Obturator to Femoral Nerve Transfer: 2-Dimensional Operative Video.

Injury to the femoral nerve can cause femoral nerve palsy,1 resulting in severe ambulation difficulties and loss of sensory function in the anteromedial thigh and medial calf.2,3 Treatment options focus on nerve repair by direct coaptation, nerve grafting, or nerve transfer.3 If the proximal nerve stump is inaccessible, the location of nerve injury is at a distance from the site of muscle innervation, and/or there is a large nerve gap, nerve transfer may be a promising alternative treatment option.4-6 Nerve transfer uses only one coaptation site and allows for a faster recovery time due to a shorter nerve regeneration distance.2,3 A 32-year-old woman presented with persistent and severe proximal right lower extremity weakness after a right retroperitoneal femoral nerve schwannoma resection at an outside institution. After surgery, she reported that she could not flex her right hip or extend her right knee. MRI demonstrated a right femoral nerve gap defect (7.5 cm) at the schwannoma resection site. A right obturator to femoral nerve transfer was performed (see Video). 1.5-year follow-up visit showed that she had begun to have evidence of active recruitment of the right quadriceps muscle and started walking without a knee brace. 2.5-year follow-up visit showed improving strength (4-) in her right quadriceps muscle, independent walking for longer distances, and participation in sporting activities. The patient consented to the procedure, and the patients and any identifiable individuals consented to publication of his/her image. Institutional Review Board approval was not required for this single case observational surgical video.

The Use of Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Instrumentation in Patients with Spinal Oncologic Tumors: A Systematic Review of Literature and Future Directions.

INTRODUCTION: Metastatic spine tumors affect over 30% of patients who have been diagnosed with cancer. While techniques in surgical intervention have undoubtedly evolved, there are some pitfalls when spinal instrumentation is required for stabilization following tumor resection. However, the use of carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone (CFR-PEEK) implants has become increasingly popular due to improved radiolucency and positive osteobiologic properties. Here, we present a systematic review describing the use of CFR-PEEK-coated instrumentation in the oncologic population while identifying advantages and potential shortcomings of these devices. METHODS: In accordance with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, a systematic review was conducted in March 2022 to identify articles detailing the use of CFR-PEEK implants for spinal instrumentation in patients with primary and secondary spine tumors. The search was performed using the PubMed, Scopus, and Embase databases. RESULTS: An initial search returned a total of 85 articles among the three databases used. After the exclusion of duplicates and screening of abstracts, 21 full-text articles were examined for eligibility. Eleven articles were excluded due to not fitting our inclusion and exclusion criteria. Ten articles were subsequently eligible for full-text review. CONCLUSIONS: CFR-PEEK possesses a similar safety and efficacy profile to titanium implants but has distinct advantages. It limits artifact, increases early detection of local tumor recurrence, increases radiotherapy dose accuracy, and is associated with low complication rates (9.96%)-making it a promising alternative for the demands unique to the treatment/outcome of spinal oncologic patients.

A case of primary central nervous system lymphoma presenting as a shunt complication.

The authors describe an 82-year-old female with a right frontal ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt for long-standing normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) who presented with worsening incontinence and gait instability. She was found to have right lateral ventricle collapse around the shunt catheter and subsequently underwent shunt revision, which failed to improve her symptoms. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was obtained on postoperative day two, which demonstrated a ventricular lesion. Endoscopic brain biopsy was performed and a diagnosis of primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) was made. The authors believe this is the first published case of PCNSL presenting as a VP shunt complication in a patient with NPH.

Size matters - From the working channel to the wavelength of light: Optimizing visualization in endoscopic spine surgery.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive surgery bases many of its benefits on decreasing tissue disruption. Endoscopic spine surgery has continued to push the boundaries to accomplish successful clinical outcomes through the evolution of the endoscope and working channel. As the indications for endoscopic spine surgery increase, a more profound discussion of cannula size selection for endoscopic spine surgery is required. The intimate relationship between the working channel, the endoscope and how these choices affect workflow and visualization are paramount to maximize outcomes. METHODS: The authors review the nuances of the endoscopic approaches to the various regions of the spine as it relates to the selection of the working channel. The advantages and limitations of various endoscopic working channels were analyzed as to how they address anatomic regional considerations as well as ultimate goals of surgery. RESULTS: In addition to anatomic regional differences and the goals of the surgery other key elements in endoscopic working channel selection included the amount of tissue disruption, regional risk to the neural elements, impact on visualization, optical physics, and the implications for surgical maneuverability/dexterity. CONCLUSION: Understanding the role and use of the endoscope-working channel combination with its effects on visualization is essential for any surgeon aspiring to perform safe and efficient full endoscopic spine surgery.

