Relationship among circulating tumor cells, CEA and overall survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: We previously reported results of a prospective trial evaluating the significance of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). This secondary analysis assessed the relationship of the CTC number with carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and overall survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with mCRC had CTCs measured at baseline and specific time points after the initiation of new therapy. Patients with a baseline CEA value ≥ 10 ng/ml and CEA measurements within ± 30 days of the CTC collection were included. RESULTS: We included 217 patients with mCRC who had a CEA value of ≥ 10 ng/ml. Increased baseline CEA was associated with shorter survival (15.8 versus 20.7 months, P = 0.012). Among all patients with a baseline CEA value of ≥ 25 ng/ml, patients with low baseline CTCs (<3, n = 99) had longer survival than those with high CTCs (≥ 3, n = 58; 20.8 versus 11.7 months, P = 0.001). CTCs added prognostic information at the 3-5- and 6-12-week time points regardless of CEA. In a multivariate analysis, CTCs at baseline but not CEA independently predicted survival and both CTCs and CEA independently predicted survival at 6-12 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that both CEA and CTCs contribute prognostic information for patients with mCRC.

A USA registry of gastrointestinal stromal tumor patients: changes in practice over time and differences between community and academic practices.

BACKGROUND: The objective of the study was to describe patterns of care of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) in the United States in the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) era. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From November 2004 through March 2009, data were collected regarding demographics, diagnostic history, treatment, relapse, and survival of 882 patients with GIST from 122 community and academic medical practices. RESULTS: The most common first-line treatment for the 719 patients presenting with localized GIST was surgery (87%). Use of adjuvant imatinib increased after June 2007; 47% of patients enrolled in the registry considered by the investigator to be at high risk for recurrence received adjuvant imatinib after June 2007 versus 18% before. Overall, 56% of patients received imatinib and 11% received sunitinib. The utilization of targeted therapy increased over time (45% and 0.4% of patients received imatinib and sunitinib, respectively, in 2006 versus 56% and 11%, respectively, in 2009). CONCLUSIONS: These are the first GIST registry data from the TKI era. The use of targeted therapy for GIST has increased in accordance with updated treatment guidelines. Diagnosis of GIST has evolved with increased use of KIT testing. The duration of targeted therapy in the adjuvant therapy setting is similar in community and academic practices.

Prognostic significance of circulating tumor cells in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: We demonstrated that circulating tumor cell (CTC) number at baseline and follow-up is an independent prognostic factor in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). This analysis was undertaken to explore whether patient and treatment characteristics impact the prognostic value of CTCs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: CTCs were enumerated with immunomagnetic separation from the blood of 430 patients with mCRC at baseline and on therapy. Patients were stratified into unfavorable and favorable prognostic groups based on CTC levels of > or = 3 or <3 CTCs/7.5 ml, respectively. Subgroups were analyzed by line of treatment, liver involvement, receipt of oxaliplatin, irinotecan, or bevacizumab, age, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS). RESULTS: Seventy-one percent of deaths have occurred. Median follow-up for living patients is 25.8 months. For all patients, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for unfavorable compared with favorable baseline CTCs is shorter (4.4 versus 7.8 m, P = 0.004 for PFS; 9.4 versus 20.6 m, P < 0.0001 for OS). In all patient subgroups, unfavorable baseline CTC was associated with inferior OS (P < 0.001). In patients receiving first- or second-line therapy (P = 0.003), irinotecan (P = 0.0001), having liver involvement (P = 0.002), >/=65 years (P = 0.0007), and ECOG PS of zero (P = 0.04), unfavorable baseline CTC was associated with inferior PFS. CONCLUSION: Baseline CTC count is an important prognostic factor within specific subgroups defined by treatment or patient characteristics.

A phase II study of pegylated-camptothecin (pegamotecan) in the treatment of locally advanced and metastatic gastric and gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.

PURPOSE: Combination chemotherapy results in a significant survival advantage in patients with advanced gastric cancer compared to best supportive care. Nevertheless, the prognosis remains poor with a median survival of 8-10 months. Topoisomerase-I inhibitors such as irinotecan have activity in advanced gastric cancer. Pegamotecan may offer significant advantages over other topoisomerase-I inhibitors due to its prolonged circulating half-life, tolerability and passive tumour accumulation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a non-randomised, multi-centre, two-step Fleming design phase II study. Eligible patients with locally advanced (inoperable) or metastatic gastric or gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma, with measurable disease, ECOG performance status < or =2, with adequate haematological, renal and hepatic function, who had received < or =1 prior chemotherapy regimen for advanced disease, were treated with 7,000 mg/m(2) of pegamotecan as a 1-h infusion every 21 days until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary efficacy measure was the objective response rate. RESULTS: Five of the 35 patients recruited into this study had a partial response (14.3%), with a median time to progression of 11.9 weeks (95% CI: 6.6, 13.1), and median overall survival of 38.1 weeks (95% CI: 29.0, 47.3). Grade 3/4 toxicities included neutropenia in 6 (17.1%) patients, thrombocytopenia in 4 (11.4%), fatigue in 8 (22.9%), nausea in 6 (17%), vomiting in 6 (17%) and anorexia in 4 (11.4%) patients. There were no episodes of febrile neutropenia and no toxic deaths. CONCLUSIONS: Pegamotecan has activity in this patient population and was generally well-tolerated. The favourable rate of haematological toxicities and diarrhoea compared with irinotecan in similar studies suggests that pegamotecan could be combined with other active agents in further studies in this disease.

Phase I study of biweekly oxaliplatin, gemcitabine and capecitabine in patients with advanced upper gastrointestinal malignancies.

BACKGROUND: Oxaliplatin, gemcitabine and capecitabine are all active agents against upper gastrointestinal and pancreaticobiliary cancers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with upper gastrointestinal malignancies treated with 0-2 prior chemotherapy regimens received oxaliplatin (85-100 mg/m(2)) as a 2-h i.v. infusion with gemcitabine (800-1000 mg/m(2)) at a constant rate i.v. infusion (CI) of 10 mg/m(2)/min on days 1 and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Capecitabine (600-800 mg/m(2)) was administered orally twice a day on days 1-7 and 15-21. A three per cohort dose escalation schema was used to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the dose-limiting toxic effects (DLTs) of this combination regimen. RESULTS: Thirty patients with advanced upper gastrointestinal malignancies were enrolled. The MTD was defined as oxaliplatin 100 mg/m(2) i.v. over 2 h plus gemcitabine 800 mg/m(2) i.v. at a CI of 10 mg/m(2)/min on days 1 and 15 with capecitabine 800 mg/m(2) p.o. b.i.d. days 1-7 and 15-21 of a 29-day cycle. DLTs include grade 3 fatigue and grade 3 dyspnea. One complete and two partial responses were observed. CONCLUSIONS: This biweekly schedule of oxaliplatin, gemcitabine and capecitabine is tolerable and warrants further investigation in biliary and pancreatic malignancies.

Phase I study of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and the multidrug-resistance modulator, valspodar.

Valspodar, a P-glycoprotein modulator, affects pharmacokinetics of doxorubicin when administered in combination, resulting in doxorubicin dose reduction. In animal models, valspodar has minimal interaction with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PEG-LD). To determine any pharmacokinetic interaction in humans, we designed a study to determine maximum tolerated dose, dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), and pharmacokinetics of total doxorubicin, in PEG-LD and valspodar combination therapy in patients with advanced malignancies. Patients received PEG-LD 20-25 mg m(-2) intravenously over 1 h for cycle one. In subsequent 2-week cycles, valspodar was administered as 72 h continuous intravenous infusion with PEG-LD beginning at 8 mg m(-2) and escalated in an accelerated titration design to 25 mg m(-2). Pharmacokinetic data were collected with and without valspodar. A total of 14 patients completed at least two cycles of therapy. No DLTs were observed in six patients treated at the highest level of PEG-LD 25 mg m(-2). The most common toxicities were fatigue, nausea, vomiting, mucositis, palmar plantar erythrodysesthesia, diarrhoea, and ataxia. Partial responses were observed in patients with breast and ovarian carcinoma. The mean (range) total doxorubicin clearance decreased from 27 (10-73) ml h(-1) m(-2) in cycle 1 to 18 (3-37) ml h(-1) m(-2) with the addition of valspodar in cycle 2 (P=0.009). Treatment with PEG-LD 25 mg m(-2) in combination with valspodar results in a moderate prolongation of total doxorubicin clearance and half-life but did not increase the toxicity of this agent.

Phase I study of rubitecan and gemcitabine in patients with advanced malignancies.

