Use of taurolidine in lung transplantation for cystic fibrosis and impact on bacterial colonization.

OBJECTIVES: The presence of bacterial colonization that causes chronic pulmonary infections in cystic fibrosis (CF) patients remains a key issue before lung transplantation. We sought to assess the impact of intraoperative taurolidine lavage on bacterial colonization and long-term outcomes following lung transplantation in CF patients. METHODS: Between 2007 and 2013, 114 CF patients underwent lung transplantation at our institute, and taurolidine 2% bronchial lavage was applied in a substantial proportion of patients (n = 42). A detailed analysis of donor and recipient bacterial colonization status in treatment and control groups and their impact on outcome was performed. RESULTS: The proportion of recipients colonized with Pseudomonas aeruginosa was lower in the taurolidine group at 3 months (P < 0.001) and at 1 year (P = 0.053) postoperatively, despite no differences before transplant (P = 1.000). Moreover, a complete eradication of Burkholderia cepacia and Stenotrophomonas maltophilias colonizations could be achieved in the taurolidine group, whereas in the non-taurolidine group, persistent B. cepacia and S. maltophilias colonizations were observed. Early outcome in the taurolidine group was superior regarding fraction of expired volume in 1 s at 3 and 6 months after surgery with 74.5 ± 14.6 vs 60.4 ± 17.5 (P < 0.001) and 80.6 ± 16.9 vs 67.2 ± 19.4 (P = 0.005) percent of predicted values, respectively. In terms of long-term overall survival (P = 0.277) and freedom from bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (P = 0.979), both groups were comparable. CONCLUSIONS: Taurolidine might be associated with a reduced proportion of CF patients colonized with multiresistant pathogens, particularly with P. aeruginosa. Long-term results should be further assessed in larger multicentre trials.

Zonal organ allocation system and its impact on long-term outcomes after lung transplantation: a propensity score matched analysis†.

OBJECTIVE: Zonal organ allocation system comprises organ procurement by teams within a specific geographical area of each retrieval team. Therefore, in a substantial number of cases organs are retrieved by 'foreign' teams and are sent for transplantation to the implanting centre. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of zonal organ allocation system on early- and long-term outcomes after lung transplantation (LTx). METHODS: Included were 331 consecutive patients who underwent LTx performed at Harefield Hospital between January 2007 and January 2015. Recipients were divided into two groups depending on the organ retrieval team: 204 (61.6%) patients were transplanted using lungs procured by our institutional team (institutional group), whereas 127 (38.4%) organs were retrieved by other teams (external group) from experienced transplant centres in the UK. To exclude selection bias and other confounders, a 1:1 propensity score-based matching procedure was performed resulting in a total number of 238 donors and recipients who were well matched for baseline characteristics. The primary end-points were overall survival after LTx and freedom from bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS). Secondary end-points were perioperative clinical characteristics as well as adverse events that occurred over the follow-up. RESULT: After propensity score matching all donor characteristics and all baseline recipient characteristics were statistically similar between the two groups. In terms of early postoperative results, both groups were statistically comparable. However, there was a trend towards higher incidence of primary graft dysfunction in the external group (P = 0.054). Regarding long-term results with up to 7 years of follow-up, the overall survival also appeared to be poorer in the external group; however, this difference did not reach statistical significance. The freedom from BOS over the long-term follow was significantly poorer in the external group (P = 0.040). CONCLUSION: Despite excellent early outcomes the zonal allocation system might be associated with significantly poorer long-term outcomes in terms of freedom from BOS after bilateral LTx. Further research is needed to find the underlying factors leading to these results.

Moving Back to the Future: Use of Organ Care System Lung for Lobectomy Before Lobar Lung Transplantation.

