5-year results of cisplatin-epirubicin-vinorelbine (PEV) combination as primary chemotherapy in T2-3, N0-2 breast cancer patients: a multicentre phase II study.

UNLABELLED: The aim this study was to assess the efficacy of cisplatin-epirubicin-vinorelbine, as primary chemotherapy, in reducing the tumour burden in T2-3 N0-2 breast carcinomas. Breast conservative surgery (BCS) rate, clinical and pathological complete response (pCR), toxicity and 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighty-eight women with tumours > or =2.5 cm were treated with cisplatin (P) 50 mg/m2, epirubicin (E) 100 mg/m2 and vinorelbine (V) 25 mg/m2, every 3 weeks. RESULTS: Fifty-six out of the 88 patients (63.6%) underwent BCS, notably including 12/23 patients with initial tumours >5 cm. The overall clinical response was 72.8% (cCR=11.4%), pCR 20.5% and pTO+pNO 17%. No cardiac toxicity was observed. Grade 3/4 adverse events were leukopenia (9.4%), neutropenia (7.9%), nausea and vomiting (7.3%). After a median follow-up of 5 years, 24 patients (27.3%) had developed local or distant metastases. The mean DFS and OS were 51.7 (SE 2.38) and 57.02 (SE 1.98) months, respectively, and were significantly higher in pCR patients in comparison to the others (63.05 vs. 48.76, p<0.01 and 64.59 vs. 55.04, p<0.05, respectively). CONCLUSION: The PEV regimen was highly effective in reducing the tumour burden, especially for large tumours. The rate of pCR was similar to that obtained by other, including taxane-based regimens, and was well-tolerated. The study demonstrated the feasibility of such a regimen even in small centres, and being of low cost this combination could be of value in the application of primary therapy.

Single-agent epirubicin as primary chemotherapy in T2-T3, N0-N2, M0 breast carcinoma: 6-year follow-up.

OBJECTIVE: Single-agent epirubicin was tested as primary chemotherapy treatment in patients with early breast cancer >3 cm. METHODS: 100 women with locally advanced breast cancer >3 cm were treated with three cycles of single-agent epirubicin at a dose of 120 mg/m2. All patients showing tumor shrinkage to less than 3 cm were considered candidates for conservative surgery (quadrantectomy); in the remaining patients modified radical mastectomy was carried out. Postsurgical treatment consisted of CMF chemotherapy except for postmenopausal node-positive, estrogen-positive patients who were assigned to hormonal treatment with tamoxifen and postmenopausal node-negative, estrogen-positive ones who did not receive any treatment. RESULTS: Quadrantectomy was carried out in 71 patients. At the median follow-up time of 69 months, the relapse rate was 29.6% among patients who underwent quadrantectomy (21 out of 71) and 58.6% among patients who underwent modified radical mastectomy (17 out of 29). CONCLUSIONS: Single-agent chemotherapy with anthracyclines could appear to be an effective treatment in inducing a tumor downstaging in patients with early breast cancer >3 cm. This treatment can be administered outside clinical trials in patients who desire to preserve their body integrity. Further prospective, randomized trials are needed in order to validate and better define the role of epirubicin in the neoadjuvant strategy of breast cancer patients.

Prevalence and management of pain in Italian patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

Pain is a highly distressing symptom for patients with advanced cancer. WHO analgesic ladder is widely accepted as a guideline for its treatment. Our aim was to describe pain prevalence among patients diagnosed with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), impact of pain on quality of life (QoL) and adequacy of pain management. Data of 1021 Italian patients enrolled in three randomised trials of chemotherapy for NSCLC were pooled. QoL was assessed by EORTC QLQ-C30 and LC-13. Analgesic consumption during the 3 weeks following QoL assessment was recorded. Adequacy of pain management was evaluated by the Pain Management Index (PMI). Some pain was reported by 74% of patients (42% mild, 24% moderate and 7% severe); 50% stated pain was affecting daily activities (30% a little, 16% quite a bit, 3% very much). Bone metastases strongly affected presence of pain. Mean global QoL linearly decreased from 64.9 to 36.4 from patients without pain to those with severe pain (P<0.001). According to PMI, 616 out of 752 patients reporting pain (82%) received inadequate analgesic treatment. Bone metastases were associated with improved adequacy and worst pain with reduced adequacy at multivariate analysis. In conclusion, pain is common in patients with advanced NSCLC, significantly affects QoL, and is frequently undertreated. We recommend that: (i). pain self-assessment should be part of oncological clinical practice; (ii). pain control should be a primary goal in clinical practice and in clinical trials; (iii). physicians should receive more training in pain management; (iv). analgesic treatment deserves greater attention in protocols of anticancer treatment.