Use of an External Ventricular Drain for Treatment of a Thoracolumbar Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak: A Case Report and Review of Literature.

Post-operative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak is a known complication in spine surgery. This mostly iatrogenic issue is typically treated using a variety of modalities (i.e., bed rest, epidural patch), CSF diversion methods, or primary repair. The use of an external ventricular drain to treat this post-operative complication has been infrequently reported. We describe a case of a CSF leak after thoraco-lumbar surgery treated using an external ventricular drain and a review of the literature regarding this treatment modality. A 70-year-old man presented to our clinic with a recent diagnosis of multiple myeloma with progressive thoracic kyphosis and spinal stenosis. He developed progressive neurological deficits over the course of several weeks. Radiological studies showed significant thoracic kyphosis and severe cord compression in the thoraco-lumbar area. The patient underwent a T9-L4 posterior instrumentation and fusion with decompression surgery that developed post-operative wound infection and a CSF leak. An external ventricular drain (EVD) was used successfully as a CSF diversion method where direct thoracolumbar approaches were not feasible. Given the effectiveness of EVD placement in treating this post-operative complication, we concluded that the use of an EVD can be a potentially safe and effective way to treat thoracolumbar CSF leakage when lumbar or cervical drainage is not feasible.

The declining incidence of cervical spine surgery in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a single-surgeon series and literature review.

OBJECTIVE: With an increasing number of disease-modifying drugs available to manage rheumatoid arthritis (RA), spine surgeons have anecdotally noted decreased rates of cervical spine surgical procedures in this population. Although these medications have been shown to mitigate RA progression and its systemic effects on joint destruction, there are currently no large-scale studies of RA patients that suggest the use of these disease-modifying drugs has truly coincided with a decline in cervical spine surgery. METHODS: Patients with RA who underwent cervical spinal fusion from 1998 to 2021 performed by the senior author were retrospectively reviewed. The cohort was stratified into 3 categories based on procedure level: 1) occipitocervical, 2) atlantoaxial, and 3) subaxial. The number of surgical procedures per year in each subgroup was evaluated to determine treatment trends over time. National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample (NIS) data on both RA and non-RA patients who underwent cervical fusion were analyzed to assess for surgical trends over time and for differences in likelihood of surgical intervention between RA and non-RA patients over the epoch. RESULTS: From 1998 to 2021, the number of overall cervical fusions performed in RA patients significantly declined (-0.13 procedures/year, p = 0.01) in this cohort, despite an overall significant increase in cervical fusions in non-RA patients over the same period. NIS analysis of cervical fusions across all patients similarly demonstrated a significant increase in cervical fusions over the same epoch (19,278 cases/year, p < 0.0001). When normalized for changes in population size, the incidence of new surgical procedures was lower in patients with RA regardless of surgical technique. Anterior cervical fusion was the most common approach used over the epoch in both RA and non-RA patients; correspondingly, RA patients were significantly less likely to undergo anterior cervical fusion (OR 0.655, 95% CI -0.4504 to -0.3972, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: At the authors' institution, there was a clear decline in the number of cervical fusions performed to treat the 3 most common forms of cervical spine pathology in RA patients (basilar impression, atlantoaxial instability, and subaxial cervical deformity). Although national trends suggest an increase in total cervical fusions in both RA and non-RA patients, the incidence of new procedures in patients with RA was significantly lower than in patients without RA, which supports the anecdotal results of spine surgeons nationally.

Immunotherapeutic treatments for spinal and peripheral nerve tumors: a primer.

