[Effect of different electrical current intensities of electroacupuncture preconditioning on cardiac function and macrophage polarization in mice with acute myocardial ischemia].

OBJECTIVE: To observe the effect of different intensities of electroacupuncture (EA) preconditioning on car-diac function and polarization state of macrophages in mice with acute myocardial ischemia (AMI), so as to explore its possible mechanism underlying improvement of AMI. METHODS: A total of 50 male C57BL/6J mice were randomly divided into sham ope-ration, AMI model, and EA pretreatment groups (0.5 mA, 1 mA, 3 mA subgroups), with 10 mice in each group/subgroup. The mice in the EA pretreatment groups were subjected to EA stimulation of bilateral "Neiguan"(PC6) with 0.5, 1.0 and 3 mA respectively and frequency of 2 Hz/15 Hz for 20 min, once a day, for 3 days. The acute myocardial ischemia model was established by ligating the anterior descending branch (ADB) of the left coronary artery, while the sham operation only had a surgical suture trans-passed below the ADB but without ligation. The myocardial infarction area was measured after TTC staining, and the cardiac function ï¼»left ventricular ejection fraction (EF), short-axis contraction rate (FS)ï¼½ was detected by using echocardiography. The M1 macrophages were labeled with CD11b+F480+CD206low, M2 macrophages were labeled with CD11b+F480+CD206high and detected by using flow cytometry, and the expression levels of myocardial interleukin-1ß (IL-1ß), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), Toll-like receptor-4 (TLR4) proteins were detected by using Western blot. RESULTS: Compared with the sham operation group, the model group had a significant increase in the infarction area (P<0.000 1), number of cardiac macrophages and percentage of M1 type macrophages (P<0.000 1), and the expression levels of myocardial IL-1ß, TNF-α, TLR4 proteins (P<0.001, P<0.01), and a remarkable decrease in the levels of EF, FS and the percentage of M2 type macrophages (P<0.000 1). In contrast to those of the model group, the area of myocardial infarction (P<0.000 1, P<0.01), expression levels of myocardial IL-1ß, TNF-α, TLR4 proteins (P<0.01, P<0.05, P<0.001) in the 0.5 mA, 1 mA and 3 mA groups, number of macrophages and percentage of M1 macrophages (P<0.05) in the 1 mA group were significantly decreased, while the levels of EF and FS (P<0.000 1, P<0.05, P<0.001) in the 3 EA groups, and percentage of M2 macrophage (P<0.05) in the 1 mA group were significantly increased. Comparison among the 3 EA groups displayed that the effects of 1 mA group were significantly superior to those of 0.5 and 3 mA groups in up-regulating EF and FS (P<0.01, P<0.001), and in down-regulating the area of infarct myocardium (P<0.01, P<0.000 1), and the expression of TLR4 protein (P<0.01), and 0.5 mA group in the expression of IL-1ß and TNF-α proteins (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: EA preconditioning with electrical current intensities of 0.5 mA, 1 mA and 3 mA can effectively reduce myocardial infarction size, improve cardiac function in mice with AMI, which may be related with its effects in reducing the number of cardiac macrophages and down-regulating the expression of myocardial IL-1ß, TNF-α and TLR4 proteins. The therapeutic effect of 1 mA is better than that of 0.5 and 3 mA.

The Angiogenesis Effects of Electro-acupuncture Treatment via Exosomal miR-210 in Cerebral Ischemia-Reperfusion Rats.

BACKGROUND: Acupuncture has been recommended as an alternative and complementary therapy for preventing and treating cerebral ischemia by the World Health Organization (WHO) for years. However, the mechanisms remain unclear. Accumulating evidence has shown that acupuncture can promote angiogenesis to attenuate brain damage after ischemic stroke. In recent years, exosome- carried microRNAs (miRNAs) activated by acupuncture have proven effective in regulating pathological changes. We, therefore, investigated whether electro-acupuncture (EA) enhanced angiogenesis in cerebral stroke via exosome-carried miR-210. METHODS: We extracted and identified the exosomes from the serum of MCAO with EA treatment and injected them into MCAO rats for further observation. Simultaneously, miR-120 siRNA and HIF-1α inhibitor were transfected. Then, we evaluated the volume of infarction, pathological changes, and expression levels of angiogenic related factors of each group of rats by TTC and HE staining, transmission electron microscope (TEM), western blot, and quantitative PCR (qPCR). RESULTS: Compared with the MCAO group, EA-Exosome (EA-EXO) treatment significantly decreased the infarct volume and the pathological damage, but miR-210 siRNA or HIF-1α inhibitor reversed the protective outcomes induced by EA-EXO. Moreover, EA-EXO treatment upregulated miR-210 and increased CD34, HIF-1α, VEGF, Notch1 protein, and mRNA expressions compared to the MCAO group. MiR-210 siRNA or HIF-1α inhibitor treatments both down-regulated those angiogenic related proteins and mRNAs. CONCLUSION: EA treatment could activate the HIF-1α/VEGF/Notch 1 signal pathway to facilitate angiogenesis after ischemic stroke via exosomal miR-210.

Dynamic compression locking system versus multiple cannulated compression screw for the treatment of femoral neck fractures: a comparative study.

BACKGROUND: Femoral neck fractures are one of the problems in clinical treatment. The prognosis is uncertain. Currently, No internal fixation method is superior to other internal fixation methods in the treatment of femoral neck fractures. Therefore, the internal fixation system needs to be further explored. The aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes of femoral neck dynamic compression locking system (DCLS) and multiple cannulated compression screws(MCCS) in the treatment of femoral neck fractures. METHODS: A prospective analysis of 54 cases of femoral neck fractures treated with either a DCLS (n = 28) or MCCS (n = 26) was conducted between December 2015 and November 2017 in authors' hospitals. The perioperative and postoperative parameters of the two groups were recorded and evaluated. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients were followed up for 24-47 months. The etiology was caused by a fall. There was no significant difference in follow-up time, operation time, incision length, surgical blood loss, the incidence of perioperative and postoperative healing complications, and mobility in the two groups (all P > 0.05). The Harris score, fracture healing time, femoral neck shortening, partial weight-bearing time and complete weight-bearing time were significantly better in the DCLS group than in the MCCS group (all P < 0.05). The fracture healing rate in the DCLS group was higher than that in the MCCS group. CONCLUSIONS: The DCLS and MCCS might be equally effective in terms of operation time, incision length, surgical blood loss, the incidence of perioperative and postoperative healing complications, and mobility in the treatment of femoral neck fractures. However, the DCLS is superior to the MCCS in Harris score, fracture healing time, femoral neck shortening, weight-bearing time and fracture healing rate. So, DCLS deserves further study.