Surgical and procedural antibiotic prophylaxis in the surgical ICU: an American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Critical Care Committee clinical consensus document.

The use of prophylactic measures, including perioperative antibiotics, for the prevention of surgical site infections is a standard of care across surgical specialties. Unfortunately, the routine guidelines used for routine procedures do not always account for many of the factors encountered with urgent/emergent operations and critically ill or high-risk patients. This clinical consensus document created by the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Critical Care Committee is one of a three-part series and reviews surgical and procedural antibiotic prophylaxis in the surgical intensive care unit. The purpose of this clinical consensus document is to provide practical recommendations, based on expert opinion, to assist intensive care providers with decision-making for surgical prophylaxis. We specifically evaluate the current state of periprocedural antibiotic management of external ventricular drains, orthopedic operations (closed and open fractures, silver dressings, local, antimicrobial adjuncts, spine surgery, subfascial drains), abdominal operations (bowel injury and open abdomen), and bedside procedures (thoracostomy tube, gastrostomy tube, tracheostomy).

Fever and infections in surgical intensive care: an American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Critical Care Committee clinical consensus document.

The evaluation and workup of fever and the use of antibiotics to treat infections is part of daily practice in the surgical intensive care unit (ICU). Fever can be infectious or non-infectious; it is important to distinguish between the two entities wherever possible. The evidence is growing for shortening the duration of antibiotic treatment of common infections. The purpose of this clinical consensus document, created by the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Critical Care Committee, is to synthesize the available evidence, and to provide practical recommendations. We discuss the evaluation of fever, the indications to obtain cultures including urine, blood, and respiratory specimens for diagnosis of infections, the use of procalcitonin, and the decision to initiate empiric antibiotics. We then describe the treatment of common infections, specifically ventilator-associated pneumonia, catheter-associated urinary infection, catheter-related bloodstream infection, bacteremia, surgical site infection, intra-abdominal infection, ventriculitis, and necrotizing soft tissue infection.

Management of Decompensated Cirrhosis in the Surgical ICU: an American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Critical Care Committee Clinical Consensus Document.

Management of decompensated cirrhosis (DC) can be challenging for the surgical intensivist. Management of DC is often complicated by ascites, coagulopathy, hepatic encephalopathy, gastrointestinal bleeding, hepatorenal syndrome, and difficulty assessing volume status. This Clinical Consensus Document created by the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Critical Care Committee reviews practical clinical questions about the critical care management of patients with DC to facilitate best practices by the bedside provider.

Rhabdomyolysis: an American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Critical Care Committee Clinical Consensus Document.

Rhabdomyolysis is a clinical condition characterized by destruction of skeletal muscle with release of intracellular contents into the bloodstream. Intracellular contents released include electrolytes, enzymes, and myoglobin, resulting in systemic complications. Muscle necrosis is the common factor for traumatic and non-traumatic rhabdomyolysis. The systemic impact of rhabdomyolysis ranges from asymptomatic elevations in bloodstream muscle enzymes to life-threatening acute kidney injury and electrolyte abnormalities. The purpose of this clinical consensus statement is to review the present-day diagnosis, management, and prognosis of patients who develop rhabdomyolysis.

Police transport of firearm-injured patients-more often and more injured.

BACKGROUND: Police transport (PT) of penetrating trauma patients decreases the time between injury and trauma center arrival. Our study objective was to characterize trends in the rate of PT and its impact on mortality. We hypothesized that PT is increasing and that these patients are more injured. METHODS: We conducted a single-center, retrospective cohort study of adult (≥18 years) patients presenting with gunshot wounds (GSWs) to a level 1 center from 2012 to 2018. Patients transported by police or ambulance (emergency medical service [EMS]) were included. The association between mode of transport (PT vs. EMS) and mortality was evaluated using χ2, t tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, and logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 2,007 patients, there were 1,357 PT patients and 650 EMS patients. Overall in-hospital mortality was 23.7%. The rate of GSW patients arriving by PT increased from 48.9% to 78.5% over the study period (p < 0.001). Compared with EMS patients, PT patients were sicker on presentation with lower initial systolic blood pressure (98 vs. 110, p < 0.001), higher Injury Severity Score (median [interquartile range], 10 [2-75] vs. 9 [1-17]; p < 0.001) and more bullet wounds (3.5 vs. 2.9, p < 0.001). Police-transported patients more frequently underwent resuscitative thoracotomy (19.2% vs. 10.0%, p < 0.001) and immediate surgical exploration (31.3% vs. 22.6%, p < 0.001). There was no difference in adjusted in-hospital mortality between transport groups. Of patients surviving to discharge, PT patients had higher Injury Severity Score (9.6 vs. 8.3, p = 0.004) and lower systolic blood pressure on arrival (126 vs. 130, p = 0.013) than EMS patients. CONCLUSION: Police transport of GSW patients is increasing at our urban level 1 center. Compared with EMS patients, PT patients are more severely injured but have similar in-hospital mortality. Further study is necessary to understand the impact of PT on outcomes in specific subsets in penetrating trauma patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Epidemiological, level III.

Acute right heart failure after hemorrhagic shock and trauma pneumonectomy-a management approach: A blinded randomized controlled animal trial using inhaled nitric oxide.

BACKGROUND: Hemorrhagic shock and pneumonectomy causes an acute increase in pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR). The increase in PVR and right ventricular (RV) afterload leads to acute RV failure, thus reducing left ventricular (LV) preload and output. Inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) lowers PVR by relaxing pulmonary arterial smooth muscle without remarkable systemic vascular effects. We hypothesized that with hemorrhagic shock and pneumonectomy, iNO can be used to decrease PVR and mitigate right heart failure. METHODS: A hemorrhagic shock and pneumonectomy model was developed using sheep. Sheep received lung protective ventilatory support and were instrumented to serially obtain measurements of hemodynamics, gas exchange, and blood chemistry. Heart function was assessed with echocardiography. After randomization to study gas of iNO 20 ppm (n = 9) or nitrogen as placebo (n = 9), baseline measurements were obtained. Hemorrhagic shock was initiated by exsanguination to a target of 50% of the baseline mean arterial pressure. The resuscitation phase was initiated, consisting of simultaneous left pulmonary hilum ligation, via median sternotomy, infusion of autologous blood and initiation of study gas. Animals were monitored for 4 hours. RESULTS: All animals had an initial increase in PVR. PVR remained elevated with placebo; with iNO, PVR decreased to baseline. Echo showed improved RV function in the iNO group while it remained impaired in the placebo group. After an initial increase in shunt and lactate and decrease in SvO2, all returned toward baseline in the iNO group but remained abnormal in the placebo group. CONCLUSION: These data indicate that by decreasing PVR, iNO decreased RV afterload, preserved RV and LV function, and tissue oxygenation in this hemorrhagic shock and pneumonectomy model. This suggests that iNO may be a useful clinical adjunct to mitigate right heart failure and improve survival when trauma pneumonectomy is required.

Does socioeconomic status predict outcomes after cholecystectomy?

BACKGROUND: This study was performed to evaluate the effect of socioeconomic status (SES) on outcomes after cholecystectomy. METHODS: The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database (2005 to 2011) was queried for patients undergoing cholecystectomy. Clinically relevant variables were used to examine clinical characteristics, postoperative complications, and mortality. SES was investigated by examining income quartile. RESULTS: More than 2 million patients underwent cholecystectomy during this period. They were divided into quartiles by SES. The lowest cohort was younger (50 years, P < .001) and had the lowest Charlson Comorbidity Index (2.08, P < .001). This cohort was more likely African American (15.8%, P < .001) and more likely to have Medicaid (19.2%, P < .001). Using split-sample validation and multivariate analysis, lower SES, Charlson comorbidity Index, and Medicaid recipients were associated with increased mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with Medicaid and lower SES had poorer outcomes after cholecystectomy.

Assuring survival of safety-net surgical patients.

BACKGROUND: Survival of surgical inpatients is a key quality metric. Patient, surgeon, and system factors all contribute to inpatient mortality, and sophisticated risk adjustment is required to assess outcomes. When the mortality of general surgery patients was determined to be high at a safety-net hospital, a comprehensive approach was undertaken to improve patient survival. METHODS: General surgical service line mortality was measured in the database of the University HealthSystem Consortium from January 2013 through June 2015. Ten best practices were implemented sequentially to decrease observed and/or increase expected mortality. University HealthSystem Consortium mortality rank, observed, expected, and observed/expected index as well as early deaths were compared with control charts for 30 months. RESULTS: University HealthSystem Consortium general surgery mortality improved from the bottom decile to the top quartile, while Case Mix Index increased from 2.48 to 2.82 (P < .05). Observed mortality decreased from 3.39 to 2.35%. Expected mortality increased from 1.40 to 2.73% (P < .05). The observed/expected mortality index decreased from 2.43 to 0.86 (P < .05). Early deaths decreased from 0.52 to 0% (P < .05). CONCLUSION: Risk-adjusted mortality and early deaths decreased significantly over 30 months in general surgery patients. Systematic implementation of quality best practices was associated with improved survival of general surgery patients at a safety-net medical center.

A prospective randomized study of the efficacy of "Turning Point," an inpatient violence intervention program.

BACKGROUND: From 2002 to 2011, there were more than 17,000 shootings in Philadelphia. "Turning Point," Temple University Hospital's inpatient violence intervention program, takes advantage of the teachable moment that occurs after violent injury. In addition to receiving traditional social work services, Turning Point patients watch their trauma bay resuscitation video and a movie about violence, meet with a gunshot wound survivor and an outpatient case manager, and also undergo psychiatric assessment. The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of Turning Point in changing attitudes toward guns and violence among victims of penetrating trauma. METHODS: This prospective randomized study was conducted from January 2012 to January 2014. Patients who sustained a gunshot or stab wound were randomized to standard of care, which involved traditional social work services only, or Turning Point. The Attitudes Toward Guns and Violence Questionnaire was administered to assess attitude change. Analysis was performed with repeated-measures analysis of variance. A p < 0.05 was significant. RESULTS: A total of 80 of a potential 829 patients completed the study (40 standard of care, 40 Turning Point). The most common reason for exclusion was anticipated length of stay being less than 48 hours. The two groups were similar with respect to most demographics. Unlike the standard-of-care group, the Turning Point group demonstrated a 50% reduction in aggressive response to shame, a 29% reduction in comfort with aggression, and a 19% reduction in overall proclivity toward violence. CONCLUSIONS: Turning Point is effective in changing attitudes toward guns and violence among victims of penetrating trauma. Longer follow-up is necessary to determine if this program can truly be a turning point in patients' lives. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/care management study, level II.

Comparing open gastrostomy tube to percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube in heart transplant patients.

INTRODUCTION: Impaired wound healing due to immunosuppression has led some surgeons to preferentially use open gastrostomy tube (OGT) over percutaneous gastrostomy tube (PEG) in heart transplant patients when long-term enteral access is deemed necessary. METHODS: The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database (2005-2010) was queried for all heart transplant patients. Those receiving OGT were compared to those treated with PEG tube. RESULTS: There were 498 patients requiring long-term enteral access treated with a gastrostomy tube, with 424 (85.2%) receiving a PEG and 74 (14.8%) an OGT. The PEG cohort had higher Charlson comorbidity Index (4.1 vs. 2.0, p = 0.002) and a higher incidence of post-operative acute renal failure (31.5 vs. 12.7%, p = 0.001). Post-operative mortality was not different when comparing the two groups (13.8 vs. 6.1%, p = 0.06). On multivariate analysis, while both PEG (OR: 7.87, 95%C.I: 5.88-10.52, p < 0.001) and OGT (OR 5.87, 95%CI: 2.19-15.75, p < 0.001) were independently associated with mortality, PEG conferred a higher mortality risk. CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest reported study to date comparing outcomes between PEG and OGT in heart transplant patients. PEG does not confer any advantage over OGT in this patient population with respect to morbidity, mortality, and length of stay.

Noncardiac Surgical Procedures After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.

As left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are increasingly used for patients with end-stage heart failure, the need for noncardiac surgical procedures (NCSs) in these patients will continue to rise. We examined the various types of NCS required and its outcomes in LVAD patients requiring NCS. The National Inpatient Sample Database was examined for all patients implanted with an LVAD from 2007 to 2010. Patients requiring NCS after LVAD implantation were compared to all other patients receiving an LVAD. There were 1,397 patients undergoing LVAD implantation. Of these, 298 (21.3%) required 459 NCS after LVAD implantation. There were 153 (33.3%) general surgery procedures, with abdominal/bowel procedures (n = 76, 16.6%) being most common. Thoracic (n = 141, 30.7%) and vascular (n = 140, 30.5%) procedures were also common. Patients requiring NCS developed more wound infections (9.1 vs. 4.6%, p = 0.004), greater bleeding complications (44.0 vs. 24.8%, p < 0.001) and were more likely to develop any complication (87.2 vs. 82.0%, p = 0.001). On multivariate analysis, the requirement of NCSs (odds ratio: 1.45, 95% confidence interval: 0.95-2.20, p = 0.08) was not associated with mortality. Noncardiac surgical procedures are commonly required after LVAD implantation, and the incidence of complications after NCS is high. This suggests that patients undergoing even low-risk NCS should be cared at centers with treating surgeons and LVAD specialists.

Comparison of open gastrostomy tube to percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube in lung transplant patients.

INTRODUCTION: Lung transplant patients require a high degree of immunosuppression, which can impair wound healing when surgical procedures are required. We hypothesized that because of impaired healing, lung transplant patients requiring gastrostomy tubes would have better outcomes with open gastrostomy tube (OGT) as compared to percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube (PEG). METHODS: The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) Database (2005-2010) was queried for all lung transplant recipients requiring OGT or PEG. RESULTS: There were 215 patients requiring gastrostomy tube, with 44 OGT and 171 PEG. The two groups were not different with respect to age (52.0 vs. 56.9 years, p = 0.40) and Charlson Comorbidity Index (3.3 vs. 3.5, p = 0.75). Incidence of acute renal failure was higher in the PEG group (35.2 vs. 11.8%, p = 0.003). Post-operative pneumonia, myocardial infarction, surgical site infection, DVT/PE, and urinary tract infection were not different. Post-operative mortality was higher in the PEG group (11.2 vs. 0.0%, p = 0.02). Using multiple variable analysis, PEG tube was independently associated with mortality (HR: 1.94, 95%C.I: 1.45-2.58). Variables associated with survival included age, female gender, white race, and larger hospital bed capacity. DISCUSSION: OGT may be the preferred method of gastric access for lung transplant recipients. CONCLUSIONS: In lung transplant recipients, OGT results in decreased morbidity and mortality when compared to PEG.

The evil of good is better: Making the case for basic life support transport for penetrating trauma victims in an urban environment.

BACKGROUND: Controversy remains over the ideal way to transport penetrating trauma victims in an urban environment. Both advance life support (ALS) and basic life support (BLS) transports are used in most urban centers. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at an urban Level I trauma center. Victims of penetrating trauma transported by ALS, BLS, or police from January 1, 2008, to November 31, 2013, were identified. Patient survival by mode of transport and by level of care received was analyzed using logistic regression. RESULTS: During the study period, 1,490 penetrating trauma patients were transported by ALS (44.8%), BLS (15.6%), or police (39.6%) personnel. The majority of injuries were gunshot wounds (72.9% for ALS, 66.8% for BLS, 90% for police). Median transport minutes were significantly longer for ALS (16 minutes) than for BLS (14.5 minutes) transports (p = 0.012). After adjusting for transport time and Injury Severity Score (ISS), among victims with an ISS of 0 to 30, there was a 2.4-fold increased odds of death (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3-4.4) if transported by ALS as compared with BLS. With an ISS of greater than 30, this relationship did not exist (odds ratio, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.3-2.7). When examined by type of care provided, patients with an ISS of 0 to 30 given ALS support were 3.7 times more likely to die than those who received BLS support (95% CI, 2.0-6.8). Among those with an ISS of greater than 30, no relationship was evident (odds ratio, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.3-2.7). CONCLUSION: Among penetrating trauma victims with an ISS of 30 or lower, an increased odds of death was identified for those treated and/or transported by ALS personnel. For those with an ISS of greater than 30, no survival advantage was identified with ALS transport or care. Results suggest that rapid transport may be more important than increased interventions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, level IV.

Pertussis vaccination in adult trauma patients: Are we missing an opportunity?

INTRODUCTION: Trauma centers commonly administer tetanus prophylaxis to patients sustaining open wounds. In the United States, there are different vaccinations available for adult administration: tetanus/diphtheria toxoid (Td) or tetanus/reduced diphtheria and acellular pertussis (Tdap). The importance of the Tdap preparation lies in its vaccination against pertussis while providing tetanus immunity. Vaccination against pertussis is paramount for disease prevention. In recent decades, there has been a steady rise in pertussis cases. This epidemic increase caused the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) to recommend the routine use of Tdap when tetanus prophylaxis is indicated. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to gather data on which formulation of tetanus vaccination is currently being given to adult trauma patients. We hoped to increase awareness of the expanded recommendations for vaccination against pertussis when tetanus prophylaxis is indicated, thus providing patients with protection against pertussis. METHODS: An institutional review board exempt, web-based, nationwide survey was sent to adult trauma center coordinators that could be located via an Internet search. Questions included trauma center level designation, number of trauma evaluations per year, zip code, hospital description (university, university affiliated, or community), and which vaccination is given for adults <65 years and those ≥65. At the conclusion of the survey, hyperlinks to the CDC ACIP recommendations were provided as an educational tool. RESULTS: A total of 718 emails were successfully sent and 439 (61%) completed surveys were returned. Level 4/5 centers had the highest compliance rates for those patients between ages 18 and 64 (93%), followed by level 2/3 (87%), and then level 1 centers (57%). Among all centers, the use of Tdap was lower in the ≥65 year group. Level 2 trauma centers were the most compliant with this age group (61%) followed by level 4/5 (57%) and level 1 (43%) centers. CONCLUSION: With the increase in pertussis cases, vaccination remains crucial to prevention. The CDC recommendations for Tdap have existed for adults <65 years since 2005 and those ≥65 years since 2012. However, many adult trauma centers do not adhere to the current CDC ACIP guidelines for tetanus/pertussis vaccination. In particular, level 1 trauma centers and those classified as university hospitals have the lowest rate of compliance with these recommendations. Through this survey, trauma centers were educated on current recommendations. Increased vaccination of trauma patients with Tdap should improve protection against this virulent pathogen.

Examining Noncardiac Surgical Procedures in Patients on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

As extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is increasingly used for patients with cardiac and/or pulmonary failure, the need for noncardiac surgical procedures (NCSPs) in these patients will continue to increase. This study examined the NCSP required in patients supported with ECMO and determined which variables affect outcomes. The National Inpatient Sample Database was examined for patients supported with ECMO from 2007 to 2010. There were 563 patients requiring ECMO during the study period. Of these, 269 (47.8%) required 380 NCSPs. There were 149 (39.2%) general surgical procedures, with abdominal exploration/bowel resection (18.2%) being most common. Vascular (29.5%) and thoracic procedures (23.4%) were also common. Patients requiring NCSP had longer median length of stay (15.5 vs. 9.2 days, p = 0.001), more wound infections (7.4% vs. 3.7%, p = 0.02), and more bleeding complications (27.9% vs. 17.3%, p = 0.01). The incidences of other complications and inpatient mortality (54.3% vs. 58.2%, p = 0.54) were similar. On logistic regression, the requirement of NCSPs was not associated with mortality (odds ratio [OR]: 0.91, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.68-1.23, p = 0.17). However, requirement of blood transfusion was associated with mortality (OR: 1.70, 95% CI: 1.06-2.74, p = 0.03). Although NCSPs in patients supported with ECMO does not increase mortality, it results in increased morbidity and longer hospital stay.