Features of atherosclerosis in patients with angina and no obstructive coronary artery disease.

BACKGROUND: An association between atherosclerosis and coronary vasospasm has previously been suggested. However, to date, no conclusive data on the whole spectrum of these disorders have been published. AIMS: This study aimed to define specific morphological features of atherosclerosis in patients with angina and no obstructive coronary artery disease (ANOCA) due to coronary vasospasm. METHODS: From February 2019 to January 2020, we enrolled 75 patients referred to our laboratory for a coronary function test (CFT) due to ANOCA and suspected coronary vasomotor dysfunction. The CFT consisted of an acetylcholine test and a physiology assessment with hyperaemic indexes using adenosine. Patients were divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of coronary vasospasm triggered by acetylcholine (ACH+ and ACH-, respectively). In addition, optical coherence tomography (OCT) was performed to assess the lipid index (LI), a surrogate for lipid area, and the prevalence of markers of plaque vulnerability. RESULTS: ACH+ patients had a higher LI than ACH- patients (LI: 819.85 [460.95-2489.03] vs 269.95 [243.50-878.05], respectively, p=0.03), and a higher prevalence of vulnerable plaques (66% vs 38%, p=0.04). Moreover, ACH+ patients showed a higher prevalence of neovascularisation compared to ACH- subjects (37% vs 6%, p=0.02) and a trend towards a higher prevalence of all individual markers, in particular thin-cap fibroatheroma (20% vs 0%, p=0.06). No differences were detected between patterns of coronary vasospasm. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of coronary vasospasm, regardless of its phenotype, is associated with higher lipid burden, plaque vulnerability and neovascularisation.

Covid-19 and gender: lower rate but same mortality of severe disease in women-an observational study.

BACKGROUND: Gender-related factors might affect vulnerability to Covid-19. The aim of this study was to describe the role of gender on clinical features and 28-day mortality in Covid-19 patients. METHODS: Observational study of Covid-19 patients hospitalized in Bergamo, Italy, during the first three weeks of the outbreak. Medical records, clinical, radiological and laboratory findings upon admission and treatment have been collected. Primary outcome was 28-day mortality since hospitalization. RESULTS: 431 consecutive adult patients were admitted. Female patients were 119 (27.6%) with a mean age of 67.0 ± 14.5 years (vs 67.8 ± 12.5 for males, p = 0.54). Previous history of myocardial infarction, vasculopathy and former smoking habits were more common for males. At the time of admission PaO2/FiO2 was similar between men and women (228 [IQR, 134-273] vs 238 mmHg [150-281], p = 0.28). Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) assistance was needed in the first 24 h more frequently in male patients (25.7% vs 13.0%; p = 0.006). Overall 28-day mortality was 26.1% in women and 38.1% in men (p = 0.018). Gender did not result an independent predictor of death once the parameters related to disease severity at presentation were included in the multivariable analysis (p = 0.898). Accordingly, the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis in female and male patients requiring CPAP or non-invasive ventilation in the first 24 h did not find a significant difference (p = 0.687). CONCLUSION: Hospitalized women are less likely to die from Covid-19; however, once severe disease occurs, the risk of dying is similar to men. Further studies are needed to better investigate the role of gender in clinical course and outcome of Covid-19.

Vasomotor dysfunction in patients with angina and nonobstructive coronary artery disease is dominated by vasospasm.

BACKGROUND: Coronary vasomotor dysfunction, comprising endotypes of coronary spasm and/or impaired microvascular dilatation (IMD), is common in patients with angina and no obstructive coronary arteries (ANOCA). However, there are discrepant reports regarding the prevalence of these endotypes. The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of coronary vasomotor dysfunction in patients with ANOCA, underlying endotypes, and differences in clinical characteristics. METHODS: Prospective registry of patients with ANOCA that underwent clinically indicated invasive coronary function testing (CFT), including acetylcholine spasm testing (2-200 µg) to diagnose coronary spasm, and adenosine testing (140 µg/kg/min) to diagnose IMD, defined as an index of microvascular resistance ≥25 and/or coronary flow reserve <2.0. RESULTS: Of the 111 patients that completed CFT (88% female, mean age 54 years), 96 (86%) showed vasomotor dysfunction. The majority 93 (97%) had coronary spasm, 63% isolated and 34% combined with IMD. Isolated IMD was rare, occurring in only 3 patients (3%). Hypertension was more prevalent in patients with vasomotor dysfunction compared to those without (39% vs. 7%, p = 0.02). Obesity and a higher severity of angiographic atherosclerotic disease were more prevalent in patients with coronary spasm compared to those without (61% vs. 28%; 40% vs. 0%, respectively, both p < 0.01). No differences in angina characteristics were observed between patients with and without vasomotor dysfunction or between endotypes. CONCLUSIONS: Coronary vasomotor dysfunction is highly prevalent in patients with ANOCA, especially epicardial or microvascular vasospasm, whereas isolated IMD was rare. Performing a CFT without acetylcholine testing should be strongly discouraged.

Absolute Coronary Blood Flow Measured by Continuous Thermodilution in Patients With Ischemia and Nonobstructive Disease.

BACKGROUND: Intracoronary continuous thermodilution is a novel technique to quantify absolute coronary flow (Q) and resistance (R) and has potential advantages over current methods such as coronary flow reserve (CFR) and index of microvascular resistance (IMR). However, no data are available in patients with ischemia and nonobstructive coronary artery disease (INOCA). OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the relationship of Q and R with the established CFR/IMR in INOCA patients, to explore the potential of absolute Q, and to predict self-reported angina. METHODS: Consecutive INOCA patients (n = 84; 87% women; mean age 56 ± 8 years) underwent coronary function testing, including acetylcholine (ACH) provocation testing, adenosine (ADE) testing (CFR/IMR), and continuous thermodilution (absolute Q and R) with saline-induced hyperemia. RESULTS: ACH testing was abnormal (ACH+) in 87%, and ADE testing (ADE+) in 38%. The median absolute Q was 198 ml/min, and the median absolute R was 416 WU. The absolute R was higher in patients with ADE+ versus ADE- (495 WU vs. 375 WU; p = 0.04) but did not differ between patients with ACH+ versus ACH- (421 WU vs. 409 WU; p = 0.74). Low Q and high R were associated with severe angina (odds ratio: 3.09; 95% confidence interval: 1.16 to 8.28; p = 0.03; and odds ratio: 2.60; 95% confidence interval: 0.99 to 6.81; p = 0.05), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, absolute R was higher in patients with abnormal CFR/IMR, whereas both Q and R were unrelated to coronary vasospasm. Q and R were associated with angina, although their exact predictive value should be determined in larger studies.

Pathological Evidence for SARS-CoV-2 as a Cause of Myocarditis: JACC Review Topic of the Week.

To investigate whether severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2)-induced myocarditis constitutes an important mechanism of cardiac injury, a review was conducted of the published data and the authors' experience was added from autopsy examination of 16 patients dying of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Myocarditis is an uncommon pathologic diagnosis occurring in 4.5% of highly selected cases undergoing autopsy or endomyocardial biopsy. Although polymerase chain reaction-detectable virus could be found in the lungs of most coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19)-infected subjects in our own autopsy registry, in only 2 cases was the virus detected in the heart. It should be appreciated that myocardial inflammation alone by macrophages and T cells can be seen in noninfectious deaths and COVID-19 cases, but the extent of each is different, and in neither case do such findings represent clinically relevant myocarditis. Given its extremely low frequency and unclear therapeutic implications, the authors do not advocate use of endomyocardial biopsy to diagnose myocarditis in the setting of COVID-19.