BACKGROUND Lung transplantation remains the gold standard treatment for patients with end-stage lung disease. Lobar lung transplantation allows for transplantation of size-mismatch donor lungs in small recipients; however, donor lung volume reduction represents a challenging surgical technique. In this paper we present our initial experience with bilateral lobectomy in donor lungs before lobar lung transplantation using normothermic perfusion on the Organ Care System (OCS) Lung. MATERIAL AND METHODS Specifics of the surgical technique for donor lung instrumentation on the OCS, lobar dissection on the OCS, and right and left donor lobectomies are presented in detail. RESULTS Potential advantages of the use of the OCS for lobectomy for lobar lung transplantation are described in this section. Donor lung volume reduction utilizing OCS appeared to be easier and safer compared to the conventional cold storage technique, due to continuous perfusion of the lungs with blood and well-distended vessels that offer the feel of live lobectomy. Moreover, the OCS represents a platform for donor organ assessment and optimization of its function before transplantation. CONCLUSIONS Donor lung volume reduction was safe and feasible utilizing the OCS, which could be a useful tool for volume reduction in cases of size mismatch. Further research is needed to evaluate early and long-term results after lobar lung transplantation using the OCS in clinical studies.

Utilization of the organ care system for bilateral lung transplantation: preliminary results of a comparative study.

OBJECTIVES: Lung transplantation (LTx) remains the gold standard for patients with end-stage lung disease. However, due to donor organ shortage and brain stem death-related lung injury, only a small proportion of lungs are used increasing the mortality rate on the waiting list. A portable normothermic continuous ex vivo perfusion using the organ care system (OCS) represents one of the tools to increase the pool of donor organs and to improve the function of marginal lungs. We sought to assess mid-term outcomes after LTx using OCS and to compare outcomes including overall survival and freedom from bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) with those after conventional preservation. METHODS: Included were 322 consecutive LTx performed at Harefield Hospital between January 2007 and December 2014. Recipients were divided into two groups depending on the organ storage strategy: the majority of patients (n = 308) were transplanted using lungs after cold storage (cold storage group), whereas 14 organs were preserved using OCS (OCS group). The primary end-points were overall survival and freedom from BOS after LTx. The secondary end-points were perioperative clinical characteristics and adverse events. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in terms of most baseline donor and recipient characteristics. The percentage of heavy smokers among donors [8 (2.9%) vs 6 (42.9%), P < 0.001] and the median number of pack-years smoked by donors [14 (7;24) vs 25 (24;30), P = 0.026] were statistically higher in the OCS group. Patients from the OCS group had significantly better postoperative FEV1 at 3 [69 (54;86) vs 93 (87;89), P < 0.001] and 6 [77 (60;90) vs 94 (84;100), P = 0.006] months. There were no statistically significant differences in terms of cumulative survival and freedom from BOS between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Results after LTx using OCS are acceptable with excellent survival, and superior early outcome in terms of postoperative lung function despite higher risk in the OCS group. Further larger prospective trials are warranted to confirm our preliminary results and to elaborate long-term outcomes.

Extended Recipient Criteria in Lung Transplantation: Impact of Pleural Abnormalities on Primary Graft Dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: Because of improved surgical expertise and intraoperative management, pleural disease (PD+) represents a relatively minor contraindication to lung transplantation (LTx). The presence of pleural abnormalities from previous procedures or pleural involvement from fungal or bacterial disease is not considered a limiting factor for LTx. However there are no studies available to assess the impact of pleural diseases on short- and midterm outcomes after LTx. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 163 consecutive patients who underwent LTx between 2010 and 2013. Patients were divided according to the presence of pleural abnormalities before the operation (PD+ versus PD-). The primary end point of the study was primary graft dysfunction (PGD; grade 3) and overall survival. To avoid possible selection bias and to heck the robustness of the results, a propensity score-matching analysis (1:3) was performed. RESULTS: A total of 26 patients (16%) had pleural abnormalities before transplantation. Intra- and postoperative variables were comparable. PD+ was associated with a significantly higher incidence of PGD at 0 and 48 hours postoperatively (p = 0.037 and p = 0.032, respectively). Moreover, PD+ was associated with significantly worse survival at 3 months (p = 0.021). Although there was a trend toward worse early overall survival in the Kaplan-Meier estimate (Breslow p = 0.050), midterm survival was comparable (log-rank p = 0.240). CONCLUSIONS: LTx in patients with preoperative pleural abnormalities is feasible. Identifying higher-risk recipients with pleural abnormalities might have important clinical relevance because of a higher incidence of PGD and worse early survival, even though midterm survival is comparable.

Long-term results after lung transplantation using organs from circulatory death donors: a propensity score-matched analysis†.

OBJECTIVES: Due to organ shortage in lung transplantation (LTx), donation after circulatory death (DCD) has been implemented in several countries, contributing to an increasing number of organs transplanted. We sought to assess long-term outcomes after LTx with organs procured following circulatory death in comparison with those obtained from donors after brain death (DBD). METHODS: Between January 2007 and November 2013, 302 LTxs were performed in our institution, whereby 60 (19.9%) organs were retrieved from DCD donors. We performed propensity score matching (DCD:DBD = 1:2) based on preoperative donor and recipient factors that were significantly different in univariate analysis. RESULTS: After propensity matching, there were no statistically significant differences between the groups in terms of demographics and preoperative donor and recipient characteristics. There were no significant differences regarding intraoperative variables and total ischaemic time. Patients from the DCD group had significantly higher incidence of primary graft dysfunction grade 3 at the end of the procedure (P = 0.014), and significantly lower pO2/FiO2 ratio during the first 24 h after the procedure (P = 0.018). There was a trend towards higher incidence of the need for postoperative extracorporeal life support in the DCD group. Other postoperative characteristics were comparable. While the overall cumulative survival was not significantly different, the DCD group had significantly poorer results in terms of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS)-free survival in the long-term follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term results after LTx with organs procured following DCD are in general comparable with those obtained after DBD LTx. However, patients transplanted using organs from DCD donors have a predisposition for development of BOS in the longer follow-up.

Extracorporeal life support in patients with refractory cardiogenic shock: keep them awake.

OBJECTIVES: Traditionally, patients on extracorporeal life support (ECLS) are sedated and mechanically ventilated and therefore prone to complications related to immobility and ventilation. We adopted this 'Awake ECLS' strategy for the patients with refractory cardiogenic shock (RCS) as a bridge to decision. METHODS: Sixty-eight patients with RCS were supported by ECLS (All veno-arterial) in years 2010-2014. Patients that could not survive 24 h after ECLS implantation (9 patients) were excluded from the study. Study population constituted 59 patients-'Awake' group (n = 18; maintained awake without intubation) and 'Control' group (n = 41; intubated and required mechanical ventilation). RESULTS: Nine (50%) patients were awake at implantation, with 5 of them remaining free of sedation and ventilator support through to explantation. Nine patients were ventilated at the time of implantation but subsequently extubated and remained non-intubated and ventilator free. Post-ECLS survival at 1 month was 78 and 42% while the survival to discharge was 78 and 37% in awake and control group, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: ECLS as a bridge to decision in RCS is effective in restoring adequate systemic perfusion and recovering end-organ function. ECLS can be initiated in awake patients with RCS and patients can be awakened on ECLS. The 'awake ECLS' strategy may avoid complications related to mechanical ventilation, sedation and immobilization. RCS patients supported on ECLS without severe metabolic acidosis, multiorgan failure, intra-aortic balloon pump or uncertain neurological status are more likely to be weaned from the ventilator. Patients that are awake at the time of ECLS implantation are more likely to remain awake during ECLS.

Minimally invasive access for central extracorporeal life support: how we do it.

Central extracorporeal life support (ECLS) is an effective treatment method of cardiogenic shock patients with or without lung failure. However, complications like infection and bleeding are common. The classical implantation approach requires full sternotomy, mobilization of the heart, with the well-known risks of bleeding and mediastinal infections. We present our minimally invasive technique for central ECLS through a nonsternotomy incision. Minimized right-sided thoracotomy is performed. Flexible arterial and venous cannulas are tunneled toward the right thoracotomy incision through the eighth intercostal space. A sewing ring is secured to the right atrium and a tube graft is anastomosed to the ascending aorta. Following full-dose heparinization, the arterial cannula is inserted with the tip into the vascular graft of the ascending aorta and the venous cannula via the ring into the right atrium. After meticulous deairing, the central ECLS is set at full flow.