OBJECTIVE: Spinal and peripheral nerve tumors are a heterogeneous group of neoplasms that can be associated with significant morbidity and mortality despite the current standard of care. Immunotherapy is an emerging therapeutic option to improve the prognoses of these tumors. Therefore, the authors sought to present an updated and unifying review on the use of immunotherapy in treating tumors of the spinal cord and peripheral nerves, including a discussion on mechanism of action, drug delivery, current treatment techniques, and preclinical and clinical studies. METHODS: Current data in the literature regarding immunotherapy were collated and summarized. Targeted tumors included primary and secondary spinal tumors, as well as peripheral nerve tumors. RESULTS: Four primary modalities of immunotherapy (CAR T cell, monoclonal antibody, viral, and cytokine) have been reported to target spine and peripheral nerve tumors. Of the primary spinal tumors, spinal cord astrocytomas had the most preclinical evidence supporting immunotherapy success with CAR T-cell therapy targeting the H3K27M mutation, whereas spinal schwannomas and ependymomas had the most evidence reported for monoclonal antibody therapy preclinically. Of the secondary spinal tumors, primary CNS lymphomas demonstrated some clinical response to immunotherapy, whereas multiple myeloma and bone tumor experiences with immunotherapy were largely limited to concept only. Within peripheral nerve tumors, the use of immunotherapy to treat neurofibromas in the setting of syndromes has been suggested in theory, and possible immunotherapeutic targets have been identified in malignant peripheral nerve tumors. To date, there have been 2 clinical trials involving spine tumors and 2 clinical trials involving peripheral nerve tumors that have reported results, all of which are promising but require validation. CONCLUSIONS: Immunotherapy to treat spinal and peripheral nerve tumors has become an emerging area of research and interest. A large amount of preclinical data supporting the translation of this therapy into practice, aimed at ameliorating the poor prognoses of specific tumors, have been reported. Future clinical studies for translation will focus on the optimal therapy type and administration route to best target these tumors, which often preclude total surgical resection given their proximity to the neural and vascular elements of the spine.

Cervical intramedullary teratoma: a case report and systematic review of the literature.

Here, we report a case of a 3-year-old female who presented to clinic with an enlarging mass in the posterior cervical midline. The mass was present since birth and demonstrated no cutaneous stigmata. Plain film, CT, and MRI of the cervical spine (C3-C5) revealed enlargement of the spinal canal, soft tissue calcification, spinal dysraphism, and an intramedullary, predominantly fatty, mass. The mass had associated calcifications and a highly proteinaceous cyst. Surgical resection of the spinal lesion was subsequently performed. Histopathological evaluation revealed a mature teratoma. Cervical spinal teratomas in the pediatric population are rare entities with few cases currently reported in the literature. We conducted a systematic review to outline the current evidence detailing cases of intramedullary spinal cord teratomas. Six articles were included for final review. All patients in the included articles underwent maximal surgical resection with one patient also receiving chemotherapy and radiation. With our report, we aim to add to the literature on cervical intramedullary spinal cord teratomas in the pediatric population.

Endoscopic decompression for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Lumbar stenosis treatment has evolved with the introduction of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) techniques. Endoscopic methods take the concepts applied to MIS a step further, with multiple studies showing that endoscopic techniques have outcomes that are similar to those of more traditional approaches. The aim of this study was to perform an updated meta-analysis and systematic review of studies comparing the outcomes between endoscopic (uni- and biportal) and microscopic techniques for the treatment of lumbar stenosis. METHODS: Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search was performed using the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Ovid Embase, and PubMed databases from their dates of inception to December 14, 2020. All identified articles were then systematically screened against the following inclusion criteria: 1) studies comparing endoscopic (either uniportal or biportal) with minimally invasive approaches, 2) patient age ≥ 18 years, and 3) diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis. Bias was assessed using quality assessment criteria and funnel plots. Meta-analysis using a random-effects model was used to synthesize the metadata. RESULTS: From a total of 470 studies, 14 underwent full-text assessment. Of these 14 studies, 13 comparative studies were included for quantitative analysis, totaling 1406 procedures satisfying all criteria for selection. Regarding postoperative back pain, 9 studies showed that endoscopic methods resulted in significantly lower pain scores compared with MIS (mean difference [MD] -1.0, 95% CI -1.6 to -0.4, p < 0.01). The length of stay data were reported by 7 studies, with endoscopic methods associated with a significantly shorter length of stay versus the MIS technique (MD -2.1 days, 95% CI -2.7 to -1.4, p < 0.01). There was no significant difference with respect to leg visual analog scale scores, Oswestry Disability Index scores, blood loss, surgical time, and complications, and there were not any significant quality or bias concerns. CONCLUSIONS: Both endoscopic and MIS techniques are safe and effective methods for treating patients with symptomatic lumbar stenosis. Patients who undergo endoscopic surgery seem to report less postoperative low-back pain and significantly reduced hospital stay with a trend toward less perioperative blood loss. Future large prospective randomized trials are needed to confirm the findings in this study.

