RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the utility of preprocedural paracetamol on reducing pain scores post office-based laryngeal procedures. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, controlled before-after comparative study. SETTING: Controlled prospective before-after study. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed of 100 patients who underwent office-based laryngeal procedures without preprocedural analgesia at our center to establish a control group. Age, sex, procedure type, and amount of substance used were documented as well as postprocedural pain score. Pain scores were recorded every 5 minutes for 30 minutes following office-based laryngeal procedures. A prospective arm of this study was then performed in which every patient undergoing office-based laryngeal procedures at our center between September 2019 and December 2020 was administered 1000 mg of paracetamol prior to their procedure. The postprocedure pain scores of the 2 groups were then compared. RESULTS: A hundred patients were included in the retrospective arm and 75 patients were included in the prospective arm, receiving 1000 mg of paracetamol a median of 45 (interquartile range: 30-53) minutes prior to their procedure. The 2 groups were matched for age, sex, and type of laryngeal procedure. Both nonanalgesia and analgesia groups demonstrated a similar proportion of patients who experienced any pain (47% and 48%, respectively) postprocedurally. The prospective arm of this study however reported a statistically significant reduction in the magnitude of their pain scores at all points postprocedurally (P = .005). CONCLUSION: Paracetamol preprocedurally reduces the severity of pain in office-based laryngeal procedures and would be a useful consideration for patients who are likely to experience significant postprocedural pain. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Vocal cord dysfunction/inducible laryngeal obstruction (VCD/ILO) is characterized by breathlessness and often mimics or accompanies severe asthma. The disorder occurs intermittently, and the diagnosis is established by using laryngoscopy. Dynamic computed tomography (CT) imaging of the larynx at low-radiation doses has the potential to provide an alternative method to make the diagnosis of VCD/ILO. METHODS: We report two case series: in series A, laryngoscopy (diagnostic standard) and CT imaging of the larynx were each performed within 1 hour of each other (n=31), and in series B, the procedures were performed on separate days 4 to 6 weeks apart (n=72). Diagnosis of VCD/ILO by laryngoscopy used conventional criteria, and diagnosis by CT imaging was based on vocal cord narrowing in excess of a validated normal threshold. In each series, we evaluated the accuracy of CT imaging of the larynx to establish a diagnosis of VCD/ILO compared with laryngoscopy. RESULTS: In series A, the sensitivity of CT imaging of the larynx was 53.8%, and specificity was 88.9%; in series B, the sensitivity of CT imaging of the larynx was 76.2%, and specificity was 93.3%. At a disease prevalence of 30% (which was known to be the case in our clinic), the positive predictive value was 67.5% in series A and 83% in series B. Negative predictive values were 81.8% and 90.1% in series A and B, respectively, and false-positive rates were 11.1% and 6.7%. CONCLUSIONS: When the population prevalence was assumed to be 30%, low-dose CT imaging of the larynx detected VCD/ILO with negative predictive values greater than 80% in both series settings and agreed with each other within 9 percentage points. Positive predictive values for laryngeal CT imaging varied substantially between the settings of the two case series. (Supported by Monash Lung and Sleep Institute and Grant APP ID 1198362 and others.)