Von Willebrand Factor Activity Association With Outcomes After Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Mitral Valve Repair.

Background: Residual mitral regurgitation (MR) is associated with worse outcomes after transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair (TEER). Shear stress induced by MR leads to altered von Willebrand factor activity (vWF:Act) and increased closure time with adenosine diphosphate (CT-ADP). Objectives: The purpose of this study was to investigate the use of CT-ADP to monitor MR during TEER and the association between the vWF, residual MR, and clinical events post-TEER. Methods: Sixty-five patients undergoing TEER were enrolled. CT-ADP was measured at baseline, after each clip deployment, 1 hour and 24 hours post-TEER. CT-ADP values were related to vWF:Act/vWF antigen (vWF:Ag) ratio at the same time points, and MR severity was assessed by echocardiography at 1 month. Combined events of all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalizations were evaluated at 1 year. Results: At 1 month, 32 (49%) patients had residual MR > mild (of those, 14% had MR > moderate). There was no significant change in CT-ADP values during the procedure. However, CT-ADP significantly decreased 1-hour post-TEER (P < 0.001). Patients with corrected MR demonstrated an increase in vWF:Act/vWF:Ag ratio 1-hour post-TEER. Elevated baseline vWF:Act/vWF:Ag ratio and the periprocedural percentage changes of the vWF:Act/vWF:Ag ratio (1 hour post-TEER - baseline values) were associated with the combined clinical outcome. Conclusions: CT-ADP evolution in time was not quick enough to provide real-time monitoring of MR severity during TEER. However, vWF:Act/vWF:Ag ratio at baseline and its variations following the procedure were associated with clinical outcomes. Those findings will need external validation.

Lipoprotein(a) and Calcific Aortic Valve Stenosis Progression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Importance: There are currently no pharmacological treatments available to slow hemodynamic progression of aortic stenosis. Plasma lipoprotein(a) concentrations predict incident aortic stenosis but its association with hemodynamic progression is controversial. Objective: To determine the association between plasma lipoprotein(a) concentrations and hemodynamic progression in patients with aortic stenosis. Design, Settings and Participants: The study included patients with aortic stenosis from 5 longitudinal clinical studies conducted from March 2001 to March 2023 in Canada and the UK. Of 757 total patients, data on plasma lipoprotein(a) concentrations and rates of hemodynamic progression assessed by echocardiography were available for 710, who were included in this analysis. Data were analyzed from March 2023 to April 2024. Exposure: Cohort-specific plasma lipoprotein(a) concentration tertiles. Main Outcomes and Measures: Hemodynamic aortic stenosis progression on echocardiography as assessed by annualized change in peak aortic jet velocity, mean transvalvular gradient, and aortic valve area. Results: Among the included patients, 497 (70%) were male and 213 (30%) were female. The mean (SD) age was 65.2 (13.1) years. Patients in the top lipoprotein(a) tertile demonstrated 41% (estimate, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.13-1.75) faster progression of peak aortic jet velocity and 57% (estimate, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.18-2.10) faster progression of mean transvalvular gradient than patients in the bottom tertile. There was no evidence of heterogeneity across the individual cohorts. Progression of aortic valve area was comparable between groups (estimate, 1.23; 95% CI, 0.71-2.12). Similar results were observed when plasma lipoprotein(a) concentrations were treated as a continuous variable. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, higher plasma lipoprotein(a) concentrations were associated with faster rates of hemodynamic progression in patients with aortic stenosis. Lowering plasma lipoprotein(a) concentrations warrants further investigation in the prevention and treatment of aortic stenosis.

Grading of Aortic Valve Calcification Severity and Risk Stratification in Aortic Stenosis.

