"Surgery First" vs. "Endoscopy First" for Pediatric Choledocholithiasis Presenting at the End of the Week - A CARES Working Group Study.

BACKGROUND: Choledocholithiasis in children is commonly managed with an "endoscopy-first" (EF) strategy (endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC)). Because ERCP availability is often limited at the end of the week (EoW), we hypothesized that a "surgery-first" (SF) approach (LC with intraoperative cholangiogram (IOC) ± transcystic laparoscopic common bile exploration (LCBDE)) would decrease length of stay (LOS) and time to definitive intervention (TTDI). METHODS: A multicenter, retrospective cohort study was conducted on pediatric patients from 2018 to 2023 with suspected choledocholithiasis. Work week (WW) presentation was defined as admission between Monday to Thursday. TTDI was defined as time to LC or postoperative ERCP (if required). RESULTS: Among seven hospitals, there were 354 pediatric patients; 217 (61%) managed with SF (125 WW, 92 EoW) and 137 (39%) managed with EF (74 WW, 63 EoW). SF groups had a shorter LOS for both WW and EoW presentation (60.2 h and 58.3 h vs 88.5 h and 93.6 h respectively; p < 0.05). TTDI decreased in SF (26.4 h and 28.9 h vs 61.4 h and 72.8 h; p < 0.05). All EF patients underwent at least two anesthetics (preoperative ERCP followed by LC) while the majority (79%) of the SF group had only one procedure (LC + IOC ± LCBDE). CONCLUSION: Children who present with choledocholithiasis at EoW have a longer LOS and TTDI. These findings are amplified when children enter an EF pathway. A surgery-first approach results in fewer procedures, decreased TTDI, and shorter LOS, regardless of the time of presentation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Worth the Wait? The Impact of Timing of Repair of Esophageal Atresia With Tracheoesophageal Fistula on Outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Infants with esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula (EA/TEF) are at increased risk for respiratory compromise and gastric perforation until fistula ligation. We sought to describe current practice regarding the timing of EA/TEF repair and hypothesized that age at repair is a predictor of adverse outcomes. METHODS: The Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) database was used to identify patients with EA/TEF who underwent fistula ligation and esophago-esophagostomy at US children's hospitals from July 2016-June 2021. Patients with a repair >10 days of age, a long-gap atresia, or H-type fistula were excluded. Comorbidities including prematurity and operative congenital heart disease were noted. Outcomes including anastomotic leak, gastric perforation, and post-operative respiratory failure were assessed for association with age and day of the week of operation. RESULTS: Among 863 patients that were evaluated, the plurality of operations was on DOL 2 (36%) and 83% were on a weekday (random rate = 71%). Later operations had shorter LOS (p = 0.04) and more recurrent nerve injuries (p = 0.01). Weekend repairs were associated with equivalent outcomes. Gastric perforations occurred in 18 (2.0%) patients; 11 (61%) of these occurred after DOL 2. CONCLUSIONS: We found no significant differences in outcomes other than more recurrent nerve injury and decreased LOS with EA/TEF repair at older ages. Although repair beyond DOL 2 was safe from a respiratory standpoint, most gastric perforations occurred after this point. In the absence of contraindications or significantly reduced weekend capabilities, we recommend repair of EA/TEF by DOL 2. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Decisions in Diversion: Enterostomy vs. Primary Anastomosis for Colonic Atresia.

BACKGROUND: Colonic atresia (CA) is associated with Hirschsprung disease (HD) in up to 10% of cases. Therefore, some surgeons elect to complete proximal diversion at the initial operation. We sought to better define the incidence of concurrent HD and evaluate practice patterns regarding diversion for CA. METHODS: The Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) database was used to identify patients with CA from 2013 to 2022. Patients with small bowel atresia, anorectal malformation, gastroschisis, or first operation after 14 days of age were excluded. Index and subsequent operations were defined. Complications, time to enterostomy closure, and unplanned operations were evaluated. RESULTS: HD was diagnosed in 8 (9.5%) patients and 7 of these were initially diverted. Diverted and anastomosed patients were demographically similar. In the 58 (69%) patients initially diverted, 19 (33%) had an ileostomy. Continuity was restored with an ileo-colic anastomosis in 63% of diverted and 27% of primarily anastomosed patients. Of those initially managed with a colostomy, 53% ultimately had a colo-colonic anastomosis. Patients with primary anastomoses had fewer operations and received more days of parenteral nutrition. Other outcomes did not vary. CONCLUSION: In a large population of infants with CA, 9.5% had concurrent HD. Almost 70% of CA patients underwent initial diversion and only one with HD had a primary anastomosis. Patients managed with a primary anastomosis were substantially more likely to retain the proximal colonic segment, but had a similar incidence of complications. When intraoperative colonic biopsies are obtained, primary anastomosis is a safe and effective strategy for CA.