Myocardial Infarction After Lumbar Surgery: A Critical Meta-Analysis of Cohort versus Database Studies for a Rare Complication.

BACKGROUND: One potentially fatal complication of spine surgery is myocardial infarction (MI). There is still uncertainty of the true incidence of MI within subsets of spine surgeries. The aim of this study was to survey the contemporary spine literature and ascertain the true incidence of MI after lumbar spine surgery, as well as to provide commentary on the inherent assumptions made when interpreting cohort versus database studies on this topic. METHODS: A systematic search of 4 electronic databases from inception to November 2020 was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Articles were screened against prespecified criteria. MI incidence was then estimated by random-effects meta-analyses of proportions based on cohort versus database studies. RESULTS: A total of 34 cohort studies and 32 database studies describing 767,326 lumbar procedures satisfied all criteria for selection. There were 12,170 (2%) cases from cohort studies and 755,156 (98%) cases from database studies. Cohort studies reported a significantly older patient cohort (P < 0.01) and longer follow-up period than did database studies (P < 0.03). Using cohort studies only, the incidence of MI was 0.44% (P heterogeneity < 0.01), whereas using database studies only, the incidence of MI was 0.41% (P heterogeneity < 0.01). These 2 incidences were statistically different (P interaction = 0.01). Bias analysis indicated that cohort studies were more vulnerable to small-study biases than were database studies. CONCLUSIONS: Although infrequent, the incidence of MI after lumbar spine surgery is unequivocally nonzero. Furthermore, the literature on this topic remains skewed based on study type, and translation of academic findings into practice should be wary of this.

Spinal anesthesia in awake surgical procedures of the lumbar spine: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 3709 patients.

OBJECTIVE: Awake surgery has previously been found to improve patient outcomes postoperatively in a variety of procedures. Recently, multiple groups have investigated the utility of this modality for use in spine surgery. However, few current meta-analyses exist comparing patient outcomes in awake spinal anesthesia with those in general anesthesia. Therefore, the authors sought to present an updated systematic review and meta-analysis investigating the utility of spinal anesthesia relative to general anesthesia in lumbar procedures. METHODS: Following a comprehensive literature search of the PubMed and Cochrane databases, 14 clinical studies were included in our final qualitative and quantitative analyses. Of these studies, 5 investigated spinal anesthesia in lumbar discectomy, 4 discussed lumbar laminectomy, and 2 examined interbody fusion procedures. One study investigated combined lumbar decompression and fusion or decompression alone. Two studies investigated patients who underwent discectomy and laminectomy, and 1 study investigated a series of patients who underwent transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, posterolateral fusion, or decompression. Odds ratios, mean differences (MDs), and 95% confidence intervals were calculated where appropriate. RESULTS: A meta-analysis of the total anesthesia time showed that time was significantly less in patients who received spinal anesthesia for both lumbar discectomies (MD -26.53, 95% CI -38.16 to -14.89; p = 0.00001) and lumbar laminectomies (MD -11.21, 95% CI -19.66 to -2.75; p = 0.009). Additionally, the operative time was significantly shorter in patients who underwent spinal anesthesia (MD -14.94, 95% CI -20.43 to -9.45; p < 0.00001). Similarly, when analyzing overall postoperative complication rates, patients who received spinal anesthesia were significantly less likely to experience postoperative complications (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.16-0.53; p < 0.0001). Furthermore, patients who received spinal anesthesia had significantly lower postoperative pain scores (MD -2.80, 95% CI -4.55 to -1.06; p = 0.002). An identical trend was seen when patients were stratified by lumbar procedures. Patients who received spinal anesthesia were significantly less likely to require postoperative analgesia (OR 0.06, 95% CI 0.02-0.25; p < 0.0001) and had a significantly shorter hospital length of stay (MD -0.16, 95% CI -0.29 to -0.03; p = 0.02) and intraoperative blood loss (MD -52.36, 95% CI -81.55 to -23.17; p = 0.0004). Finally, the analysis showed that spinal anesthesia cost significantly less than general anesthesia (MD -226.14, 95% CI -324.73 to -127.55; p < 0.00001). CONCLUSIONS: This review has demonstrated the varying benefits of spinal anesthesia in awake spine surgery relative to general anesthesia in patients who underwent various lumbar procedures. The analysis has shown that spinal anesthesia may offer some benefits when compared with general anesthesia, including reduction in the duration of anesthesia, operative time, total cost, and postoperative complications. Large prospective trials will elucidate the true role of this modality in spine surgery.

Revisiting anterior longitudinal ligament release: Are we ready for an endoscopic approach?

Anterior longitudinal ligament release is a proven method for restoring spinopelvic parameters. This technique is mostly described using either lateral or anterior approaches with paucity regarding a posterior method. This paper is the first to provide descriptive analysis of the neurovascular anatomy in the context of planning for a posterior endoscopic ALL release. A retrospective chart review was performed on patients underwent any lumbar surgery by a single surgeon. Anatomical data was obtained from pre-operative CT to describe the location of key neurovascular structures in relation to the ALL with focus on posterior approach. A total of 20 patients were included in data analysis. A posterior approach with endoscopic assistance would be feasible at L4/5 and L5/S1, where the bifurcation of the abdominal aorta has occurred with a vessel window that ranges from 18.85 mm to 33.45 mm with at least 2 mm space between the vessels and the corresponding disc spaces in the anterior-posterior dimension with slight predilection of the left side at the L5/S1 level to avoid any neurovascular structures. Our study confirmed the findings of previous studies examining the vascular anatomy associated with the lumbar spine. Interestingly, we found that direct midline would likely not be the best location for a posterior annulotomy, and that both the window between the iliac vessels as well as the distance in AP dimension between the spine and vessels increases as you descend the lumbar spine. This information will help guide future efforts to fully develop a safe and reproducible posterior endoscopic ALL release.

An updated management algorithm for incorporating minimally invasive techniques to treat thoracolumbar trauma.

OBJECTIVE: Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) techniques can effectively stabilize and decompress many thoracolumbar injuries with decreased morbidity and tissue destruction compared with open approaches. Nonetheless, there is limited direction regarding the breadth and limitations of MIS techniques for thoracolumbar injuries. Consequently, the objectives of this study were to 1) identify the range of current practice patterns for thoracolumbar trauma and 2) integrate expert opinion and literature review to develop an updated treatment algorithm. METHODS: A survey describing 10 clinical cases with a range of thoracolumbar injuries was sent to 12 surgeons with expertise in spine trauma. The survey results were summarized using descriptive statistics, along with the Fleiss kappa statistic of interrater agreement. To develop an updated treatment algorithm, the authors used a modified Delphi technique that incorporated a literature review, the survey results, and iterative feedback from a group of 14 spine trauma experts. The final algorithm represented the consensus opinion of that expert group. RESULTS: Eleven of 12 surgeons contacted completed the case survey, including 8 (73%) neurosurgeons and 3 (27%) orthopedic surgeons. For the 4 cases involving patients with neurological deficits, nearly all respondents recommended decompression and fusion, and the proportion recommending open surgery ranged from 55% to 100% by case. Recommendations for the remaining cases were heterogeneous. Among the neurologically intact patients, MIS techniques were typically recommended more often than open techniques. The overall interrater agreement in recommendations was 0.23, indicating fair agreement. Considering both literature review and expert opinion, the updated algorithm indicated that MIS techniques could be used to treat most thoracolumbar injuries. Among neurologically intact patients, percutaneous instrumentation without arthrodesis was recommended for those with AO Spine Thoracolumbar Classification System subtype A3/A4 (Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score [TLICS] 4) injuries, but MIS posterior arthrodesis was recommended for most patients with AO Spine subtype B2/B3 (TLICS > 4) injuries. Depending on vertebral body integrity, anterolateral corpectomy or mini-open decompression could be used for patients with neurological deficits. CONCLUSIONS: Spine trauma experts endorsed a range of strategies for treating thoracolumbar injuries but felt that MIS techniques were an option for most patients. The updated treatment algorithm may provide a foundation for surgeons interested in safe approaches for using MIS techniques to treat thoracolumbar trauma.

