCS), and Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System physical function (PROMIS-PF). BMI predictive power grouping on PROMs was evaluated using simple linear regression. Established minimum clinically important difference values were used to compute achievement rates across PROMs using logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 116 nonobese, 70 obese I, and 61 severe + morbid patients were included. Demographics among BMI grouping significantly differed in gender, hypertensive status, and American Society of Anesthesiologists score (P ≤ 0.037, all). Operative time was significantly different in perioperative values among BMI grouping (P ≤ 0.001). Increased BMI was significantly associated with greater VAS back at 12 weeks and 2 years (P ≤ 0.026, all), greater ODI preoperatively at 12 weeks and 6 months (P ≤ 0.015, all), and decreased PROMIS-PF at 12 weeks (P ≤ 0.011, all). Mean PROMs between obese I and severe + morbid cohorts differed in SF-12 PCS at 12 weeks, only (P = 0.050). ODI overall was the only parameter for which minimum clinically important difference was achieved among BMI cohorts (P ≤ 0.023). CONCLUSION: WC patients with increased BMI were more likely to develop significant back pain and disability at numerous postoperative timepoints compared with nonobese individuals. Our findings highlight the weight management importance within WC population to minimize back pain and disability following MIS TLIF, but provide a sense of reassurance with comparable clinical improvement regardless of BMI. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: When considering the effect of weight, surgeons may incorporate these findings in managing patient expectations in the WC population undergoing lumbar spine surgery.

Patient Satisfaction Following Lumbar Decompression: What is the Role of Mental Health?

OBJECTIVE: To determine the association between patient-reported depressive symptoms and patient satisfaction following minimally invasive lumbar decompression. METHODS: Primary, single-level/multilevel minimally invasive lumbar decompression was identified. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) collected preoperatively/postoperatively included visual analog scale back/leg, Oswestry Disability Index, 9-Item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), and 12-Item Short Form Mental Composite Score (SF-12 MCS). Patients rated current satisfaction level (0-10) with back/leg pain and disability. A paired Student's t-test compared each postoperative PROM score to its preoperative baseline. At each timepoint, patients were categorized by PHQ-9 and SF-12 MCS scores. One-way analysis of variance compared patient satisfaction with back/leg pain and disability among PHQ-9 subgroups. The Student's t-test for independent samples compared patient satisfaction between SF-12 MCS subgroups. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) assessed differences in satisfaction between depression subgroups while controlling for preoperative/postoperative values in corresponding PROMs. RESULTS: 193 patients were included. All PROMs demonstrated significant postoperative improvement from 6-weeks through 2-years (P < 0.001, all), except PHQ at 9 2-years (P = 0.874). Mean satisfaction scores ranged from 6.9-7.9 (back pain), 7.3-8.0 (leg pain), and 7.6-8.0 (disability). Satisfaction with back/leg pain and disability significantly differed among PHQ-9 subgroups at all postoperative timepoints (P < 0.001, all). Accounting for baseline and current pain/disability values, ANCOVA revealed differences between PHQ-9 subgroups only in satisfaction with back pain at 2 years (P < 0.001), leg pain at 12 weeks/1 year/2 years (P ≤ 0.047, all), and disability at 6 months/2 years (P ≤ 0.049, both). Satisfaction differed between SF-12 MCS subgroups at all timepoints (P ≤ 0.047), except back pain 6 months (P = 0.263). Accounting for baseline and postoperative pain/disability, ANCOVA revealed differences in satisfaction between SF-12 MCS groups only for back/leg pain at 2 years (P ≤ 0.001, both). CONCLUSIONS: Independent effect of depression at long-term follow-up was significant. This highlights the importance of understanding the interaction between physical and mental health outcomes to optimize patients' perceptions of surgical outcomes.

Presenting Mental Health Influences Postoperative Clinical Trajectory and Long-Term Patient Satisfaction After Lumbar Decompression.

OBJECTIVE: To compare patient-reported outcomes (PROMs), postoperative patient-reported satisfaction, and minimum clinically important difference (MCID) achievement after minimally invasive surgery lumbar decompression (MIS-LD) in patients stratified by their preoperative 12-Item Short-Form Mental Component Score (SF-12 MCS). METHODS: Patients who underwent single-level/multilevel MIS-LD were included. PROMs were administered preoperatively and 6 weeks/12 weeks/6 months/1 year postoperatively. Patients were grouped by preoperative SF-12 MCS. Demographic/perioperative characteristics were compared among groups using a χ2 and Student t test for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. Mean PROM and postoperative satisfaction scores were compared using an unpaired Student t test. PROM improvement within cohorts was assessed with paired-samples t test. MCID achievement rates were compared using χ2 analysis. RESULTS: A total of 297 patients were included: 111 patients in SF-12 MCS <48.9 and 186 patients in the SF-12 MCS ≥48.9 cohort. Cohorts showed mean postoperative differences for visual analog scale (VAS) back score at 12 weeks, VAS leg score at 6 weeks/12 weeks, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at 6 weeks/12 weeks, SF-12 MCS at all postoperative time points, and 12-Item Short-Form Physical Component Score at 6 weeks/12 weeks (P < 0.022, all). Of patients in the SF-12 MCS <48.9 cohort, more achieved MCID for SF-12 MCS at all postoperative time points and ODI at 1 year (P < 0.023, all). More patients in the SF-12 MCS ≥48.9 cohort achieved MCID for VAS leg score at 12 weeks and 12-Item Short-Form Physical Component Score at 6 weeks (P < 0.038). Patients in the SF-12 MCS <48.9 cohort showed inferior postoperative satisfaction for VAS leg score at 6 weeks/12 weeks/1 year, VAS back score at 12 weeks, and ODI at all postoperative time points. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with inferior mental health preoperatively showed worse mean short-term postoperative clinical outcome for leg/back pain, physical function and disability, short-term and long-term postoperative satisfaction for leg pain and disability, and long-term satisfaction for sleeping/lifting/walking/standing/sex/travel.