Gemcitabine versus FLEC regimen given intra-arterially to patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer: a prospective, randomized phase III trial of the Italian Society for Integrated Locoregional Therapy in Oncology.

Gemcitabine is considered the gold standard treatment for unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Intra-arterial drug administration had shown some interesting results in small phase II studies. In this study, patients were randomly assigned to receive gemcitabine at a dose of 1,000 mg/m2 over 30 minutes intravenously weekly for 7 weeks, followed by 1 week of rest, then weekly for 3 weeks every 4 weeks or FLEC: 5-fluoruracil 1,000 mg/m2, leucovorin 100 mg/m2, epirubicin 60 mg/m2, carboplatin 300 mg/m2 infused bolus intra-arterially into celiac axis at a 3-week interval 3 times or 5-fluorouracil 400 mg/m2 plus folinic acid 20 mg/m2 for 5 days every 4 weeks for 6 cycles. The primary endpoint was overall survival, while time to treatment failure, response rate, clinical benefit response were secondary endpoints. Sixty-seven patients were randomly allocated gemcitabine and 71 were allocated FLEC intra-arterially. Patients treated with FLEC lived for significantly longer than patients on gemcitabine (p=0.036). Survival at 1 year increased from 21% in the gemcitabine group to 35% in the FLEC group. Median survival was 7.9 months in the FLEC group and 5.8 months in the gemcitabine group. Median time to treatment failure was longer with FLEC (5.3 vs 4.2 months for FLEC vs gemcitabine respectively; p=0.013). Clinical benefit was similar in both groups (17.9% for gemcitabine and 26.7% for FLEC; p=NS). CT-scan partial response was similar in both groups (5.9% for gemcitabine and 14% for FLEC; p=NS). Toxicity profiles were different. Compared with gemcitabine, the FLEC regimen given intra-arterially improved survival in patients with unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Supportive care in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

The present study describes supportive care (SC) in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), evaluating whether it is affected by concomitant chemotherapy, patient's performance status (PS) and age. Data of patients enrolled in three randomised trials of first-line chemotherapy, conducted between 1996 and 2001, were pooled. The analysis was limited to the first three cycles of treatment. Supportive care data were available for 1185 out of 1312 (90%) enrolled patients. Gastrointestinal drugs (45.7%), corticosteroids (33.4%) and analgesics (23.8%) were the most frequently observed categories. The mean number of drugs per patient was 2.43; 538 patients (45.4%) assumed three or more supportive drugs. Vinorelbine does not produce substantial variations in the SC pattern, while cisplatin-based treatment requires an overall higher number of supportive drugs, with higher use of antiemetics (41 vs 27%) and antianaemics (10 vs 4%). Patients with worse PS are more exposed to corticosteroids (42 vs 30%). Elderly patients require drugs against concomitant diseases significantly more than adults (20 vs 7%) and are less frequently exposed to antiemetics (12 vs 27%). In conclusion, polypharmacotherapy is a relevant issue in patients with advanced NSCLC. Chemotherapy does not remarkably affect the pattern of SC, except for some drugs against side effects. Elderly patients assume more drugs for concomitant diseases and receive less antiemetics than adults.

Randomised trial of gemcitabine versus flec regimen given intra-arterially for patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer.

