Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 60
Filtrar
1.
Viruses ; 16(4)2024 04 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38675954

RESUMO

The first point-of-care (PoC) test (v-RetroFel®; modified version 2021) determining the presence of FeLV p27 antigen and FeLV anti-p15E antibodies has become recently commercially available to identify different feline leukaemia virus (FeLV) infection outcomes. This study aimed to assess this PoC test's performance concerning FeLV p27 antigen and FeLV anti-p15E antibody detection. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV) were assessed after ten minutes (recommended) and 20 min (prolonged) incubation times. The test results were evaluated as either positive or negative. Serum samples from 934 cats were included, originating from Italy (n = 269), Portugal (n = 240), Germany (n = 318), and France (n = 107). FeLV p27 antigen and anti-p15E antibodies were measured by reference standard ELISAs and compared to the PoC test results. The PoC test was easy to perform and the results easy to interpret. Sensitivity and specificity for FeLV p27 antigen were 82.8% (PPV: 57.8%) and 96.0% (NPV: 98.8%) after both, ten and 20 minues of incubation time. Sensitivity and specificity for anti-p15E antibodies were 31.4% (PPV: 71.6%) and 96.9% (NPV: 85.1%) after ten minutes incubation time; sensitivity was improved by a prolonged incubation time (20 min) to 40.0% (PPV: 76.3%), while specificity remained the same (96.9%, NPV: 86.7%). Despite the improved sensitivity using the prolonged incubation time, lower than ideal sensitivities for both p27 antigen and especially anti-p15E antibodies were found, indicating that the PoC test in its current version needs further improvement prior to application in the field.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Antivirais , Antígenos Virais , Vírus da Leucemia Felina , Testes Imediatos , Antígeno Nuclear de Célula em Proliferação , Animais , Gatos , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Anticorpos Antivirais/imunologia , Antígenos Virais/imunologia , Doenças do Gato/diagnóstico , Doenças do Gato/imunologia , Doenças do Gato/virologia , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática/métodos , Vírus da Leucemia Felina/imunologia , Leucemia Felina/diagnóstico , Leucemia Felina/imunologia , Leucemia Felina/virologia , Sistemas Automatizados de Assistência Junto ao Leito , Proteínas Oncogênicas de Retroviridae/química , Proteínas Oncogênicas de Retroviridae/imunologia , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
2.
Viruses ; 15(8)2023 08 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37632050

RESUMO

Vaccine-associated adverse events (VAAEs), including feline injection-site sarcomas (FISSs), occur only rarely but can be severe. Understanding potential VAAEs is an important part of informed owner consent for vaccination. In this review, the European Advisory Board on Cat Diseases (ABCD), a scientifically independent board of feline medicine experts, presents the current knowledge on VAAEs in cats, summarizing the literature and filling the gaps where scientific studies are missing with expert opinion to assist veterinarians in adopting the best vaccination practice. VAAEs are caused by an aberrant innate or adaptive immune reaction, excessive local reactions at the inoculation site, an error in administration, or failure in the manufacturing process. FISS, the most severe VAAE, can develop after vaccinations or injection of other substances. Although the most widely accepted hypothesis is that chronic inflammation triggers malignant transformation, the pathogenesis of FISS is not yet fully understood. No injectable vaccine is risk-free, and therefore, vaccination should be performed as often as necessary, but as infrequently as possible. Vaccines should be brought to room temperature prior to administration and injected at sites in which FISS surgery would likely be curative; the interscapular region should be avoided. Post-vaccinal monitoring is essential.


Assuntos
Doenças do Gato , Sarcoma , Gatos , Animais , Vacinação/efeitos adversos , Vacinação/veterinária , Sarcoma/etiologia , Sarcoma/veterinária , Doenças do Gato/etiologia , Comércio , Inflamação
3.
Viruses ; 15(8)2023 08 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37632060

