Fractional Flow Reserve to Guide Treatment of Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease.

BACKGROUND: There is limited evidence that fractional flow reserve (FFR) is effective in guiding therapeutic strategy in multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) beyond prespecified percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary graft surgery candidates. OBJECTIVES: The FUTURE (FUnctional Testing Underlying coronary REvascularization) trial aimed to evaluate whether a treatment strategy based on FFR was superior to a traditional strategy without FFR in the treatment of multivessel CAD. METHODS: The FUTURE trial is a prospective, randomized, open-label superiority trial. Multivessel CAD candidates were randomly assigned (1:1) to treatment strategy based on FFR in all stenotic (≥50%) coronary arteries or to a traditional strategy without FFR. In the FFR group, revascularization (percutaneous coronary intervention or surgery) was indicated for FFR ≤0.80 lesions. The primary endpoint was a composite of major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events at 1 year. RESULTS: The trial was stopped prematurely by the data safety and monitoring board after a safety analysis and 927 patients were enrolled. At 1-year follow-up, by intention to treat, there were no significant differences in major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events rates between groups (14.6% in the FFR group vs 14.4% in the control group; hazard ratio: 0.97; 95% confidence interval: 0.69-1.36; P = 0.85). The difference in all-cause mortality was nonsignificant, 3.7% in the FFR group versus 1.5% in the control group (hazard ratio: 2.34; 95% confidence interval: 0.97-5.18; P = 0.06), and this was confirmed with a 24 months' extended follow-up. FFR significantly reduced the proportion of revascularized patients, with more patients referred to exclusively medical treatment (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with multivessel CAD, we did not find evidence that an FFR-guided treatment strategy reduced the risk of ischemic cardiovascular events or death at 1-year follow-up. (Functional Testing Underlying Coronary Revascularisation; NCT01881555).

Long-term outcomes after acute myocardial infarction in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia: The French registry of Acute ST-elevation and non-ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction program.

BACKGROUND: Patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) are prone to develop acute myocardial infarction (AMI) at a younger age. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to assess 5-year outcomes after AMI according to the presence of FH in a large multicenter cohort of patients. METHODS: The French registry of Acute ST-elevation and non-ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction consists of nationwide surveys recruiting patients over a 1- to 2-month period every 5 years. Patients recruited in 2005 and 2010 were followed up to 5 years. RESULTS: Of 5147 patients discharged alive and in whom FH status could be assessed, 2.8% had probable/definite FH, using an adapted Dutch Lipid Clinic score. They were 12 years younger, on average, than non-FH patients. Before adjustment, their 5-year survival and event-free survival did not differ from non-FH patients. After adjustment, however, both mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 1.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.15-2.89; P = .011) and the combined endpoint of death, AMI, or stroke (HR 2.22, 95% CI: 1.51-3.26; P < .001) were higher in FH patients. The higher risk in FH patients was also present in patients receiving high-intensity lipid-lowering therapy at discharge: adjusted HR for mortality 2.29, 95% CI: 1.18 to 4.47, P = .015; HR for cardiovascular events 2.57, 95% CI: 1.48 to 4.48, P = .001. Concordant results were observed in propensity score-marched cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of long-term mortality and cardiovascular events is twice as high in FH than in non-FH patients, when adjusted on baseline characteristics, even for those receiving high-intensity lipid-lowering therapy. Additional therapeutic measures are needed in these patients.

Pharmacological approaches to reperfusion therapy.

Despite the fact that numerous clinical trials investigating infarct size have been completed over the last two to three decades, the methods for treating lethal reperfusion injury efficiently have only become established very recently. After several years of accumulating evidence in experimental preparations that lethal reperfusion injury might exist, the description of the phenomenon of ischaemic post-conditioning in animal models has fully convinced us of the existence and importance of irreversible myocardial damage occurring after reflow. Transfer to the clinics was possible in small phase II trials, provided care was taken to assess the determinants of infarct size and, most importantly, to consider the timing of drug administration with respect to the time of reflow. Technical questions remain to be resolved regarding the assessment of the area at risk in the difficult setting of emergency care for reperfusion therapy. Nevertheless, convincing pharmacological trials are being performed that mark the start of a new era that will, in the future, improve the prognosis of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction through the prevention of lethal myocardial reperfusion injury. At present, while erythropoietin and adenosine have not proved efficient for alleviation of lethal reperfusion injury, a significant benefit has been reported for cyclosporin and exenatide. New pharmacological agents need to be identified and tested in phase II trials. In the meantime, clinical outcome studies are currently being conducted for cyclosporin.