Magnetic resonance lymphangiography: Establishing normal.

BACKGROUND: Despite an increased interest in visualizing the lymphatic vessels with magnetic resonance lymphangiography (MRL), little literature is available describing their appearance in nonlymphedematous individuals. To determine lymphatic abnormalities, an understanding of how healthy lymphatic vessels appear and behave needs to be established. Therefore, in this study, MRL of individuals without a history of lymphatic disease was performed. METHODS: A total of 25 individuals (15 women) underwent MRL of their lower limbs using a 3.0 T Philips magnetic resonance imaging scanner (Philips Medical Systems). The first nine participants were recruited to establish the concentration of gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) to administer, with the remainder imaged before and after interdigital forefoot GBCA injections at the optimized dose. Outcomes, including lymphatic vessel diameter, tortuosity, and frequency of drainage via particular drainage routes, were recorded. RESULTS: Healthy lymphatic vessels following the anteromedial pathway were routinely observed in post-contrast T1-weighted images (average tortuosity, 1.09 ± 0.03), with an average of 2.16 ± 0.93 lymphatic vessels with a diameter of 2.47 ± 0.50 mm crossing the anterior ankle. In six limbs, vessels following the anterolateral pathways were observed. No vessels traversing the posterior of the legs were seen. In a subset of 10 vessels, the lymphatic signal, measured at the ankle, peaked 29 minutes, 50 seconds ± 9 minutes, 29 seconds after GBCA administration. No lymphatic vessels were observed in T2-weighted images. CONCLUSIONS: Contrast-enhanced MRL reliably depicts the lymphatic vessels in the legs of healthy controls. Following interdigital contrast injection, anteromedial drainage appears dominant. Quantitative measures related to lymphatic vessel size, tortuosity, and drainage rate are readily obtainable and could be beneficial for detecting even subtle lymphatic impairment.

Redefining WILD syndrome: a primary lymphatic dysplasia with congenital multisegmental lymphoedema, cutaneous lymphovascular malformation, CD4 lymphopaenia and warts.

BACKGROUND: Primary lymphoedema (PL) syndromes are increasingly recognised as presentations of complex genetic disease, with at least 20 identified causative genes. Recognition of clinical patterns is key to diagnosis, research and therapeutics. The defining criteria for one such clinical syndrome, 'WILD syndrome' (Warts, Immunodeficiency, Lymphoedema and anogenital Dysplasia), have previously depended on a single case report. METHODS AND RESULTS: We present 21 patients (including the first described case) with similar clinical and immunological phenotypes. All had PL affecting multiple segments, with systemic involvement (intestinal lymphangiectasia/pleural or pericardial effusions) in 70% (n=14/20). Most (n=20, 95%) had a distinctive cutaneous lymphovascular malformation on the upper anterior chest wall. Some (n=10, 48%) also had hyperpigmented lesions resembling epidermal naevi (but probably lymphatic in origin). Warts were common (n=17, 81%) and often refractory. In contrast to the previous case report, anogenital dysplasia was uncommon-only found in two further cases (total n=3, 14%). Low CD4 counts and CD4:CD8 ratios typified the syndrome (17 of 19, 89%), but monocyte counts were universally normal, unlike GATA2 deficiency. CONCLUSION: WILD syndrome is a previously unrecognised, underdiagnosed generalised PL syndrome. Based on this case series, we redefine WILD as 'Warts, Immunodeficiency, andLymphatic Dysplasia' and suggest specific diagnostic criteria. The essential criterion is congenital multisegmental PL in a 'mosaic' distribution. The major diagnostic features are recurrent warts, cutaneous lymphovascular malformations, systemic involvement (lymphatic dysplasia), genital swelling and CD4 lymphopaenia with normal monocyte counts. The absence of family history suggests a sporadic condition, and the random distribution of swelling implicates mosaic postzygotic mutation as the cause.

Radiation-induced subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus.

We present an unusual case of radiation-induced subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus (SCLE) occurring in a patient with non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Dermatologists should be aware of the ability of low-dose radiation treatment to induce a first presentation or flare of SCLE, with the possibility of extension of disease outside of the radiation field.

The importance of considering monogenic causes of autoimmunity: A somatic mutation in KRAS causing pediatric Rosai-Dorfman syndrome and systemic lupus erythematosus.

OBJECTIVES: Clinicians need to be aware of the growing list of defined monogenic etiologies of autoimmune diseases. This is particularly relevant when evaluating children, as these rare monogenic forms of autoimmunity tend to present very early in life. METHODS AND RESULTS: By harnessing the transformative power of next generation sequencing, we made the unifying diagnosis of RAS-associated autoimmune leukoproliferative disease (RALD), caused by the somatic gain-of-function p.G13C KRAS mutation, in a boy with the seemingly unrelated immune dysregulatory conditions of Rosai-Dorfman and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). CONCLUSIONS: This case expands our understanding of the clinical phenotypes associated with the extremely rare condition of RALD, and emphasizes the importance of always considering the possibility of a monogenic cause for autoimmunity, particularly when the disease manifestations begin early in life and do not follow a typical clinical course.