Decoding 22q11.2: prenatal profiling and first-trimester risk assessment in Danish nationwide cohort.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the distribution of nuchal translucency thickness (NT), free ß-human chorionic gonadotropin (ß-hCG) and pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A) in pregnancies with a fetal 22q11.2 aberration. Furthermore, the performance of combined first-trimester screening (cFTS) and a new risk algorithm targeting 22q11.2 deletions in detecting affected pregnancies was evaluated. Finally, prenatal malformations and pregnancy outcome were assessed. METHODS: This was a nationwide registry-based cohort study of all pregnancies that underwent prenatal screening with a due date between January 2008 and December 2018 in Denmark. All cases with a fetal 22q11.2 deletion or duplication (hg19 chr22:18.9mio-25.0mio) diagnosed pre- or postnatally or following pregnancy loss or termination of pregnancy were retrieved from the Danish Cytogenetic Central Register and linked with pregnancy data from the Danish Fetal Medicine Database. Fetal and maternal characteristics, including cFTS results and pregnancy outcome, of pregnancies with any 22q11.2 deletion or duplication (LCR22-A to -H) and pregnancies with a classic deletion or duplication (LCR22-A to -D) diagnosed by chromosomal microarray were compared with those of a chromosomally normal reference group. A risk algorithm was developed for assessing patient-specific risks for classic 22q11.2 deletions based on NT, PAPP-A and ß-hCG. Detection rates and false-positive rates at different risk cut-offs were calculated. RESULTS: We included data on 143 pregnancies with a fetal 22q11.2 aberration, of which 97 were deletions (54 classic) and 46 were duplications (32 classic). NT was significantly increased in fetuses with a classic deletion (mean, 1.89 mm), those with any deletion (mean, 1.78 mm) and those with any duplication (mean, 1.86 mm) compared to the reference group (mean, 1.65 mm). ß-hCG multiples of the median (MoM) was decreased in all 22q11.2 subgroups compared with the reference group (mean, 1.02) and reached significance in pregnancies with a classic deletion and those with any deletion (mean, 0.77 and 0.71, respectively). PAPP-A MoM was significantly decreased in pregnancies with a classic duplication and those with any duplication (mean, 0.57 and 0.63, respectively), and was significantly increased in pregnancies with a classic deletion and those with any deletion (mean, 1.34 and 1.16, respectively), compared to reference pregnancies (mean, 1.01). The screen-positive rate by cFTS was significantly increased in pregnancies with a classic deletion (13.7%), any deletion (12.5%), a classic duplication (46.9%) or any duplication (37.8%) compared to the reference group (4.5%). A risk algorithm targeting classic 22q11.2 deletions more than doubled the prenatal detection rate of classic 22q11.2 deletions, but with a substantial increase in the false-positive rate. Structural malformations were detected in 41%, 35%, 17% and 25% of the pregnancies with a classic deletion, any deletion, classic duplication or any duplication, respectively. Pregnancy loss occurred in 40% of pregnancies with a classic deletion and 5% of those with a classic duplication diagnosed prenatally or following pregnancy loss. CONCLUSIONS: The distribution of cFTS markers in pregnancies with a classic 22q11.2 duplication resembles that of the common trisomies, with decreased levels of PAPP-A. However, classic 22q11.2 deletions are associated with increased levels of PAPP-A, which likely limits early prenatal detection using the current cFTS risk algorithm. The scope for improving early detection of classic 22q11.2 deletions using targeted risk algorithms based on NT, PAPP-A and ß-hCG is limited. This demonstrates the capability, but also the limitations, of cFTS markers in detecting atypical chromosomal anomalies, which is important knowledge when designing new prenatal screening programs. © 2023 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Atypicality index as an add-on to combined first-trimester screening for chromosomal aberrations.