BACKGROUND: Rubitecan (9-nitrocamptothecin, 9-NC, Orathecin) and gemcitabine have single-agent activity in pancreatic and ovarian carcinoma. We conducted a phase I trial to evaluate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and toxicities of this combination in advanced malignancies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-one patients with refractory or recurrent malignancies were enrolled in this dose escalation trial. Dose escalation proceeded from a starting level of rubitecan at 0.75 mg/m(2)/day administered orally on days 1-5 and 8-12 in combination with gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) administered intravenously on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. RESULTS: The MTD was defined as rubitecan 1 mg/m(2) administered orally days 1-5 and 8-12, and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) administered intravenously over 30 min days 1 and 8, given every 21 days. Dose-limiting toxicity was myelosuppression including neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. Other side effects included diarrhea, nausea, vomiting and fatigue. Five patients with stable disease were observed among 18 evaluable patients. CONCLUSIONS: The recommended phase II dose is rubitecan 1 mg/m(2) given orally on days 1-5 and 8-12 in combination with gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) as a 30-min intravenous infusion on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle.

A phase II Hoosier Oncology Group study of vinorelbine and estramustine phosphate in hormone-refractory prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: The purpose was to evaluate the combined anti-microtubular regimen of vinorelbine and estramustine phosphate (EMP) in hormone refractory prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Weekly vinorelbine 20 mg/m2 (or 15 mg/m2 if a history of prior pelvic radiotherapy) was combined with EMP at 280 mg orally tds for 3 days (the day before, the day of and the day after vinorelbine infusion). After 8 weeks of therapy the combination was given every other week. RESULTS: From February 1998 to February 1999, 23 men were enrolled with a median age of 69 years (range 50-83 years). The median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) at entry was 160 ng/ml (range 0-802 ng/ml). A median of 13 weeks of therapy was administered and the median follow-up was 14.8 months. Eleven patients (48%) had lower extremity edema requiring diuretic therapy, two (9%) had grade 2 granulocytopenia and four patients [17%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 5% to 39%] had a thromboembolic episode. There was no treatment-related mortality. Fifteen of 21 patients (71%; 95% CI 49% to 89%) had at least a 50% decrease in the PSA for at least 2 months with a median time to serologic progression of 3.5 months (range 0.75-10.5 months). One of eight patients (12.5%; 95% CI 0% to 53%) with measurable disease had a confirmed partial response. The estimated median survival was 15.1 months and the actual one year overall survival was 71% (95% CI 51% to 88%). CONCLUSIONS: Weekly vinorelbine with short course oral EMP is an active regimen as evaluated by rate of PSA response, time to progression and median survival. However, the toxicities of EMP, even when given as a short course, are still problematic.

Radiation therapy for epidermoid carcinoma of the anal canal, clinical and treatment factors associated with outcome.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In recent years, treatment with combined chemotherapy and radiation has become the standard of care for epidermoid carcinoma of the anus. However, optimal radiotherapy techniques and doses are not well established. MATERIALS AND METHODS: During the period 1975-1997, 106 patients with epidermoid carcinoma of the anal canal underwent radiation therapy. Treatment policies evolved from radiation therapy alone or with surgery, to combined chemotherapy and radiation followed by surgery, to combined chemotherapy and radiation. RESULTS: Overall 74% of patients were NED (no evidence of disease) at last follow-up. The most important clinical correlate with ultimate freedom from disease (includes the contribution of salvage surgery) was extent of disease. The 5-year ultimate freedom from disease was 87+/-5% for T1/T2N0, 78+/-10% for T3N0 (15% salvaged by surgery), and 43+/-10% for either T4N0 or any N+ lesions (P<0.001, Tarone-Ware). There was no difference between planned vs. expectant surgery (5-year ultimate NED: 67+/-11% planned surgery vs. 73+/-5% expectant surgery). The most important correlate with late toxicity was a history of major pelvic surgery (surgical vs. non-surgical group: P=0.013, Fisher's exact test, two-tailed summation). Thirty-three additional malignancies have been seen in 26 patients. The most common additional malignancies were gynecologic (nine cases), head and neck (six cases), and lung cancer (five cases). CONCLUSIONS: For T1/T2N0 disease, moderate doses of radiation combined with chemotherapy provided adequate treatment. T4N0 and N+ lesions are the most appropriate candidates for investigational protocols evaluating dose intensification. T3N0 tumors may also be appropriate for investigation; however, dose intensification may ultimately prove counterproductive if the cure rate is not improved and salvage surgery is rendered more difficult. The volume of irradiated small bowel should be minimized for patients who have a past history of major pelvic surgery or who (because of locally advanced tumors) may need salvage surgery in the future. Because of the occurrence of additional malignancy, patients with anal cancer should receive general oncologic screening in long-term follow-up.