Evaluating the Benefits of Ventriculostomy Compared to Intracranial Pressure Monitoring for Severe Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury.

BACKGROUND: In this study, we compared outcomes between intracranial pressure monitoring (ICP) only versus ventriculostomy (VT) using a nationwide database of pediatric trauma patients. METHODS: Pediatric patients (<18 years) with severe blunt TBI who underwent ICP monitoring with or without VT were identified from the 2017-2021 ACS Trauma Quality Programs. We excluded patients who experienced death or craniotomy/craniectomy within 48 h. The primary outcome was discharge disposition. Secondary outcomes were subsequent intracranial surgery, length of stay (LOS), and infectious complications. Competing risks survival analysis was used to evaluate the multivariable association between ICP vs. VT and outcomes. RESULTS: Of 1719 eligible patients, 65.9% were male and 54.1% had VT. Between the ICP and VT groups, there were no differences in mean age (11.4 vs. 11.0 years, p = 0.145), injury severity score (30.9 vs. 30.9, p = 0.937), or median GCS (3 vs. 3, p = 0.120). Multivariable analysis showed a robust association between VT and discharge home (compared to rehabilitation center; sHR 0.85, 95% CI 0.74-0.97, p = 0.017). VT use was not associated with increased mortality compared to ICP (p = 0.342). Finally, VT patients had longer median LOS (20.5 vs. 18.0 days, p < 0.001) but there was no difference in subsequent craniotomy/craniectomy (8.6 vs. 6.5%, p = 0.096) or infectious complications (1.2 vs. 0.9%, p = 0.549). CONCLUSION: VT was associated with greater discharge to home. Although VT patients had a greater LOS, the risk for other secondary outcomes did not vary, suggesting that VT may have benefits for the treatment of severe TBI with respect to discharge disposition. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Patient Safety and Radiation Exposure in Transcystic Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration: A CARES Working Group Multicenter Study.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of choledocholithiasis with laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and intraoperative cholangiogram (IOC) ± transcystic laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) is associated with fewer procedures and shorter length of stay (LOS) compared to preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) followed by LC. Fluoroscopy is required for both LCBDE and ERCP but fluoroscopic time (FT) and radiation dose (RD) in LCBDE has not been studied. METHODS: The Choledocholithiasis Alliance for Research, Education, and Surgery (CARES) Working Group conducted this retrospective study on pediatric patients with suspected choledocholithiasis who received IOC. Demographics, type of LCBDE, FT and RD during IOC ± LCBDE, were analyzed. Statistical analysis was completed using Microsoft Excel and R software. RESULTS: From five centers, 157 patients were identified (79 without LCBDE, 78 with LCBDE). Wire access into the duodenum was successful in 67 patients (86%) and 64 patients (82%) had successful duct clearance. Median FT for all LCBDE cases was 3.3 min [1.6, 6.7] and RD was 59.8 mGy [30.1, 125.0] with no difference between successful and unsuccessful duct clearance (66.7 mGy [29.0, 115.0], 55.8 mGy [35.8, 154.1], respectfully; p = 0.51). CONCLUSION: Although both ERCP and LCBDE approaches result in fluoroscopic radiation exposure, FT, and RD in LCBDE have not previously been studied and are inadequately described in ERCP. Limiting radiation exposure in children is essential and fluoroscopy stewardship is a key component of pediatric safety in LCBDE. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Reducing MRCP Utilization Through a "Surgery First" Approach for Pediatric Choledocholithiasis: A CARES Working Group Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Choledocholithiasis in children is rising and frequently managed with an endoscopy-first (EF) approach that utilizes endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is a resource intensive modality that often precedes ERCP to gain further assurance of choledocholithiasis prior to intervention. MRCP can lead to a longer length of stay (LOS) and strain healthcare resources. We hypothesized that the use of MRCP is decreased with a surgery-first (SF) approach. METHODS: The Choledocholithiasis Alliance for Research, Education, and Surgery (CARES) Working Group conducted this retrospective study on pediatric patients with suspected choledocholithiasis. SF patients underwent LC + intraoperative cholangiogram (IOC) ± laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE). Imaging studies included ultrasound (US), MRCP, and computed tomography (CT). RESULTS: From seven institutions, 357 pediatric patients were identified. The SF (n = 220) group received fewer imaging studies then EF (n = 137) (1.29 vs. 1.62; p < 0.05). US was more commonly employed and the number of US and CT scans was similar. The SF group had lower MRCP utilization than EF (29% vs. 59%; p < 0.05). EF patients that received an MRCP had the longest LOS (4.0 d [2.4, 6.3]) compared to SF that did not (1.9 d [1.2, 3.2]) (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Children with choledocholithiasis managed with an EF approach receive more diagnostic imaging, especially MRCP. While MRCP remains a powerful diagnostic tool, a surgery-first approach can minimize the resource utilization and LOS associated with magnetic resonance imaging. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Multi-institutional Analysis of Choledocholithiasis in Pediatric vs Adult Patients.