Gemcitabine is considered the golden standard treatment for unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Intra-arte-rial drug administration had shown a deep rationale with some interesting results. In a multicenter phase III trial, we compared gemcitabine given weekly with a combination of 5-fluoruracil, leucovorin, epirubicin, carboplatin (FLEC) administered intra-arteriously as first-line therapy in unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Patients were randomly assigned to receive gemcitabine at a dose of 1,000 mg/m2 over 30 minutes intravenously weekly for 7 weeks, followed by 1 week of rest, then weekly for 3 weeks every 4 weeks or 5-fluoruracil 1,000 mg/m2, leucovorin 100 mg/m2, epirubicin 60 mg/m2, carboplatin 300 mg/m2 infused bolus intra-arteriously at three-weekly interval for 3 times. The primary end point was overall survival, while time to treatment failure, response rate, clinical benefit response were secondary endpoints. Sixty-seven patients were randomly allocated gemcitabine and 71 were allocated FLEC intra-arterially. Patients treated with FLEC lived for significantly longer than patients on gemcitabine (p=.036). Survival at 1 year was increased from 21% in the gemcitabine group to 35% in the FLEC group. Median survival was 7.9 months in the FLEC group and 5.8 months in the gemcitabine group. Median time to treatment failure was longer with FLEC (5.3 vs 4.2 months for FLEC vs gemcitabine respectively; p=.013). Clinical benefit was similar in both groups (17.9% for gemcitabine and 26.7% for FLEC; p=NS). CT-scan partial response was similar in both group (5.9% for gemcitabine and 14% for FLEC; p=NS). Toxicity profiles were different. Compared with gemcitabine, FLEC regimen given intra-arteriously, improved survival in patient with unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Gemcitabine plus vinorelbine in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a phase II study of three different doses. Gem Vin Investigators.

Our aim was to study the activity and toxicity of the gemcitabine plus vinorelbine (Gem Vin) combination and to identify the optimal dose. Previously untreated patients aged < 70 years, with stage IV or IIIb (not candidates for radiotherapy) non-small cell lung cancer were eligible. Studied dose-levels of Gem Vin, administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks, were (mg m(-2)): level I = 1000/25; level II = 1200/25; level III = 1000/30; level IV = 1200/30. A feasibility study was performed at each dose-level, followed by a single-stage phase II study. Dose-level IV was unfeasible because of grade 4 neutropenia. Overall, out of 126 patients enrolled in phase II studies, there were one complete and 32 partial responses (response rate 26%: 95% CI 18-34%). Response rates were 27.9%, 21.4% and 29.3% at levels I, II and III, respectively. The treatment was well tolerated. Toxicity was less frequent and severe at level I. Overall median survival was 33 weeks (95% CI 28-40). Descriptive quality of life analysis showed that patients with a worse baseline global health status score tended to drop out of the study earlier than those with a better score. Gem Vin is feasible at different doses. It is sufficiently active and well tolerated. A phase III study to compare the effect on quality of life of Gem Vin (level I) vs cisplatin-based chemotherapy is ongoing.

Schedule specific biochemical modulation of 5-fluorouracil in advanced colorectal cancer: a randomized study. GISCAD, IOR and collaborating centers.

BACKGROUND: We have recently suggested that bolus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) may work via a RNA directed mechanism while continuous infusion 5-FU may kill cells via a thymidylate synthase related pathway. It may thus be possible to selectively modulate each schedule biochemically. We have compared an alternating regimen of bolus and continuous infusion 5-FU, selectively modulated for the schedule of administration, with modulated bolus 5-FU in advanced colorectal cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred fourteen patients from nineteen Italian centers were randomized to the control arm consisting of biweekly cycles of MTX, 200 mg/m2 on day 1, followed by bolus 5-FU 600 mg/m2 on day 2 and 6-S-leucovorin rescue, or to the experimental arm consisting of two biweekly cycles of the same regimen as in the control arm alternated to three weeks of continuous infusion 5-FU (200 mg/m2 day) + weekly bolus 6-S-leucovorin, 20 mg/m2. RESULTS: Nine CR and twenty-seven PR were obtained on one hundred eleven evaluable patients treated in experimental arm (RR = 32%, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 24%-42%), while two CR and eleven PR were observed among one hundred three evaluable patients in control arm (RR = 13%, 95% CI: 7%-21%). WHO grade 3-4 toxicity occurred in 13% of cycles of experimental arm and in 8% of cycles in control arm. The PFS was significantly longer in experimental arm (6.2 vs. 4.3 months, odds ratio 0.66, P = 0.003), while the overall survival was similar in both arms (14.8 months in experimental arm vs. 14.1 months in control arm); quality of life was similar as well. Eighty percent of patients receiving second-line chemotherapy in control arm were treated with continuous infusion 5-FU. CONCLUSIONS: Alternating, schedule-specific biochemical modulation of FU is more active than MTX --> 5-FU as first-line treatment of advanced colorectal cancer. However, the overall survival was similar suggesting that alternating bolus and infusional 5-FU upfront may be as effective as giving them in sequence as first- and second-line treatment.

