Mitral valve surgery in acute infective endocarditis: long-term outcomes of mitral valve repair versus replacement.

AIMS: Timing and surgical strategies in acute infective endocarditis are still questionable. We sought to investigate clinical outcomes of patients undergoing mitral valve repair (MVR) compared with mitral valve replacement [mitral valve prosthesis (MVP)] for acute infective endocarditis. METHODS: From 2004 to 2019, 109 consecutive patients with acute mitral valve infective endocarditis were retrospectively investigated. Patients were divided into two groups according to surgical strategy: MVR 53/109 (48.6%) versus MVP 56/109 (51.4%). Primary end points were in-hospital mortality and overall survival at 10 years. Secondary end point was the freedom from infective endocarditis relapse. RESULTS: Our institutional surgical approach for infective endocarditis allowed us to achieve MVR in 48.6% of patients. Hospital mortality was comparable between the two groups [MVR: 1/53 (1.9%) versus MVP: 2/56 (3.6%), P  = 1.000]. Overall 10-year survival was 80.0 ±â€Š14.1 and 77.2 ±â€Š13.5% for MVR and MVP, respectively ( P  = 0.648). MVR showed a lower incidence of infective endocarditis relapse compared with MVP (MVR: 93.6 ±â€Š7.1 versus MVP: 80.9 ±â€Š10.8%, P  = 0.041). At Cox regression, infective endocarditis relapse was an independent risk factor for death (hazard ratio 4.03; 95% confidence interval 1.41-11.52; P  = 0.009). CONCLUSION: The tendency to postpone surgery in stable patients with mitral infective endocarditis allowed achievement of MVR in almost 50% of patients. Although repair remains the approach of choice in our institution, no differences between MVR and MVP were reported in terms of early/late survival. However, MVP had a higher incidence of infective endocarditis relapse that represents an independent risk of mortality.

Thoracoscopic Surgical Ablation of Lone Atrial Fibrillation: Long-term Outcomes at 7 Years.

BACKGROUND: Antiarrhythmic drugs and transcatheter ablation in atrial fibrillation (AF) provide suboptimal rhythm control with a not negligible rate of failure in paroxysmal AF (PAF) and nonparoxysmal AF (n-PAF) at midterm and long-term follow-up. This study evaluated the safety profile and long-term efficacy of thoracoscopic ablation in patients with lone AF. METHODS: A consecutive 153 patients with lone AF were prospectively enrolled and underwent thoracoscopic surgical ablation. Inclusion criteria were symptomatic AF refractory to pharmacologic therapy (Vaughan-Williams class I-III), age >18 years, and absence of left atrial thrombosis. Exclusion criteria were long-standing AF >5 years, left atrial diameter >55 mm, and contraindication to oral anticoagulation. The "box lesion set" (encircling of pulmonary veins) was always used. Exclusion of the left atrial appendage was performed only in selected cases. The primary study end point was freedom from AF. Secondary end points were overall survival and cumulative incidence function of cardiac event-related death, cerebrovascular accidents, and pacemaker implantation. RESULTS: There was no in-hospital mortality. Early postoperative complications were pacemaker implantation (4/153 [2.6%]), cerebrovascular accident (2/153 [1.3%]) with full recovery of both, and bleeding requiring surgical revision (2/153 [1.3%]). Overall freedom from AF at 7 years was 86% ± 4% (76.9% in n-PAF, 96.1% in PAF). Survival freedom from AF in patients without antiarrhythmic drugs in PAF and n-PAF groups was 79.1% and 52.2%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Thoracoscopic surgical ablation of lone AF by means of an isolated left atrial box lesion provided an excellent long-term rhythm outcome, even in long-standing persistent AF. The isolated left atrial ablation showed an excellent safety profile with low incidence of pacemaker implantation and postoperative complications.

Rhythm outcomes of minimally-invasive off-pump surgical versus catheter ablation in atrial fibrillation: A meta-analysis of reconstructed time-to-event data.

BACKGROUND: Mid- and long-term rhythm outcomes of catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) are reported to be suboptimal. Minimally invasive surgical off-pump ablation (MISOA), including both thoracoscopic and trans-diaphragmatic approaches, has been developed to reduce surgical invasiveness and overcome on-pump surgery drawbacks. We sought to compare the efficacy and safety of MISOA and CA for AF treatment. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature was performed including studies comparing MISOA and CA. The primary endpoint was survival freedom from AF at follow-up after a 3-month blanking period. Subgroup analysis of the primary endpoint was performed according to the type of surgical incision and hybrid approach. RESULTS: Freedom from AF at 4 years was 52.1% ± 3.2% vs 29.1% ± 3.5%, between MISOA and CA respectively (log-rank p < 0.001; Hazard Ratio: 0.60 [95%Confidence Interval (CI):0.50-0.72], p < 0.001). At landmark analysis, a significant improvement in rhythm outcomes was observed in the MISOA group after the 5th month of follow-up (2 months from the blanking period). The Odds Ratio between MISOA and CA of postoperative cerebrovascular accident incidence and postoperative permanent pacemaker implant (PPM) were 2.00 (95%CI:0.91-4.40, p = 0.084) and 1.55 (95%CI:0.61-3.95, p = 0.358), respectively. The incidence rate ratio of late CVA between MISOA and CA was 0.86 (95%CI:0.28-2.65, p = 0.787), while for late PPM implant was 0.45 (95%CI:0.11-1.78, p = 0.256). CONCLUSIONS: The current meta-analysis suggests that MISOA provides superior rhythm outcomes when compared to CA in terms of sinus rhythm restoration. Despite the rhythm outcome superiority of MISOA, it is associated to higher postoperative complications compared to CA.