BACKGROUND: In adults, upfront intraoperative cholangiogram with laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) is well accepted for management of choledocholithiasis. Despite recent evidence supporting LCBDE utility in children, there has been hesitation to adopt this surgery first (SF) approach over ERCP first (EF) due to perceived technical challenges. We compared rates of successful stone clearance during LCBDE between adult and pediatric patients to evaluate if pediatric surgeons could anticipate similar rates of successful clearance. METHODS: A multicenter, retrospective review of pediatric (<18 years) and adult patients with choledocholithiasis managed from 2018 to 2024 was performed. Demographic and clinical data were obtained. Rate of successful duct clearance with LCBDE was compared. Surgical and endoscopic complications (infections, bleeding, pancreatitis, bile leak) were also compared. RESULTS: 724 patients, 333 (45.9%) pediatric and 391 (54.0%) adults, were included. The median age of pediatric vs adult patients was 15.2 years [13.1, 16.6] vs 55.5 years [34.1, 70.5], respectively. Of these, 201 (60.4%) pediatric vs 169 (43.2%) adult patients underwent SF, p < 0.001. LCBDE was attempted in 84 (41.7%) pediatric vs 140 (82.8%) adults, p = 0.002. LCBDE success was higher in pediatric vs adult patients (82.1% vs 71.4%, p = 0.004). Complications rates were similar however, pediatric patients who underwent EF had higher endoscopic complications (9.1% vs 3.6%, p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: LCBDE is highly successful in children vs adults with no increased surgical complications. This data, coupled with the limited ERCP access for children, supports that LCBDE is an equally effective tool for managing choledocholithiasis in children as is accepted in adults. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Navigating the Impact of the Dobbs Decision: Perspectives from Pediatric Surgeons on Reproductive Healthcare.

Nationwide abortion restrictions resulting from the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization (2022) decision have generated confusion and uncertainty among healthcare professionals, with concerns for liability impacting clinical decision-making and outcomes. The impact on pediatric surgery can be seen in prenatal counseling for fetal anomaly cases, counseling for fetal intervention, and recommendations for pregnant children and adolescents who seek termination. It is essential that all physicians and healthcare team members understand the legal implications on their clinical practices, engage with resources and organizations that can help navigate these circumstances, and consider advocating for patients and themselves. Pediatric surgeons must consider the impact of these changing laws on their ability to provide comprehensive and ethical care and counseling to all patients.

Bridging the Knowledge Gap: A Toolkit on Reproductive Rights for Pediatric Surgeons in the Post-Dobbs Era.

BACKGROUND: The ripple effect of the Supreme Court ruling in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization has impacted physicians and patients across numerous medical specialties. In pediatric surgery, the patient population ranges from fetus to the pregnant patient. There is a gap in the knowledge of pediatric surgeons regarding abortion laws and access. This project aims to bridge the gap by creating access to reliable resources which may be used to optimize patient care and support physicians. METHODS: We collaborated with the Reproductive Health Coalition, co-founded by the American Medical Women's Association and Doctors for America, to curate a list of resources beneficial to pediatric surgeons. RESULTS: We created a web-based toolkit with the purpose of providing easily accessible and reliable information on reproductive rights in the United States. We identified up-to-date resources on state-by-state abortion laws, legal resources, patient-centered information on obtaining abortion care, and resources for physicians interested in getting involved in advocacy. CONCLUSION: Pediatric surgery rests at a critical juncture with respect to reproductive rights in the United States. Our toolkit enables users to understand the current climate and identify next steps to advocate for patients and physicians amidst a formidable legal environment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V.

Evaluating Outcomes of Nonaccidental Trauma in Military Children.