OBJECTIVES: To compute a set of atypicality indices based on combined first-trimester screening (cFTS) markers and second-trimester estimated fetal weight (EFW), and to demonstrate their potential in identifying pregnancies at reduced or increased risk of chromosomal aberrations following a low-risk cFTS result. METHODS: The atypicality index quantifies the unusualness of an individual set of measurements relative to a reference distribution and can be computed from any variables or measurements available. A score of 0% on the atypicality index represents the most typical profiles, while a score of 100% indicates the highest level of atypicality. From the Danish Fetal Medicine Database, we retrieved data on all pregnant women seen for cFTS in the Central Denmark Region between January 2008 and December 2018. All pregnancies with a cytogenetic or molecular analysis obtained prenatally, postnatally or following pregnancy loss or termination were identified. A first-trimester atypicality index (AcFTS) was computed based on nuchal translucency (NT) thickness, maternal serum free ß-human chorionic gonadotropin (ß-hCG) and pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A). Furthermore, a second-trimester index (AcFTS + EFW) was computed from cFTS markers and EFW from a routine second-trimester anomaly scan. All pregnancies were stratified into subgroups based on their atypicality levels and their cFTS risk estimates. The risk of chromosomal aberrations in each subgroup was then compared with the overall prevalence, and a graphical presentation of the multivariate measurement profiles was developed. RESULTS: We retrieved data on 145 955 singleton pregnancies, of which 9824 (6.7%) were genetically examined. Overall, 1 in 122 (0.82% (95% CI, 0.77-0.87%)) of all pregnancies seen for cFTS were affected by a fetal chromosomal aberration, and in screen-negative pregnancies (cFTS trisomy 21 risk < 1 in 100 and/or trisomy 18/13 risk < 1 in 50), 0.41% (95% CI, 0.38-0.44%) were affected. In screen-negative pregnancies with a typical first-trimester profile (AcFTS < 80%), the risk of chromosomal aberrations was significantly reduced (0.28%) compared with the overall risk. The risk of chromosomal aberrations increased with higher atypicality index to 0.49% (AcFTS [80-90%)), 1.52% (AcFTS [90-99%)) and 4.44% (AcFTS ≥ 99%) and was significantly increased in the two most atypical subgroups. The same applied for the second-trimester atypicality index, with risks of chromosomal aberrations of 0.76% and 4.16% in the two most atypical subgroups (AcFTS + EFW [90-99%) and AcFTS + EFW ≥ 99%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: As an add-on to cFTS, the atypicality index identifies women with typical measurement profiles, which may provide reassurance, whereas atypical profiles may warrant specialist referral and further investigation. In pregnancies identified as low risk on cFTS but with a highly atypical distribution of NT, PAPP-A and ß-hCG, the risk of a chromosomal aberration is substantially increased. The atypicality index optimizes the interpretation of pre-existing prenatal screening profiles and is not limited to cFTS markers or EFW. © 2023 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Atypicality index: avoiding false reassurance in prenatal screening.

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the application of the atypicality index as an adjunct to first-trimester risk assessment for major trisomies by the combined test. METHODS: This was a study of 123 998 Danish women with a singleton pregnancy who underwent routine first-trimester screening, including risk assessment for major trisomies. An atypicality index, which is a measure of the degree to which a profile is atypical, was produced for measurements of fetal nuchal translucency thickness and maternal serum free ß-human chorionic gonadotropin and pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A. The incidence of adverse pregnancy outcome, including miscarriage, intrauterine death and termination of pregnancy, was tabulated according to the screening result and atypicality index. RESULTS: In pregnancies with low risk and those with high risk for major trisomies according to the combined screening test, the incidence of adverse pregnancy outcome increased with increasing atypicality index. In pregnancies with a low risk for trisomies and atypicality index of ≥ 99%, the incidence of adverse outcome was 5.1 (95% CI, 3.4-7.6) times higher compared with that in low-risk pregnancies with a typical measurement profile, reflected by an atypicality index of < 80%. Similarly, in high-risk pregnancies, the incidence of adverse outcome was 7.9 (95% CI, 4.4-14.5) times higher in those with an atypicality index of ≥ 99% compared to those with an atypicality index of < 80%. Using individual profile plots, we were able to demonstrate a transparent and intuitive method for visualization of multiple variables, which can help interpret the individual combination of measurements and level of atypicality. CONCLUSIONS: In pregnancies undergoing first-trimester combined screening and classified as being at low risk for major trisomies, profiles that are typical of pregnancies with normal outcome provide additional reassurance, whereas those with an atypical profile may warrant further investigation. © 2022 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Antidepressant use in pregnancy and severe cardiac malformations: Danish register-based study.