Evaluation of the organ care system in heart transplantation with an adverse donor/recipient profile.

BACKGROUND: A severe shortage of available donor organs has created an impetus to use extended criteria organs for heart transplantation. Although such attempts increase donor organ availability, they may result in an adverse donor-recipient risk profile. The TransMedics Organ Care System (OCS) (TransMedics, Inc, Boston) allows preservation of the donor heart by perfusing the organ at 34°C in a beating state, potentially reducing the detrimental effect of cold storage and providing additional assessment options. We describe a single-center experience with the OCS in high-risk heart transplant procedures. METHODS: Thirty hearts were preserved using the OCS between February 2013 and January 2014, 26 of which (86.7%) were transplanted. Procedures were classified as high risk based on (1) donor factors, ie, transport time more than 2.5 hours with estimated ischemic time longer than 4 hours, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) less than 50%, left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), donor cardiac arrest, alcohol/drug abuse, coronary artery disease or (2) recipient factors, ie, mechanical circulatory support or elevated pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR), or both. RESULTS: Donor and recipient age was 37 ± 12 years and 43 ± 13 years, respectively. Allograft cold ischemia time was 85 ± 17 minutes and OCS perfusion time was 284 ± 90 minutes. The median intensive care unit stay was 6 days. One death (3.8%) was observed over the follow-up: 257 ± 116 (109-445 days). There was preserved allograft function in 92% of patients, with a mean LVEF of 64% ± 5%. CONCLUSIONS: Use of the OCS is associated with markedly improved short-term outcomes and transplant activity by allowing use of organs previously not considered suitable for transplantation or selection of higher risk recipients, or both.

Risk factors predictive of one-year mortality after lung transplantation.

OBJECTIVES: Lung transplantation (LTx) is a life-saving therapy for patients with end-stage lung disease. However, there remains a significant postoperative complication rate and mortality in this extreme patient group. The aim of the present study was to identify donor, recipient and perioperative risk factors for one-year mortality after LTx. METHODS: A total of 252 LTxs were performed in our institution between 2007 and 2013. Donor and recipient demographics and clinical characteristics of 1-year survivors and non-survivors were collected and compared retrospectively. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed on univariate predictors for 1-year mortality with an entry criterion of P < 0.05. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis revealed female-to-male transplantation (95% CI: 0.088-0.767; P = 0.015), lower pO2/FiO2-ratio at 72 h postoperatively (95% CI: 0.988-0.999; P = 0.024), need for postoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support (95% CI: 0.035-0.658; P = 0.012) and on-pump technique (95% CI: 0.007-0.944; P = 0.045) as the only independent predictors for 1-year mortality. Mainly unplanned intraoperative conversion to cardiopulmonary bypass contributed to poorer survival in patients who underwent LTx using cardiopulmonary bypass (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that the unplanned use of CPB (conversion from off- to on-pump) might adversely affect outcome after LTx. Also, the negative impact of female-to-male transplantation should not be underestimated during recipient selection. Furthermore, poor early postoperative oxygenation, particularly with the need for extracorporeal oxygenation, might be a very strong negative prognostic factor after LTx.

Outcomes after implantation of 139 full-support continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices as a bridge to transplantation.

