The clinical impact of pectoral nerve block in an 'enhanced recovery after surgery' program in breast surgery.

Background: Pectoral nerve block (PECS) is increasingly performed in breast surgery. Aim: The study evaluated the clinical impact of these blocks in the postoperative course. Patients & methods: In this case-control study, patients undergoing breast surgery with 'enhanced recovery after surgery' pathways were divided into group 1 (57 patients) in whom PECS was performed before general anesthesia, and group 2 (57 patients) in whom only general anesthesia was effected. Results: Postoperative opioid consumption (p < 0.002), pain at 32 h after surgery (p < 0.005) and the length of stay (p < 0.003) were significantly lower in group 1. Conclusion: Reducing opioid consumption and pain after surgery, PECS could favor a faster recovery with a reduction in length of stay, ensuring a higher turnover of patients undergoing breast surgery.

'Enhanced recovery after surgery' (ERAS) protocols have been recently applied in breast cancer patients in order to improve the postoperative course. However, the incidence of moderate to severe pain after breast surgery is frequent, and a multimodal approach is recommended. In this view, the interfascial plane blocks are advocated as a valid alternative to both paravertebral and epidural blockade. In this study, we evaluated the effects of these blocks on the postoperative course in patients undergoing breast surgery with ERAS protocols. We compared two patient groups: in the first, pectoral blocks were performed before general anesthesia, while in the second no block was carried out. We found that in the patient group receiving the blocks, postoperative opioid consumption (with essentially the same pain after surgery) and length of stay were significantly lower. Therefore, although more robust studies are needed to confirm our findings, these emerging locoregional techniques could favor a faster recovery in the context of ERAS in breast surgery. These results could have important clinical implications in terms of not only reducing healthcare costs but also ensuring a higher turnover of patients undergoing breast surgery.

The multidisciplinary audit in enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) colorectal surgery: experience in a single Italian center.

BACKGROUND: Current literature underlines the role of periodical feed-back to improve Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) path adherence during implementation program. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the clinical impact of an audit program in an ERAS path. METHODS: All elective patients submitted to elective colorectal surgery from November 2018 to January 2020 in our Institution were considered. The sample was divided into two study groups: group 1, including patients enrolled in the first sixth months of ERAS program until the first audit; group 2, patients enrolled in a time period of a six months after the first audit. RESULTS: The final analysis included 46 patients in group 1 and 64 in group 2. Group 2 showed a higher ASA Score (P<0.03), a higher prevalence of right hemicolectomy, and a lower prevalence of left hemicolectomy and anterior rectum resection (RAR) (P<0.016). Group 2 also had a lower prevalence of anastomotic leakage (AL) (P<0.004). Intraoperative normothermia (T>36 C°) in this group was achieved in a larger number of patients in comparison with group 1 (39% vs. 19.5%) (P<0.01). Group 2 experienced a higher average body temperature at admission in recovery room (RR) when compared to Group 1 (35.8 vs. 35.1 C°, P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Audit program may represent a useful tool to promote advantageous changes in clinical practice and to favor a better compliance to ERAS program.