RESUMO

Prevalence of progressive feline leukaemia virus (FeLV) infection is known to still be high in cats in Europe, especially in Southern Europe, but the prevalence of other outcomes of FeLV infection has not been determined in most countries. The present study aimed to investigate the prevalence of progressive, regressive, abortive, and focal infection in four European countries, two with a high (Italy, Portugal) and two with a low expected prevalence (Germany, France). Blood samples of 934 cats (Italy: 269; Portugal: 240; France: 107; Germany: 318) were evaluated for the p27 antigen, as well as anti-whole virus, anti-SU, and anti-p15E antibodies by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in serum and for proviral DNA by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) in whole blood. Positive p27 antigen ELISA results were confirmed by reverse transcriptase-qPCR (RT-qPCR) detecting viral RNA in saliva swabs and/or blood. The outcome of FeLV infection was categorised as progressive (antigen-positive, provirus-positive), regressive (antigen-negative, provirus-positive), abortive (antigen- and provirus-negative, antibody-positive), and focal (antigen-positive, provirus-negative) infection. Overall FeLV prevalence was 21.2% in Italy, 20.4% in Portugal, 9.5% in Germany, and 9.3% in France. Prevalence of progressive, regressive, abortive, and focal infection in Italy was 7.8%, 4.5%, 6.3%, and 2.6%; in Portugal 3.8%, 8.3%, 6.7%, and 1.7%; in Germany 1.9%, 1.3%, 3.5%, and 2.8%; in France 1.9%, 3.7%, 2.8%, and 0.9%, respectively. In conclusion, overall FeLV prevalence is still very high, especially in Southern European countries. Therefore, testing, separation of infected cats, and vaccination are still important measures to reduce the risk of FeLV infection.


Assuntos
Infecção Focal , Leucemia Felina , Gatos , Animais , Vírus da Leucemia Felina , Prevalência , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Itália/epidemiologia , Provírus
4.
Animals (Basel) ; 13(16)2023 Aug 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37627371

RESUMO

Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte (NLR), monocyte-to-lymphocyte (MLR), and platelet-to-lymphocyte (PLR) ratios have been proposed as diagnostic and prognostic markers for neoplastic and inflammatory diseases in dogs and cats. The aim of this retrospective preliminary study was to evaluate the relationship between these ratios and markers of inflammation routinely measured in cats. A total of 275 cats were enrolled. Complete blood count, serum amyloid A (SAA), albumin, globulin, and albumin-to-globulin ratio (AGR) data were analyzed, as well as the presence of leukocyte alterations considered suggestive of inflammation (LAI: neutrophils left shift, toxic neutrophils, and reactive lymphocytes) evaluated in blood smears. The NLR and MLR correlated positively with SAA and globulins and negatively with albumin and AGR. Higher NLR and MLR were found in cats with increased SAA and globulins and decreased albumin and AGR. The PLR correlated negatively with albumin and AGR. A higher PLR was found in cats with hypoalbuminemia. Cats with LAI had higher NLR, MLR, and PLR. In cats with no changes in parameters indicative of inflammation, 11.25, 0.42, and 528.3 were identified as upper limits for NLR, MLR, and PLR, respectively. In conclusion, the NLR, MLR, and PLR act as good inflammatory markers easily evaluated by routine hematology.

5.
Viruses ; 14(5)2022 04 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35632665

RESUMO

Immunocompromise is a common condition in cats, especially due to widespread infections with immunosuppressive viruses, such as feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV) and feline leukaemia virus (FeLV), but also due to chronic non-infectious diseases, such as tumours, diabetes mellitus, and chronic kidney disease, as well as treatment with immunosuppressive drugs, such as glucocorticoids, cyclosporins, or tumour chemotherapy. In this review, the European Advisory Board on Cat Diseases (ABCD), a scientifically independent board of experts in feline medicine from eleven European countries, discusses the current knowledge and rationale for vaccination of immunocompromised cats. So far, there are few data available on vaccination of immunocompromised cats, and sometimes studies produce controversial results. Thus, this guideline summarizes the available scientific studies and fills in the gaps with expert opinion, where scientific studies are missing. Ultimately, this review aims to help veterinarians with their decision-making in how best to vaccinate immunocompromised cats.


Assuntos
Vírus da Imunodeficiência Felina , Vírus da Leucemia Felina , Animais , Gatos , Europa (Continente) , Vacinação/veterinária
6.
J Feline Med Surg ; 22(11): 1084-1088, 2020 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33100172

RESUMO

OVERVIEW: Encephalitozoon cuniculi is a common obligate intracellular microsporidian parasite of rabbits that is increasingly recognised as a pathogen of cats and other mammalian species. These guidelines aim to review the literature on feline E cuniculi infection and provide recommendations on prevention and management. INFECTION IN CATS: E cuniculi infection should be considered as a differential diagnosis in cases of feline uveitis and cataract formation. It is not significantly associated with either chronic kidney disease or meningoencephalitis. E cuniculi infection is more common in stray or feral cats than in pet cats. DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT: Serological tests for antibody detection in the blood are easy to perform and can be useful for diagnosis, but their specificity is low as antibodies have been found in apparently healthy cats. PCR appears to be more sensitive than histopathology for diagnosis, and is more sensitive when performed on cataractous lenses compared with aqueous humour, although ease of sampling is an obvious limitation. Treatment is with fenbendazole for 3 weeks and phacoemulsification to remove microsporidia from cataractous lenses. ZOONOTIC RISK: E cuniculi is a potential zoonotic agent, and there is a particular risk to immunocompromised humans posed by infected rabbits. Albeit infrequent, spore shedding has been identified in cats, so care should be taken around infected cats.