OBJECTIVES: Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are a routine treatment for patients with advanced heart failure as a bridge to transplantation. The aim of this study was to present our institutional experience and mid-term outcomes after implantation of 139 continuous-flow (cf) LVADs as a bridge to transplantation. METHODS: One hundred and thirty-nine consecutive LVAD implantations were performed in our institution between July 2007 and August 2013. The mean age of the population was 44.0 ± 13.7 years and 24 (17%) of the patients were female. A substantial number of the patients were on preoperative mechanical support: 35 (25%) with an intra-aortic balloon pump, 9 (6.5%) with an extracorporeal membrane oxygenator and 25 (18%) with previous LVAD, for LVAD exchange. RESULTS: The mean support duration was 514 ± 481 days, whereas the longest support duration was 2493 days (>6 years). The overall cumulative survival rate following cfLVAD implantation was 89% at 30 days, 76% at 1 year and 66% at 2 years (Fig. 1). There was a statistically significant difference in survival in favour of first LVAD implantation compared with VAD exchange: 91 vs 80% at 30 days, 79 vs 57% at 1 year and 70 vs 43% at 2 years (log-rank P = 0.010). Postoperatively, patients had a significant improvement in end-organ function 1 month after LVAD implantation. In addition, comparison of two different devices [HeartMate II (HM II) and HeartWare] using propensity score matching showed no significant differences in survival and most postoperative adverse events. However, patients supported with HM II required significantly more units of fresh frozen plasma (P = 0.020) with a trend towards a higher use of red blood cells (P = 0.094), and were also more likely to develop percutaneous site infections (P = 0.022). CONCLUSIONS: HM II and HeartWare cfLVADs have excellent early postoperative outcomes and good mid-term survival, despite a considerable number of patients needing VAD exchange.

Simple and non-invasive techniques to evaluate the function of CircuLite Synergy.

OBJECTIVES: The Synergy CircuLite micropump is a novel partial-support miniature left ventricular assist device that propels 2-3 l/min blood from the left atrium into the right subclavian artery. The ability of currently available investigative modalities to confirm Synergy pump malfunction is limited. The Synergy speed fluctuates periodically (at 10-s intervals) from the baseline to a transient decrease followed by a transient increase (alternating speed algorithm, ASA) with the purpose of changing the blood flow behaviour, thereby reducing thrombogenicity. The aim of this study was to develop a simple non-invasive monitoring technique to assess pump function based on the detection of the ASA in the peripheral microcirculation. METHODS: Between February 2012 and July 2013, 10 patients with advanced chronic heart failure underwent Synergy implantation at our institution. The pump function was assessed by echocardiography and invasive monitoring according to standard protocols; additionally, the pump speed and power consumption were monitored. During the pump function assessment, the pulse oximeter waveform was recorded from the index fingers of the left and right hand with simultaneous pump auscultation using a stethoscope positioned on the pump (right infra-clavicular pocket). RESULTS: The pulse oximeter waveform was readily detectable from the right and left hand of all study patients. If the Synergy function was normal, there was a significant difference in the morphology of the pulse oximeter waveform from each hand: the ASA algorithm produced a more pronounced variation (giant wave) in the trace from the right hand than from the left. The giant waves invariably coincided with the sound variation associated with the ASA algorithms, which were detected regularly at 10-s intervals. CONCLUSIONS: We describe a simple, readily applicable, inexpensive, non-invasive technique that allows evaluation of Synergy pump function and may have diagnostic utility under conditions of suspected pump thrombus/malfunction. This technique is readily applicable from the early post-implant period throughout support and allows clinical personnel to verify blood flow variation through the Synergy, thereby providing a novel method of assessing device function.

Outcomes after different non-sternotomy approaches to left single-vessel revascularization: a comparative study with up to 10-year follow-up.