Mitral valve surgery with extensive annular calcification: review of surgical techniques and postoperative complications.

Mitral annular calcification (MAC) represents an important risk factor in mitral valve (MV) surgery. Despite several procedures having been described, no surgical treatment of choice has been established so far: whether a decalcification should be systematically carried out, or if the MV should be preferentially repaired rather than replaced. A review of the literature on patients undergoing MV surgery associated with MAC was performed. Studies were excluded if dealing with endovascular procedures or emergency surgery for associated endocarditis. Case reports were also not considered in the final analysis. The literature search identified 1429 potentially eligible studies, and 25 papers were eventually included. Several surgical techniques were described to approach this challenging condition. During MV surgery, the presence of MAC favors the occurrence of suboptimal intraoperative outcomes. MAC-related complications such as atrioventricular groove rupture, cerebrovascular accident, new permanent pacemaker implantation, intraoperative conversion from valve repair to replacement and mortality were analyzed. MV surgery in the presence of MAC considerably impacts the postoperative outcomes in terms of morbidity and mortality. A great variability of surgical techniques is reported, suggesting the need for standardization of the approach.

Sutureless aortic valves in elderly patients with aortic stenosis and intermediate-risk profile.

AIMS: Sutureless valves became an alternative to standard bioprostheses, allowing surgeons to significantly reduce cross-clamping and extracorporeal circulation times, with a potential positive impact on major postoperative complications. The aim of this European multicentre study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of sutureless valves in patients with an intermediate-risk profile undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR). METHODS: We investigated early and mid-term outcomes of 518 elderly patients with aortic stenosis at intermediate-risk profile (mean STS Score 6.1 ±â€Š2%) undergoing AVR with sutureless aortic valve. Primary endpoints were 30-day mortality and freedom from all-cause death at follow-up. The secondary endpoint was survival freedom from MACCEs [all-cause death, stroke/transitory ischemic attack (TIA), bleeding, myocardial infarction, aortic regurgitation Grade II, endocarditis, reintervention and pacemaker implant; VARC 1--2 criteria]. RESULTS: Sutureless valve implantation was successfully performed in 508 patients, with a procedural success rate of 98.1% (508/518) as per VARC criteria. Concomitant myocardial revascularization [coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)] was performed in 74 out of 518 patients (14.3%). In-hospital mortality was 1.9% (10/518). Postoperative complications included revision for bleeding (23/518; 4.4%), prolonged intubation more than 48h (4/518; 0.7%), acute renal failure (14/518; 2.7%), stroke/TIA (11/518; 2.1%), pacemaker implantation (26/518; 5.1%) and aortic regurgitation more than Grade II (7/518; 1.4%). At 48-month follow-up, Kaplan-Meier overall survival and freedom from MACCEs in patients receiving isolated AVR were 83.7% [95% confidence interval (95% CI): 81.1-86.3] and 78.4% (95% CI: 75.5-81.4), respectively, while in patients with concomitant CABG, Kaplan-Meier overall survival and freedom from MACCEs were 82.3% (95% CI: 73.3-91.3) and 79.1% (95% CI: 69.9-88.3), respectively. CONCLUSION: The use of sutureless aortic valves in elderly patients with an intermediate-risk profile provided excellent early and mid-term outcomes, providing a reliable tool in patients undergoing surgical AVR in this specific subset of population. These preliminary data need to be investigated with a TAVI control-group in further studies.

MIDCAB Tips and tricks for a successful procedure.

Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) for a left internal mammary artery on left anterior descending (LIMA-LAD) graft, is a safe and relatively less traumatic surgical technique. Adoption in some centers has been slow because of perceived technical difficulty, but it should be considered a first-choice therapy for patients with isolated proximal LAD lesions or multi-vessel disease, and as a component of a hybrid revascularization strategy.  Results in our institute, where we have been using MIDCAB for more than 20 years, confirm both its short- and long-term efficacy. This video tutorial demonstrates the technical aspects of the procedure.