Development, Applications, and Refinement of the Family Nutrition and Physical Activity (FNPA) Child Obesity Prevention Screening.

Concerns regarding the continued high prevalence of childhood overweight and obesity have created a need for proactive approaches to behavior change. The Family Nutrition and Physical Activity (FNPA) screening tool was developed for research and clinical use to identify home environments and behaviors that could predispose youth to increased weight. FNPA scores have been shown to correlate with body mass index (BMI) percentiles in first-grade students and to predict unique variance in change in BMI percentiles from first to second grade. The FNPA has been used for family behavior counseling and is now a standard component of well-child visits throughout the Geisinger Health System in Pennsylvania. Parents complete the FNPA prior to annual visits, and providers can discuss areas of concern based on screening results. Children of parents who complete the FNPA have shown smaller increases in BMI z-scores over the following year than children of parents who did not complete the FNPA. The FNPA is also used to inform the arrangement of family-centered obesity treatment for children. Recently, the FNPA has undergone a systematic update to ensure its continued relevance and utility. The updated tool is provided, and current and future users can access more information about the tool at myfnpa.org.

Construct Validity of an Obesity Risk Screening Tool in Two Age Groups.

Home environment influences child health, but the impact varies as children move into adolescence. The Family Nutrition and Physical Activity (FNPA) screening tool has been used to evaluate home environments, but studies have not compared the utility of the tool in different age groups. The purpose of this study was to examine the efficacy of the FNPA tool in first and tenth grade samples. Parents of first grade (n = 250) and tenth grade (n = 99) students completed the FNPA and results were linked to body mass index (BMI) data. FNPA scores were examined by gender, income, race, and school-level socioeconomic status (SES). Correlations examined associations between FNPA scores and several BMI indicators. Logistic and linear regression analyses evaluated the construct validity of the FNPA in both groups. Mean FNPA score differed by age group, by SES in both age groups, and by race in the first grade sample only. Correlations between FNPA score and BMI indicators were higher in the first grade sample, but SES was significantly associated with BMI only in tenth graders. The FNPA has stronger utility in younger children, while school SES is a stronger predictor of adolescent weight status.

Effects of Enhancing School-Based Body Mass Index Screening Reports with Parent Education on Report Utility and Parental Intent To Modify Obesity Risk Factors.

BACKGROUND: School-based body mass index screenings (SBMIS) have been controversial. We aimed to determine if parents would indicate improved utility with SBMIS when the report included parent education and whether parental intent to modify obesity risk factors would vary with report type or child weight. METHODS: A cluster-controlled trial was conducted with 31 elementary schools randomized to distribute a standard SBMIS report or the standard report plus education (SBMIS+). A random subsample of parents completed a mailed survey (731 SBMIS, 738 SBMIS+). Using a two-stage cluster sampling design, logistic regression models with school-level random effect were used to assess differences between conditions and by weight category. RESULTS: Parents in the SBMIS+ condition vs. the standard condition were more likely to indicate that the report provided useful information (not significant) and an intent to help their child get enough sleep (p < 0.001). Parents of children who were overweight or obese were less likely than parents of children who were not to indicate that the report provided useful information about their child's weight status (p < 0.001) or access to resources (p < 0.05). However, these parents were more likely to plan a visit to healthcare provider (p < 0.001) and to intend to limit sugar-sweetened beverages (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Parental education can enhance the utility of the SBMIS report and parental intention to modify at least one obesity risk factor. SBMIS reports prompted parents of children with overweight and obesity to seek clinical care and limit sugar-sweetened drinks.