RESUMO
AIM: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols have been proven to optimize postoperative outcomes; however, misuse of opioid analgesics can still hinder postoperative recovery due to related side effects and potential complications. INTRODUCTION: To determine if the implementation of ERAS protocol in post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (PC-RPLND) patients could help with reducing postoperative pain and opioid use. METHODS: A case-control study of consecutive testicular cancer patients with indications for PCRLPND, who were offered Conventional Post-operative Management (CPM) or ERAS protocol. Outcomes of interest included Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)-assessed pain level at postoperative days 3, 7, and 30, and Morphine-Equivalent Doses (MEDs)/postoperative day. Intraoperative parameters and postoperative complications were recorded. Parametric and non-parametric tests were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: In total, 100 opioid-naïve PC-RPLND patients were studied. CPM and ERAS groups (36 and 64 patients, respectively) had similar demographic and baseline clinical characteristics). ERAS group patients had significantly lower blood loss (p = 0.005), blood transfusion rate (p < 0.001), and duration of the procedure (p < 0.001). Post-operative complications were comparable between groups. Nausea and bowel disorders were numerically but not statistically more frequent in the CPM group. ERAS patients had shorter mean hospital stay (5.3 ± 1.4 vs. 7.4 ± 1.6 days, p < 0.001), lower daily MEDs (4.73 ± 2.63 vs. 7.04 ± 2.29, p < 0.001), and lower VAS scores on post-operative day 7 (3.89 ± 1.07 vs. 4.67 ± 1.17, p = 0.001). Post-operative pain was similar between groups on post-operative days 3 and 30. CONCLUSION: Systematic implementation of ERAS protocol after PC-RPLND improves pain management, optimizes patient recovery, and prevents over-prescription of opioid analgesics.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Surgical management of small renal masses can be challenging in frail patients and thus modalities such as radiofrequency ablation (RFA) have emerged as valid alternative options. The aim of the current study was to present mid-term oncological and functional results on a series of patients with cT1a renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) who were unfit for surgery and underwent RFA using ultrasound guidance under local anesthesia. METHODS: Data from patients fulfilling the study selection criteria were retrospectively collected. RENAL nephrometry score was used for tumor description. Parametric tests were used for data analysis and survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Overall, 32 patients (mean±standard deviation age, 72.4 ± 7.6 years) with biopsy-proven RCCs (tumor size, 23.75 ± 10.44 mm and RENAL score, 5.28 ± 1.33) underwent 32 RFA sessions. Twenty-seven patients (84.4%) had low complexity masses and five patients had masses of intermediate complexity (15.6%) according to RENAL score categorization. Over a follow-up period of 22.1 ± 13.7 months, one case of primary treatment failure was recognized (primary technical success 97.0%), and overall, three patients were diagnosed with residual disease (primary technique effectiveness 90.6%). No major complications occurred during the postprocedure 90-day follow up, while no difference was found in serum creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate pre and post procedure. Patients with intermediate-complexity renal lesions had shorter time to recurrence in comparison to low-complexity masses (p = 0.002). All patients were alive at the time of study data analysis without diagnosed metastases. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous RFA of small RCCs using ultrasound-based guidance under local anesthesia can be an effective alternative method for managing patients who are unfit for surgery.