BACKGROUND: Thresholds of aortic valve calcification (AVC) to define hemodynamically moderate aortic stenosis (AS) from mild are lacking. We aimed to establish a novel grading classification of AVC as quantified by computed tomography and determine its prognostic value. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study included 915 patients with at least mild AS (mean age 70±12 years, 30% women) from a multicenter prospective registry. All patients underwent Doppler-echocardiography and noncontrast computed tomography within 3 months. Primary end point was the occurrence of all-cause death. Receiver operating characteristic curves analyses were used to determine the sensitivity and specificity of sex-specific thresholds of AVC to identify hemodynamically moderate AS. Optimal thresholds (ie, with best sensitivity/specificity) of AVC to distinguish moderate (aortic valve area 1.0-1.5 cm2 and mean gradient 20-39 mm Hg) from mild AS (aortic valve area >1.5 cm2 and mean gradient <20 mm Hg) were AVC ≥360 arbitrary units in women and ≥1037 arbitrary units in men. Based on the guidelines' thresholds for severe AS and the new thresholds in our study for moderate AS, 312 (34%) patients had mild, 253 (28%) moderate, and 350 (38%) severe AVC. During a mean follow-up of 5.6±3.9 years, 183 (27%) deaths occurred. In Cox multivariable models, AVC remained associated with an increased risk of death (adjusted hazard ratio per grade increase, 1.94 [95% CI, 1.53-2.56]; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A novel grading classification of anatomic AS severity based on sex-specific thresholds of AVC provides significant prognostic value for predicting mortality. These findings support the complementarity of computed tomography-calcium scoring to Doppler-echocardiography to corroborate AS severity and enhance risk stratification in patients with AS.

Long-term results of patients undergoing the Ross procedure after a previous aortic valve surgery.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the long-term outcomes of patients undergoing a Ross procedure in the context of a redo aortic valve (AV) surgery. METHODS: Prospectively collected data in all consecutive adults who underwent a Ross procedure were analyzed to compare the Ross procedure performed as a first surgery (RF) or as a redo surgery (RP). RESULTS: Between 1990 and 2021, 395 Ross procedures were performed at our center (RF, n = 345; RP, n = 50). A 2:1 propensity score matching was performed (RF, n = 100; RP, n = 50). The overall median follow-up was 11.6 years (interquartile range, 5.0-21.8 years) and 100% complete. Mean survival at 20 years was 87 ± 12% in the RF group and 87 ± 8% in the RP group (P = .30). The cumulative incidence of autograft reintervention at 10 years and 20 years was 6 ± 3% and 21 ± 6%, respectively, in the RF group and 9 ± 5% and 25 ± 8%, respectively, in the RP group (P = .74). The AV gradient remained stable up to 20 years in both groups (P = .42). The size of the sinuses of Valsalva tended to increase over time in the RF group but remained stable in the RP group (P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: The ross procedure after a previous sternotomy for AV surgery is safe and offers good long-term results. Patients undergoing redo AV intervention have similar results as patients undergoing a primary Ross procedure, perhaps with a lower risk of autograft dilatation.

Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography in Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis.

IMPORTANCE: Guidelines recommend the use of dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) in patients with low-gradient aortic stenosis (AS) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <50%. However, a paucity of DSE data exists when LVEF >35%. OBJECTIVE: To examine the diagnostic accuracy of DSE in patients with low-gradient AS with a wide range of LVEF and to examine the interaction between the diagnostic accuracy of DSE and LVEF. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Patients with mean gradient <40 mm Hg, aortic valve area <1.0 cm2, and stroke volume index ≤35 mL/m2 undergoing DSE and cardiac computer tomography (C-CT) were identified from 3 prospectively collected patient cohorts and stratified according to LVEF: LVEF<35%, LVEF 35% to 50%, and LVEF>50%. EXPOSURE: Dobutamine stress echocardiography and C-CT were performed on patients with low-gradient AS. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Severe AS was defined as aortic valve calcification score ≥2,000 arbitrary units (AU) among men and ≥1,200 AU for women on C-CT. RESULTS: Of 221 patients included in the study, 78 (35%) presented with LVEF <35%, 67 (30%) with LVEF 35% to 50%, and 76 (34%) with LVEF >50%. Mean-gradient and aortic valve peak velocity during DSE showed significant diagnostic heterogeneity between LVEF groups, being most precise when LVEF <35% (both areas under the curve [AUC] = 0.90), albeit with optimal thresholds of 30 mm Hg and 377 cm/sec and a limited diagnostic yield in patients with LVEF ≥35% (AUC = 0.67 and 0.66 in LVEF 35% to 50% and AUC = 0.65 and 0.60 in LVEF ≥50%). Using guideline thresholds led to a sensitivity/specificity of 49%/84% for all patients with LVEF <50%. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: While DSE is safe and leads to an increase in stroke volume in patients with low-gradient AS regardless of LVEF, the association between DSE gradients and AS severity assessed by C-CT demonstrates important heterogeneity depending on LVEF, with the highest accuracy in patients with LVEF <35%.

Effect of Sex and Flow Status on Outcomes After Surgical or Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Background: Low stroke volume index <35 ml/m2 despite preserved ejection fraction (paradoxical low flow [PLF]) is associated with adverse outcomes in patients with aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) or surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). However, whether the risk associated with PLF is similar in both sexes is unknown. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to analyze the risk associated with PLF in severe aortic stenosis for men and women randomized to TAVR or SAVR. Methods: Patients with ejection fraction ≥50% from the PARTNER (Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves) 2 and 3 trials were stratified by sex and treatment arm. The impact of PLF on the 2-year occurrence of the composite of death or heart failure hospitalization (primary endpoint) and of all-cause mortality alone (secondary endpoint) was analyzed. Analysis of variance was used to assess baseline differences between groups. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to identify predictors of the endpoint. Results: Out of 2,242 patients, PLF was present in 390 men and 239 women (30% vs 26%, P = 0.06). PLF was associated with a higher rate of NYHA functional class III to IV dyspnea (60% vs 54%, P < 0.001) and a higher prevalence of atrial fibrillation (39% vs 24%, P < 0.001). PLF was a significant predictor of the primary endpoint among women undergoing SAVR in multivariate analysis (adjusted HR: 2.25 [95% CI: 1.14-4.43], P = 0.02) but was not associated with a worse outcome in any of the other groups (all P > 0.05). Conclusions: In women with PLF, TAVR may improve outcomes compared to SAVR. PLF appears to have less impact on outcomes in men.

Prosthesis-patient mismatch in transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement.

Prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) occurs when the effective orifice area (EOA) of a normally functioning prosthetic valve is too small in relation to the patient's body size. The effect of PPM on outcomes and valve durability have gained credibility, making this an important possibly preventable risk factor. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) generally has a lower incidence of PPM than surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). Current surgical literature and randomized trials show an association between severe PPM and mortality in patients with SAVR but there is less evidence for an association with TAVR. Differences in the incidence of PPM may be related to the methods and cutoffs for measuring mismatch. This review will discuss the current state of field and propose standardization of measurement methods which may more accurately risk stratify patients.

Prevalence, Characteristics, and Impact on Prognosis of Aortic Stenosis in Patients With Cardiac Amyloidosis.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac amyloidosis (CA) is frequently found in older patients with aortic stenosis (AS). However, the prevalence of AS among patients with CA is unknown. The objective was to study the prevalence and prognostic impact of AS among patients with CA. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of a prospective registry comprising 976 patients with native aortic valves who were confirmed with wild type transthyretin amyloid (ATTRwt), hereditary variant transthyretin amyloid (ATTRv), or immunoglobulin light-chain (AL) CA. CA patients' echocardiograms were re-analyzed focusing on the aortic valve. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was performed to assess the mortality risk associated with moderate or greater AS in ATTRwt CA. The crude prevalence of AS among patients with CA was 26% in ATTRwt, 8% in ATTRv, and 5% in AL. Compared with population-based controls, all types of CA had higher age- and sex-standardized rate ratios (SRRs) of having any degree of AS (AL: SRR, 2.62; 95% Confidence Interval (CI) [1.09-3.64]; ATTRv: SRR, 3.41; 95%CI [1.64-4.60]; ATTRwt: SRR, 10.8; 95%CI [5.25-14.53]). Compared with hospital controls, only ATTRwt had a higher SRR of having any degree of AS (AL: SRR, 0.97, 95%CI [0.56-1.14]; ATTRv: SRR, 1.27; 95%CI [0.85-1.44]; ATTRwt: SRR, 4.01; 95%CI [2.71-4.54]). Among patients with ATTRwt, moderate or greater AS was not associated with increased all-cause death after multivariable adjustment (hazard ratio, 0.71; 95%CI [0.42-1.19]; P=0.19). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with CA, ATTRwt but not ATTRv or AL is associated with a higher prevalence of patients with AS compared with hospital controls without CA, even after adjusting for age and sex. In our population, having moderate or greater AS was not associated with a worse outcome in patients with ATTRwt.

Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement for severe aortic valve stenosis: Meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Randomized controlled trials comparing transcatheter aortic valve implantation with surgical aortic valve replacement demonstrate conflicting evidence, particularly in low-risk patients. We aim to reevaluate the evidence using trial sequential analysis, balancing type I and II errors, and compare with conventional meta-analysis. METHODS: Databases were searched for randomized controlled trials, which were divided into higher-risk and lower-risk randomized controlled trials according to a pragmatic risk classification. Primary outcomes were death and a composite end point of death or disabling stroke assessed at 1 year and maximum follow-up. Conventional meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis were performed, and the required information size was calculated considering a type I error of 5% and a power of 90%. RESULTS: Eight randomized controlled trials (n = 5274 higher-risk and 3661 lower-risk patients) were included. Higher-risk trials showed no significant reduction in death at 1 year with transcatheter aortic valve implantation (relative risk, 0.93, 95% CI, 0.81-1.08, P = .345). Lower-risk trials suggested lower death risk on conventional meta-analysis (relative risk, 0.67, 95% CI, 0.47-0.96, P = .031), but trial sequential analysis indicated potential spurious evidence (P = .116), necessitating more data for conclusive benefit (required information size = 5944 [59.8%]). For death or disabling stroke at 1 year, higher-risk trials lacked evidence (relative risk, 0.90, 95% CI, 0.79-1.02, P = .108). In lower-risk trials, transcatheter aortic valve implantation indicated lower risk in conventional meta-analysis (relative risk, 0.68, 95% CI, 0.50-0.93, P = .014), but trial sequential analysis suggested potential spurious evidence (P = .053), necessitating more data for conclusive benefit (required information size = 5122 [69.4%]). Follow-up results provided inconclusive evidence for both primary outcomes across risk categories. CONCLUSIONS: Conventional meta-analysis methods may have prematurely declared an early reduction of negative outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation when compared with surgical aortic valve replacement.

Integrative genomic analyses identify candidate causal genes for calcific aortic valve stenosis involving tissue-specific regulation.

There is currently no medical therapy to prevent calcific aortic valve stenosis (CAVS). Multi-omics approaches could lead to the identification of novel molecular targets. Here, we perform a genome-wide association study (GWAS) meta-analysis including 14,819 cases among 941,863 participants of European ancestry. We report 32 genomic loci, among which 20 are novel. RNA sequencing of 500 human aortic valves highlights an enrichment in expression regulation at these loci and prioritizes candidate causal genes. Homozygous genotype for a risk variant near TWIST1, a gene involved in endothelial-mesenchymal transition, has a profound impact on aortic valve transcriptomics. We identify five genes outside of GWAS loci by combining a transcriptome-wide association study, colocalization, and Mendelian randomization analyses. Using cross-phenotype and phenome-wide approaches, we highlight the role of circulating lipoproteins, blood pressure and inflammation in the disease process. Our findings pave the way for the development of novel therapies for CAVS.

Impact of Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch After Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Reconstructed Time-to-Event Data of 122 989 Patients With 592 952 Patient-Years.

BACKGROUND: It remains controversial whether prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) impacts long-term outcomes after surgical aortic valve replacement. We aimed to evaluate the association of PPM with mortality, rehospitalizations, and aortic valve reinterventions. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a systematic review with meta-analysis of reconstructed time-to-event data of studies published by March 2023 (according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses). Sixty-five studies met our eligibility criteria and included 122 989 patients (any PPM: 68 332 patients, 55.6%). At 25 years of follow-up, the survival rates were 11.8% and 20.6% in patients with and without any PPM, respectively (hazard ratio [HR], 1.16 [95% CI, 1.13-1.18], P<0.001). At 20 years of follow-up, the survival rates were 19.5%, 12.1%, and 8.8% in patients with no, moderate, and severe PPM, respectively (moderate versus no PPM: HR, 1.09 [95% CI, 1.06-1.11], P<0.001; severe versus no PPM: HR, 1.29 [95% CI, 1.24-1.35], P<0.001). PPM was associated with higher risk of cardiac death, heart failure-related hospitalizations, and aortic valve reinterventions over time (P<0.001). Statistically significant associations between PPM and worse survival were observed regardless of valve type (bioprosthetic versus mechanical valves), contemporary PPM definitions unadjusted and adjusted for body mass index, and PPM quantification method (in vitro, in vivo, Doppler echocardiography). Our meta-regression analysis revealed that populations with more women tend to have higher HRs for all-cause death associated with PPM. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study suggest that any degree of PPM is associated with poorer long-term outcomes following surgical aortic valve replacement and provide support for implementation of preventive strategies to avoid PPM after surgical aortic valve replacement.

Patient-Prosthesis Mismatch After Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: Analysis of the PARTNER Trials.

BACKGROUND: Our objective was to compare the impact of patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM) for 2 years after surgical aortic valve replacement within the prospective, randomized Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves (PARTNER) trials. METHODS: Surgical aortic valve replacement patients from the PARTNER 1, 2, and 3 trials were included. PPM was classified as moderate (indexed effective orifice area ≤0.85 cm2/m2) or severe (indexed effective orifice area ≤0.65 cm2/m2). The primary endpoint was the composite of all-cause death and heart failure rehospitalization at 2 years. RESULTS: By the predicted PPM method (PPMP), 59.1% had no PPM, 38.8% moderate PPM, and 2.1% severe PPM; whereas by the measured PPM method (PPMM), 42.4% had no PPM, 36.0% moderate, and 21.6% severe. Patients with no PPMP (23.6%) had a lower rate of the primary endpoint compared with patients with moderate (28.2%, P = .03) or severe PPMP (38.8%, P = .02). Using the PPMM method, there was no difference between the no (17.7%) and moderate PPMM groups (21.1%) in the primary outcome (P = .16). However, those with no PPMM or moderate PPMM were improved compared with severe PPMM (27.4%, P < .001 and P = .02, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Severe PPM analyzed by PPMP was only 2.1% for surgical aortic valve replacement patients. The PPMM method overestimated the incidence of severe PPM relative to PPMP, but was also associated with worse outcome. There was higher all-cause mortality in patients with severe PPM, thus surgical techniques to minimize PPM remain critical.

Diagnostic accuracy of virtual non-contrast CT for aortic valve stenosis severity evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Computed tomography aortic valve calcium (AVC) score has accepted value for diagnosing and predicting outcomes in aortic stenosis (AS). Multi-energy CT (MECT) allows virtual non-contrast (VNC) reconstructions from contrast scans. We aim to compare the VNC-AVC score to the true non-contrast (TNC)-AVC score for assessing AS severity. METHODS: We prospectively included patients undergoing a MECT for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) planning. TNC-AVC was acquired before contrast, and VNC-AVC was derived from a retrospectively gated contrast-enhanced scan. The Agatston scoring method was used for quantification, and linear regression analysis to derive adjusted-VNC values. RESULTS: Among 109 patients (55% female) included, 43% had concordant severe and 14% concordant moderate AS. TNC scan median dose-length product was 116 â€‹mGy∗cm. The median TNC-AVC was 2,107 AU (1,093-3,372), while VNC-AVC was 1,835 AU (1293-2,972) after applying the coefficient (1.46) and constant (743) terms. A strong correlation was demonstrated between methods (r â€‹= â€‹0.93; p â€‹< â€‹0.001). Using accepted thresholds (>1,300 AU for women and >2,000 AU for men), 65% (n â€‹= â€‹71) of patients had severe AS by TNC-AVC and 67% (n â€‹= â€‹73) by adjusted-VNC-AVC. After estimating thresholds for adjusted-VNC (>1,564 AU for women and >2,375 AU for men), 56% (n â€‹= â€‹61) had severe AS, demonstrating substantial agreement with TNC-AVC (κ â€‹= â€‹0.77). CONCLUSIONS: MECT-derived VNC-AVC showed a strong correlation with TNC-AVC. After adjustment, VNC-AVC demonstrated substantial agreement with TNC-AVC, potentially eliminating the requirement for an additional scan and enabling reductions in both radiation exposure and acquisition time.

Five-Year Outcomes After Bicuspid Aortic Valve Replacement With a Novel Tissue Bioprosthesis.

BACKGROUND: This study investigated the safety and effectiveness of surgical aortic valve replacement with RESILIA tissue (Edwards Lifesciences) through 5 years in patients with native bicuspid aortic valves. Outcomes were compared with those for patients with tricuspid aortic valves. METHODS: Of 689 patients from the COMMENCE (ProspeCtive, nOn-randoMized, MulticENter) trial who received the study valve, 645 had documented native valve morphology and core laboratory-evaluable echocardiograms from any postoperative visit, which were used to model hemodynamic outcomes over 5 years. Linear mixed-effects models were used to estimate longitudinal changes in mean gradient and effective orifice area. RESULTS: Patients with native bicuspid aortic valves (n = 214) were more than a decade younger than those with tricuspid aortic valves (n = 458; 59.8 ± 12.4 years vs 70.2 ± 9.5 years; P < .001). The bicuspid aortic valve cohort exhibited no structural valve deterioration over 5 years, and rates of paravalvular leak and transvalvular regurgitation were low (0.7% and 2.9%, respectively [all mild] at 5 years). These outcomes mirrored those in patients with native tricuspid aortic valves. The model-estimated postoperative mean gradient and effective orifice area, as well as the rate of change of these outcomes, adjusted for age, body surface area, and bioprosthesis size, did not differ between the 2 cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with bicuspid aortic valves, RESILIA tissue valves demonstrated excellent outcomes to 5 years, including no structural valve deterioration and very low rates of paravalvular and transvalvular regurgitation. These results are encouraging for RESILIA tissue durability in young patients.

Seven-year outcomes following aortic valve replacement with a novel tissue bioprosthesis.

OBJECTIVE: As bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement (AVR) extends to younger cohorts, tissue durability is of paramount importance. We report 7-year outcomes from an AVR bioprosthesis utilizing novel tissue. METHODS: This was an international investigational device exemption trial for novel AVR with annual follow-up and a subset re-consented at 5 years for extended 10-year follow-up. Safety end points and echocardiographic measurements were adjudicated by an independent clinical events committee and by a dedicated core laboratory, respectively. RESULTS: Between January 2013 and March 2016, 689 patients underwent AVR with the study valve. Mean age was 66.9 ± 11.6 years, Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk score was 2.0% ± 1.8%, and 74.3% of patients were New York Heart Association functional class II and III. Five-year follow-up was completed by 512 patients, and 225 re-consented for extended follow-up. Follow-up duration was 5.3 ± 2.2 years (3665.6 patient-years), and 194 and 195 patients completed 6- and 7-year follow-ups, respectively. One-, 5-, and 7-year freedom from all-cause mortality was 97.7%, 89.4%, and 85.4%, respectively. Freedom from structural valve deterioration at 7 years was 99.3%. At 7 years, effective orifice area and mean gradients were 1.82 ± 0.57 cm2 (n = 153), and 9.4 ± 4.5 mm Hg (n = 157), respectively. At 7 years, predominantly none (96.8% [152 out of 157]) or trivial/trace (2.5% [4 out of 157]) paravalvular regurgitation and none (84.7% [133 out of 157]) or trivial/trace (11.5% [18 out of 157]) transvalvular regurgitation were observed. CONCLUSIONS: We report the longest surgical AVR follow-up with novel tissue in an investigational device exemption trial utilizing an independent clinical events committee and an echocardiography core laboratory. This tissue demonstrates excellent outcomes through 7 years and is the benchmark for future surgical and transcatheter prostheses.

Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients at Five Years.