Altretamine for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma. A Hoosier Oncology Group trial.

Thirty patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma were treated on a phase 11 trial with altretamine. Altretamine was administered orally at a dosage of 260 mg/m2 days 1 through 14 with cycles repeated every 28 days. Nausea and vomiting were the most common toxicities. Ten percent (3 of 30) experienced Grade 3 gait abnormalities. None of the thirty evaluable patients achieved a complete or partial response. In summary, altretamine did not show antitumor activity in the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma.

A phase I/II trial of three-dimensionally planned concurrent boost radiotherapy and protracted venous infusion of 5-FU chemotherapy for locally advanced rectal carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Improving the response to preoperative therapy may increase the likelihood of successful resection of locally advanced rectal cancers. Historically, the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate has been < approximately 10% with preoperative radiation therapy alone and < approximately 20% with concurrent chemotherapy and radiation therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Thirty-seven patients were enrolled on a prospective Phase I/II protocol conducted jointly at Washington University, St. Louis and the Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome evaluating a three-dimensionally (3D) planned boost as part of the preoperative treatment of patients with unresectable or recurrent rectal cancer. Preoperative treatment consisted of 4500 cGy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks to the pelvis, with a 3D planned 90 cGy per fraction boost delivered once or twice a week concurrently (no time delay) with the pelvic radiation. Thus, on days when the boost was treated, the tumor received a dose of 270 cGy in one fraction while the remainder of the pelvis received 180 cGy. When indicated, nonaxial beams were used for the boost. The boost treatment was twice a week (total boost dose 900 cGy) if small bowel could be excluded from the boost volume, otherwise the boost was delivered once a week (total boost dose 450 cGy). Patients also received continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (1500 mg/m(2)-week) concurrently with the radiation as well as postoperative 5-FU/leucovorin. RESULTS: All 37 patients completed preoperative radiotherapy as planned within 32--39 elapsed days. Twenty-seven underwent proctectomy; reasons for unresectability included persistent locally advanced disease (6 cases) and progressive distant metastatic disease with stable or smaller local disease (4 cases). Actuarial 3-year survival was 82% for the group as a whole. Among resected cases the 3-year local control and freedom from disease relapse were 86% and 69%, respectively.Twenty-four of the lesions (65%) achieved an objective clinical response by size criteria, including 9 (24%) with pCR at the primary site (documented T0 at surgery). The most important factor for pCR was tumor volume: small lesions with planning target volume (PTV) < 200 cc showed a 50% pCR rate (p = 0.02). There were no treatment associated fatalities. Nine of the 37 patients (24%) experienced Grade 3 or 4 toxicities (usually proctitis) during preoperative treatment. There were an additional 7 perioperative and 2 late toxicities. The most important factors for small bowel toxicity (acute or late) were small bowel volume (> or = 150 cc at doses exceeding 4000 cGy) and large tumor (PTV > or = 800 cc). For rectal toxicity the threshold is PTV > or = 500 cc. CONCLUSION: 3D planned boost therapy is feasible. In addition to permitting the use of nonaxial beams for improved dose distributions, 3D planning provides tumor and normal tissue dose-volume information that is important in interpreting outcome. Every effort should be made to limit the treated small bowel to less than 150 cc. Tumor size is the most important predictor of response, with small lesions of PTV < 200 cc most likely to develop complete responses.

Pretreatment clinical findings predict outcome for patients receiving preoperative radiation for rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: As a sole modality, preoperative radiation for rectal carcinoma achieves a local control comparable to that of postoperative radiation plus chemotherapy. Although the addition of chemotherapy to preoperative treatment improves the pathologic complete response rate, there is also a substantial increase in acute and perioperative morbidity. Identification of subsets of patients who are at low or high risk for recurrence can help to optimize treatment. METHODS: During the period 1977-95, 384 patients received preoperative radiation therapy for localized adenocarcinoma of the rectum. Ages ranged from 19 to 97 years (mean 64.4), and there were 171 females. Preoperative treatment consisted of conventionally fractionated radiation to 3600-5040 cGy (median 4500 cGy) 6-8 weeks before surgery in 293 cases or low doses of <3000 cGy (median 2000 cGy) immediately before surgery in 91 cases. Concurrent preoperative chemotherapy was given to only 14 cases in this study period. Postoperative chemotherapy was delivered to 55 cases. RESULTS: Overall 93 patients have experienced recurrence (including 36 local failures). Local failures were scored if they occurred at any time, not just as first site of failure. For the group as a whole, the actuarial (Kaplan-Meier) freedom from relapse (FFR) and local control (LC) were 74% and 90% respectively at 5 years. Univariate analysis of clinical characteristics demonstrated a significant (p < 0.05) adverse effect on both LC and FFR for the following four clinical factors: (1) location <5 cm from the verge, (2) circumferential lesion, (3) near obstruction, (4) tethered or fixed tumor. Size, grade, age, gender, ultrasound stage, CEA, radiation dose, and the use of chemotherapy were not associated with outcome. Background of the surgeon was significantly associated with outcome, colorectal specialists achieving better results than nonspecialist surgeons. We assigned a clinical score of 0 to 2 on the basis of how many of the above four adverse clinical factors were present: 0 for none, 1 for one or two, 2 for three or four. This sorted outcome highly significantly (p < or = 0.002, Tarone Ware), with 5-year LC/FFR of 98%/85% (score 0), 90%/72% (score 1), and 74%/58% (score 2). The scoring system sorts the data for both subgroups of surgeons; however, there are substantial differences in LC on the basis of the surgeon's experience. For colorectal specialists (251 cases), the 5-year LC is 100%, 94%, and 78% for scores of 0, 1, and 2, respectively (p = 0.004). For the more mixed group of nonspecialist surgeons (133 cases), LC is 98%, 80%, and 65% for scores of 0, 1, and 2 (p = 0.008). In multivariate analysis, the clinical score and surgeon's background retained independent predictive value, even when pathologic stage was included. CONCLUSIONS: For many patients with rectal cancer, adjuvant treatment can be administered in a well-tolerated sequential fashion-moderate doses of preoperative radiation followed by surgery followed by postoperative chemotherapy to address the risk of occult metastatic disease. A clinical scoring system has been presented here that would suggest that the local control is excellent for lesions with a score of 0 or (if the surgeon is experienced) 1, and therefore sequential treatment could be considered. Cases with a clinical score of 2 should be strongly considered for protocols evaluating more aggressive preoperative treatment, such as combined modality preoperative treatment.

Neoadjuvant therapy for adenocarcinoma of the rectum: tumor response and acute toxicity.

PURPOSE: This study was designed to evaluate the down-staging effect and acute toxicity of preoperative radiation and chemoradiation for primary adenocarcinoma of the rectum. METHODS: The results of pretreatment staging with transrectal ultrasound and computed tomography were compared with final histologic stage in 260 consecutive patients who underwent neoadjuvant therapy and proctectomy for primary adenocarcinoma of the rectum. Patients underwent short-course radiation (2,000 cGy in five fractions), long-course radiation (4,500 cGy in 25 fractions), or chemoradiation (4,500 cGy in 25 fractions with concurrent chemotherapy). RESULTS: Down-staging of one or more T stages occurred in 116 of 260 (45 percent) patients overall (short-course radiation 34/82 (42 percent), long-course radiation 55/122 (45 percent), chemoradiation 27/56 (48 percent), P = not significant). Down-staging of one or more N stages occurred in 85 of 178 (48 percent) patients overall (short-course radiation 12/45 (27 percent), long-course radiation 49/86 (57 percent), chemoradiation 24/47 (51 percent), P = 0.003). Complete pathologic response was observed in 16 of 260 (6 percent) patients overall (short-course radiation 4/82 (5 percent), long-course radiation 5/122 (4 percent), chemoradiation 7/56 (13 percent), P = 0.08). Resection with negative margins (distal, proximal, and radial) was achieved in 211 of 227 patients (93 percent) in whom complete radial margin data were available. Permanent stomas were created in 35 percent of patients; temporary stomas were created in 15 percent. Thirty-three Grade 3 or 4 toxicities occurred in 22 of 260 (8 percent) patients overall during neoadjuvant therapy. Toxicity was more frequent in patients receiving chemoradiation (14/56; 25 percent) and long-course radiation (8/122; 7 percent) than in those receiving short-course radiation (0/82; 0 percent), P < 0.0001. Perioperative complications occurred in 93 patients overall (36 percent). The postoperative mortality rate was 0.4 percent (1/260). There was no significant difference in the complication rate between patients treated with short-course radiation (26/82; 32 percent), long-course radiation (46/122; 36 percent), and chemoradiation (21/56; 38 percent). CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant therapy for adenocarcinoma of the rectum is well tolerated and can produce substantial down-staging and a high curative resection rate. Chemoradiation can achieve high complete pathologic response rates, although toxicity during neoadjuvant therapy is greater than for radiation alone. Short-course radiation can achieve down-staging of both T stage and N stage.

Scatter factor-hepatocyte growth factor elevation in the serum of patients with prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: Scatter factor (SF), also known as hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), has been shown to induce proliferation, scattering and invasiveness in human prostate cancer cell lines. In this study we determined the serum level of SF-HGF in men with metastatic prostate cancer compared to those with localized prostate cancer and without prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Serum samples were obtained from men with biopsy proved adenocarcinoma of the prostate and radiographic evidence of metastatic disease, those with biopsy proved adenocarcinoma of the prostate and clinically localized disease, and those with negative sextant prostate biopsies. Serum SF-HGF was determined using a commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit. RESULTS: Of the 108 men enrolled in our study 52 had negative sextant biopsies, 36 had clinically localized cancer and 20 had metastatic disease. The serum level in men with metastatic disease was significantly elevated (mean 2,117 pg./ml., range 820 to 6,403) compared to that in men with localized cancer and without prostate cancer (mean 974 pg./ml., range 437 to 2,132 and 700, range 272 to 1,875, respectively, p = 9.5 x 10(-15)). Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that the association of ln (SF-HGF) with prostate cancer persisted after controlling for patient age and ln (prostate specific antigen) (p = 3.1 x 10(-4)). CONCLUSIONS: Serum SF-HGF is increased in men with metastatic prostate cancer. SF-HGF levels are associated with metastatic prostate cancer independent of the prostate specific antigen level and patient age. These data imply that SF-HGF may be an important serum marker for prostate cancer.

Activity of multitargeted antifolate (pemetrexed disodium, LY231514) in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma: results from a phase II study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to confirm the activity and assess the safety profile of multitargeted antifolate (MTA) for patients with metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma. METHODS: Forty-six patients were enrolled in the study, 35 with colon and 11 with rectal carcinoma. Adjuvant therapy was allowed if completed 1 year previously. Patients received MTA 600 mg/m(2) as a 10-minute intravenous infusion once every 21 days. Blood samples were taken every cycle for pharmacokinetic and vitamin metabolite assays. RESULTS: Among 39 patients eligible for efficacy analysis, 1 complete response and 5 partial responses were identified, for an overall response rate of 15.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.1-26. 7%) for all patients. Fifteen patients had stable disease, with 9 living longer than 1 year. The median survival was 16.2 months (95% CI, 10.5-17.0%); 65% of patients were alive at 1 year, and the median time to progression was 4.4 months (range, 3.2-5.7 months). The main toxicities were hematologic, with common toxicity criteria (CTC) Grades 3 or 4 noted as follows: thrombocytopenia (18%), neutropenia (55%), and anemia (18%). Nonhematologic toxicities included Grade 2 or 3 skin reaction (53%), ameliorated by dexamethasone, and Grade 3 transaminases (23%). Dose omissions were not required and 21% of doses were reduced. CONCLUSIONS: MTA has clear activity in patients with colorectal carcinoma, and encouraging survival times were noted. MTA was well tolerated in this patient group, but myelosuppression was frequent. Toxicity may be increased with folate deficiency.

Phase II study of the multitargeted antifolate LY231514 (ALIMTA, MTA, pemetrexed disodium) in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine the safety and activity of LY231514 (ALIMTA, MTA, pemetrexed disodium, Eli Lilly and Co., Indianapolis, IN) in chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with unresectable or metastatic pancreatic cancer received LY231514 600 mg/m2 as a 10-minute infusion every three weeks. RESULTS: Forty-two patients were enrolled in this phase II trial. The median age was 60.3 (range 37-77) years; 79% had metastatic disease. Neutropenia was common (40% of patients > or = grade 3) but infectious complications were rare. Significant anemia or thrombocytopenia occurred in < 20% of patients. Non-hematologic toxicities included grade 2 or 3 skin reaction which was ameliorated by dexamethasone. Elevations of bilirubin or transaminases were infrequent (< 25% of patients) and did not require dose reductions or treatment delays. Thirty-five patients received two cycles of therapy and were evaluable for response. One complete (duration 16.2 months) and one partial (duration 6.9 months) were observed resulting in an objective response rate of 5.7% for evaluable patients. In addition, 17 patients (40%) had stable disease that lasted > or = 6 months in 5 patients. The median survival was 6.5 months, with 28% of patients alive at one year. CONCLUSIONS: LY231514 is a well-tolerated agent with minimal objective antitumor activity in pancreatic cancer. The median and one year survival times, which may be important indicators in phase II trials of new agents, are of interest. Combination trials of LY231514 in pancreatic cancer are planned.

Docetaxel (Taxotere) as monotherapy in the treatment of hormone-refractory prostate cancer: preliminary results.

Previous chemotherapy trials in hormone refractory prostate cancer have resulted in low response rates and minimal survival impact. Clearly, better agents are needed to improve outcomes in such patients. Microtubule inhibitors have been a recent focus of investigation as chemotherapeutic agents in prostate cancer; in tissue culture, docetaxel (Taxotere; Rhône-Poulenc Rorer, Collegeville, PA) appears to be the most active of these drugs. Patients enrolled in this trial had hormone refractory prostate cancer and were required to have progressive disease despite hormonal therapy and, if previously treated with antiandrogens, have progressive disease despite antiandrogen withdrawal. Patients had not been exposed to any prior chemotherapy. Testosterone suppression was continued during the trial when patients received docetaxel at 75 mg/m2 every 21 days. Thirty-five patients with ages ranging from 49 to 85 years (median age, 70 years) were enrolled in the trial. Three hundred twelve treatments have been given (median, six treatments), with a minimum follow-up of 4 months. The median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) at the time of entry was 96 ng/mL (range, 24 to 2,070 ng/mL). Seven patients (20%) have had a more than 80% decline in PSA and 16 (46%) have had a more than 50% decline. Six additional patients have had a PSA decline of 40% to 50%. Soft tissue disease was seen in 25 of 35 patients. One patient had a complete response; three others had a nearly complete response. Three patients met criteria for a partial response, yielding a 28% response rate with measurable disease. Three additional patients had substantial shrinkage and 12 had prolonged stable disease. Combining both PSA and soft tissue responses, one complete response and five partial responses were seen. Substantial responses, defined as a more than 40% PSA decline and a more than 50% reduction of bidimensional cross-products in patients with measurable disease, were seen in 17 of 35 patients enrolled. Responses were maintained for a median of 9 months (range, 2 to 24 months). The median overall survival was 27 months. Three patients remain under therapy. Toxicity remained tolerable throughout the treatment. Grade 4 toxicities requiring discontinuation of treatment included stomatitis, small bowel obstruction, and a gluteal abscess. There were two deaths during the study: one due to lung toxicity/pneumonia and one due to pulmonary embolus. The patient with lung toxicity had markedly elevated transaminases with marked involvement of the liver with tumor. Six patients stopped voluntarily due to fatigue or edema Other common toxicities were neutropenia, anemia, mild edema and hyperglycemia (due to steroids), anorexia, myalgias, and mild alopecia The responses seen in this population are very encouraging and suggest substantial durable activity for docetaxel as single-agent therapy for hormone refractory prostate cancer.

Hydrocortisone with or without mitoxantrone in men with hormone-refractory prostate cancer: results of the cancer and leukemia group B 9182 study.

PURPOSE: Approximately 40,000 men die each year of hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). The results of treatment with chemotherapy have been disappointing to date, with no trials demonstrating a benefit with respect to survival duration. Corticosteroids and mitoxantrone each have been shown to be active agents in this disease. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate an advantage of mitoxantrone and hydrocortisone (M+H) over hydrocortisone alone with respect to survival duration. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred forty-two patients with HRPC were randomized to receive either M+H or hydrocortisone alone. Patients were monitored for survival, time to disease progression, time to treatment failure, response, and quality-of-life (QOL) parameters. RESULTS: Treatment in both arms was well tolerated. Although there was a delay in time to treatment failure and disease progression in favor of M+H over hydrocortisone alone, there was no difference in overall survival (12.3 months for M+H v 12.6 months for hydrocortisone alone). There was an indication that QOL was better with M+H, in particular with respect to pain control. CONCLUSION: M+H generated more frequent responses and a delay in both time to treatment failure and disease progression compared with hydrocortisone alone. In addition, there was a possible benefit of M+H with respect to pain control over hydrocortisone alone. No improvement in survival was observed. Although M+H could be viewed as a palliative option for patients with HRPC, new drugs and novel strategies are needed to improve survival for this disease.

Five fractions of preoperative radiotherapy for selected cases of rectal carcinoma: long-term tumor control and tolerance to treatment.

BACKGROUND: Randomized Swedish studies demonstrate the efficacy of a 5-fraction course of preoperative radiotherapy for rectal carcinoma. The present study evaluates the results in a single U.S. institution over a 20-year period with a similar regimen. METHODS AND MATERIALS: During the period of 1975-1995, 83 patients received pelvic radiotherapy of 20 Gy/5 fractions, followed by immediate surgery for rectal cancer. These patients represented 21% of cases receiving preoperative treatment; the remainder received 45-50 Gy preoperatively. The 5-fraction course was used for lesions deemed readily resectable but too bulky for conservative endocavitary treatment. Since 1990, it has been our policy to administer postoperative chemotherapy to medically fit patients who prove to have pathologic Stage II or III disease. Patient characteristics including age (mean 65 years, range 23-90), gender (45% male), and location within the rectum were comparable to our previously reported cases that received 45 Gy/25 fractions preoperatively. However, the group selected for 5 fractions preoperatively had relatively fewer lesions that were tethered (20% vs. 61%), circumferential (11% vs. 20%), or near obstructing (1% vs. 16%). RESULTS: With a post treatment follow-up of 1-15 years (mean 4.7), there have been 3 local failures and 12 distant failures, with an actuarial local control of 95%, and disease-specific survival of 77% at 5 and 10 years. Grade > or = 3 perioperative or late toxicity occurred in 11 cases (13%), including 3 (3.5%) late bowel obstructions. Stage II or III disease was found in 56% of the cases, 74% of which were free of disease at last follow-up. However, patients with Stage II or III lesions that were significantly tethered or fixed had a 40% greater likelihood of recurring than similar stage lesions that were, at most, slightly tethered. Sphincter-preserving surgery was possible in 60% of the patients. In recent years, postoperative chemotherapy has been administered to 16 patients with Stage II or III disease; this has been well tolerated, with only 1 late toxicity (cystitis managed medically). When compared with a matched group of cases receiving conventionally fractionated preoperative radiation, there were no significant differences in perioperative morbidity and nonradiotherapeutic cost generating factors (length of hospital stay, duration of postoperative antibiotics, blood loss at surgery). CONCLUSION: Patients with resectable rectal cancer who received 20 Gy/5 fractions preoperative radiotherapy to the pelvis had excellent local and distant control of disease. These patients were able to undergo sphincter-preserving surgery and postoperative chemotherapy. It would be of interest to conduct a randomized trial comparing short course with longer course (45 or 50 Gy) preoperative radiotherapy for resectable T3 lesions. The results of this study suggest that, in general, differences in toxicity, local control, and disease-free survival would probably be < 10%. However, since the results of this study suggest that patients with significantly tethered lesions may be better served with the higher dose and longer duration course of radiation, clinical degree of fixation should be included as a stratification parameter, and stopping criteria should be included for tethered lesions.

Multidisciplinary treatment of biliary tract cancers.

Ninety-six patients referred for radiation therapy to Washington University affiliated institutions with tumors of the extrahepatic biliary tree form the basis of this report. Patients were examined with regard to demographic factors, tumor primary site, presenting symptoms, methods of diagnosis, and methods of management. The median survival of all 96 patients in this series was 11 months. There was no significant difference between patients with gallbladder cancer and patients with cancer of the biliary ductal system. There was a statistically significant improvement in survival in those patients undergoing resection as management or as a component of the management of their tumors (P = 0.02). Patients receiving > 4,000 cGy of radiation therapy had an improved survival compared to those patients receiving < or = 4,000 cGy of radiation therapy (P = 0.003). While surgical resection improved survival for those patients undergoing removal of all gross tumor, this effect was noted especially in patients with gallbladder cancer.