Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Indoor Air ; 29(2): 263-275, 2019 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30578573

RESUMO

The envelope of low-energy buildings is generally constructed with significant amounts of plastics, sealants and insulation materials that are known to contain various chemical additives to improve specific functionalities. A commonly used group of additives are flame retardants to prevent the spread of fire. In this study, decabromodiphenyl ether (BDE-209) and fourteen emerging brominated flame retardants (BFRs) were analyzed in indoor dust, air and on the window surface of newly built low-energy preschools to study their occurrence and distribution. BDE-209 and decabromodiphenyl ethane (DBDPE) were frequently detected in the indoor dust (BDE-209: <4.1-1200 ng/g, DBDPE: <2.2-420 ng/g) and on window surfaces (BDE-209: <1000-20 000 pg/m2 , DBDPE: <34-5900 pg/m2 ) while the other thirteen BFRs were found in low levels (dust: <0.0020-5.2 ng/g, window surface: 0.0078-35 pg/m2 ). In addition, the detection frequencies of BFRs in the indoor air were low in all preschools. Interestingly, the dust levels of BDE-209 and DBDPE were found to be lower in the environmentally certified low-energy preschools, which could be attributed to stricter requirements on the chemical content in building materials and products. However, an increase of some BFR levels in dust was observed which could imply continuous emissions or introduction of new sources.


Assuntos
Poluição do Ar em Ambientes Fechados/análise , Bromobenzenos/análise , Poeira/análise , Retardadores de Chama/análise , Éteres Difenil Halogenados/análise , Creches , Pré-Escolar , Exposição Ambiental/análise , Monitoramento Ambiental , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Suécia
2.
Scand J Urol ; 50(4): 255-9, 2016 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27192553

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to create a model for predicting progression-free survival after radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The risk of biochemical recurrence (BCR) was modelled in a cohort of 3452 men aged 70 years or younger who were primarily treated with radical prostatectomy after being diagnosed between 2003 and 2006 with localized prostate cancer [clinical stage T1c-T2, Gleason score 5-10, N0/NX, M0/MX, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) < 20 ng/ml]. The cohort was split into two: one cohort for model development (n = 3452) and one for validation (n = 1762). BCR was defined as two increasing PSA values of at least 0.2 ng/ml, initiation of secondary therapy, distant metastases or death from prostate cancer. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression was applied, predictive performance was assessed using the bootstrap resampling technique to calculate the c index, and calibration of the model was evaluated by comparing predicted and observed Kaplan-Meier 1 year BCR. RESULTS: The overall 5 year progression-free survival was 83% after a median follow-up time of 6.8 years in the development cohort and 7.3 years in the validation cohort. The final model included T stage, PSA level, primary and secondary Gleason grade, and number of positive and negative biopsies. The c index for discrimination between high and low risk of recurrence was 0.68. The probability of progression-free survival ranged from 22% to 97% over the range of risk scores in the study population. CONCLUSIONS: This model is based on nationwide population-based data and can be used with a fair predictive accuracy to guide decisions on clinical follow-up after prostatectomy. An online calculator for convenient clinical use of the model is available at www.npcr.se/nomogram.


Assuntos
Prostatectomia , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Progressão da Doença , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos Estatísticos , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/epidemiologia , Prognóstico , Prostatectomia/métodos , Suécia
3.
Eur Urol ; 67(3): 559-68, 2015 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25457018