A combination of gemcitabine and 5-fluorouracil in advanced pancreatic cancer, a report from the Italian Group for the Study of Digestive Tract Cancer (GISCAD).

In a randomized clinical trial, gemcitabine (GEM) was more effective than 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in advanced pancreatic cancer patients. GEM and 5-FU have different mechanisms of action and their combination, from a theoretical point of view, could result in a higher activity. To test activity and feasibility of such a combination, a multi-institutional phase II study was initiated in November 1996 by the Italian Group for the study of Digestive Tract Cancer (GISCAD). Primary objectives of this study were to determine the activity in terms of response rate and clinical benefit, while the secondary objective was toxicity. According to the optimal two-stage phase II design, 54 patients were enrolled. Schedule was: GEM 1000 mg m(-2) intravenous (i.v.), and 5-FU 600 mg m(-2) bolus i.v. weekly for 3 weeks out of every 4. All the 54 patients were symptomatic (pain, weight loss, dyspepsia). A clinical benefit was obtained in 28 patients (51%) (95% confidence interval (CI) 38-64%). Two patients achieved a partial response and 34 a stable disease. Median survival for all the patients was 7 months. Side-effects were mild: no gastrointestinal or haematological grade 3-4 toxicity (WHO) were recorded. We observed only six episodes of grade 2 (WHO) leukopenia and seven episodes of thrombocytopenia. Although the non-randomized design of this study suggests caution in the interpretation of these data, in consideration of the low incidence of toxicity and the favourable results obtained in terms of clinical benefit, it may be worthwhile to test more active schedules of 5-FU (continuous infusion) in combination with gemcitabine.

Phase II study of the activity and tolerability of a combined regimen of high-dose epirubicin and cisplatin in stage IIIb and IV non-small cell lung cancer.

AIM: To explore the feasibility and activity of a combined regimen of high-dose epirubicin and cisplatin as an alternative to current treatments for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHOD: Forty-four patients with stage IIIb or IV NSCLC, median Karnofsky index 90, were enrolled. Epirubicin (60 mg/m2) was administered on days 1 and 2 and cisplatin (100 mg/m2) on day 1. Treatment was repeated every 21 days for a maximum of six cycles. A hematopoietic growth factor (G-CSF) was used only for patients reaching codified nadir count values. RESULTS: A total of 130 cycles were administered with a mean of 2.9 cycles per patient. Of 41 assessable patients one showed a complete response and 15 had partial responses (overall response rate, 39%). Grade 3 or 4 leukopenia and grade 3 hemoglobin toxicity were seen in 40% and 14%, respectively, of the administered cycles. The most common nonhematologic toxic events were nausea and vomiting, mucositis, anorexia, and asthenia. CONCLUSIONS: This epirubicin-cisplatin regimen seemed effective and was generally well tolerated, and therefore suitable for use in an outpatient setting.