Assuntos
Doenças do Gato/terapia , Catarata/veterinária , Encephalitozoon cuniculi/fisiologia , Encefalitozoonose/veterinária , Uveíte/veterinária , Animais , Doenças do Gato/diagnóstico , Doenças do Gato/prevenção & controle , Catarata/diagnóstico , Catarata/parasitologia , Gatos , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Encefalitozoonose/diagnóstico , Encefalitozoonose/prevenção & controle , Encefalitozoonose/terapia , Uveíte/diagnóstico , Uveíte/parasitologia
7.
J Feline Med Surg ; 22(5): 442-451, 2020 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32326862

RESUMO

OVERVIEW: Dirofilaria immitis and Dirofilaria repens are the most important filarial worms, causing heartworm disease and subcutaneous dirofilariosis, respectively. D repens is currently considered an emerging zoonotic agent in Europe. LIFE CYCLE AND INFECTION: Filarial worms infect mainly dogs, but also cats, ferrets, wild carnivores and humans. The life cycle involves an intermediate mosquito host. Compared with dogs, cats are imperfect hosts for dirofilarial worms. After inoculation, only a low number of L3 larvae develop to the adult stage in a small percentage of cats. Heartworm disease in cats may be associated with severe pulmonary thromboembolism and an eosinophilic inflammatory response in the lungs, potentially leading to sudden death. Otherwise self-cure occurs in most cases after 18-48 months. Subcutaneous dirofilariosis may present as subcutaneous nodules or dermatitis. DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT: Diagnosis in cats is more difficult compared with dogs and needs a multistep approach (antigen and antibody tests, as well as diagnostic imaging). Cats with acute heartworm disease require stabilisation within an intensive care unit. Cats with respiratory signs or suggestive radiographic changes should receive prednisolone and follow-up with a similar multistep approach. Adulticidal therapy is not safe in cats. PREVENTION: In endemic areas cats should receive year-round chemoprophylaxis from 2 months of age.


Assuntos
Doenças do Gato , Dirofilariose , Animais , Doenças do Gato/prevenção & controle , Doenças do Gato/terapia , Gatos , Dirofilaria immitis , Dirofilaria repens , Dirofilariose/prevenção & controle , Dirofilariose/terapia
8.
Viruses ; 11(11)2019 10 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31671816

RESUMO

Feline leukaemia virus (FeLV) is a retrovirus associated with fatal disease in progressively infected cats. While testing/removal and vaccination led to a decreased prevalence of FeLV, recently, this decrease has reportedly stagnated in some countries. This study aimed to prospectively determine the prevalence of FeLV viraemia in cats taken to veterinary facilities in 32 European countries. FeLV viral RNA was semiquantitatively detected in saliva, using RT-qPCR as a measure of viraemia. Risk and protective factors were assessed using an online questionnaire to report geographic, demographic, husbandry, FeLV vaccination, and clinical data. The overall prevalence of FeLV viraemia in cats visiting a veterinary facility, of which 10.4% were shelter and rescue cats, was 2.3% (141/6005; 95% CI: 2.0%-2.8%) with the highest prevalences in Portugal, Hungary, and Italy/Malta (5.7%-8.8%). Using multivariate analysis, seven risk factors (Southern Europe, male intact, 1-6 years of age, indoor and outdoor or outdoor-only living, living in a group of ≥5 cats, illness), and three protective factors (Northern Europe, Western Europe, pedigree cats) were identified. Using classification and regression tree (CART) analysis, the origin of cats in Europe, pedigree, and access to outdoors were important predictors of FeLV status. FeLV-infected sick cats shed more viral RNA than FeLV-infected healthy cats, and they suffered more frequently from anaemia, anorexia, and gingivitis/stomatitis than uninfected sick cats. Most cats had never been FeLV-vaccinated; vaccination rates were indirectly associated with the gross domestic product (GDP) per capita. In conclusion, we identified countries where FeLV was undetectable, demonstrating that the infection can be eradicated and highlighting those regions where awareness and prevention should be increased.


Assuntos
Doenças do Gato/epidemiologia , Infecções por Retroviridae/veterinária , Infecções Tumorais por Vírus/veterinária , Animais , Doenças do Gato/diagnóstico , Gatos , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Feminino , Vírus da Leucemia Felina/isolamento & purificação , Masculino , Prevalência , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Proteção , Infecções por Retroviridae/diagnóstico , Infecções por Retroviridae/epidemiologia , Fatores de Risco , Saliva/virologia , Infecções Tumorais por Vírus/diagnóstico , Infecções Tumorais por Vírus/epidemiologia , Viremia/diagnóstico , Viremia/epidemiologia , Viremia/veterinária
9.
Parasit Vectors ; 12(1): 133, 2019 Mar 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30909952

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Feline leishmaniosis caused by Leishmania infantum is considered a rare disease in endemic areas, whereas subclinical infections are common. Immune response plays a key role in driving the course of L. infantum infection in other host species; however, the feline cell-mediated immune response to L. infantum infection has not yet been investigated. The aim of this study was to determine the cell-mediated immune response specific to L. infantum by means of interferon (IFN)-γ release in whole blood assay from cats living in endemic areas (66 in Sicily and 113 in Catalonia) and to compare with antibody levels to L. infantum [enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and immunofluorescence antibody test (IFAT)], blood parasite load and retroviral infections. RESULTS: Most cats (n = 140) were L. infantum antibody negative and only 22% (n = 39) were positive. Only 9 and 2% of tested cats had a feline immunodeficency virus (FIV) infection or a feline leukemia virus (FeLV) infection, respectively. Thirty-two cats out of 179 (18%) produced IFN-γ after stimulation with L. infantum soluble antigen (LSA) while the majority of cats (93%) produced IFN-γ after stimulation with concanavalin A (ConA). Six LSA-IFN-γ-producer cats were seropositive (three to ELISA and five to IFAT) but they were polymerase chain reaction (PCR) negative, while only one cat was antibody- and PCR-positive. Significant positive correlations were found between IFN-γ concentrations after stimulation with LSA and ConA, and between serology and PCR testing. No association was found between FIV status and LSA or ConA-IFN-γ production. Combining PCR, serology and specific IFN-γ concentration results, we found that 36% of cats studied were exposed to L. infantum. CONCLUSIONS: As expected, cats from endemic areas produce IFN-γ after ex vivo blood stimulation with LSA and therefore are able to activate a cell-mediated adaptive immune response against the parasite that is variably associated with antibody or blood PCR positivity. The association of this assay to serological and molecular tests provides a better estimate of cat exposure to L. infantum.


Assuntos
Doenças do Gato/parasitologia , Doenças do Cão/parasitologia , Interferon gama/sangue , Leishmania infantum/imunologia , Leishmaniose Visceral/veterinária , Animais , Anticorpos Antiprotozoários/sangue , Anticorpos Antiprotozoários/imunologia , Doenças do Gato/imunologia , Gatos , Doenças do Cão/epidemiologia , Cães , Doenças Endêmicas/veterinária , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática/veterinária , Feminino , Imunofluorescência/veterinária , Imunidade Celular , Leishmaniose Visceral/imunologia , Masculino , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase em Tempo Real/veterinária , Sicília/epidemiologia , Espanha/epidemiologia
10.
Parasit Vectors ; 11(1): 136, 2018 03 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29554931

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Cats can be carriers of infected arthropods and be infected with several vector-borne pathogens (VBP) but there is limited knowledge about their pathogenic role in cats. RESULTS: A cross-sectional controlled study investigated the clinical status and antibody (Bartonella henselae, Rickettsia conorii, Ehrlichia canis, Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Babesia microti and Leishmania infantum) and/or blood PCR (Mycoplasma spp., Bartonella spp., Rickettsia spp., Ehrlichia/Anaplasma spp., piroplasmids, L. infantum, Hepatozoon felis) prevalence in 197 cats. Outdoor cats lacking ectoparasiticide treatment or hosting ectoparasites (study group [SG], n = 134) and indoor cats treated against ectoparasites (control group [CG], n = 63) were enrolled. Clinical data and retroviral co-infections were compared between the two groups. Multivariable analysis tested associations between variables and VBP exposure. Lymphadenia, stomatitis, and various haematological abnormalities were statistically more frequent in SG. Antibodies against R. conorii, B. henselae, A. phagocytophylum, B. microti, E. canis and L. infantum were detected. Bartonella henselae, Bartonella clarridgeiae, Mycoplasma haemofelis, "Candidatus Mycoplasma haemominutum" and "Candidatus Mycoplasma turicensis" DNA were identified. Very high antibody (87.8%) and PCR (40.1%) positivity to at least one pathogen were detected and were significantly higher in SG. Co-infections were confirmed in about one-third of the cats and were more frequent in SG cats. Molecular and overall (antibody and PCR) positivity to Bartonella and antibody positivity to R. conorii were higher in SG. Multivariable analysis found significant associations of Bartonella spp. infection with Feline Immunodeficiency Virus (FIV) infection and increased globulins, and of Mycoplasma spp. infection with adult age, FIV infection, anaemia, and increased creatinine. CONCLUSIONS: A very high prevalence of exposure to zoonotic VBP was found in cats, with Rickettsia and Bartonella infections being most prevalent. Some risk factors were documented namely for Mycoplasma spp. and Bartonella spp. The lifestyle of cats is clinically relevant and requires specific preventative measures to protect their health.