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Many elderly or impotent men with prostate cancer may not receive a bundle-preserving radical prostatectomy as a result of uncertainty regarding the effect on urinary incontinence. OBJECTIVE: We searched for predictors of urinary incontinence 1 yr after surgery among surgical steps during radical prostatectomy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: More than 100 surgeons in 14 centers prospectively collected data on surgical steps during an open or robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. At 1 yr after surgery, a neutral third-party secretariat collected patient-reported information on urinary incontinence. After excluding men with preoperative urinary incontinence or postoperative irradiation, data were available for 3379 men. INTERVENTION: Surgical steps during radical prostatectomy, including dissection plane as a measure of the degree of preservation of the two neurovascular bundles. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Urinary incontinence 1 yr after surgery was measured as patient-reported use of pads. In different categories of surgical steps, we calculated the percentage of men changing pads "about once per 24 h" or more often. Relative risks were calculated as percentage ratios between categories. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: A strong association was found between the degree of bundle preservation and urinary incontinence 1 yr after surgery. We set the highest degree of bundle preservation (bilateral intrafascial dissection) as the reference category (relative risk = 1.0). For the men in the remaining six groups, ordered according to the degree of preservation, we obtained the following relative risks (95% confidence interval [CI]): 1.07 (0.63-1.83), 1.19 (0.77-1.85), 1.56 (0.99-2.45), 1.78 (1.13-2.81), 2.27 (1.45-3.53), and 2.37 (1.52-3.69). In the latter group, no preservation of any of the bundles was performed. The pattern was similar for preoperatively impotent men and for elderly men. Limitations of this analysis include the fact that noise influences the relative risks, due to variations between surgeons in the use of undocumented surgical steps of the procedure, variations in surgical experience and in how the surgical steps are reported, as well as variations in the metrics of patient-reported use of pads. CONCLUSIONS: We found that the degree of preservation of the two neurovascular bundles during radical prostatectomy predicts the rate of urinary incontinence 1 yr after the operation. According to our findings, preservation of both neurovascular bundles to avoid urinary incontinence is also meaningful for elderly and impotent men. PATIENT SUMMARY: We studied the degree of preservation of the two neurovascular bundles during radical prostatectomy and found that the risk of incontinence decreases if the surgeon preserves two bundles instead of one, and if the surgeon preserves some part of a bundle rather than not doing so.


Assuntos
Sistema Nervoso Autônomo/cirurgia , Dissecação/métodos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Prostatectomia/métodos , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Bexiga Urinária/inervação , Incontinência Urinária/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Idoso , Sistema Nervoso Autônomo/fisiopatologia , Dissecação/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Tampões Absorventes para a Incontinência Urinária , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Razão de Chances , Prostatectomia/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Fatores de Risco , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/efeitos adversos , Suécia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Incontinência Urinária/diagnóstico , Incontinência Urinária/etiologia , Incontinência Urinária/fisiopatologia
4.
Scand J Urol ; 48(2): 160-7, 2014 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23906418

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to strengthen the validity of future findings in the Laparoscopic Prostatectomy Robot Open (LAPPRO) study by investigating the extent of interobserver variability between local pathologists and re-evaluating reference pathologists. MATERIAL AND METHODS: LAPPRO is a Swedish prospective study comparing robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy to open retropubic radical prostatectomy. Patients were recruited from 2008 to 2011. A random selection of 289 prostatectomy specimens was re-evaluated, in a blind fashion, by two reference pathologists from a University Hospital in Denmark and compared with original reports from local pathologists. RESULTS: The exact concordance rate of Gleason score (GS) between local and reference pathologists was 56% (Spearman correlation coefficient 0.54). Exact concordance rates (κ value) for pathological tumour stage (pT), extraprostatic extension (EPE), surgical margin status (SMS) and seminal vesicle invasion (SVI) were 87% (0.63), 86% (0.59), 92% (0.76) and 98% (0.82), respectively. In subanalyses for surgical technique, exact concordance rates of GS, pT, EPE, SMS and SVI were 58%, 83%, 84%, 90% and 97%, respectively, for surgical technique 1 (ST1), compared to 55%, 88%, 87%, 93% and 98%, for surgical technique 2 (ST2). In ST1 specimens undergrading of GS by the local pathologists compared to central review was more common than overgrading (26% vs 16%). The inverse relationship was seen in ST2 specimens (14% vs 32%). CONCLUSION: Re-evaluation of randomly selected prostatectomy specimens in the LAPPRO cohort showed comparable results compared to previous studies of this kind. A systematic variation in the assessment of GS exists, attributable to individual differences in judgement between pathologists. Dichotomising GS (≤ 7 vs ≥ 8) overcomes the systematic variation.


Assuntos
Laparoscopia , Próstata/patologia , Próstata/cirurgia , Prostatectomia/métodos , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Robótica , Idoso , Humanos , Masculino , Gradação de Tumores , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Patologia Clínica/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Prospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA