Creation of an institutional preoperative checklist to support clinical risk assessment in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) considering ileoanal pouch surgery.

Background: Total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the most established restorative operative approach for patients with ulcerative colitis. It has associated morbidity and the potential for major repercussions on quality of life. As such, patient selection is crucial to its success. The main aim of this paper is to present an institutional preoperative checklist to support clinical risk assessment and patient selection in those considering IPAA. Methods: A literature review was performed to identify the risk factors associated with surgical complications, decreased functional outcomes/quality of life, and pouch failure after IPAA. Based on this, a preliminary checklist was devised and modified through an iterative process. This was then evaluated by a consensus group comprising the pouch multidisciplinary team (MDT) core members. Results: The final preoperative checklist includes assessment for risk factors such as gender, advanced age, obesity, comorbidities, sphincteric impairment, Crohn's disease and pelvic radiation therapy. In addition, essential steps in the decision-making process, such as pouch nurse counselling and discussion regarding surgical alternatives, are also included. The last step of the checklist is discussion at a dedicated pouch-MDT. Discussion: A preoperative checklist may support clinicians with the selection of patients that are suitable for pouch surgery. It also serves as a useful tool to inform the discussion of cases at the MDT meeting.

Transanal Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis for Ulcerative Colitis has Comparable Long-Term Functional Outcomes to Transabdominal Approach: A Multicentre Comparative Study.

BACKGROUND: The transanal approach to ileal pouch-anal anastomosis [Ta-IPAA] provides better access to the lower pelvis with lower short-term morbidity in ulcerative colitis [UC]. The aim of this study was to assess the long-term functional outcomes after Ta-IPAA vs transabdominal IPAA [Abd-IPAA] in UC. METHODS: A multicentre cohort analysis was performed between March 2002 and September 2017. Patient characteristics, surgical details and postoperative outcomes were compared. CGQL [Cleveland global quality of life] score at 12 months with a functioning pouch was considered the primary end point. RESULTS: A total of 374 patients [100 Ta-IPAA vs 274 Abd-IPAA] were included. Ta-IPAA demonstrated a comparable overall quality of life [CGQL score] to Abd-IPAA [0.75 ± 0.11 vs 0.71 ± 0.14; respectively, p = 0.1]. Quality of life [7.71 ± 1.17 vs 7.30 ± 1.46; p = 0.04] and energy-level items [7.16 ± 1.52 vs 6.66 ± 1.68; p = 0.03] were significantly better after Ta-IPAA, while the quality of health item was comparable [7.68 ± 1.26 vs 7.64 ± 1.44; p = 0.96]. Analysis excluding anastomotic leaks did not change the overall CGQL scores. Stool frequencies [>10/24 h: 22% vs 21%; p = 1.0] and the rate of a single episode of major incontinence during the following 12-month period [27% vs 26%; p = 0.89] were similar. The differences in 30-day morbidity rates [33% vs 41%; p = 0.2] and anastomotic leak rates were not significant [6% vs 13%; p = 0.09]. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence of comparable long-term functional outcome and quality of life after Ta-IPAA and Abd-IPAA for UC.

Osteoporosis in patients over 50 years of age following restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis: is DXA screening warranted?

BACKGROUND: Ulcerative colitis (UC) and increasing age are associated with an increased risk of osteoporosis. Screening of postmenopausal women and men older than 50 years with ulcerative colitis for osteoporosis is recommended. The prevalence of osteoporosis in restorative proctocolectomy (RPC) patients more than 50 years old is not known. METHODS: Fifty-three consecutive patients older than age 50 who had undergone RPC for UC underwent a bone density scan (DXA). Sex, smoking status, age at diagnosis of UC, duration of UC, age at RPC, years since RPC, age at DXA, and pouch histological inflammatory score were recorded. The Kruskal-Wallis test and Spearman's correlation coefficient were used to analyze the data. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients were studied; their median age was 58 years, and the median age at RPC was 45. The prevalence of osteopenia and osteoporosis was 43.4% and 13.2%, respectively. Age at RPC was negatively correlated with bone density (P = 0.041, r = 0.281), and there was a negative correlation approaching significance with age at the time of DXA (P = 0.071, r = -0.250). No other factor studied correlated with bone density. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of osteoporosis and osteopenia found in this study is similar to that reported for UC patients who have not undergone RPC. Patients having RPC should be screened in line with current UC guidelines, targeting those older than 50 years.

Ileoanal pouch dysfunction and the use of a Medena catheter following hospital discharge.

With the advent of new surgical techniques to manage colorectal disease, the number of ileoanal pouch operations has amplified and therefore increased numbers of pouch patients are being discharged into the community setting. Community nurses will now encounter the ileoanal pouch patient and may be required to manage related complications. Restorative proctocolectomy with ileoanal pouch anastomosis (RPC) has become established as the gold standard operation for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and selected patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). Using a reservoir constructed from small bowel as a substitute rectum is a medical triumph which in the majority of cases improves the quality of life for patients, not only by eradicating disease and preserving anal sphincter function but also by avoiding a permanent ileostomy. Recent investigation into the use of Medena catheterization for pouch dysfunction has found that it is tolerated in the long-term and is associated with satisfactory quality of life in pouch patients with outflow obstruction.

Recommended follow-up for ileo-anal pouch patient.

One of the greatest advances in colorectal surgery over the past 30-years has been the development of restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for patients suffering with ulcerative colitis and selected patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. This has coincided with a proliferation of new and exciting advanced clinical roles for nurses in the United Kingdom and subsequently has led to an increase in the responsibilities and professional status of nurses. Staff development is necessary to maintain the unique contribution that nurses make to health care in the terms of practice, education and research. Nurse specialists in gastroenterology are taking their place alongside medical specialists, and more importantly establishing themselves as the principle carer in many diverse roles. However, as these nursing roles expand, a recognized framework needs to be designed, which takes into account the educational, ethical and legal issues related to accountability of running nurse-led clinics, offering support, advice and follow-up for patients. This article provides nursing staff with research-based recommendations and practical guidance on running a successful nurse-led pouch clinic and follow-up service in collaboration with the consultant surgeon, gastroenterology teams and nursing staff involved specifically with the ileo-anal pouch patient.

Education in practice: a colorectal link-nurse programme.

This article illustrates the planning, implementation, evaluation and personal implications of a link-nurse programme for colorectal cancer nursing. The programme was designed to maintain a patient-centred support service and continue the provision of bowel cancer education and support to nurses in the clinical environment. Literature on previous link-nurse schemes, and the recent legislation on education and cancer nursing provides the background on which this programme is based. The use of educational theory supplies the theoretical underpinnings for this approach to learning, and evaluation findings are reported from both the group's and the individual's viewpoints. The programme increased the link nurses' awareness of the patient's pathway, support and information needs and the role of the multidisciplinary team in managing care. Sufficient time, support and encouragement from ward teams and clinical managers were seen as vital to the success of the programme, and specific benefits and challenges when establishing this type of practice based education for nurses are explored.