BACKGROUND: A previous analysis in this trial showed that among patients with severe, symptomatic aortic stenosis who were at low surgical risk, the rate of the composite end point of death, stroke, or rehospitalization at 1 year was significantly lower with transcatheter aortic-valve replacement (TAVR) than with surgical aortic-valve replacement. Longer-term outcomes are unknown. METHODS: We randomly assigned patients with severe, symptomatic aortic stenosis and low surgical risk to undergo either TAVR or surgery. The first primary end point was a composite of death, stroke, or rehospitalization related to the valve, the procedure, or heart failure. The second primary end point was a hierarchical composite that included death, disabling stroke, nondisabling stroke, and the number of rehospitalization days, analyzed with the use of a win ratio analysis. Clinical, echocardiographic, and health-status outcomes were assessed through 5 years. RESULTS: A total of 1000 patients underwent randomization: 503 patients were assigned to undergo TAVR, and 497 to undergo surgery. A component of the first primary end point occurred in 111 of 496 patients in the TAVR group and in 117 of 454 patients in the surgery group (Kaplan-Meier estimates, 22.8% in the TAVR group and 27.2% in the surgery group; difference, -4.3 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -9.9 to 1.3; P = 0.07). The win ratio for the second primary end point was 1.17 (95% CI, 0.90 to 1.51; P = 0.25). The Kaplan-Meier estimates for the components of the first primary end point were as follows: death, 10.0% in the TAVR group and 8.2% in the surgery group; stroke, 5.8% and 6.4%, respectively; and rehospitalization, 13.7% and 17.4%. The hemodynamic performance of the valve, assessed according to the mean (±SD) valve gradient, was 12.8±6.5 mm Hg in the TAVR group and 11.7±5.6 mm Hg in the surgery group. Bioprosthetic-valve failure occurred in 3.3% of the patients in the TAVR group and in 3.8% of those in the surgery group. CONCLUSIONS: Among low-risk patients with severe, symptomatic aortic stenosis who underwent TAVR or surgery, there was no significant between-group difference in the two primary composite outcomes. (Funded by Edwards Lifesciences; PARTNER 3 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02675114.).

ACC/AHA and ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the Management of Valvular Heart Diseases: JACC Guideline Comparison.

Valvular heart disease (VHD) is common and poses important challenges from the standpoints of diagnosis and therapeutic management. Clinical practice guidelines have been developed to help health care professionals to overcome these challenges and provide optimal management to patients with VHD. The American College of Cardiology, in collaboration with the American Heart Association, and the European Society of Cardiology, in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, recently updated their guidelines on the management of VHD. Although these 2 sets of guidelines are generally concordant, there are some substantial differences between these guidelines, which may have significant implications for clinical practice. This review prepared on behalf of the EuroValve Consortium describes the consistencies and discrepancies between the guidelines and highlights the gaps in these guidelines and the future research perspectives to fill these gaps.

Mid-term clinical and echocardiographic results of the INSPIRIS RESILIA aortic valve: a retrospective comparison to the Magna Ease.

OBJECTIVES: The INSPIRIS aortic valve combines the RESILIA proprietary tissue preservation process and an expandable stent frame to benefit future transcatheter valve-in-valve procedures. As the INSPIRIS valve became commercially available in 2017, mid-term outcome reports are scarce. We aimed to evaluate mid-term safety and echocardiographic performance of the INSPIRIS valve in comparison to its predecessor, the Carpentier Edwards Perimount Magna Ease (ME). METHODS: This study was a retrospective single-centre study. Clinical results included early postoperative outcomes, mid-term mortality and readmission for cardiovascular cause or stroke. Echocardiographic follow-up (FU) was performed at discharge and 1-3, 6, 12 and 24 months. Clinical end point analyses were accomplished with a propensity score matching analysis and FU echocardiographic data comparisons using pairwise analyses and linear mixed-effect models. RESULTS: We included 953 patients who received an INSPIRIS (n = 488) or ME (n = 463) bioprosthesis between January 2018 and July 2021. In the matched population (n = 217 per group), no significant difference in short-term outcomes was observed, survival was similar at 30 months (INSPIRIS: 94% vs ME: 91%, P = 0.89), but freedom from readmission was higher in the INSPIRIS group (94% vs 86%, P = 0.014). INSPIRIS valves had a lower gradient at discharge (∼10 vs 14 mmHg, P < 0.001), 1-3 months (∼10 vs 12 mmHg, P < 0.001) and 24 months (∼11 vs 17 mmHg, P < 0.001) in paired analyses and significantly lower evolution of mean transvalvular gradients compared to ME. CONCLUSIONS: This study represents the largest comparative evaluation of the INSPIRIS to the ME valves, which demonstrated safe clinical outcomes and favourable haemodynamic performance at 2 years. Long-term FU is underway.