Management and outcomes of spontaneous coronary artery dissection: a systematic review of the literature.

Background: Contemporary management of spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is still controversial. This systematic review of the literature aims to explore outcomes in the patients treated with conservative management vs. invasive strategy. Methods: The PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines were followed when we extensively searched three electronic databases: PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Web of Science, for studies that compared conservative vs. invasive revascularization treatment outcomes for patients with SCAD from 2003 to 2023. The outcomes of interest were all-cause death and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including acute coronary syndrome (ACS), heart failure (HF), need for additional revascularization, target vessel revascularization (TVR), SCAD recurrence, and stroke. Results: The systematic review included 13 observational studies evaluating 1,801 patients with SCAD. The overall mean age was 49.12 +/- 3.41, and 88% were females. The overall prevalence of arterial hypertension was 33.2%, hyperlipidemia, 26.9%, smoking, 17.8%, and diabetes, 3.9%. Approximately 48.5% of the patients were diagnosed with non-ST elevated myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), 36.8% with ST elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI), 3.41% with unstable angina, 0.56% with stable angina, and 0.11% were diagnosed with various types of arrhythmias. The left anterior descending artery (LAD) was the most common culprit lesion in 51% of the patients. There were initially 65.2% of conservatively treated patients vs. 33.4% that underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or 1.28% that underwent coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). SCAD-PCI revascularization was associated with a variable range of PCI failure. The most common complications were hematoma extension and iatrogenic dissection. SCAD-PCI revascularization frequently required three or more stents and had residual areas of dissection. The overall reported in-hospital and follow-up mortality rates were 1.2% and 1.3%, respectively. The follow-up range across studies was 7.3-75.6 months. The authors reported variable prevalence of MACE, recurrent SCAD up to 31%, ACS up to 27.4%, TVR up to 30%, repeat revascularization up to 14.7%, UA up to 13.3%, HF up to 17.4%, and stroke up to 3%. Conclusion: Our results highlight that conservative treatment should be the preferred method of treatment in patients with SCAD. PCI revascularization is associated with a high prevalence of periprocedural complications. SCAD poses a considerable risk of MACE, mainly associated with TVR, ACS, and recurrent SCAD.

Impact of COVID-19 on cardiac surgery outcomes.

AIM: This study aimed to assess the impact of COVID-19 infection on cardiac surgery outcomes in patients who contracted COVID-19 peri-operatively or had recently recovered from COVID-19. METHODS: The study prospectively enrolled 95 patients scheduled for cardiac surgery who had recently recovered from COVID-19. This formed the post-COVID-19 group. The other group consisted of 25 patients who contracted COVID-19 peri-operatively. Patients were followed for all-cause mortality as the primary endpoint and postoperative course complications as the secondary endpoint. Data were compared to a historical cohort of 280 non-COVID-19 patients. RESULTS: The peri-operative COVID-19 group exhibited a significantly higher prevalence of primary outcome all-cause mortality (28%), compared with 4.3% in the controls (p < 0.01), as well as the secondary composite endpoint (stroke, peri-operative myocardial infarction and pneumonia) (52 vs 13.9%, p < 0.01). The post-COVID-19 group had a higher incidence of acute pulmonary embolism (3.2 vs 0%, p < 0.01) and atrial fibrillation (23.4 vs 11.4%, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Patients who contracted COVID-19 peri-operatively had an increased rate of mortality and postoperative complications, while cardiac surgery in the recently recovered COVID-19 group was associated with a higher incidence of pulmonary embolism and atrial fibrillation.

Results of the trycort: Cohort study of add-on antihypertensives for treatment of resistant hypertension.

Although true treatment resistant hypertension is relatively rare (about 7.3% of all patients with hypertension), optimal control of blood pressure is not achieved in every other patient due to suboptimal treatment or nonadherence. The aim of this study was to compare effectiveness, safety and tolerability of various add-on treatment options in adult patients with treatment resistant hypertension The study was designed as multi-center, prospective observational cohort study, which compared effectiveness and safety of various add-on treatment options in adult patients with treatment resistant hypertension. Both office and home blood pressure measures were recorded at baseline and then every month for 6 visits. The study cohort was composed of 515 patients (268 females and 247 males), with average age of 64.7 ± 10.8 years. The patients were switched from initial add-on therapy to more effective ones at each study visit. The blood pressure measured both at office and home below 140/90 mm Hg was achieved in 80% of patients with add-on spironolactone, while 88% of patients taking this drug also achieved decrease of systolic blood pressure for more than 10 mm Hg from baseline, and diastolic blood pressure for more than 5 mm Hg from baseline. Effectiveness of centrally acting antihypertensives as add-on therapy was inferior, achieving the study endpoints in <70% of patients. Adverse drug reactions were reported in 9 patients (1.7%), none of them serious. Incidence rate of hyperkalemia with spironolactone was 0.44%, and gynecomastia was found in 1 patient (0.22%). In conclusion, the most effective and safe add-on therapy of resistant hypertension were spironolactone alone and combination of spironolactone and a centrally acting antihypertensive drug.

Predictors for hospital readmission after cardiac surgery.

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: Unplanned hospital readmissions are responsible for increased health care costs and have direct influence on patient quality of life. The aim of the study was to determine the predictors for hospital readmission after open-heart surgery. METHODS: Prospective study analyzed all patients who underwent cardiac surgery in the year 2012. Follow-up period was one year from the date of operation. Patients were divided in two groups based on their readmission status. RESULTS: In the study period of one year, 1268 patients who underwent cardiac surgery were included. A total of 121 patients (9.54%) were readmitted within one year after the operation. The main reasons for readmission were congestive heart failure (17.3%), sternal dehiscence (14.9%), rhythm and conduction disturbances (14.9%), wound infection (11.6%), recurrent angina pectoris (11.6%), and pericardial effusion (10.7%). Independent predictors for hospital readmission were previous stroke (p = 0.002), chronic heart failure (p < 0.0005), and postoperative pericardial effusion (p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Our study determined risk factors and predictors for hospital readmission after cardiac surgery. This may help to reduce readmission rates.

Syncope as initial symptom of ostial lesion of the left main coronary artery with cardiogenic shock.

INTRODUCTION: Syncope represents a relatively atypical symptom of acute coronary syndrome. Syncope itself does not provide enough information to indicate an acute coronary event, especially a lesion of the left main coronary artery, without malignant rhythm and conduction disorders. CASE REPORT: A male patient, aged 63, was admitted to the intensive cardiac care unit because of a short loss of consciousness, in sinus tachycardia, with signs of acute heart failure and being hypotensive. Electrocardiogram showed a possible acute anterior myocardial infarction, followed by cardiogenic shock and emergency coronary angiography (subocclusive ostial lesion of the left main coronary artery) and primary percutaneous coronary intervention with intra-aortic balloon pump therapy was performed. A direct drug eluting stent was implanted with the optimal primary result. CONCLUSION: The prompt diagnosis, especially in such relatively atypical clinical presentation, reperfusion therapy with primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock, contribute to the improvement in the survival rate and patient's quality of life. This case report is clinically educative due to relatively atypical presentation and performed interventions.

[Streptococcus bovis endocarditis as a sign of colon cancer: case report].

INTRODUCTION: Streptococcus bovis is labeled in the literature as a cause of bacteremia and endocarditis, which are often associated with gastrointestinal malignancy. CASE OUTLINE: In our paper we present a patient with endocarditis induced by Streptococcus bovis who was also, after completed cardiologic examination and treatment, diagnosed colon cancer in situ by targeted endoscopy. Owing to the timely diagnosis, and after successful cardiologic surgery with implantation of an artificial aortic valve, patient underwent surgery of the colon, and is now asymptomatic and in good health. CONCLUSION: Complete and detailed endoscopic examination of the colon must be done in patients with endocarditis caused by Streptococcus bovis, even if the patient is asymptomatic. By following these recommendations, it is possible to detect precancerosis or cancer at an early stage and save the patient's life.

Necessity for introducing the procedure of percutaneous aortic valve implantation in the province of Vojvodina.

INTRODUCTION: Percutaneous aortic valve implantation is an alternative that offers hope to patients who are too old or sick to undergo the conventional surgical aortic valve replacement. The aim of this study was to determine the number of high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis, hospitalized at the Institute for Cardiovascular Diseases, who are the candidates for percutaneous aortic valve implantation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The paper prospectively analyzed all patients diagnosed to have severe aortic stenosis who had been hospitalized at the Institute for Cardiovascular Diseases from April 1st, 2011 to October 31st, 2012. Each of these patients was analyzed in relation to the inclusive criteria for percutaneous aortic valve implantation. We analyzed the distribution of these risk factors in relation to age and gender, and the presence of aortic valve replacement surgery by age groups. RESULTS: In the period from April 1st, 2011 to October 31st, 2012, 374 patients diagnosed to have severe aortic stenosis were hospitalized at the Institute for Cardiovascular Diseases. The group of patients older than 80 years had a higher percentage of those patients with low ejection fraction of the heart, chronic pulmonary hypertension and mitral regurgitation. On the other hand, when the total number of surgical aortic valve replacement was taken into consideration with respect to age, there was a significant decrease in their number in the group of patients older than 75 years (41.6%), especially in the age group over 80 years (90.2%). CONCLUSION: The data obtained in this study indicate a high percentage of conservatively treated patients with severe aortic stenosis and high operative risk in patients over 75 years. These data confirm the necessity for the implementation of percutaneous aortic valve replacement in the Province of Vojvodina.

[Optimal postoperative radiotherapy treatment of orbital rhabdomyosarcoma].

INTRODUCTION: Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is the most common sarcoma of the soft tissue, mostly affecting the region of head and neck (orbit, paranasal sinus). Histological types include embryonal (66-70%) with better prognosis, and alveolar type (20%) with poorer prognosis. There are also diffuse anaplastic and undifferentiated sarcomas (10%). Due to multimodal therapy approach (surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy), RMS survival rate is considerably improving. Nevertheless, early diagnosis of RMS is of crucial importance for the outcome of treatment. Standard conformal radiation therapy is very complex due to closeness of many critical structures of head and neck, thus limiting optimal tumor dose coverage. CASE OUTLINE: Patient aged 59 years, surgically treated for RMS of nasal cavity several times before radiation therapy treatment. Due to relapse, patient was re-operated, when subtotal re-resection of the maxilla with exenteration of the right orbit was done. The patient received IV cycles of polychemotherapy postoperatively. Standard procedure and planning for conformal radiation therapy did not lead to acceptable irradiation plan, and hence modification in the patient's preparation was done, resulting in optimal therapeutic plan according to internationally recognized recommendations. CONCLUSION: The reported case shows a rare pediatric tumor, which often occurs in children but extremely rare in adults. The problem of inadequate isodose distribution obtained by standard conformal plan was solved by placing bolus material into the orbital cavity.The outcome of the treatment plan showed much better isodose distribution and tumor bed coverage.