High-versus low-dose levo-leucovorin as a modulator of 5-fluorouracil in advanced colorectal cancer: a 'GISCAD' phase III study. Italian Group for the Study of Digestive Tract Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Although leucovorin (LV) + 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is considered the treatment of choice for advanced colorectal cancer in most countries, the optimal schedule of this combination has not yet been established. Low-dose LV appears to be as active as high-dose LV in the daily-times-five regimen, but no randomized study of the levorotatory stereoisomer (6S-LV) given at two different dose levels has been published. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between November 1991 and June 1994, 422 patients (all with measurable disease previously untreated with chemotherapy) were randomized to 6S-LV (100 mg/sqm/i.v.) + 5-FU (370 mg sqm/15 min i.v. infusion), both administered for 5 days every 28 days (arm A), or to 6S-LV (10 mg/sqm/i.v./5-FU (doses as above), also given for 5 days every 28 days (arm B). The primary endpoint of the study was the comparison of response rates (WHO criteria): the secondary endpoint was the assessment of survival and tolerability. No evaluation of the quality of life or the symptomatic effect of treatment was planned. RESULTS: The response rate was 9.3% in arm A (95% CI: 5.4-13.1), with 2 CR and 18 PR, and 10.7% in arm B (95% CI: 6.5-14.9), with 3 CR + 19 PR, without any significant difference (P = 0.78). The median time to progression was eight months in both groups and overall survival was 11 months, with no difference between treatments. Toxicity mainly consisted of gastrointestinal side effects (mucositis and diarrhoea), which were rarely severe (grade 3-4: 5%-10% of patients) and similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this large-scale multicentre trial, the low and high doses of 6S-LV appeared to be equivalent in terms of the biochemical modulation of 5-FU in advanced colorectal cancer although, for several reasons (including the timing and the strict criteria of response evaluation, the high number of patients with unfavourable prognostic factors, the multi-institutional nature of the study, the dose and modality of 5-FU administration), the response rate was lower than that reported in some of the other published studies. Given the considerable difference in economic cost between the two dosages, the use of high-dose 6S-LV in the daily-times-five regimen is not recommended in clinical practice.

Familial AL-amyloidosis in three Italian siblings.

BACKGROUND AND METHODS: Familial occurrence of immunoglobulin-related (AL) amyloidosis has occasionally been reported. In this work we describe the concomitance of systemic amyloidosis and monoclonal gammopathy (one case of Waldenström's macroglobulinemia and two cases without multiple myeloma or related diseases) in three Italian siblings, two males and one female. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: All of them showed a common pattern of polyneuropathy to different degrees; two presented a sicca syndrome and one also suffered from nephropathy. Two of them showed the same HLA typing with the same light chain type (k), but had different presenting symptoms. Polyneuropathy and a history of peptic disease in two cases was suggestive of type III familial amyloidotic polyneuropathy (FAP) occurring in the setting of a familial monoclonal component. However, immunohistochemical studies on different tissue specimens using anti-apolipoprotein A1 and anti-transthyretin antibodies were negative. Further screening of DNA samples for transthyretin (TTR) gene mutations was also negative. Clinical and laboratory investigations ruled out reactive or senile amyloidosis and immunohistochemical studies with anti-light chain antibodies on amyloidotic tissue specimens were positive. As a consequence, this family represents a new case of familial AL-amyloidosis.

Cisplatin-vinorelbine combination chemotherapy in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

AIM: The North Milan Group presents the results of a phase II study on a cisplatin-vinorelbine combination schedule in the treatment of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer to evaluate its activity and tolerability. METHODS: Seventy-six consecutive patients entered the study. Patients' characteristics were the following: males/females 69/7; median age, 61.4 years (range, 40-73); ECOG performance status, 0-1; 17 stage IIIa and 59 stage IIIb. There were 49 squamous cell carcinomas, 20 adenocarcinomas, and 7 large cell carcinomas. All patients had not been previously treated and showed measureable disease. Treatment consisted of vinorelbine, 25 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8, plus cisplatin, 80 mg/m2 on day 1, administered intravenously every 21 days for three standard courses. RESULTS: Seventy-four patients were evaluable for response. Objective responses were documented in 42/74 patients with an overall response rate (CR+PR) of 56.7%; 18/74 patients (24.3%) showed stable disease and the remaining 14/74 (18.9%) went into progression. Twelve patients (16.2%) were suitable for a subsequent surgery. The median duration of response was 13.3 months. Survival time ranged from 4 to 36 months; it was 14.6 months for PR patients, 8.6 months for NC and 5 months for PD. Mean survival time is presently 12.85 months (SE, 1.2 months). Toxicity evaluated on 222 cycles administered was acceptable, and it was necessary to use G-CSF or delay the treatment because of severe leukopenia in only a few cases. CONCLUSIONS: The regimen is active and safe: the slight survival increase is likely due to the small amenability to surgery achieved (16.2%). However, our results are fully comparable to others obtained with vinorelbine in two/three drug combination chemotherapy regimens.

Epirubicin, cisplatin, and continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil is an active and safe regimen for patients with advanced gastric cancer. An Italian Group for the Study of Digestive Tract Cancer (GISCAD) report.

BACKGROUND: A Phase II confirmatory multicenter trial was performed to evaluate a combination of epirubicin, cisplatin, and continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil (ECF) in treating patients with advanced gastric cancer. METHODS: Fifty-three patients with locally advanced (n = 7) or metastatic (n = 46) gastric cancer received a dose of epirubicin (50 mg/m2) and cisplatin (60 mg/m2) intravenously every 21 days for eight cycles with 5-fluorouracil (200 mg/m2/day) by intravenous continuous infusion for 21 consecutive weeks, administered through a central line using an external pump. RESULTS: Eight complete responses and 22 partial responses (response rate = 56%, 95% confidence interval +/- 13) were achieved. Twelve patients had stable disease. The median duration of response was 10 months (range, 3-21 months), and the median survival for all the patients was 9+ months (range, 2-28 months). Overall toxicity, which was primarily hematologic, was mild with only three patients requiring hospitalization for neutropenic fever. No death due to toxicity occurred. CONCLUSIONS: This study found that the ECF regimen is substantially active in treating patients with advanced gastric cancer and has a favorable pattern of toxicity. This schedule clearly deserves randomized comparative trials for palliation of metastatic disease and for adjuvant purposes.

Peri-operative assessment of glomerular permeability.

Surgical trauma may provoke an increase in glomerular permeability. Microalbuminuria is a subclinical increase in urinary albumin ranging from 20 to 300 mg..-1. This cannot be measured with routine laboratory tests and is estimated by radioimmunoassay. It has been proposed that microalbuminuria, an expression of increased glomerular permeability, serves to reflect a generalised increase in systemic vascular permeability. In this study the degree of microalbuminuria (expressed as microalbuminuria/creatinine ratio to correct for dilutional changes) has been measured in two groups of patients undergoing either videolaparoscopic surgery (group A) or conventional, open, abdominal surgery (group B). The anaesthetic technique was standardised and the duration of surgery similar in the two groups. A significant increase (p < 0.01) in the microalbuminuria/urinary creatinine ratio occurred in patients undergoing open abdominal surgery (group B). This alteration appeared 2 h after surgery but had disappeared 24 h after the end of the operation. During surgery, there was a direct relationship between glomerular permeability and the severity of the surgical insult.

Double modulation of 5-fluorouracil in advanced colorectal cancer with low-dose interferon-alpha 2b and folinic acid. The "GISCAD" experience. Italian Group for the Study of Digestive Tract Cancer.