OBJECTIVES: Various non-sternotomy approaches have been used for left internal mammary artery (LIMA) grafting in left single-vessel revascularization. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of three different non-sternotomy techniques on long-term outcomes after left single-vessel revascularization. METHODS: A total of 502 patients having single-vessel LAD disease treated from April 2003 to May 2013 by minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting (MIDCAB), endoscopically assisted coronary artery bypass grafting (EACAB) or robotically assisted direct coronary artery bypass grafting (RADCAB) were reviewed. In all cases, distal anastomoses were performed through anterolateral minithoracotomy incisions. In-hospital and long-term (10-year) outcomes were compared using standard and propensity score-adjusted analyses. RESULTS: One hundred and eighty-nine patients had MIDCAB, 76 had EACAB and 236 had RADCAB. After propensity score matching, RADCAB patients had significantly longer operative duration (P < 0.001), whereas MIDCAB and RADCAB patients had significantly higher incidence of postoperative angina over the follow-up (P = 0.034). The groups were comparable regarding in-hospital mortality and reintervention rate as well as incidence of myocardial infarction, reoperations, reinterventions and cardiac death. All groups showed comparable long-term survival (P = 0.943). CONCLUSIONS: MIDCAB, EACAB and RADCAB are associated with similar long-term survival and incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) in single-vessel surgical revascularization. However, the endoscopic approach was found to be free from the disadvantages of longer operating duration observed in RADCAB or higher incidence of angina and shorter freedom from MACEs observed in both MIDCAB and RADCAB groups.

Lung transplantation from donors outside standard acceptability criteria--are they really marginal?

Lung transplantation (LTx) from "extended donor criteria" donors may reduce significantly organ shortage. However, its influence on results remains unclear. In this study, we evaluate retrospectively the results of LTx from donors outside standard criteria: PaO2/FiO2 ratio < 300 mmHg, age over 55 years, and history of smoking > 20 pack-years. Two hundred and forty-eight patients underwent first time LTx in our institution between January 2007 and January 2013. Seventy-nine patients (Group I) received organs from "extended donor criteria" and 169 patients (Group II) from "standard donor criteria." Recipients' and donors' demographics, perioperative variables, and outcome were compared. Donors from Group I were significantly older [median (interquartile range)]: 52.5 (44;58) vs. 42 (28.5;48.5) years (P < 0.001) with lower PaO2/FiO2 ratio: 366 ± 116.1 455 ± 80.5 mmHg (P < 0.001), higher incidence of smoking history: 57.7% vs. 41.8% (P = 0.013), and more extensive smoking history: 24(15;30) vs. 10(3.75;14) pack-years (P < 0.001). Other parameters were comparable. Recipients' gender, diagnosis, percentage of patients operated on pump and receiving double LTx were also comparable. Recipients from Group I were significantly older: 50 (42;57) vs. 44 (29.5;53.5) years (P = 001). There were no differences observed in recipients' prevalence of primary graft dysfunction (PGD) grade 3 over first three postoperative days, duration of mechanical ventilation, intensive care and hospital length of stay, prevalence of rejection, and bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS). 90-day, 1-year, and 5-year survival (Group I vs. II) were also similar: 88.6% vs. 91.7%, 83.2% vs. 84.6%, and 59% vs. 68.2% (log rank P = 0.367). Carefully selected donor lungs from outside the standard acceptability criteria may expand existing donor pool with no detrimental effect on LTx outcome.

No-clamp technique for pulmonary artery and venous anastomoses in lung transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Lung transplantation (LTx) is a complex surgical procedure conventionally performed with clamps on the recipient pulmonary artery (PA) and left atrial (LA) cuff, with or without cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). The clamps may be awkward to apply and maintain on these structures, potentially causing injury and possibly compromising the quality of anastomosis. We describe a no-clamp technique for performing these types of anastomoses. METHODS: A total of 184 LTx procedures performed under CPB were grouped depending on clamping of recipient PA and LA during anastomosis using either the "no-clamp" technique (Group 1, n = 41) or the conventional technique (Group 2, n = 143). Pre-operative donor and recipient demographics and baseline characteristics as well as post-operative outcomes were compared. RESULTS: The demographics and pre-operative baseline characteristics of donors and recipients in both the groups were similar. Patients in Group 1 had a significantly shorter total ischemic time (p < 0.001), CPB time (p < 0.001), decreased incidence of post-LTx atrial fibrillation (p = 0.048), less need for blood and blood products transfusion, and fewer post-LTx pulmonary infections (p = 0.038). No patient in any group had post-LTx stroke. Although the incidence of post-operative bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) did not differ between the two groups (p = 0.638), patients in Group 1 had significantly better mid- and long-term survival (p = 0.013): 89.7% vs 80%, 89.7% vs 66.5% and 89.7% vs 62.2% at 1, 3 and 6 years after LTx, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The no-clamp technique for anastomosis of PA and LA in LTx is feasible and safe. It may reduce warm ischemia time as well as CPB time, with improvement in post-LTx outcomes. It may also reduce the incidence of post-LTx atrial arrhythmias.

Aortic valve replacement 10 years after lung transplantation.

Age-related native pathologic conditions are an inevitable sequela in long-term survivors of solid organ transplantation. A sexagenarian presented with severe aortic valve stenosis 10 years after lung transplantation (LTx). Despite overwhelming concerns of infection because of long-term immunosuppression and the risk of postoperative deterioration of function in transplanted lungs, an open heart surgical procedure with appropriate perioperative management was undertaken, and a successful aortic valve replacement (AVR) was performed.

Influence of donor smoking on midterm outcomes after lung transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Lung transplantation (LTx) is significantly limited by donor organ shortage. Donor smoking history of more than 20 pack-years is considered an extended donor criterion. In this study, we retrospectively evaluated impact of donor smoking history and extent of smoking on midterm outcome after LTx. METHODS: In all, 237 LTx were performed in our institution between 2007 and 2012. Patients were divided into three groups, receiving lungs from 53% nonsmoking donors, 29% smoking donors with fewer than 20 pack-years, and 18% heavy smokers with more than 20 pack-years. RESULTS: Preoperative donor and recipient characteristics among the groups were comparable. However, donors from the heavy smokers group were significantly older (p < 0.001). The overall presence of abnormal histology (inflammation or metaplasia) in donor main bronchi samples increased with the extent of smoking but did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.211). Although metaplasia was found in significantly more donors from the heavy smokers group (p = 0.037), this did not translate into inferior outcomes for the recipients. There were no statistically significant differences in PaO2/FiO2 ratio after LTx, duration of mechanical ventilation (p = 0.136), intensive care unit stay (p = 0.133), and total postoperative hospital stay (p = 0.322). One-year and three-year survival were comparable across all three groups (log rank p = 0.151). Prevalence of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (p = 0.616), as well as bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome free survival (p = 0.898) after LTx were also comparable. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, history and extent of donor smoking do not significantly affect early and midterm outcomes after LTx. Although this finding does not obviate the need for longer-term observation, donor lungs from even heavy smokers may not per se contraindicate LTx and may provide a valuable avenue for expanding donor organ availability.

CentriMag short-term ventricular assist as a bridge to solution in patients with advanced heart failure: use beyond 30 days.

OBJECTIVES: Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) offer very valuable therapeutic options for patients with advanced heart failure. CentriMag (Thoratec, Pleasanton, CA, USA) is an extracorporeal short-term circulatory assist device Conformité Européenne-marked in Europe for use up to 30 days. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 41 patients with advanced heart failure who, from 2003 to 2011, were supported with CentriMag for >30 days as a bridge to recovery, long-term VAD or transplantation. RESULTS: Forty-one adult patients were supported with 46 CentriMag devices for a total of 2695 days with a mean support time of 59 (range: 31-167) days. Indications were post-cardiotomy cardiogenic shock (PC = 4), primary graft failure (PGF = 7) and refractory heart failure (RHF = 35). Six devices were used to support the left ventricle, 19 to support the right ventricle and 21 to support both the ventricles (biventricular support considered as single device unit). In the PC cohort, 3 (75%) patients were weaned from support, while 4 (57%) were weaned from support in the PGF cohort. In the RHF cohort, 8 patients were bridged to long-term VAD and 5 were bridged to transplantation; heart function recovered and device explanted in 14, while 8 patients died on support. There were no device failures. Overall, 34 (74%) patients were recovered or bridged, with a 1-year survival of 54%. CONCLUSIONS: CentriMag proved to be a versatile, safe and effective short-term circulatory support for patients with advanced heart failure as a bridge to solution. Its use over 30 days is associated with acceptable survival and does not increase device-related complications.