OBJECTIVE: Studies restricted to live births may underestimate severe teratogenic effects. We address the limitation by including data from both prenatal and postnatal diagnoses of cardiac malformations. DESIGN: Register-based study. SETTING: Denmark. POPULATION: 364 012 singleton pregnancies from 2007 to 2014. METHODS: We used data from five nationwide registries. Exposure to antidepressants was measured using redeemed prescriptions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pregnancies with cardiac malformations that end in miscarriage, termination, stillbirth, postnatal death or cardiac surgery <1 year of birth were classified as severe cardiac malformations (SCM). Propensity scores with adjusted prevalence ratios (PRs) were calculated. RESULTS: SCM were reported in 972 of 364 012 pregnancies overall and in 16 of 4105 exposed. For venlafaxine, the PR for SCM was 2.13 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.89-5.13), 1.73 (95% CI 1.08-2.77) for other cardiac malformations, and there was a cluster of hypoplastic left heart syndromes (HLHS) (crude PR 17.4 [95% CI 6.41-47.2]), none of which ended in a live birth. For HLHS, the absolute risk increase was 4.4/1000 and the number needed to harm was 225. For selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, the PRs were 1.09 (95% CI 0.52-2.30) and 1.38 (95% CI 1.00-1.92) for SCM and other cardiac malformations, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Pregnancy exposure to venlafaxine is associated with an increased risk of severe cardiac malformations but with a low absolute risk. Potential mechanisms include direct effects or confounding by indication. Venlafaxine exposure is a marker for risk pregnancies for which fetal echocardiography may be considered. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Exposure to venlafaxine is associated with an increased risk of cardiac malformations but with a low absolute risk.

Early pathogenesis and inflammatory response in experimental bovine mastitis due to Streptococcus uberis.

A generally similar clinical response was observed in six lactating Holstein-Friesian cows after intramammary inoculation with approximately 10(7) colony-forming units of Streptococcus uberis. Increased concentrations of serum amyloid A (SAA) were measured in both milk and serum taken 6 and 11h after inoculation, respectively. In contrast, increased concentrations of haptoglobin were detected after 10h of infection, in milk only. In the blood, tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TFN-alpha) was detected (0.503 ng/ml) in only one animal, at the time of euthanasia (10h after infection). Interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma), like haptoglobin, was not detected in blood. Parallel to the development of inflammation and influx of inflammatory cells into the udder tissue, a marked decrease in the number of monocytes and neutrophils in blood was observed. Bacteria were found both intracellularly (macrophages and neutrophils) and within the lumen of ducts and alveoli. Lesions developed progressively in an ascending manner and became widespread throughout the mammary gland in less than 8h. The parallel development of inflammation and increased concentrations of SAA and haptoglobin in milk points to these acute phase proteins as potential diagnostic markers for the early detection of S. uberis -associated mastitis.

Genotoxicity testing of the herbicide Roundup and its active ingredient glyphosate isopropylamine using the mouse bone marrow micronucleus test, Salmonella mutagenicity test, and Allium anaphase-telophase test.

The genotoxic potential of the herbicide Roundup and its active agent, glyphosate isopropylamine salt, was studied in three different assays. No clastogenic effects were found in the mouse bone marrow micronucleus test for either of the two agents. In the Salmonella assay only Roundup was tested. It showed a weak mutagenic effect for the concentrations 360 micrograms/plate in TA98 (without S9) and 720 micrograms/plate in TA100 (with S9). These concentrations are close to the toxic level. The anaphase-telophase Allium test showed no effect for the glyphosate isopropylamine salt, but a significant increase in chromosome aberrations appeared after treatment with Roundup at concentrations of 1.44 and 2.88 mg/l when calculated as glyphosate isopropylamine. The most frequent aberrations observed could be characterized as disturbances of the spindle.