Capecitabine efficacy after cycline-dependent-kinase 4/6 inhibitor plus endocrine therapy in metastatic hormone receptor-positive breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: The combination of endocrine treatment with cycline-dependent-kinase 4/6 inhibitor is the new standard of treatment in hormone receptor-positive HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer. The optimal subsequent treatment after CDK4/6 inhibitor remain unclear. As recommended by standard guidelines, capecitabine, an oral chemotherapy is a therapeutic option in endocrine resistant metastatic breast cancer. The objective of this study was to evaluate capecitabine efficacy after disease progression under combination of ET and CDK4/6 inhibitor in a hormone receptor positive metastatic breast cancer population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients progressing under CDK 4/6 inhibitor plus ET and treated with capecitabine, between January 2016 and December 2020, were retrospectively included. Primary endpoint was time to treatment failure (TTF) on capecitabine. Logistic regression were used to identify predictive factors: exclusive bone versus visceral metastases, first-line versus ≥ 2 lines of combination therapy, aromatase inhibitor (AI) versus fulvestrant. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients with a 62-year median age (IC95% 42-81) were analyzed. The CDK 4/6 inhibitor and ET combination was prescribed in first-line setting in 26 patients (46%). Twenty-five patients (44%) had exclusive bone metastasis. Median TTF was 6.1 months. Six patients discontinued capecitabine due to toxicity. Outcomes were not significantly different regardless of metastases localization, ET, and treatment line of the combination of CDK 4/6 inhibitor and ET. Median PFS was 7.1 months. Median OS was 41.3 months. CONCLUSION: Compared to other data of capecitabine prescribed in patients with hormonal resistant MBC, this retrospective study suggests that capecitabine remains effective after CDK 4/6 inhibitor plus ET progression, regardless of therapeutic-line setting and metastases localization. MICRO ABSTRACT: Cycline dependant kinase 4/6 inhibitor plus endocrine therapy have become the standard of care in metastatic hormone receptor positive (HR+) breast cancer (BC). Few data reported the optimal subsequent therapy after progression under the combination. Capecitabine is a therapeutic option in endocrine resistant HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer. Data evaluating efficacy of capecitabine after disease progression on endocrine therapy plus cycline-dependant kinase 4/6 inhibitor are poor. This study showed a 6.1-month median time to treatment failure on capecitabine. Capecitabine remained effective regardless of therapeutic-line setting and metastases localization.

A propensity score-weighted study comparing a two- versus four-weekly pegylated liposomal doxorubicin regimen in metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE: A 4-weekly schedule of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) has been approved for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Phase II trials have suggested interest in a 2-weekly regimen. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of these two schedules. METHODS: Data from MBC patients treated with PLD between 2011 and 2021 were retrospectively collected. The objective was to demonstrate the noninferiority of the 2-weekly versus the 4-weekly schedule in terms of 6-month progression-free survival (PFS). The prespecified noninferiority margin was calculated as 1.20. A propensity score to receive either schedule was estimated using a gradient boosting algorithm. Survival analyses using Cox regression models weighted by the propensity score were performed to compare the schedules. RESULTS: Among the 192 patients included, 96 (50%) underwent each schedule. The median number of previous systemic therapies was 4 (IQR, 3 to 6). Anthracyclines were previously given in early breast cancer in 63.9% of patients. The median follow-up was 10.0 months (IQR, 5.0 to 20.1). A comparable distribution of adverse events was observed. The median PFS was 3.2 months (95% CI, 2.9 to 3.9), and the median overall survival was 12.1 months (95% CI, 10.8 to 14.9). The weighted hazard ratio for PFS was 1.12 (90% CI, 0.82 to 1.54), including the noninferiority boundaries. CONCLUSION: PLD appeared to be a well-tolerated drug in this heavily pretreated MBC population. The efficacy and safety of the 2-weekly schedule did not provide any advantage, suggesting no interest in changing the registered regimen.

Increased cardiac uptake of (18F)-fluorodeoxyglucose incidentally detected on positron emission tomography after left breast irradiation: How to interpret?

Radiation-induced heart disease is a complication that occurs years after thoracic irradiation. Recent studies suggest that radiation-induced heart disease could be an earlier complication and that subclinical cardiac injury can be detected. The present case described an increased uptake of (18F)-fluorodeoxyglucose incidentally detected on positron emission tomography after left breast irradiation with slightly reversible perfusion defect on (99mTc)-tetrofosmin single photon emission computed tomography. The cardiac clinical examination was asymptomatic, and the patient had a normal angiography, suggesting a radiation-induced hibernating myocardium. The relevant question is: how far should an incidentally (18F)-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake be explored?

[Diffusion prophylactic axillary irradiation in breast cancer - Literature review]. / Irradiation axillaire prophylactique « de diffusion ¼ dans le cancer du sein ­ revue de la littérature.

PURPOSE: In breast cancer, radiotherapy is an essential component of the treatment. However, indications of irradiation of the internal mammary chain and axillary area are debatables. Axillary recurrence in patients with invasive breast carcinoma remains an issue. Currently, the substitution of axillary lymph node dissection by sentinel node biopsy leads to revisit the role of axillary irradiation. Breast irradiation including level I, II and III might decrease the risk of axillary recurrence. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A literature search was performed in PubMed and the Cochrane library to identify articles publishing data regarding dose-volume analysis of axillary levels in breast irradiation aiming to determine the potential therapeutic implications. RESULTS: Eleven articles were retained. A total of 375 treatment plans were analyzed. The results concerning the irradiation technique, initial dose prescribed to breast, delineated volumes and dose received at axillary levels were heterogeneous. The average dose delivered to axilla levels I-III with 3D-conformal radiotherapy using standard fields were between 24Gy and 43.5Gy, 3Gy and 32.5Gy and between 1.0Gy and 20.5Gy respectively. The average doses delivered to axilla levels I-III with 3D-conformal radiotherapy using high tangential fields were between 38Gy and 49.7Gy, 11Gy and 47.1Gy and 5Gy 38.7Gy, 32.1Gy and 5Gy (result available for only one study) respectively. Finally, the average doses delivered to axilla levels I-III with intensity modulated radiation therapy were between 14.5Gy and 42.6Gy, 3.4Gy and 35Gy and between 1.2Gy and 25.5Gy respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Incidental axillary dose seems insufficient to be therapeutic regardless of the irradiation technique. There are meaningful differences between intensity modulated radiation therapy and 3D-conformal radiotherapy.

[Advances in the management of cervical lymphadenopathies of unknown primary with intensity modulated radiotherapy: Doses and target volumes]. / Évolutions dans la prise en charge des métastases ganglionnaires cervicales sans cancer primitif retrouvé : doses et volumes cibles de la radiothérapie avec modulation d'intensité.

The definition of nodal and/or mucosal target volumes for radiation therapy for lymphadenopathies of unknown primary is controversial. Target volumes may include all nodal areas bilaterraly and be pan-mucosal or unilateral, selective, including the sole oropharyngeal mucosa. This review presents current recommendations in light of changes in the TNM classification, Human papillomavirus status and therapeutic advances. We conducted a systematic review of the literature with the following keywords: lymphadenopathy; head and neck; unknown primary and radiation therapy. There are no direct comparative studies between unilateral or bilateral nodal irradiation or pan-mucosal and selective mucosal irradiation. Contralateral lymph node failure rates range from 0 to 6% after unilateral nodal irradiation and 0 and 31% after bilateral irradiation. Occurrence of a mucosal primary varies between 0 and 19.2%. Initial clinical presentation and Human papillomavirus status are critical to define mucosal target volumes. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy is recommended (rather than three-dimensional irradiation) to avoid toxicities. Systemic treatments have similar indications as for identified primary head and neck cancers. Failures do not appear superior in case of unilateral nodal irradiation but comparative studies are warranted due to major biases hampering direct comparisons. Human papillomavirus status should be incorporated into the therapeutic strategy and practice-changing TNM staging changes will need to be evaluated.