BACKGROUND: Nonaccidental trauma (NAT), or child abuse, is a leading cause of childhood injury and death in the US. Studies demonstrate that military-affiliated individuals are at greater risk of mental health complication and family violence, including child maltreatment. There is limited information about the outcomes of military children who experience NAT. This study compares the outcomes between military-dependent and civilian children diagnosed with NAT. STUDY DESIGN: A single-institution, retrospective review of children admitted with confirmed NAT at a Level I trauma center was performed. Data were collected from the institutional trauma registry and the Child Abuse Team's database. Military affiliation was identified using insurance status and parental or caregiver self-reported active-duty status. Demographic and clinical data including hospital length of stay (LOS), morbidity, specialty consult, and mortality were compared. RESULTS: Among 535 patients, 11.8% (n = 63) were military-affiliated. The median age of military-associated patients, 3 months (interquartile range [IQR] 1 to 7), was significantly younger than civilian patients, 7 months (IQR 3 to 18, p < 0.001). Military-affilif:ated patients had a longer LOS of 4 days (IQR 2 to 11) vs 2 days (IQR 1 to 7, p = 0.041), increased morbidity or complication (3 vs 2 counts, p = 0.002), and a higher mortality rate (10% vs 4%, p = 0.048). No significant difference was observed in the number of consults or injuries, trauma activation, or need for surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Military-affiliated children diagnosed with NAT experience more adverse outcomes than civilian patients. Increased LOS, morbidity or complication, and mortality suggest military-affiliated patients experience more life-threatening NAT at a younger age. Larger studies are required to further examine this population and better support at-risk families.

Utility of Enteral Contrast Protocols in Pediatric Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction: A Prospective Multicenter Observational Study.

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to determine the utility of enteral contrast-based protocols in the diagnosis and management of adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO) for children. BACKGROUND: Enteral contrast-based protocols for adults with ASBO are associated with decreased need for surgery and shorter hospitalization. Pediatric-specific data are limited. METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational study between October 2020 and December 2022 at nine children's hospitals who are members of the Western Pediatric Surgery Research Consortium. Inclusion criteria were children aged 1-20 years diagnosed with ASBO who underwent a trial of nonoperative management (NOM) at hospital admission. Comparisons were made between those children who received an enteral contrast challenge and those who did not. The primary outcome was need for surgery. RESULTS: We enrolled 136 children (71% male; median age: 12 y); 84 (62%) received an enteral contrast challenge. There was no difference in rate of operative intervention between the no contrast (34.6%) and contrast groups (36.9%; P=0.93). Eighty-seven (64%) were successfully managed nonoperatively with no difference in median length of stay (P=0.10) or rate of unplanned readmission (P=0.14). Among the 49 children who required an operation, there was no significant difference in time from admission to surgery or rate of small bowel resection based on prior contrast administration. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of enteral contrast-based protocols for management of pediatric ASBO does not decrease the likelihood of surgery or shorten hospitalization. Larger randomized studies may be needed to further define the role of radiologic contrast in the management of ASBO in children.

A Comparative Study of Laparoscopic versus Open Management of Index Small Bowel Obstruction in Children.

INTRODUCTION: There is limited literature on the optimal approach to treat adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO) in children. We sought to compare rates and outcomes of laparoscopic (LAP) and open (OPEN) surgery for pediatric ASBO. METHODS: A California statewide database was used to identify children (<18 years old) with an index ASBO from 2007 to 2020. The primary outcome was the type of operative management: LAP or OPEN. Secondary outcomes were hospital characteristics, patient demographics, and postoperative complications. We excluded patients treated non-operatively. RESULTS: Our study group had 545 patients. 381 (70%) underwent OPEN and 164 (30%) LAP during the index admission. Over the study period, there was increasing use of laparoscopic surgery, with higher use in older children (p < 0.001). LAP was associated with fewer overall complications (65.2% vs. 81.6%, p < 0.001), with a decreasing trend in complications over time (p < 0.001). The LAP group had significantly lower rates of bowel resection (4.9% vs. 17.1%, p < 0.001), length of stay (LOS) (17 vs. 23 days, p < 0.001), and TPN use (12.2% vs. 29.1%, p < 0.001). Mortality rates were equivalent. Although the LAP group had lower readmission rates (22.6% vs. 37.3%, p < 0.001), the length of time between discharge and readmission was similar (171 vs. 165 days, p = 0.190). DISCUSSION: The use of laparoscopic surgery for index ASBO increased over the study period. However, it was less commonly utilized in younger children. LAP had fewer overall complications as well as shorter LOS, decreased TPN use, and fewer readmissions. The benefits and risks of each approach must be weighed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Trends in Management of Index Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction in Children.