Assuntos
Doenças do Gato/epidemiologia , Vetores de Doenças , Ectoparasitoses/veterinária , Zoonoses/epidemiologia , Anaplasma/imunologia , Anaplasma/isolamento & purificação , Animais , Anticorpos Antibacterianos/sangue , Bartonella/imunologia , Bartonella/isolamento & purificação , Infecções por Bartonella/epidemiologia , Infecções por Bartonella/veterinária , Doenças do Gato/parasitologia , Gatos , Estudos Transversais , Ectoparasitoses/epidemiologia , Ectoparasitoses/parasitologia , Ehrlichia/imunologia , Ehrlichia/isolamento & purificação , Ehrlichia canis/imunologia , Ehrlichia canis/isolamento & purificação , Feminino , Itália/epidemiologia , Masculino , Mycoplasma/imunologia , Mycoplasma/isolamento & purificação , Infecções por Mycoplasma/epidemiologia , Infecções por Mycoplasma/veterinária , Infecções por Retroviridae/epidemiologia , Infecções por Retroviridae/microbiologia , Infecções por Retroviridae/veterinária , Infecções por Retroviridae/virologia , Rickettsia/imunologia , Rickettsia/isolamento & purificação , Infecções por Rickettsia/epidemiologia , Infecções por Rickettsia/veterinária , Fatores de Risco , Zoonoses/microbiologia , Zoonoses/parasitologia
11.
J Feline Med Surg ; 20(3): 256-261, 2018 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29478400

RESUMO

OVERVIEW: Haemoplasmas are haemotropic bacteria that can induce anaemia in a wide range of mammalian species. Infection in cats: Mycoplasma haemofelis is the most pathogenic of the three main feline haemoplasma species known to infect cats. ' Candidatus Mycoplasma haemominutum' and ' Candidatus Mycoplasma turicensis' are less pathogenic but can result in disease in immunocompromised cats. Male, non-pedigree cats with outdoor access are more likely to be haemoplasma infected, and ' Candidatus M haemominutum' is more common in older cats. All three haemoplasma species can be carried asymptomatically. Transmission: The natural mode of transmission of haemoplasma infection is not known, but aggressive interactions and vectors are possibilities. Transmission by blood transfusion can occur and all blood donors should be screened for haemoplasma infection. DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT: PCR assays are the preferred diagnostic method for haemoplasma infections. Treatment with doxycycline for 2-4 weeks is usually effective for M haemofelis-associated clinical disease (but this may not clear infection). Little information is currently available on the antibiotic responsiveness of ' Candidatus M haemominutum' and ' Candidatus M turicensis'.


Assuntos
Doenças do Gato , Infecções por Mycoplasma , Mycoplasma , Animais , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Doenças do Gato/diagnóstico , Doenças do Gato/tratamento farmacológico , Doenças do Gato/transmissão , Gatos , Feminino , Masculino , Infecções por Mycoplasma/diagnóstico , Infecções por Mycoplasma/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Mycoplasma/transmissão , Infecções por Mycoplasma/veterinária , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto
12.
J Feline Med Surg ; 20(8): 690-695, 2018 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28840776

RESUMO

Objectives The aim of this study was to investigate the presence of naturally occurring antibodies against canine erythrocyte antigens in cats and vice versa. The influence of canine and feline blood type on cross-match results was also studied. Methods Blood samples from 34 cats and 42 dogs were used to perform test tube major and minor cross-match tests and blood typing. Blood from each cat was cross-matched with blood from 2-6 dogs, for a total of 111 cross-match tests. Haemolysis, macro- and microagglutination were considered markers of a positive cross-match. Results Eighty-three overall major cross-match tests were positive at 37°C, 86 at room temperature and 90 at 4°C. The minor cross-match tests were positive in all but two cross-matches performed at 37°C, all tests performed at room temperature and all but one test performed at 4°C. No cats tested totally negative at both major and minor cross-matches performed with samples from any single dog. Prevalence of warm natural antibodies against canine erythrocyte antigens was lower in type B cats than in type A cats, regardless of the blood type of donor dogs. Conclusions and relevance This study reveals a high prevalence of naturally occurring antibodies in cats against dog erythrocyte antigens and vice versa, and suggests that transfusion of cats with canine blood is not recommended as a routine procedure owing to the potential high risk of either acute severe or milder transfusion reactions.


