Prevalence and prognostic value of monoclonal gammopathy in heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction: A prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and monoclonal gammopathy of uncertain significance (MGUS) are two entities that share pathophysiological mechanisms. The aim herein, was to assess the prevalence of MGUS in patients with HFpEF and no left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy, as well as its association with a pre-specified clinical endpoint at 12 months. METHODS: The present study prospectively enrolled 69 patients admitted with HF, with ejection fraction ≥ 50%, and LV wall thickness < 12 mm. All patients were screened for MGUS. Clinical events were determined over a 12 month follow-up. The pre-specified composite clinical endpoint was readmission for HF or death. RESULTS: The prevalence of MGUS in this population was 13%. There were no differences in the incidence of the composite clinical endpoint between patients with and without MGUS. Multivariate analysis showed that treatment with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) was associated with fewer clinical events (HR: 0.153, 95% CI: 0.037-0.622, p = 0.009) and indicated a trend to lower risk of readmission for HF and death. Beta-blockers were associated with lower rates of the composite clinical endpoint (HR: 0.192, 95% CI: 0.05-0.736, p = 0.016), readmission for HF (HR: 0.272, 95% CI: 0.087-0.851, p = 0.025) and indicated a trend to lower mortality. Moreover, potassium serum levels > 5 mEq/L were associated with higher rates of the composite endpoint (HR: 6.074, 95% CI: 1.6-22.65, p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of MGUS in patients with HFpEF without hypertrophy was 3-fold that of the general population. There was no significant correlation between clinical outcomes and the presence of MGUS. Beta-blockers and ACEIs/ARBs reduced the composite of mortality and readmissions for HF in HFpEF patients. Hyperpotassemia was related to worse prognosis.

Prevalence of transthyretin amyloidosis in patients with heart failure and no left ventricular hypertrophy.

AIMS: As evidenced by scintigraphy imaging, the prevalence of transthyretin (TTR) cardiac amyloidosis in heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) ranges between 13% and 19%. The natural evolution of cardiac amyloidosis begins with the deposition of amyloid material in the myocardium, with LVH ensuing at later stages. With current imaging modalities, it is possible to detect TTR cardiac amyloidosis before the hypertrophic stage. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of TTR cardiac amyloidosis in HFpEF patients without LVH. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study prospectively enrolled patients admitted for HF with LV ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥ 50% and LV wall thickness <12 mm. TTR cardiac amyloidosis was diagnosed according to accepted criteria, which include positive cardiac 99-Tc-DPD scintigraphy in the absence of monoclonal protein expansion in blood. Transthyretin gene sequencing was performed in positive patients. From July 2017 to January 2020, 329 patients with HFpEF and LV thickness <12 mm were identified. After exclusions, 58 patients completed the study with cardiac scintigraphy (79 years, 54% men; median LVEF 60% and LV wall thickness 10.5 mm). Three patients (5.2%) were positive for TTR cardiac amyloidosis; genetic analysis excluded the presence of hereditary TTR amyloidosis. Positive patients baseline characteristics (84 years, 67% men, LVEF 60%, and LV wall thickness 11 mm) were similar to patients without TTR, except for troponin levels (0.05 vs. 0.02 ng/mL, P = 0.03) and glomerular filtration rate (82 vs. 60 mL/min, P = 0.032), which were higher in TTR patients. CONCLUSIONS: In a cohort of patients with HFpEF without LVH, the prevalence of TTR cardiac amyloidosis was 5%. Early diagnosis of cardiac involvement in TTR amyloidosis (before manifest LVH) would seem recommendable because newly approved specific treatments can prevent additional deposition of amyloid material.

Cardiovascular Damage in COVID-19: Therapeutic Approaches Targeting the Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is usually more severe and associated with worst outcomes in individuals with pre-existing cardiovascular pathologies, including hypertension or atherothrombosis. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) can differentially infect multiple tissues (i.e., lung, vessel, heart, liver) in different stages of disease, and in an age- and sex-dependent manner. In particular, cardiovascular (CV) cells (e.g., endothelial cells, cardiomyocytes) could be directly infected and indirectly disturbed by systemic alterations, leading to hyperinflammatory, apoptotic, thrombotic, and vasoconstrictive responses. Until now, hundreds of clinical trials are testing antivirals and immunomodulators to decrease SARS-CoV-2 infection or related systemic anomalies. However, new therapies targeting the CV system might reduce the severity and lethality of disease. In this line, activation of the non-canonical pathway of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) could improve CV homeostasis under COVID-19. In particular, treatments with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) and angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARB) may help to reduce hyperinflammation and viral propagation, while infusion of soluble ACE2 may trap plasma viral particles and increase cardioprotective Ang-(1-9) and Ang-(1-7) peptides. The association of specific ACE2 polymorphisms with increased susceptibility of infection and related CV pathologies suggests potential genetic therapies. Moreover, specific agonists of Ang-(1-7) receptor could counter-regulate the hypertensive, hyperinflammatory, and hypercoagulable responses. Interestingly, sex hormones could also regulate all these RAAS components. Therefore, while waiting for an efficient vaccine, we suggest further investigations on the non-canonical RAAS pathway to reduce cardiovascular damage and mortality in COVID-19 patients.