Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Acta Paediatr ; 112(5): 970-976, 2023 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36815277

RESUMO

AIM: To describe pulmonary important outcomes (PIO) reported by parents of children born extremely preterm. METHODS: Over 1-year, all parents of children aged 18 months-7-years born <29 weeks' GA were asked regarding their perspectives. The proportion of parents who described PIO and the themes they invoked were examined. Results were analysed using mixed methods. RESULTS: Among parental responses (n = 285, 98% participation rate), 44% spoke about PIO, invoking 24 themes pertaining to NICU hospitalisation and/or long-term respiratory health. Some themes had an impact primarily on the child (e.g. exercise limitation), while the majority had an impact on the whole family (e.g. hospital readmissions). None mentioned oxygen at 36 weeks nor bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). The proportion of responses invoking PIO were statistically similar between parents of children with and without BPD, born before or after 25 weeks or with birthweight < or ≥750 g. PIO were more likely to be mentioned in males and among those readmitted for respiratory problems. CONCLUSION: Parents describe many PIO, most related to the functional impact of lung disease on their child (and family), rather than the diagnosis of BPD itself. Most of these PIO are not primary outcomes in large neonatal trials nor collected in neonatal databases.


Assuntos
Displasia Broncopulmonar , Pneumopatias , Pulmão , Nascimento Prematuro , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Displasia Broncopulmonar/epidemiologia , Lactente Extremamente Prematuro , Pais
2.
Semin Perinatol ; 40(8): 571-577, 2016 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27793420

RESUMO

Medium- and long-term outcomes have been collected and described among survivors of neonatal intensive care units for decades, for a number of purposes: (1) quality control within units, (2) comparisons of outcomes between NICUs, (3) clinical trials (whether an intervention improves outcomes), (4) end-of-life decision-making, (5) to better understand the effects of neonatal conditions and/or interventions on organs and/or long-term health, and finally (6) to better prepare parents for the future. However, the outcomes evaluated have been selected by investigators, based on feasibility, availability, cost, stability, and on what investigators consider to be important. Many of the routinely measured outcomes have major limitations: they may not correlate well with long-term difficulties, they may artificially divide continuous outcomes into dichotomous ones, and may have no clear relationship with quality of life and functioning of children and their families. Several investigations, such as routine term cerebral resonance imaging for preterm infants, have also not yet been shown to improve the outcome of children nor their families. In this article, the most common variables used in neonatology as well as some variables which are rarely measured but may be of equal importance for families are presented. The manner in which these outcomes are communicated to families will be examined, as well as recommendations to optimize communication with parents.


Assuntos
Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde , Doenças do Prematuro/terapia , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Neonatal , Neonatologia , Cuidados Paliativos , Pais/psicologia , Relações Profissional-Família , Benchmarking , Comunicação , Tomada de Decisões , Emoções , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Recém-Nascido Prematuro , Doenças do Prematuro/psicologia , Recém-Nascido de muito Baixo Peso , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Neonatal/normas , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Cuidados Paliativos/normas , Relações Profissional-Família/ética , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde , Qualidade de Vida
3.
Environ Microbiol ; 18(5): 1604-19, 2016 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26914587

RESUMO

A wide diversity of organisms utilize faecal habitats as a rich nutrient source or a mechanism to traverse through animal hosts. We sequenced the 18S rRNA genes of the coprophilic, fruiting body-forming amoeba Guttulinopsis vulgaris and its non-fruiting relatives Rosculus 'ithacus' CCAP 1571/3, R. terrestris n. sp. and R. elongata n. sp. and demonstrate that they are related to the coprophilic flagellate Helkesimastix in a strongly supported, but highly divergent 18S sister clade. PCR primers specific to both clades were used to generate 18S amplicons from a range of environmental and faecal DNA samples. Phylogenetic analysis of the cloned sequences demonstrated a high diversity of uncharacterised sequence types within this clade, likely representing previously described members of the genera Guttulinopsis, Rosculus and Helkesimastix, as well as so-far unobserved organisms. Further, an Illumina MiSeq sequenced set of 18S V4-region amplicons generated from faecal DNAs using universal eukaryote primers showed that core-cercozoan assemblages in faecal samples are as diverse as those found in more conventionally examined habitats. These results reveal many novel lineages, some of which appear to occur preferentially in faecal material, in particular cercomonads and glissomonads. More broadly, we show that faecal habitats are likely untapped reservoirs of microbial eukaryotic diversity.


Assuntos
Eucariotos/fisiologia , Fezes/microbiologia , Animais , Evolução Biológica , Primers do DNA , Eucariotos/genética , Dados de Sequência Molecular , Filogenia , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase/métodos , RNA Ribossômico 18S/genética
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA