Desensitization Protocol for Cemiplimab-Related Infusion Reaction in Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Case Report and Literature Review.

BACKGROUND: The landscape of systemic therapies for advanced non-melanoma skin cancers has been revolutionized by the advent of immunotherapy. Cemiplimab is the only immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) approved by the European Medicine Agency for recurrent/metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC). Its excellent efficacy outcomes are achieved due to its good tolerability profile. The drug-related hypersensitivity reaction (HSR) is a well-known issue in oncology, but it is rarely reported in respect to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Cemiplimab is among the agents with the best infusion tolerability profiles. Clinical practice guidelines in this field are lacking. RESULTS: We report on the successful management of a severe infusion reaction induced by Cemiplimab in a patient with cSCC based on a desensitization protocol, which led to adequate treatment delivery and prolonged clinical benefit. A review of the available literature on HSR rates and its management with ICIs, and on drug desensitization (DD) protocols and their efficacy, was conducted to highlight the limited knowledge on this topic and its importance. CONCLUSION: Our experience highlights the need for a DD protocol in order to improve the treatment of HSRs, particularly when elicited by an immunotherapy agent, preventing treatment discontinuation and preserving its efficacy.

EGPA Phenotyping: Not Only ANCA, but Also Eosinophils.

BACKGROUND: Eosinophilic Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis (EGPA) is a small-vessel necrotizing vasculitis. The anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies' (ANCA) role in defining clinical EGPA phenotypes is well established. Although the role of eosinophils in disease pathogenesis has been clearly demonstrated, the value of blood eosinophil count (BEC) as a biomarker of disease phenotypes is currently uncertain. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed EGPA patients referred to our Immunology Clinic. Demographic, laboratory and clinical features were retrieved from clinical records, and a Logistic Regression was fitted to evaluate the predictive power of all baseline clinical and laboratory features to define EGPA phenotypes. RESULTS: 168 patients were recruited. BEC ≤ 1500 cells/mL was predictive of a clinical involvement characterized by asthma, chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) and lung opacities (OR 0.18, 95% CI 0.07-0.43; respiratory-limited phenotype); BEC > 3500/mL was predictive of extrapulmonary organ involvement (OR 3.5, 95% CI 1.7-7.1; systemic phenotype). BEC was also predictive of peripheral nervous system (PNS) involvement, with a positive trend with increasing BEC (<1500/mL: OR 0.17, 95%CI, 0.06-0.47; >3500/mL: OR 2.8, 95% CI, 1.5-5.28). ANCA positivity was also predictive of extrapulmonary involvement (OR 4.7, 95% CI 1.9-11.99). CONCLUSIONS: according to BEC and irrespective of the ANCA status, two EGPA phenotypes could be identified, named systemic and respiratory-limited phenotypes, with different organ involvement and possibly different prognoses.

High proportion of inflammatory CD62Llow eosinophils in blood and nasal polyps of severe asthma patients.

BACKGROUND: In mice models, eosinophils have been divided into different subpopulations with distinct phenotypes and functions, based on CD62L and CD101 patterns of membrane expression. Limited data are available in humans. OBJECTIVE: To investigate eosinophils subpopulations in peripheral blood (PB) and nasal polyp tissue (NP) from severe eosinophilic asthma (SEA) patients plus concomitant chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). METHODS: We recruited 23 SEA patients (14 with CRSwNP); as controls, we enrolled 15 non-severe asthma patients, 15 allergic rhinitis patients without asthma and 15 healthy donors. Eosinophils were isolated from PB and NP and analysed by FACS. Eotaxin-3 and eotaxin-1 mRNA expression in NP tissue was also evaluated. RESULTS: A significantly higher percentage of circulating CD62Llow cells was observed in SEA, as compared with controls, expressing higher levels of CCR3, CD69 and lower levels of CD125 (IL-5R), CRTH2, CD86 and CD28 in comparison with CD62Lbright cells. In NP, eosinophils showed a high proportion of CD62Llow phenotype, significantly greater than that observed in PB. Surface expression of IL-3R, IL-5R, CD69 and CD86 was significantly higher in CD62Llow eosinophils from NP than in those from blood. Moreover, eotaxin-3 mRNA expression positively correlated with the percentage of CD62Llow cells in NP. CONCLUSION: Two different eosinophil subphenotypes can be identified in blood and NP of SEA patients, with a preferential accumulation of CD62Llow inflammatory cells in NP.

Baseline Eosinophil Count as a Potential Clinical Biomarker for Clinical Complexity in EGPA: A Real-Life Experience.

Background: Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) is a small-vessel necrotizing vasculitis with multiple organ involvement. Despite improvements in clinical management, biomarkers for organ involvement and disease prognosis are still an unmet need. Methods: EGPA patients referred to our immunology clinic were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic/clinical features, eosinophils, ANCA status, eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) and total serum IgE were evaluated at the baseline. Eosinophils, total serum IgE, ECP and ANCA were studied as possible biomarkers for lung and extrapulmonary disease. Results: In total, 167 EGPA patients were recruited for our study. A positive association between eosinophils and peripheral nervous system (PNS) involvement was demonstrated (p <0.001; chi-squared test). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves using the eosinophil count or percentage as predictors of PNS involvement yielded AUC values of 0.75 and 0.67, respectively. ANCA positivity was associated with PNS involvement, while no correlations with clinical parameters were found for ECP and total serum IgE. Patients without extrapulmonary involvement had lower eosinophils (eosinophils: 2844.7 ± 1698 vs. 6373 ± 5468, p < 0.001; eosinophil percentage: 24.6 ± 10% vs. 36.2 ± 15.8, p < 0.001) and were less likely to be ANCA+ (p < 0.001, chi-squared test). Conclusion: Eosinophils in EGPA are an important biomarker and are associated with extrapulmonary involvement. These findings could strengthen the role of anti-eosinophilic drugs in improving extrapulmonary disease.

The anti-IgE monoclonal antibody omalizumab as adjuvant treatment in desensitization to carboplatin in patients with ovarian cancer.

•Ovarian cancer is the most lethal among gynecological cancers.•Carboplatin-based chemotherapy identifies as the main systemic treatment for ovarian cancer patients.•Almost one every three patients treated with carboplatin experiences hypersensitivity reactions.•Patients may experience breakthrough reactions during drug desensitization.•Omalizumab represents a promising new treatment to overcome carboplatin hypersensitivity.

How to Prevent and Mitigate Hypersensitivity Reactions to Biologicals Induced by Anti-Drug Antibodies?

Biologicals are widely used therapeutic agents for rheumatologic diseases, cancers, and other chronic inflammatory diseases. They are characterized by complex structures and content of variable amounts of foreign regions, which may lead to anti-drug antibodies (ADA) development. ADA onset may limit the clinical usage of biologicals because they may decrease their safety. In fact they are mainly associated with immediate hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs). Development of ADAs is reduced by concomitant immunosuppressive treatment, while it is increased by longer intervals between drug administrations; thus, regular infusion regimens should be preferred to reduce HSRs. Once ADAs have formed, some procedures can be implemented to reduce the risk of HSRs. ADAs may belong to different isotype; the detection of IgE ADA is advisable to be assessed when high and early ADAs are detected, in order to reduce the risk of severe HRs. In patients who need to reintroduce the biological culprit, as alternative therapies are not available, drug desensitization (DD) may be applied. Desensitization should be conceptually dedicated to patients with an IgE-mediated HSR; however, it can be performed also in patients who had developed non-IgE-mediated HSRs. Although the underlying mechanisms behind successful DD has not been fully clarified, the DD procedure is associated with the inhibition of mast cell degranulation and cytokine production. Additionally, some data are emerging about the inhibition of drug-specific immune responses during DD.