RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Eclampsia is a pregnancy complicationcharacterized bygeneralized tonic-clonicconvulsions.Not all seizures in pregnancy are eclamptic, and othercauses include epilepsy, infection,stroke,tumor, and ruptured aneurysm. CASE: A 19-year-old G1P0 presentedinlabor at term. She had a generalized tonic-clonicseizure one hour aftervaginaldelivery for which she received methergine for uterine atony. Seizure activity resolved with lorazepam and magnesium sulfate for presumed eclampsia.Brain imaging revealedvasoconstriction of theleftposterior cerebral artery and blood in the subarachnoid space,andshewas diagnosed with eclampsia with reversible cerebral vasoconstrictive syndrome (RCVS). CONCLUSION: RCVS isapregnancy-related cause of seizure that should remain on the differential for any patient presenting with a seizure in the peripartum period, especially with use of vasoconstrictive agents. Management is controversial but involves calcium channel blockers and magnesium sulfate, as well as avoidance of vasoconstrictive agents.
Assuntos
Metilergonovina/administração & dosagem , Ocitócicos/efeitos adversos , Síndrome da Leucoencefalopatia Posterior/induzido quimicamente , Hemorragia Pós-Parto/tratamento farmacológico , Eclampsia/diagnóstico , Feminino , Humanos , Metilergonovina/efeitos adversos , Ocitócicos/administração & dosagem , Síndrome da Leucoencefalopatia Posterior/diagnóstico por imagem , Gravidez , Convulsões/etiologia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To understand the perception of professionalism surrounding smartphone use (wards/educational activities) among medical students and surgical faculty. DESIGN: A prospective cohort study was conducted using an electronic survey and distributed to third- and fourth-year medical students, obstetrics/gynecology, and surgery faculty members. Five cases were randomly presented; participants were asked to review and rate the clinician's behavior on a 5-point Likert scale. SETTING: The study was completed at The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, a tertiary care institution, in the departments of gyn/ob and surgery. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 123 medical students (51% response rate) from the class of 2015/2016 along with 73 surgical faculty in the departments of gyn/ob and surgery completed the study. Of the surgical faculty, 48% were ob/gyn (54% response rate) and 52% were surgery (21% response rate). Of note, when quarrying the department of surgery all surgical faculty were included, however, only those with direct student interaction were asked to complete the survey leading to the lower response rate. RESULTS: In 3 of 5 scenarios, students and faculty had significant differences in perception of professionalism (p<0.05). Faculty were more likely to find behaviors unprofessional compared to students. The acceptability of certain behaviors was significantly correlated in some case scenarios with how participants reported using their smartphones. Personal use of technology appears to influence the perception of acceptable behavior in certain scenarios.