Assuntos
Anticorpos/imunologia , Antígenos de Grupos Sanguíneos/imunologia , Tipagem e Reações Cruzadas Sanguíneas , Gatos/imunologia , Cães/imunologia , Animais , Anticorpos/sangue , Gatos/sangue , Cães/sangue , Eritrócitos/imunologia
13.
J Feline Med Surg ; 19(5): 542-548, 2017 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28438088

RESUMO

OVERVIEW: Anaplasma species, Ehrlichia species and Rickettsia species are vector-borne pathogens infecting a wide variety of mammals, but causing disease in very few of them. Infection in cats: Anaplasma phagocytophilum is the most important feline pathogen among these rickettsial organisms, and coinfections are possible. Little information is available on the pathogenesis of these agents in cats. Clinical signs are usually reported soon after tick infestation. They are mostly non-specific, consisting of fever, anorexia and lethargy. Joint pain may occur. Infection in humans: Some rickettsial species ( A phagocytophilum, Ehrlichia chaffeensis, Ehrlichia ewingii, Rickettsia conorii, Rickettsia rickettsii, Rickettsia felis, Rickettsia typhi and Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis) are of zoonotic concern. Direct contact with cat saliva should be avoided because of potential contamination by R felis. Infected cats are 'sentinels' of the presence of rickettsial pathogens in ticks and fleas in a given geographical area, and they signal a risk for people exposed to vectors.


Assuntos
Anaplasmose , Doenças do Gato , Ehrlichiose/veterinária , Infecções por Rickettsia/veterinária , Anaplasma/fisiologia , Anaplasmose/diagnóstico , Anaplasmose/tratamento farmacológico , Anaplasmose/microbiologia , Anaplasmose/prevenção & controle , Animais , Doenças do Gato/diagnóstico , Doenças do Gato/tratamento farmacológico , Doenças do Gato/microbiologia , Doenças do Gato/prevenção & controle , Gatos , Ehrlichia/fisiologia , Ehrlichiose/diagnóstico , Ehrlichiose/microbiologia , Ehrlichiose/terapia , Humanos , Rickettsia/fisiologia , Infecções por Rickettsia/diagnóstico , Infecções por Rickettsia/microbiologia , Infecções por Rickettsia/terapia
14.
J Feline Med Surg ; 17(7): 570-82, 2015 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26101308

RESUMO

OVERVIEW: The ABCD has published 34 guidelines in two Special Issues of the Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery (JFMS): the first in July 2009 (Volume 11, Issue 7, pages 527-620) and the second in July 2013 (Volume 15, Issue 7, pages 528-652). The present article contains updates and new information on 18 of these (17 disease guidelines and one special article 'Prevention of infectious diseases in cat shelters'). For detailed information, readers are referred to the guidelines published in the above-mentioned JFMS Special Issues.


Assuntos
Infecções Bacterianas/veterinária , Doenças do Gato/prevenção & controle , Viroses/veterinária , Animais , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Infecções Bacterianas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Bacterianas/prevenção & controle , Vacinas Bacterianas/imunologia , Doenças do Gato/tratamento farmacológico , Gatos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Medicina Veterinária/normas , Vacinas Virais/imunologia , Viroses/tratamento farmacológico , Viroses/prevenção & controle
15.
J Feline Med Surg ; 17(7): 583-7, 2015 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26101309

RESUMO

OVERVIEW: In 2013, the ABCD published 'Matrix vaccination guidelines: ABCD recommendations for indoor/outdoor cats, rescue shelter cats and breeding catteries' in a Special Issue of the Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery (Volume 15, Issue 7, pages 540-544). The ABCD's vaccination recommendations were presented in tabulated form, taking into account that there is no universal vaccination protocol for all cats. To support the veterinarian's decision making, recommendations for four lifestyles were made: for cats with outdoors access, cats kept solely indoors, rescue shelter cats and cats in breeding catteries. This update article follows the same approach, offering current and, where relevant, expanded recommendations.