The role of an anterior approach in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis-associated cervical fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Cervical fractures in patients with ankylosing spondylitis can have devastating neurological consequences. Currently, several surgical approaches are commonly used to treat these fractures: anterior, posterior, and anterior-posterior. The relative rarity of these fractures has limited the ability of surgeons to objectively determine the merits of each. The authors present an updated systematic review and meta-analysis investigating the utility of anterior surgical approaches relative to posterior and anterior-posterior approaches. METHODS: After a comprehensive literature search of the PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases, 7 clinical studies were included in the final qualitative and 6 in the final quantitative analyses. Of these studies, 6 compared anterior approaches with anterior-posterior and posterior approaches, while 1 investigated only an anterior approach. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated where appropriate. RESULTS: A meta-analysis of postoperative neurological improvement revealed no statistically significant differences in gross rates of neurological improvement between anterior and posterior approaches (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.10-1.59; p = 0.19). However, when analyzing the mean change in neurological function, patients who underwent anterior approaches had a significantly lower mean change in postoperative neurological function relative to patients who underwent posterior approaches (mean difference [MD] -0.60, 95% CI -0.76 to -0.45; p < 0.00001). An identical trend was seen between anterior and anterior-posterior approaches; there were no statistically significant differences in gross rates of neurological improvement (OR 3.05, 95% CI 0.84-11.15; p = 0.09). However, patients who underwent anterior approaches experienced a lower mean change in neurological function relative to anterior-posterior approaches (MD -0.46, 95% CI -0.60 to -0.32; p < 0.00001). There were no significant differences in complication rates between anterior approaches, posterior approaches, or anterior-posterior approaches, although complication rates trended lower in patients who underwent anterior approaches. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this review and meta-analysis demonstrated the varying benefits of anterior approaches relative to posterior and anterior-posterior approaches in treatment of cervical fractures associated with ankylosing spondylitis. While reports demonstrated lower degrees of neurological improvement in anterior approaches, they may benefit patients with less-severe injuries if lower complication rates are desired.

Incidence and Clinical Outcomes of Hypothyroidism in Patients Undergoing Spinal Fusion.

Background Hypothyroidism has been independently associated with the development of several comorbidities and is known to increase complication rates in non-spinal surgeries. However, there are limited data regarding the effects of hypothyroidism in major spine surgery. Therefore, we present the largest retrospective analysis evaluating outcomes in hypothyroid patients undergoing spinal fusion. Methods A retrospective review of the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 2004-2014 was performed. Patients with an International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) procedure code indicating spinal fusion (81.04-81.08, 81.34-81.38, 81.0x, 81.3x) were included. Patients with an ICD-9-CM diagnosis code indicating hypothyroidism (244.x) were compared to those without. Cervical and lumbar fusions were evaluated independently. Significant covariates in univariable logistic regression were utilized to construct multivariable models to analyze the effect of hypothyroidism on perioperative morbidity and mortality. Results A total of 4,149,125 patients were identified, of which 9.4% were hypothyroid. Although, hypothyroid patients had a higher risk of hematologic complications (lumbar - odds ratio [OR] 1.176, p < 0.0001; cervical - OR 1.162, p < 0.0001), they exhibited decreased in-hospital mortality (lumbar - OR .643, p < 0.0001; cervical - OR .606, p < 0.0001). Hypothyroid lumbar fusion patients also demonstrated decreased rates of perioperative myocardial infarction (MI) (OR .851, p < 0.0001). All these results were independent of patient gender. Conclusions Hypothyroid patients undergoing spinal fusion demonstrated lower rates of inpatient mortality and, in lumbar fusions, also had lower rates of acute MI when compared to their euthyroid counterparts. This suggests that hypothyroidism may offer protection against all-cause mortality and may be cardioprotective in the postoperative period for lumbar spinal fusions independent of patient gender.

Cervical Subarachnoid Drain for the Treatment of Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak: 2-Dimensional Operative Video.

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak is a common phenomenon encountered by the neurosurgeon. It is most commonly come across after a neurosurgical procedure, but it can be seen idiopathically. Treatment usually ranges from conservative management through cerebrospinal fluid diversion to direct surgical repair. Continuous CSF drainage provides a path for diversion and allowing the site of the dural injury to heal effectively.1 Cervical subarachnoid drain is a safe and effective alternative when lumbar access is contraindicated or not achievable.2 Here we present a case of a 22-yr-old female with progressive symptomatic positional headaches due to a CSF leak from a prior deformity surgery treated with a cervical subarachnoid drain after a failed attempt at a direct repair. This 2-dimensional video illustrates the technique used for the placement of a cervical subarachnoid drain for the treatment of symptomatic CSF leak. Patient consented to the procedure and for the publication of their image.

Indeterminate Cell Histiocytosis of the Spine: A Case Report.

INTRODUCTION: Indeterminate cell histiocytosis is a rare neoplastic disease characterized by proliferation of dendritic cells that share morphologic and immunophenotypic features of Langerhans cells and non-Langerhans histiocytes. ICH lesions are typically restricted to the skin; however, there have been rare reports of extracutaneous and systemic involvement. CASE PRESENTATION: We describe a case of a 13-year-old female presenting with complaints of worsening lower back pain for 1 year. CT and MRI of the lumbar spine demonstrated a well-defined bony, lytic, expansile lesion of the posterior and mid-endplate of the L4 vertebra with mass effect on the thecal sac. The patient underwent L3-L5 decompression and fusion with surgical excision of the vertebral body tumor. Microscopic examination of the lesion showed benign fibrohistiocytic proliferation with giant cells, and immunohistochemical staining revealed a phenotype consistent with indeterminate cell histiocytosis (S100+ CD1a+ langerin-). DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: ICH is an extraordinarily rare neoplastic disease of dendritic cells that has a poorly understood pathogenesis. This case expands the spectrum of potential ICH extracutaneous involvement to now include the spine, a location previously undocumented in the literature in the pediatric population.

Endoscopic Interlaminar Approach for Lumbar 4/5 Ipsilateral and Contralateral Decompression: 2-Dimensional Operative Video.

Lumbar radiculopathy often results from direct compression of the exiting nerve roots. This may be caused mainly by spondylotic changes with any contribution from components like a herniated disc, facet overgrowth, and ligamentum flavum hypertrophy, or any combination of them. There are a wide range of surgical treatments directed at decompressing the neural elements. Over the last decade, endoscopic spine surgery has gained popular interest because of potential benefits, including decreased bony removal, less muscle disruption, and enhanced visualization.1 A unilateral endoscopic surgical approach can accomplish an effective bilateral decompression using the ipsilateral-contralateral technique.2 This method allows for addressing both central and bilateral recess stenoses. We present a case of a 48-yr-old female with persistent bilateral lower extremity radicular pain worse on the left side with severe lumbar 4/5 stenosis and a left-sided synovial cyst causing significant foraminal narrowing. This 2-dimensional video illustrates the technique used for an endoscopic interlaminar approach for lumbar 4/5 ipsilateral and contralateral decompression. We highlight key elements regarding the positioning, workflow, and surgical technique to successfully perform this approach. Patient consented to the procedure.

Antiresorptive and anabolic medications used in the perioperative period of patients with osteoporosis undergoing spine surgery: their impact on the biology of fusion and systematic review of the literature.

OBJECTIVE: Osteoporosis represents the most common metabolic disease of the bone, with an estimated 10% of adults aged 50 years or older affected in the United States. This patient population is at increased risk for spine fracture and instrumentation-related complications after spine surgery. Surgeon knowledge of the available treatments for patients with low bone mineral density (BMD) and how they impact biology of fusion may help mitigate negative effects in the postoperative period. Recombinant parathyroid hormone, which is sold under the name teriparatide, is the most extensively studied bone-protecting agent in humans. Additionally, the success of the monoclonal antibody denosumab has led to further clinical investigations of human patients undergoing spine surgery. Another monoclonal antibody, romosozumab, was recently approved by the US FDA for human use in patients with osteoporosis. Although studies of romosozumab in patients undergoing spine surgery have not been conducted, this is a promising potential therapeutic agent based on its early success in preclinical and clinical trials. Here, the authors aimed to review the mechanisms of action and evidence of use of antiresorptive and anabolic agents in patients with osteoporosis undergoing spine surgery. METHODS: In accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, a systematic review was conducted to explore the antiresorptive and anabolic agents used in the perioperative period in patients with osteoporosis undergoing spinal surgery. The search was performed by using the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. Titles and abstracts were screened and subsequently selected for full review. RESULTS: The initial search returned 330 articles. Of these articles, 23 final articles were included and reviewed. Many of these articles reported that use of adjuvant agents in the perioperative period improved radiographic evidence of bony fusion and bone fusion rates. These agents tended to improve BMD postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Although antiosteoporosis agents are effective to varying degrees as treatments of patients with low BMD, teriparatide and bisphosphonates have been the most extensively studied with respect to spinal instrumentation. The advent of newer agents represents an area for further exploration, especially due to the current paucity of controlled investigations. It is imperative for spine surgeons to understand the mechanisms of action of these drugs and their effects on biology of fusion.