Use of antibodies neutralizing epithelial cell infection to diagnose patients at risk for CMV Disease after transplantation.

OBJECTIVES: Although a CMV-specific T-cell response is associated with reduced risk for infection after transplantation, some patients still develop CMV disease. Thus, the characterization of additional parameters of the CMV-specific immune response that correlate with the control of CMV infection and disease and their use in defining thresholds that can be applied to clinical practice is of interest. METHODS: In a cohort of high risk solid organ transplant recipients we characterized CMV-specific T-cell responses using intracellular cytokine staining upon stimulation with pp65 and IE-1 peptides, and levels of CMV-specific antibodies neutralizing infection in fibroblast (MRC-5) and epithelial (ARPE-19) cells using microneutralization assays. RESULTS: Although patients with a positive (≥0.25%CD8(+)CD69(+)IFN-γ+) T-cell response were 6.4 fold more protected (OR 6.4, 95% CI 1.6-25.3; p < 0.001) from CMV infection than patients without a response, 2 (4.2%) patients developed disease. We defined a cut-off titer for epithelial cell neutralizing antibodies of ≥480 that correlated with disease protection. Thus, patients with a CMV-specific T-cell response and titers ≥480 were 14.2 fold more protected from CMV infection (OR 14.2, 95% CI 5-40.2; p < 0.001) and had no episodes of CMV disease. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that antibodies neutralizing epithelial cell infection may have an important role in long-term protection. Quantification of antibodies neutralizing epithelial cells, in addition to the T-cell response, may be useful for identifying patients with lower risk for CMV disease.

Clinical utility of real-time polymerase chain reaction to quantify cytomegalovirus replication in allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients with different prevention strategies.

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) end-organ disease is a serious, frequent complication after allogenic stem cell transplantation (Allo-SCT). There are two prevention strategies: universal prophylaxis and preemptive therapy. Preemptive therapy is administered based on the results of sensitive techniques that detect the viral infection. We analyzed 41 peripheral blood Allo-SCT recipients: 34 received prophylaxis and seven preemptive treatment. Viral infections determined using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assays occurred at an overall incidence of 65.8%. The viral loads quantified by RT-PCR were compared among the prophylaxis versus the preemptive group. Overall, the median viral load was significantly higher in the preemptive compared with the prophylaxis group (P=.002). Furthermore, within the first 100 days posttransplantation, viral load values were higher among patients undergoing preemptive therapy (P=.009).

Differences in cytomegalovirus replication quantified using quantitative polymerase chain reaction and antigenemia after allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

Fifty percent of allogeneic stem cell recipients develop cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in the first 100 days posttransplantation. Various methods have been used to determine CMV infections, including antigenemia assay and real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Although antigenemia assay has been used more frequently, this technique is less sensitive than RT-PCR. In contrast, RT-PCR has a low positive predictive value for CMV end-organ disease. Cytomegalovirus infections were analyzed in 41 peripheral blood samples from allogeneic stem cell recipients using both antigenemia assay and RT-PCR; results were discordant in 36.6% of patients. Although the antigenemia assay detected CMV replication in 29.2% of cases, RT-PCR was positive in 65.8%. In 83.3% of patients, results detected using the antigenemia assay were delayed by a median (range) of 5 (2-20) weeks compared with positive RT-PCR results. Within the first 100 days posttransplantation, higher levels of viral replication measured using RT-PCR were observed in patients with vs without antigenemia. In addition, in patients with antigenemia, viral load was significantly higher before day 100 than after (P=.01 and P=.008, respectively) compared with those without antigenemia.