In advanced colorectal cancer the addition of folinic acid (FA) has been shown to lead to increased activity, at least in terms of response rate, in comparison with 5-fluorouracil (5FU) alone. Similarly, interferon-alpha (IFN) is able to potentiate 5FU, although high doses cause heavy toxicity. Given the different mechanisms of action of the two agents, the double modulation of 5FU deserves clinical evaluation. In a multicenter study (involving both primary care and referral institutions) 63 patients with advanced colorectal cancer, previously untreated with chemotherapy, received, in an outpatient setting, FA (200 mg/m2 i.v. bolus) + 5FU (400 mg/m2 i.v. in 15 min) for 5 consecutive days every 4 weeks + IFN 3 x 10(6) U on alternate days, starting 1 week before chemotherapy. During the 5 days of 5FU + FA, IFN was administered daily. The antitumour activity, the impact on response duration and survival and toxicity of the combination were evaluated according to WHO criteria. Of the 63 enrolled patients, 56 were evaluable: there were 2 complete responses (3%) and 13 partial responses (21%), giving an objective response rate of 24% (95% confidence interval 13-35%); no change was observed in 17 cases and progressive disease in 24. Median duration of response was 9 months and median survival (all patients) 13 months. Toxicity was acceptable, even though 4 patients presented reversible grade 4 side-effects (2 mucositis and 2 diarrhoea). With this schedule and these doses, addition of IFN did not lead to any increase in the activity of 5FU + FA. In colorectal cancer, further clinical studies with these drugs should be based on a deeper experimental knowledge of their mechanisms of interaction.

Six-drug sequential chemotherapy in non small cell lung cancer. A North Milan Group Study.

Forty-five patients with inoperable non small cell lung carcinoma were treated according to a sequential polychemotherapeutic regimen with cisplatin-vinblastine (A), cyclophosphamide-etoposide (B), and adriamycin-vincristine (C). Patients were evaluated every two cycles. Ten patients (22.2%) showed a partial response with a mean duration of 20 weeks, and mean survival of 50.8 weeks. It is remarkable that, among them, 6 patients (13.3%) lived over 12 months and three (6.6%) over 18 months. The mean survival for all patients was 35.7 weeks. Toxicity was acceptable and reversible.

Transient blindness and seizure associated with cisplatin therapy.

A 38-year-old woman with adenocarcinoma of unknown origin was treated with cisplatin and etoposide. After the 4th course of chemotherapy she complained of blindness and had a seizure with spontaneous recovery in 4 days. The relationship between these events and the known neurotoxicity of other heavy metals indicate cisplatin as a possible etiologic factor.

Pharmacokinetic study of intravenous and oral idarubicin in cancer patients.

Idarubicin (4-demethoxydaunorubicin) is a new anthracycline analogue which lacks the methoxyl group at the C-4 position of the aglycone moiety. The present study was undertaken to investigate the pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of idarubicin in man. The drug was administered at 3-week intervals to six patients by both intravenous and oral routes. Doses used were 13-15 mg/m2 intravenous and 45 mg/m2 p.o. Plasma levels of unchanged idarubicin and of its metabolite idarubicinal were assayed by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). After intravenous administration the plasma levels of the unchanged drug declined very rapidly reaching the sensitivity limits of the analytical method (1-2 ng/ml) 24 h after dosing. Plasma levels of idarubicinal reached a peak of about 10 ng/ml within two hours then decreased very slowly with a plasma t1/2 of about 2.5 days. After the oral dose of 45 mg/m2, the plasma level patterns of both parent compound and the idarubicinal were roughly similar to those after 15 mg/m2 intravenous except for the obvious difference linked to the absorption of idarubicin. The absorption of oral idarubicin was rapid and, in terms of area under curve of the metabolite, the availability after oral administration can be estimated as about 30% of the dose. The urine findings reflected the plasma situation. The metabolite levels were much higher and longer lasting than those of the parent compound. Urinary recovery after intravenous (16% of the dose in four days) and oral administration (approximately 5% of the dose) confirmed the 30% absorption estimated on the basis of plasma levels.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

[Analysis of the risk of backache in the occupational environment]. / Analyse du risque lombalgique en milieu professionnel.

In a cross-sectional, and one year retrospective study low back pain risk was analysed in a sample of 1812 subjects stratified by five professions: nurses, industrial workers, truck drivers, construction workers and white collar workers. Data were collected by occupational physicians during annual systematic examinations. Relative risks were significantly higher in nurses and industrial worker occupations than in the control group of white collar employees. Multivariate analysis points out that heavy or light handling, bad postures, non-sitting jobs and exposure to vibration or inclemency are the prevalent occupational factors of low back pain. Housekeeping among females and gardening or odd jobs in males are less but significant extra-professional factors. Prevention should include instruction in lifting techniques and improvement in work conditions.