Biliary complications after liver transplantation: the role of endoscopy.

Biliary complications are important causes of early and late postoperative morbidity and mortality after liver transplantation and are seen in 10-20 % of the patients. The common biliary complications include bile leaks, stones or debris, and anastomotic strictures. Less common complications are hilar strictures, intrahepatic strictures, and papillary stenosis/dysfunction. The complications are similar in living-donor and cadaveric liver transplantations, except for a higher incidence of bile leaks among living-donor transplant recipients. The clinical presentation of post-liver transplant bile duct complications is often subtle, and noninvasive imaging studies may sometimes fail to detect mild but clinically significant stenoses or small leaks. Early recognition and prompt treatment of biliary complications following liver transplantation reduces the morbidity and improves long-term graft and patient survival. In this report, we discuss the role of endoscopy in the diagnosis, treatment options, and the outcome for patients with biliary complications following liver transplantation.

Endoscopic ultrasonography.

Over the past two decades, endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) has undergone a transition from being a novel imaging technique to a clinical diagnostic test that is necessary for the optimal management of gastrointestinal diseases. EUS has established itself as an important diagnostic modality, mainly for the detection and staging of gastrointestinal cancers. As EUS has become more widespread, research has gradually shifted towards studies that explore the effect of EUS on patient management and outcome. These outcome studies have examined the primary clinical applications of EUS, such as esophageal, gastric, pancreatic, and colorectal cancer staging, as well as the role of EUS in the diagnosis of inflammatory pancreatic diseases. Widespread use of EUS has recently led to studies that examine complications associated with the performance of the procedure. Endosonographers have continued efforts to define a clinical role for EUS in other gastrointestinal diseases, such as portal hypertension. EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) is continuing to develop into a powerful diagnostic tool for the management of lung cancer and other mediastinal diseases. New applications for EUS-FNA are also emerging. Finally, investigators are continuing to explore the remaining frontier of EUS-guided therapy.

EUS predictors of long-term survival in esophageal carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: EUS is the most accurate nonsurgical modality for the staging of esophageal cancer, but the ability of EUS to predict outcomes or prognosis is unclear. Patients were examined who had EUS performed for esophageal cancer staging to determine which endosonographic features predict survival. METHOD: Data on 203 patients undergoing EUS for esophageal cancer staging were studied retrospectively. Median survival was calculated for each T-stage and N-stage and according to the presence or absence of celiac axis (CAx) lymphadenopathy as determined by EUS. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were generated for each stage and the log-rank test was used to test for significant differences in survival. Multivariate analysis was performed to test for the relative importance in predicting survival of the EUS stages, also considering age, gender, histology, and type of treatment. RESULTS: Significant differences were found in the ability of EUS-determined T-stage (p = 0.0005), N-stage (p < 0.0001), and presence of CAx nodes (p = 0.0049) to predict survival. Multivariate analysis showed N-stage to predict survival. CONCLUSIONS: Pretreatment EUS can predict survival in esophageal cancer based on initial T-stage, N-stage, and the presence of CAx nodes. The presence of lymphadenopathy at EUS is an important predictor of survival. EUS should be performed in all patients with esophageal cancer, not only for staging patients before therapy, but also as a valuable method of determining prognosis.

Nutrition.

The use of nutrition for the medical patient, in the inpatient setting and at home, will likely continue to increase in the future. Each patient should be evaluated in an individualized but systematic fashion. Each patient in whom malnourishment is suspected should undergo a thorough assessment for the presence and degree of malnutrition with an accurate calculation of nutritional requirements. It is important to choose the correct method of delivery of nutrition, to monitor and recognize any complications or problems that may arise, and to tailor the nutritional therapy to the unique diseases that are encountered in medicine. Although increasingly new advances and changes are occurring in the field of nutrition, nutritional support and therapy are best delivered and supplied to the patient with a network of health care workers, including the physician, the nurse, the dietitian, the social worker, and pharmacist.

Esophageal dilation for endosonographic evaluation of malignant esophageal strictures is safe and effective.

OBJECTIVE: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is accepted as the most accurate modality for T- and N-staging of esophageal cancer, but some malignant strictures prevent passage of the echoendoscope beyond the level of the tumor. This incomplete evaluation may decrease staging accuracy. Previous studies have yielded conflicting results regarding the safety and efficacy of esophageal dilation for EUS. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated 267 consecutive patients undergoing EUS for esophageal carcinoma staging at our institution over a 66-month period to determine the number of patients requiring dilation for EUS examination, the success of dilation, safety of dilation, and clinical importance. RESULTS: Among 267 endosonographic examinations of the esophagus, 81 (30.3%) required dilation to advance the echoendoscope beyond the level of the stricture. After dilation was performed, the echoendoscope could be passed through the stricture in 69 patients (85.2%), and in 63 of 67 of the patients dilated to > or = 14 mm (94.0%). No complications have occurred secondary to the dilations performed to permit completion of the endosonographic examination. Tumor staging by EUS after dilation was T2 (14.8%), T3 (56.8%), and T4 (21.0%), nodal staging N0 (14.6%) and N1 (75.3%); and M1 (9.9%). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that incremental, stepwise dilation of malignant strictures to 14 mm is safe and effective in permitting echoendoscope passage beyond the stenosis. The presence of a malignant stricture does not seem to diminish the utility of EUS staging of esophageal cancer.

Endoscopic management of postoperative biliary complications in orthotopic liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Surgery, percutaneous cholangiography, and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) have been used in the management of biliary complications after orthotopic liver transplantation with varied results. We assessed the role of ERCP in the diagnosis, treatment, and outcome of post-orthotopic liver transplantation biliary complications. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 260 patients who underwent orthotopic liver transplantation. We examined the number of patients referred for ERCP and the indication, diagnosis, therapeutic intervention, success, and complication rate of ERCP post orthotopic liver transplantation. We compared the survival and retransplantation rates of the patients who underwent ERCP with a control group of post-orthotopic liver transplantation patients not undergoing ERCP. RESULTS: Of the 260 patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation, 64 (24.6%) underwent 137 ERCPs. Two categories of indications for ERCP were identified: bile leak (n = 31) and obstruction (n = 39). ERCP identified the site of the bile leak in 27 of 31 cases (87.1%) and the leak was treated by endoscopic means in 26 of 31 (83.9%). Treatment success differed significantly based on location of the leak (T tube, 95.2% vs. anastomosis, 42.9%; p = 0. 009). ERCP identified the site of obstruction in 37 of 39 cases (94. 9%) and obstruction was relieved by endoscopic means in 25 of 35 cases (71.4%). ERCP was significantly less successful in the treatment of biliary casts (25.0%, p = 0.048). There was no difference in survival or retransplantation between patients who did and did not undergo ERCP. CONCLUSION: ERCP should be the primary method for diagnosis and treatment of post-orthotopic liver transplantation biliary complications. Endoscopic therapy is safe and effective for the majority of post-orthotopic liver transplantation complications and temporizes management for those complications that may require surgery.