An Anatomical Method for Rib Disconnection During Posterior Costotransversectomy for Paravertebral Access to the Ventral Thoracic Spine.

OBJECTIVE: Posterior costotransversectomy in the thoracic spine is commonly used for degenerative diseases, tumors, trauma, and other operative indications. It involves resection of the rib head after the ligamentous complexes have been disconnected from the transverse process and lateral vertebral body. The current literature provides only vague descriptions of the steps involved in rib disconnection with respect to posterior costotransversectomy. METHODS AND RESULTS: Through cadaveric studies and in vivo application, a stepwise method for rib disconnection is described. CONCLUSIONS: This manuscript is the first to outline an anatomical method for rib disconnection during costotransversectomy.

Total Anterior Uncinatectomy During Anterior Discectomy and Fusion for Recurrent Cervical Radiculopathy: A Two-dimensional Operative Video and Technical Report.

A common cause of cervical radiculopathy from degenerative foraminal stenosis is severe uncovertebral hypertrophy. It is difficult to accomplish complete foraminal decompression in these cases with posterior techniques without the removal of a large portion of the facet joint. Total removal of the uncovertebral joint from an anterior approach allows for complete decompression of the exiting cervical nerve root and has been shown to be a safe technique. In this surgical video and technical report, we demonstrate the surgical anatomy and operative technique of a two-level anterior uncinatectomy during anterior discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for recurrent cervical radiculopathy after a previous multi-level posterior foraminotomy. The patient is a 67-year-old male with a progressive left arm and neck pain with radiographic, clinical, and electrophysiologic diagnostic evidence of active C6 and C7 radiculopathies from degenerative foraminal stenosis at the C5-6 and C6-7 levels. Posterior foraminotomies had been performed without significant improvement in his radicular pain. A repeat MRI demonstrated lateral foraminal stenosis from severe uncovertebral joint hypertrophy at the C5-6 and C6-7 levels. After acquiring informed consent from the patient, an anterior approach was performed with complete removal of the uncovertebral joints at both levels with discectomy and fusion. Postoperatively, the patient had complete resolution of his radicular pain and remained pain-free at the latest follow-up. Complete uncinatectomy and ACDF is an effective technique for complete foraminal decompression in cases of refractory radiculopathy and neck pain after unsuccessful posterior decompression.

The SpineBox: A Freely Available, Open-access, 3D-printed Simulator Design for Lumbar Pedicle Screw Placement.

Background The recent COVID-19 pandemic has demonstrated the need for innovation in cost-effective and easily produced surgical simulations for trainee education that are not limited by physical confines of location. This can be accomplished with the use of desktop three-dimensional (3D) printing technology. This study describes the creation of a low-cost and open-access simulation for anatomical learning and pedicle screw placement in the lumbar spine, which is termed the SpineBox. Materials and methods An anonymized CT scan of the lumbar spine was obtained and converted into 3D software files of the L1-L5 vertebral bodies. A computer-assisted design (CAD) software was used to assemble the vertebral models into a simulator unit in anatomical order to produce an easily prototyped simulator. The printed simulator was layered with foam in order to replicate soft tissue structures. The models were instrumented with pedicle screws using standard operative technique and examined under fluoroscopy. Results Ten SpineBoxes were created using a single desktop 3D printer, with accurate replication of the cortico-cancellous interface using previously validated techniques. The models were able to be instrumented with pedicle screws successfully and demonstrated quality representation of bony structures under fluoroscopy. The total cost of model production was under $10. Conclusion The SpineBox represents the first open-access simulator for the instruction of spinal anatomy and pedicle screw placement. This study aims to provide institutions across the world with an economical and feasible means of spine surgical simulation for neurosurgical trainees and to encourage other rapid prototyping laboratories to investigate innovative means of creating educational surgical platforms in the modern era.

Ex vivo virtual and 3D printing methods for evaluating an anatomy-based spinal instrumentation technique for the 12th thoracic vertebra.

INTRODUCTION: Three-dimensional printing and virtual simulation both provide useful methods of patient-specific anatomical modeling for assessing and validating surgical techniques. A combination of these two methods for evaluating the feasibility of spinal instrumentation techniques based on anatomical landmarks has not previously been investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nineteen anonymized CT scans of the thoracic spine in adult patients were acquired. Maximum pedicle width and height were recorded, and statistical analysis demonstrated normal distributions. The images were converted into standard tessellation language (STL) files, and the T12 vertebrae were anatomically segmented. The intersection of two diagonal lines drawn from the lateral and medial borders of the T12 transverse process (TP) to the lateral border of the pars and inferolateral portion of the TP was identified on both sides of each segmented vertebra. A virtual screw was created and insertion into the pedicle on each side was simulated using the proposed landmarks. The vertebral STL files were then 3D-printed, and 38 pedicles were instrumented according to the individual posterior landmarks used in the virtual investigation. RESULTS: There were no pedicle breaches using the proposed anatomical landmarks for insertion of T12 pedicle screws in the virtual simulation component. The technique was further validated by additive manufacturing of individual T12 vertebrae and demonstrated no breaches or model failures during live instrumentation using the proposed landmarks. CONCLUSIONS: Ex vivo modeling through virtual simulation and 3D printing provides a powerful and cost-effective means of replicating vital anatomical structures for investigation of complex surgical techniques.

The importance of teaching clinical anatomy in surgical skills education: Spare the patient, use a sim!

Anatomical knowledge is a key tenet in graduate medical and surgical education. Classically, these principles are taught in the operating room during live surgical experience. This puts both the learner and the patient at a disadvantage due to environment, time, and safety constraints. Educational adjuncts such as cadaveric courses and surgical skills didactics have been shown to improve resident confidence and proficiency in both anatomical knowledge and surgical techniques. However, the cost-effectiveness of these courses is a limiting factor and in many cases prevents implementation within institutional training programs. Anatomical simulation in the form of "desktop" three-dimensional (3D) printing provides a cost-effective adjunct while maintaining educational value. This article describes the anatomical and patient-centered approach that led to the establishment of our institution's 3D printing laboratory for anatomical and procedural education. Clin. Anat. 32:124-127, 2019. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Freehand C2 Pedicle Screw Placement: Surgical Anatomy and Operative Technique.

We present a surgical video demonstrating the anatomy and technique of freehand C2 pedicle screw placement using a cadaveric specimen and 3-dimensional simulation software. C2 pedicle screws have been shown to augment cervical constructs and provide increased biomechanical stability compared with pars screws due to the increased length and bony purchase of pedicle screws within the pedicle and vertebral body.1 The presence of vertebral artery variations within the transverse foramen may preclude pedicle screw placement, and these should be identified on preoperative imaging. The C2 pedicle can be directly palpated at the time of screw placement, which aids screw placement in cases of deformity or trauma. A freehand technique without the use of computed tomography scan guidance or intraoperative fluoroscopy decreases radiation exposure for the operator and patient and has been shown to be safe for patient-related outcomes.2-5 Complete exposure of the C2 posterior elements is key to identifying the pedicle. The trajectory is based on direct visualization of the medial and superior pedicle borders to avoid lateral or inferior breaches into the transverse foramen. A curved probe is used for access into the vertebral body, respecting the outer cortical walls of the pedicle. The intraosseous position is confirmed with a ball-tipped probe. Fluoroscopy should be performed after screw placement to confirm proper position. By accomplishing proper exposure and understanding the anatomy of the C2 pedicle, the placement of C2 pedicle screws using a freehand technique is a safe and efficient technique for high cervical fixation.

Prospective Evaluation of Radiculitis following Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 Use for Transforaminal Interbody Arthrodesis in Spine Surgery.

Study Design: Prospective observational cohort study. Purpose: This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) with regard to postoperative radiculitis. Overview of Literature: Bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) is being used increasingly as an alternative to iliac crest autograft in spinal arthrodesis. Recently, the use of BMP in TLIF has been examined, but concerns exist that the placement of BMP close to the nerve roots may cause postoperative radiculitis. Furthermore, prospective studies regarding the use of BMP in TLIF are lacking. Methods: This prospective study included 77 patients. The use of BMP-2 was determined individually, and demographic and operative characteristics were recorded. Leg pain was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain and the Sciatica Bothersome Index (SBI) with several secondary outcome measures. The outcome data were collected at each follow-up visit. Results: Among the 77 patients, 29 were administered with BMP. Postoperative leg pain significantly improved according to VAS leg and SBI scores for the entire cohort, and no clinically significant differences were observed between the BMP and control groups. The VAS back, Oswestry Disability Index, and Short-Form 36 scores also significantly improved. A significantly increased 6-month fusion rate was noted in the BMP group (82.8% vs. 55.3%), but no significant differences in fusion rate were observed at the 12- and 24-month follow-up. Heterotopic ossification was observed in seven patients: six patients and one patient in the BMP and control groups, respectively (20.7% vs. 2.1%). However, no clinical effect was observed. Conclusions: In this prospective observational trial, the use of BMP in TLIF did not lead to significant postoperative radiculitis, as measured by VAS leg and SBI scores. Back pain and other functional outcome scores also improved, and no differences existed between the BMP and control groups. The careful use of BMP in TLIF appears to be both safe and effective.

Prognostic factors and survival in low grade gliomas of the spinal cord: A population-based analysis from 2006 to 2012.

PURPOSE: Primary spinal cord tumors are rare, and evidence-based management of these patients remains a source of controversy. This study used a large cohort of low-grade spinal cord astrocytomas to determine the effectiveness of prognostic factors and survival. METHODS: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) cancer registry was used to identify patients with WHO grade I-II primary spinal cord astrocytomas from 1973 to 2012; however, patients before 2006 were excluded due to ambiguity diagnosis. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were created to compare survival across covariates and summarized using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: A total of 561 patients with low-grade glioma (astrocytoma) were identified. Among these, 15.5% of patients received a gross total resection (GTR), 26.1% subtotal resection (STR), and 46.2% unidentified extent of resection. 59.4% did not receive any radiation therapy at any point of the treatment course, while 40.6% underwent radiation therapy. In our cohort, only patients with GTR demonstrated statistically improved survival (HR: 0.22, P < 0.001). Patients with STR had nearly identical survival compared to patients with no surgery (HR: 0.98), and radiotherapy was associated with increased odds of mortality (HR: 1.47, P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated a significant survival benefit among patients with younger age, GTR and absence of radiotherapy. Histologic grade did not statistically impact survival. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that GTR results in improved survival among patients with low-grade gliomas within the spinal cord. Future, considerable data research efforts will aim to better define the role of radiotherapy and tumor grading in this patient population.

Challenges of Managing Patients with Symptomatic Large Traumatic Cervical Pseudomeningoceles.

BACKGROUND: Traumatic cervical pseudomeningoceles (TCPs) occur secondary to traction of the cervical nerve roots resulting in violation of the dura. Surgical repair is not necessary in most cases because pseudomeningoceles have a high propensity to spontaneously resolve with conservative management alone. Currently, there are a limited number of cases of large TCPs (large is defined as ≥6 cm in greatest diameter), and there is no established guideline for the management of such lesions. CASE DESCRIPTION: We describe the cases of 2 young men in their 20s who were involved in a motor vehicle accident. Both patients suffered a brachial plexus injury and developed large TCPs. Patient 1 was treated surgically for TCP using a combined intra-/extradural approach using a fascia lata graft. Patient 2 was ultimately treated nonsurgically because a spontaneous resolution of the pseudomeningocele was achieved over the period of 7 months after the accident. Both patients underwent brachial plexus repair surgery consisting of spinal accessory nerve transfer to the suprascapular nerve and intercostal nerve transfer to the musculocutaneous nerve. CONCLUSIONS: Disease progression of TCPs is a dynamic process, and even large lesions may spontaneously resolve without surgical intervention. When surgery is indicated, a definitive dural repair using a fascia lata graft to cover the dural tear intra- and extradurally is an effective method. Surgery must be planned carefully on a case-by-case basis, and close follow-up with thorough physical examination and serial imaging is critical to monitor disease progression.

Total lumbar facetectomy without fusion: short and long term follow-up in a single surgeon series.

BACKGROUND: Total lumbar facetectomy may be advantageous for exposure or to completely free a constricted nerve root. OBJECTIVE: We retrospectively reviewed a single surgeon series without fusion for short and long term outcomes regarding radicular pain relief, subsequent relevant surgeries, and any identifiable instability. METHODS: All operations in which a single, total lumbar facetectomy was performed were reviewed. A total of 222 patients were identified with a minimal follow-up of 3 months; 187 (84.2%) were available for long term follow-up ≥1 year by continued accessible health care records, correspondence, or mailed questionnaire. RESULTS: Short term success (3-month follow-up) for radicular pain relief in 222 patients found the following results: 176 patients (79.3%) had no pain or minimal pain, and 16 patients (7.2%) were improved, and thus resulting in 192 (86.5%) with no pain, or improved radicular pain. 30 patients (13.5%) were postoperative failures at 3 months. Long term follow-up ≥1 year was available for 187 patients (84.2%); (range 1-17 years; mean 7 years); found the following results: 23/30 (76.6%) short term surgical failures remained failures in long term follow-up with (7 patients) or without (16 patients) further surgery of any kind; 13/16 improved patients at long term follow-up remained improved (6), were pain free (6), or worse (1); 19/151 no or minimal pain patients at long term follow-up recurred or worsened by 1 year or longer, 12/19 pursued a second surgery with (9) or without (4) fusion and many improved. A total of 13 patients had a subsequent fusion operation (6.95%). DISCUSSION: Most patients do well in the short term for radicular pain relief. Most patients continue to do well in long term follow-up. Surgically induced clinical instability is uncommon in this highly selected series.

Radiographic comparison of cross-sectional lumbar pedicle fill when placing screws with navigation versus free-hand technique.

BACKGROUND: Pedicle screws are often used for spinal fixation. Increasing the percentage of pedicle that is filled with the screw presumably yields greater fixation. It has not been shown whether spinal navigation helps surgeons more completely fill their instrumented pedicles. METHODS: Fifty consecutive patients from each arm (navigated and free-hand) were retrospectively reviewed. The cross-sectional area of each instrumented lumbar pedicle and screw were measured using an automatic area calculation tool. The coronal images and measurements were blinded to the surgeons. RESULTS: The instrumented pedicles in the navigated patients were significantly more filled by screws than the pedicles in the non-navigated patients (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Obtaining a higher cross-sectional percentage fill of the pedicle with a screw is expected to provide greater spinal fixation in instrumented fusion surgery. This study shows that utilizing spinal navigation helps to more completely fill the pedicles that are being instrumented. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Migration to the ICD-10 coding system: A primer for spine surgeons (Part 1).

BACKGROUND: On 1 October 2015, a new federally mandated system goes into effect requiring the replacement of the International Classification of Disease-version 9-Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) with ICD-10-CM. These codes are required to be used for reimbursement and to substantiate medical necessity. ICD-10 is composite with as many as 141,000 codes, an increase of 712% when compared to ICD-9. METHODS: Execution of the ICD-10 system will require significant changes in the clinical administrative and hospital-based practices. Through the transition, diminished productivity and practice revenue can be anticipated, the impacts of which the spine surgeon can minimizeby appropriate education and planning. RESULTS: The advantages of the new system include increased clarity and more accurate definitions reflecting patient condition, information relevant to ambulatory and managed care encounters, expanded injury codes, laterality, specificity, precise data for safety and compliance reporting, data mining for research, and finally, enabling pay-for-performance programs. The disadvantages include the cost per physician, training administrative staff, revenue loss during the learning curve, confusion, the need to upgrade hardware along with software, and overall expense to the healthcare system. CONCLUSIONS: With the deadline rapidly approaching, gaps in implementation result in delayed billing, delayed or diminished reimbursements, and absence of quality and outcomes data. It is thereby essential for spine surgeons to understand their role in transitioning to this new environment. Part I of this article discusses the background, coding changes, and costs as well as reviews the salient features of ICD-10 in spine surgery.

Implementation and impact of ICD-10 (Part II).

BACKGROUND: The transition from the International Classification of Disease-9(th) clinical modification to the new ICD-10 was all set to occur on 1 October 2015. The American Medical Association has previously been successful in delaying the transition by over 10 years and has been able to further postpone its introduction to 2015. The new system will overcome many of the limitations present in the older version, thus paving the way to more accurate capture of clinical information. METHODS: The benefits of the new ICD-10 system include improved quality of care, potential cost savings, reduction of unpaid claims, and improved tracking of healthcare data. The areas where challenges will be evident include planning and implementation, the cost to transition, a shortage of qualified coders, training and education of the healthcare workforce, and a loss of productivity when this occurs. The impacts include substantial costs to the healthcare system, but the projected long-term savings and benefits will be significant. Improved fraud detection, accurate data entry, ability to analyze cost benefits with procedures, and enhanced quality outcome measures are the most significant beneficial factors with this change. RESULTS: The present Current Procedural Terminology and Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System code sets will be used for reporting ambulatory procedures in the same manner as they have been. ICD-10-PCS will replace ICD-9 procedure codes for inpatient hospital services. The ICD-10-CM will replace the clinical code sets. Our article will focus on the challenges to execution of an ICD change and strategies to minimize risk while transitioning to the new system. CONCLUSION: With the implementation deadline gradually approaching, spine surgery practices that include multidisciplinary health specialists have to anticipate and prepare for the ICD change in order to mitigate risk. Education and communication is the key to this process in spine practices.

Intraoperative image-guided spinal navigation: technical pitfalls and their avoidance.

Spinal instrumentation has made significant advances in the last two decades, with transpedicular constructs now widely used in spinal fixation. Pedicle screw constructs are routinely used in thoracolumbar-instrumented fusions, and in recent years, the cervical spine as well. Three-column fixations with pedicle screws provide the most rigid form of posterior stabilization. Surgical landmarks and fluoroscopy have been used routinely for pedicle screw insertion, but a number of studies reveal inaccuracies in placement using these conventional techniques (ranging from 10% to 50%). The ability to combine 3D imaging with intraoperative navigation systems has improved the accuracy and safety of pedicle screw placement, especially in more complex spinal deformities. However, in the authors' experience with image guidance in more than 1500 cases, several potential pitfalls have been identified while using intraoperative spinal navigation that could lead to suboptimal results. This article summarizes the authors' experience with these various pitfalls using spinal navigation, and gives practical tips on their avoidance and management.

L5-S1 extraforaminal intraneural disc herniation mimicking a malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: An extraforaminal disc herniation may present as a retroperitoneal mass and is thus a differential diagnosis for a malignant lesion. PURPOSE: To highlight the difficulty in the accurate preoperative differentiation between an extraforaminal disc herniation and a malignant retroperitoneal mass despite the use of advanced anatomical and metabolic imaging. STUDY DESIGN: Case report. METHODS: The authors present a case of a 55-year-old man, with a family history of neurofibromatosis, who presented to us 2 months after the insidious occurrence of severe, unrelenting, right-sided, L5 dermatomal pain. He subsequently developed rapidly progressive motor weakness in the same myotome, which caused a foot drop. On examination, his straight-leg raise test was normal. Magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated a peripherally enhancing, complex, cystic mass continuous with the L5 nerve, displacing its fascicles medially, as it descended over the right sacral ala. A positron emission tomography scan demonstrated increased radiotracer uptake. The clinicoradiologic presentation was that of a malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor. RESULTS: At surgery, an intraneural disc herniation was seen. CONCLUSIONS: Several pitfalls exist in establishing the uncommon diagnosis of an extraforaminal disc herniation. This entity occurs ventrally and must remain a consideration when elaborating the differential diagnosis of a retroperitoneal mass in close proximity to the vertebral column.

Synovial sarcoma of the spine: A report of three cases and review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Synovial sarcoma (SS) is a rare sarcoma with distinct morphologic and genetic features, which, despite its name, does not arise from synovium. While most SSs (>80%) arise in the deep soft tissue of the extremities, up to 5% of these tumors are encountered in the body axis including the spine, mediastinum, retroperitoneum, and head/neck regions. Reports of SS located within the spinal axis have been rare to date. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched the medical records at our institution and found three patients who were diagnosed and treated for SSs involving the spine. We also performed an exhaustive literature search using PubMed to identify all reported cases in the literature. RESULTS: In this study, we report on three SS cases involving the spine. All three cases involved the paraspinal muscles and spinal nerve roots, with one case having a significant leptomeningeal involvement. In two cases, "smaller operations" were performed first because the lesions were thought to be benign, however, when the final pathology identified them as SSs, more radical procedures were performed. Additionally, we identified 14 cases of SSs involving the spine published in the literature and all cases are reviewed here. CONCLUSIONS: Due to limited numbers of cases, spine SS long-term outcomes are hard to quantify. The currently accepted standard of treatment for SSs starts with wide surgical excision with negative margins followed by chemotherapy and radiation. We summarize the available literature on spinal SSs and review the current treatment options available for these tumors.

Rheumatoid arthritis of the craniovertebral junction.

BACKGROUND: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is the most common inflammatory disease involving the spine. It has a predilection for involving the craniocervical spine. Despite widespread involvement of the cervical spine with RA, few patients need surgery. The 3 major spinal manifestations of RA in the cervical spine are basilar invagination, atlantoaxial instability, and subaxial subluxations. Surgical management of RA involving the craniovertebral junction remains a challenge despite a decline in severe cases and an improvement in surgical techniques. METHODS: We conducted an exhaustive review of English-language publications discussing RA involving the craniovertebral junction. We paid special attention to publications detailing modern surgical management of these conditions. In addition, we outline our own surgical experience with such patients. RESULTS: We discuss alternative surgical methods for treating basilar invagination, atlantoaxial instability, and concurrent subaxial subluxations. We detail our surgical technique for transoral odontoidectomy, occipital cervical fusion, and atlantoaxial fusion. We detail the use of spinal surgical navigation in both of these procedures. CONCLUSION: Surgical management of RA remains a challenging field. There clearly has been a decrease in cases of mutilating RA involving the craniovertebral junction. Surgical techniques for managing these conditions have steadily improved.

Can posterior-only surgery provide similar radiographic and clinical results as combined anterior (thoracotomy/thoracoabdominal)/posterior approaches for adult scoliosis?

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective matched cohort analysis. OBJECTIVE: To determine if posterior-only (post-only) surgical techniques consisting of pedicle screws, osteotomies, transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, and bone morphogenetic protein-2 may provide similar results as compared anterior (thoracotomy/thoracoabdominal)/posterior surgical approaches for the treatment of adult spinal deformity with respect to correction, fusion rates, or outcomes. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Combined anterior/posterior (A/P) fusion has traditionally been used to treat many adult scoliosis deformities. Anterior approaches negatively impact pulmonary function and require additional operative time and anesthesia. METHODS: Twenty-four patients who had A/P fusion for primary adult scoliosis (16 staged, 8 same-day) were matched with a cohort of 24 patients who had post-only treatment. Anterior fusion was performed via a thoracotomy (n = 1)/thoracoabdominal (n = 23) approach. All post-only surgeries were under one anesthesia. Minimum 2-year follow-up included radiographic, clinical, and outcomes data. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between groups for age, gender, diagnosis, comorbidities, preoperative curve magnitudes, or global balance. Postoperative radiographic correction and alignment were similar for both groups except for thoracolumbar curve percent improvement which was statistically better in the post-only group (P = 0.03). The average surgical time was higher in A/P versus post-only group (11.6 vs. 6.9 hours, P < 0.0001) as was total estimated blood loss (1330 vs. 980 mL, P = 0.04). Hospital length of stay (LOS) was longer in A/P versus post-only group (11.9 vs. 8.3 days, P = 0.03). There were no significant differences between postoperative complications. Revision surgery was performed in 5 A/P and 2 post-only patients. Higher pseudarthrosis rates found in the A/P versus post-only (17 vs. 0%) were not significant (P = 0.11). SRS-30 and Oswestry scores reflected a similar patient assessment before surgery, and improvement between groups at follow-up. CONCLUSION: Post-only adult scoliosis surgery achieved similar correction to A/P surgery while decreasing blood loss, operative time, length of stay, and avoiding additional anesthesia. Complications, radiographic, and clinical outcomes were similar at over 2-year follow-up.

Revision rates following primary adult spinal deformity surgery: six hundred forty-three consecutive patients followed-up to twenty-two years postoperative.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the prevalence of and reasons for unanticipated revision surgery in an adult spinal deformity population treated at one institution. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: No recent studies exist that analyze the rate or reason for unanticipated revision surgery for adult spinal deformity patients over a long period. METHODS: All patients presenting for primary instrumented spinal fusion with a diagnosis of adult deformity at a single institution from 1985 to 2008 were reviewed using a prospectively acquired database. All surgical patients with instrumented fusion of > or =5 levels using hooks, hybrid, or screw-only constructs were identified. Patient charts and radiographs were reviewed to provide information as to the indication for initial and any subsequent reoperation. A total of 643 patients underwent primary instrumented fusion for a diagnosis of adult idiopathic scoliosis (n = 432), de novo degenerative scoliosis (n = 104), adult kyphotic disease (n = 63), or neuromuscular scoliosis (n = 45). The mean age was 37.9 years (range, 18-84). Mean follow-up for the entire cohort was 4.7 years, and 8.2 years for the subset of the cohort requiring reoperation (range, 1 month-22.3 years). RESULTS: A total of 58 of 643 patients (9.0%) underwent at least one revision surgery and 15 of 643 (2.3%) had more than one revision (mean 1.3; range, 1-3). The mean time to the first revision was 4.0 years (range, 1 week-19.7 years). The most common reasons for revision were pseudarthrosis (24/643 = 3.7%; 24/58 = 41.4%), curve progression (13/643 = 2.0%; 13/58 = 20.7%), infection (9/643 = 1.4%; 9/58 = 15.5%), and painful/prominent implants (4/643 = 0.6%; 4/58 = 6.9%). Uncommon reasons consisted of adjacent segment degeneration (3), implant failure (3), neurologic deficit (1), and coronal imbalance (1). Revision rates over the follow-up period were: 0 to 2 years (26/58 = 44.8%), 2 to 5 years (17/58 = 29.3%), 5 to 10 years (7/58 = 12.1%), >10 years (8/58 = 13.8%). CONCLUSION: Repeat surgical intervention following definitive spinal instrumented fusion for primary adult deformity performed at a single institution demonstrated a relatively low rate of 9.0%. The most common reasons for revision were predictable and included pseudarthrosis, proximal or distal curve progression, and infection.