INTRODUCTION: To examine practice patterns and surgical outcomes of nonoperative versus operative management (OPM) of children presenting with an index adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO). METHODS: A California statewide health discharge database was used to identify children (<18 y old) with an index ASBO from 2007 to 2020. The primary study outcome was evaluating initial management patterns (nonoperative versus OPM and early [≤3 d] versus late surgery [>3 d]) of ASBO. Secondary outcomes were hospital characteristics, patient demographics, and postoperative complications. RESULTS: Of the 2297 patients identified, 1948 (85%) underwent OPM for ASBO during the index admission. Of these, 14.7% underwent early surgery within 3 d. Teaching hospitals had higher operative intervention than nonteaching centers (87.1% versus 83.7%, P = 0.034). OPM was the highest in 0-5-year-olds compared to other ages (89% versus 82%, P < 0.001). In comparison to early surgery, late surgery was associated with longer length of stay (early 7[interquartile range 5-10], late 9[interquartile range 6-17], P < 0.001), increased infectious complications (16.4% versus 9.8%, P = 0.004), and greater use of total parenteral nutrition (28.0% versus 14.3%, P = 0.001); there was no difference in bowel resection (21% versus 18%, P = 0.102) or mortality (P = 0.423). CONCLUSIONS: Our pediatric study demonstrated a high rate of OPM for index ASBO, especially in newborns and toddlers. Although operative intervention, especially late surgery, was associated with increased length of stay, increased infectious complications, and increased total parenteral nutrition use, the rates of bowel resection and mortality did not differ by management strategy. These trends need to be further evaluated to optimize outcomes.

Pediatric penetrating thoracic trauma: Examining the impact of trauma center designation and penetrating trauma volume on outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: We analyzed the impact of treating center designation and case volume of penetrating trauma on outcomes after pediatric penetrating thoracic injuries (PTI). METHODS: PTI patients <18 years were identified from the National Trauma Data Bank (2013-2016). Centers were categorized by type (Pediatric or Adult) and designation status (Level I, Level II, and other). Performance was calculated as the difference between observed and expected mortality and standardized using the total penetrating trauma volume per center. Expected mortality was calculated using the Trauma Mortality Prediction Model. Pearson correlation and linear mixed-effects models evaluated the association between variables and performance. RESULTS: We identified 4,134 PTI patients treated at 596 trauma centers: 879 (21%) at Adult Level I, 608 (15%) at Adult Level II, 531 (13%) at Pediatric Level I, 320 (8%) at Pediatric Level II, and 1,796 (43%) at other centers. Primary injury mechanisms were firearm-related (58%) and cut/piercing (42%). Overall mortality was 16% and median predicted mortality was 3.6% (IQR: 1.5% - 11.2%). Among patients with thoracic firearm-related injuries, centers with lower penetrating case volume and total trauma care demonstrated significantly worse outcomes. Multivariable analysis revealed Adult Level I centers had superior outcomes compared with all other non-Level I centers. There was no difference in mortality between Pediatric and Adult Level I centers. DISCUSSION: Adult Level I trauma center designation and annual case volume of penetrating thoracic trauma are associated with improved mortality after pediatric firearm-related thoracic injuries. Further study is needed to identify factors in higher volume centers that improve outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Patient-oriented online resources in pediatric surgery: Are we failing the readability test?

BACKGROUND: The study aim was to evaluate the readability of patient-oriented resources in pediatric surgery from children's hospitals in the US. METHODS: The websites of 30 children's hospitals were evaluated for information on 10 common pediatric surgical procedures. Hospitals of varying characteristics including bed number, geographic location and ACS Children's Surgery Verification (CSV) were selected for the study. Readability scores were calculated using validated algorithms, and text was assigned an overall grade level. RESULTS: Of 195 patient-oriented resources identified, only three (2%) were written at or below the recommended sixth grade level. Larger hospitals provided patient information at a higher grade level than medium and smaller sized centers (10.7 vs 9.3 vs 9.0 respectively, p < 0.001). Hospital size also correlated with availability of information, with large and medium sized hospitals having information more often. Hospitals with ACS CSV had information available more often, and written at a lower grade level, compared to nonverified centers (78% vs 62%, p = 0.023; 9.0 vs 10.0, p = 0.013). CONCLUSION: Most hospital provided patient-oriented resources in pediatric surgery are written at a grade level well above the national guidelines. Centers with ACS CSV status have improved availability and readability of this material, while larger hospitals have improved availability, but decreased readability. TYPE OF STUDY: Modeling study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.