Assuntos
Infecções Bacterianas/veterinária , Vacinas Bacterianas/imunologia , Doenças do Gato/prevenção & controle , Vacinas Virais/imunologia , Viroses/veterinária , Bem-Estar do Animal/normas , Animais , Infecções Bacterianas/prevenção & controle , Vacinas Bacterianas/administração & dosagem , Doenças do Gato/microbiologia , Doenças do Gato/virologia , Gatos , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Abrigo para Animais , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Medicina Veterinária/normas , Vacinas Virais/administração & dosagem , Viroses/prevenção & controle
16.
J Feline Med Surg ; 17(7): 588-93, 2015 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26101310

RESUMO

OVERVIEW: The availability of blood components has increased the number of indications for transfusing cats, and fresh whole blood is readily accessible to clinicians because it can be taken from in-house donor cats or 'volunteer' feline blood donors. A certain amount of risk remains to the recipient cat, as immediate or delayed adverse reactions can occur during or after transfusion, related to immunemediated mechanisms. This article, however, focuses on adverse events caused by infectious agents, which may originate either from contamination of blood following incorrect collection, storage or transfusion, or from transfusion of contaminated blood obtained from an infected donor. PREVENTION OF BLOOD CONTAMINATION: In cats, blood cannot be collected through a closed system and, therefore, collection of donor blood requires a multi-step manipulation of syringes and other devices. It is crucial that each step of the procedure is performed under the strictest aseptic conditions and that bacterial contamination of blood bags is prevented, as bacterial endotoxins can cause an immediate febrile reaction or even fatal shock in the recipient cat. PREVENTION OF DISEASE TRANSMISSION: With a view to preventing transmission of blood-borne infectious diseases, the American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine has adopted basic criteria for selecting pathogens to be tested for in donor pets. The worldwide core screening panel for donor cats includes feline leukaemia virus, feline immunodeficiency virus, Bartonella species and feline haemoplasma. The list should be adapted to the local epidemiological situation concerning other vector-borne feline infections. The most practical, rapid and inexpensive measure to reduce transfusion risk is to check the risk profile of donor cats on the basis of a written questionnaire. Blood transfusion can never, however, be considered entirely safe.


Assuntos
Transfusão de Sangue/veterinária , Doenças do Gato/prevenção & controle , Doenças Transmissíveis/veterinária , Doença Iatrogênica/veterinária , Bem-Estar do Animal/normas , Animais , Gatos , Doença Iatrogênica/prevenção & controle , Vírus da Imunodeficiência Felina , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Reação Transfusional , Medicina Veterinária/normas
17.
J Feline Med Surg ; 17(7): 594-605, 2015 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26101311

RESUMO

OVERVIEW: Regardless of whether a pathogen is viral, bacterial, parasitic, fungal or an emerging unknown, the mainstay of infectious disease control is hygiene, and the cornerstone of good hygiene is effective disinfection. CHALLENGES AND CURRENT CHOICES: Certain pathogens present a challenge to kill effectively: parvovirus, protozoal oocysts, mycobacteria, bacterial spores and prions resist most disinfectants but can be eliminated through heat, especially steam, which will kill protozoal oocysts. Heat is the safest and most effective disinfectant, but cannot be universally applied. Temperatures in washing machines and dishwashers should be at least 60 °C to eliminate pathogenic spores and resistant viruses. Enveloped viruses are susceptible to most disinfectants; of the non-enveloped viruses, parvovirus is recognised as being the most difficult to eradicate. Sodium hypochlorite is recommended for many applications: cleaning of floors, laundry, food preparation surfaces and utensils. Skin scrubs and rubs containing alcohols are more effective than those containing chlorhexidine, and less subject to contamination. DISINFECTANTS TO AVOID: Deficiency of the enzyme UDP-glucuronosyl transferase renders the cat susceptible to the toxic effects of phenol-based disinfectants (including many essential oils), so these should be avoided in feline environments. Quaternary ammonium compounds (eg, benzalkonium chloride) are also probably best avoided. THE FUTURE: Veterinary disinfection approaches in the future may include use of ultraviolet radiation and, increasingly, silver.


Assuntos
Bem-Estar do Animal/normas , Doenças do Gato/prevenção & controle , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis/normas , Desinfetantes/administração & dosagem , Desinfecção/normas , Abrigo para Animais/normas , Animais , Gatos , Desinfetantes/efeitos adversos , Animais de Estimação , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Medicina Veterinária/normas
18.
J Feline Med Surg ; 17(7): 614-6, 2015 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26101313

RESUMO

OVERVIEW: Borna disease virus (BDV) has a broad host range, affecting primarily horses and sheep, but also cattle, ostriches, cats and dogs. In cats, BDV may cause a non-suppurative meningoencephalomyelitis ('staggering disease'). INFECTION: The mode of transmission is not completely elucidated. Direct and indirect virus transmission is postulated, but BDV is not readily transmitted between cats. Vectors such as ticks may play a role and shrews have been identified as a potential reservoir host. Access to forested areas has been reported to be an important risk factor for staggering disease. DISEASE SIGNS: It is postulated that BDV may infect nerve endings in the oropharynx and spread via olfactory nerve cells to the central nervous system. A strong T-cell response may contribute to the development of clinical disease. Affected cats develop gait disturbances, ataxia, pain in the lower back and behavioural changes. DIAGNOSIS: For diagnostic purposes, detection of viral RNA by reverse transcription PCR in samples collected from cats with clinical signs of Borna disease can be considered diagnostic. Serology is of little value; cats without signs of Borna disease may be seropositive and yet not every cat with BDV infection has detectable levels of antibodies. HUMAN INFECTION: A hypothesis that BDV infection may be involved in the development of selected neurological disorders in man could not be confirmed. A research group within the German Robert Koch Institute studied the potential health threat of BDV to humans and concluded that BDV was not involved in the aetiology of human psychiatric diseases.


Assuntos
Bem-Estar do Animal/normas , Doença de Borna/prevenção & controle , Vírus da Doença de Borna/isolamento & purificação , Doenças do Gato/prevenção & controle , Abrigo para Animais/normas , Zoonoses/virologia , Animais , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Doença de Borna/diagnóstico , Doenças do Gato/diagnóstico , Doenças do Gato/virologia , Gatos , Humanos , Masculino , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Medicina Veterinária/normas
19.
J Feline Med Surg ; 17(7): 617-9, 2015 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26101314

RESUMO

OVERVIEW: West Nile virus (WNV) is a zoonotic mosquito-borne virus with a broad host range that infects mainly birds and mosquitos, but also mammals (including humans), reptiles, amphibians and ticks. It is maintained in a bird-mosquito-bird transmission cycle. The most important vectors are bird-feeding mosquitos of the Culex genus; maintenance and amplification mainly involve passerine birds. WNV can cause disease in humans, horses and several species of birds following infection of the central nervous system. INFECTION IN CATS: Cats can also be infected through mosquito bites, and by eating infected small mammals and probably also birds. Although seroprevalence in cats can be high in endemic areas, clinical disease and mortality are rarely reported. If a cat is suspected of clinical signs due to an acute WNV infection, symptomatic treatment is indicated.


Assuntos
Bem-Estar do Animal/normas , Doenças do Gato/prevenção & controle , Febre do Nilo Ocidental/veterinária , Vírus do Nilo Ocidental/isolamento & purificação , Animais , Aves , Doenças do Gato/diagnóstico , Doenças do Gato/virologia , Gatos , Culex , Reservatórios de Doenças/veterinária , Humanos , Insetos Vetores , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Medicina Veterinária/normas , Febre do Nilo Ocidental/transmissão
20.
J Feline Med Surg ; 17(7): 620-5, 2015 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26101315

RESUMO

OVERVIEW: Streptococcus canis is most prevalent in cats, but recently S equi subsp zooepidemicus has been recognised as an emerging feline pathogen. S CANIS INFECTION: S canis is considered part of the commensal mucosal microflora of the oral cavity, upper respiratory tract, genital organs and perianal region in cats. The prevalence of infection is higher in cats housed in groups; and, for example, there may be a high rate of vaginal carriage in young queens in breeding catteries. A wide spectrum of clinical disease is seen, encompassing neonatal septicaemia, upper respiratory tract disease, abscesses, pneumonia, osteomyelitis, polyarthritis, urogenital infections, septicaemia, sinusitis and meningitis. S EQUI SUBSP ZOOEPIDEMICUS INFECTION: S equi subsp zooepidemicus is found in a wide range of species including cats. It was traditionally assumed that this bacterium played no role in disease of cats, but it is now considered a cause of respiratory disease with bronchopneumonia and pneumonia, as well as meningoencephalitis, often with a fatal course. Close confinement of cats, such as in shelters, appears to be a major risk factor. As horses are common carriers of this bacterium, contact with horses is a potential source of infection. Additionally, the possibility of indirect transmission needs to be considered. DIAGNOSIS: Streptococci can be detected by conventional culture techniques from swabs, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid or organ samples. Also real-time PCR can be used, and is more sensitive than culture. TREATMENT: In suspected cases, treatment with broad-spectrum antibiotics should be initiated as soon as possible and, if appropriate, adapted to the results of culture and sensitivity tests.


Assuntos
Bem-Estar do Animal/normas , Doenças do Gato/microbiologia , Doenças do Gato/prevenção & controle , Doenças Respiratórias/veterinária , Infecções Estreptocócicas/veterinária , Streptococcus equi/patogenicidade , Animais , Doenças do Gato/diagnóstico , Gatos , Surtos de Doenças/veterinária , Feminino , Cavalos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Doenças Respiratórias/microbiologia , Doenças Respiratórias/prevenção & controle , Infecções Estreptocócicas/microbiologia , Infecções Estreptocócicas/prevenção & controle , Streptococcus equi/isolamento & purificação , Medicina Veterinária/normas
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA